Loading this committee’s profile from its FEC filings.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Loading this committee’s profile from its FEC filings.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
PACs › Party committee (qualified) › 2025–2026
Party committee (qualified)Augusta, MaineActive
Connected organization: DNC Services Corp. / Democratic National Committee
FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026 · FEC bulk filing data · committee C00179408 · files monthly
“We are working hard to reverse the affordability crisis that is pricing out Mainers in neighborhoods their parents once thrived.”
Maine Democratic Party, on its own site, mainedems.org
Quoted from the committee's site, or its sponsor's or funder's where its own says nothing. The statement is filed under topics from a fixed list, chosen by AI models when two of three agree; which side it takes is in its own words.
5 priorities from the committee’s own site, in the order they are listed there. Every heading and the text under it is copied exactly, as one passage for each page it is from, and links to that place on the page; hover a source to see which passage it opens.
Through the coastlines, forests, and mountains that make our state beautiful, working Mainers are feeling the pressure.
The Maine way of life is under threat as prices rise, rural hospitals close, shifts in climate throw off the ecosystems we depend on, and Republicans are implementing policies that squeeze us and damage the diversity that makes our home unique.
As Democrats, we are set on protecting the Maine way of life, future-proofing our home, and living up to the state motto: Dirigo, I lead.
We are making big changes to reflect this core sentiment.
But they aren’t just there for tourists.
They are there to sustain us.
Our nature is the lifeblood of our economy and history.
We need to pull in the next generation of Mainers.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · mainedems.org/for-maine-to-look-to-the-future-were-returning-to-our-roots
Heading as listed on mainedems.org ↗ (opens mainedems.org at this heading)
Maine has always been touted as a beautiful and restful getaway, but there’s a struggle for the residents who provide the food, services, and care that make the magic happen.
Maine’s poverty rate is incredibly high, housing costs have outpaced what most can afford, and food insecurity is an ongoing issue.
Maine can’t just be Vacationland; it needs to be a good place for us to live as well.
Maine needs the opportunity to build a future.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · mainedems.org/leading-on-policy-making-life-affordable-for-all-mainers
Heading as listed on mainedems.org ↗ (opens mainedems.org at this heading)
Maine is defined by its connection to the land and sea.
Our way of life is centered around agriculture, fishing, forestry, and tourism to see our landscapes.
The climate and strong seasons set our rhythm for the rest of the year, as many places shut down for the winter, and heating and fuel costs worry many residents.
Now, things are changing around us.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · mainedems.org/protecting-land-and-sea-making-our-way-of-life-sustainable
Heading as listed on mainedems.org ↗ (opens mainedems.org at this heading)
Health care is a necessity, but its importance isn’t always obvious until you lose it.
Rural hospital cuts mean some women can’t get obstetric or maternity care near the home.
Federal policies like the Big Beautiful Bill will cut off tens of thousands of Mainers from coverage and close more clinics.
We will protect against cuts and expand coverage.
From young parents to seniors, we all need different treatments.
A fair health care system is diverse.
Maine’s future depends on health care.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · mainedems.org/health-care-our-plan-for-taking-care-of-me
We will fight to make sure that every single worker in Maine has access to affordable health care.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · mainedems.org
We will fight to make sure that every single worker in Maine has access to affordable healthcare.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · mainedems.org/our-priorities
Health care is a right. Not a privilege for people with the right job.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · mainedems.org/health-care
Heading as listed on mainedems.org ↗ (opens mainedems.org at this heading)
We are dedicated to safeguarding the land and waters that sustain us and make up our beloved home state.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · mainedems.org
We are dedicated to safeguarding the land and waters that sustain us & make up our beloved home state.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · mainedems.org/our-priorities
Maine's environment is not a backdrop. It is our way of life.
The clean drinking water that flows from our wells.
The trails our families have hiked for generations.
A coastline that stays wild.
Because once it is gone, it is gone.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · mainedems.org/environment
Heading as listed on mainedems.org ↗ (opens mainedems.org at this heading)
Heading as listed on mainedems.org ↗ (opens mainedems.org at this heading)
Families are struggling to put food on the table and keep their homes warm.
Rural hospitals are closing their doors.
Out-of-state billionaires are bankrolling a Republican Party sprinting toward extremism, gutting the programs that help our communities thrive.
A rapidly changing climate threatens our working waterfronts and the natural resources that have sustained us for generations.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · mainedems.org/our-story
Heading as listed on mainedems.org/our-story ↗ (opens mainedems.org/our-story at this heading)
Each part reads different filings, so counts and totals can differ.
Direct PAC contributions and independent expenditures explicitly reported as support, by the party of the candidate they went to.
No candidate-directed contributions or explicitly supportive independent expenditures were returned.
Contributions are reported money, not endorsements; a PAC giving to both parties is common.
Every contribution on line 23 of the committee’s own Schedule B, which is the filing its summary totals are built from. That line covers federal candidates, party committees and other political committees alike, so a super PAC funding other super PACs appears here rather than under candidate giving.
| Recipient | Count | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| Democratic party committees | 1 | $8.8K · 100% |
| All recipients | 1 | $8.8K |
No recipient here is matched to a candidate with a state on record.
Bars drawn to $8.8K, the largest gift total here. 2025–2026 filings.
Nothing loaded
Candidate contribution rows come from candidate committee Schedule A filings, the same rows the party chart above counts.
Money moving between this committee and other committees, matched on FEC committee ID rather than the name each filing was typed under. Both sides exclude memo entries. The figures here count each committee once, from the itemized transfers read for this section, so they will not match the payment counts under Who this PAC gave to.
Committees that reported giving to this one on their own Schedule A filings, grouped by the giver’s committee ID.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| Party committee (qualified) · 22 payments | $931.5K |
| PAC (nonqualified) · 3 payments | $484K |
| Party committee (qualified) · Connected to DEMOCRATIC GRASSROOTS VICTORY FUND · 24 payments | $225.1K |
| PAC (nonqualified) · 11 payments |
A donor who gave several times appears once. The 12 largest donors by total given are listed. In all, 2,998 itemized contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $1.1M. FEC contributor lists are public records and cannot be used for commercial solicitation.
The 3 largest committees by total given are listed. Counted from the givers' own filings, which can run above the total this committee reports.
Total reported receipts $5,988,343
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. Open a source marked + to see who gave. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 1,927 contributions · 60% | $651,165 |
| 204 contributions · 7.8% | $85,174 |
| 138 contributions · 6.8% |
Total reported disbursements $5,438,776
Every dollar this committee reported spending this cycle, split by the lines it reports against. Open a line to see who was actually paid on it. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
These are the payments the committee itemized to vendors, staff and other committees. Its $3,400 in independent expenditures is filed separately, against the candidate each was about, so it is counted in the split above and listed by candidate below, not here.
$5.4M spent from Jan 2025 to Oct 2026. Most in one report: $1.2M, Oct 1 – Oct 14, 2026.
The running total of what the committee’s FEC reports say it spent, independent expenditures included, with a point at the end of each report. The line is straight between reports because a report gives one total for its whole period.
Published by the Commission against this committee’s own FEC ID. An audit is a periodic examination that reports findings; an administrative fine is a penalty for filing a specific report late or not at all. They are separate instruments and are not combined into a score here.
1998 cycleReport released Oct 6, 2000
1984 cycleReport released Nov 4, 1985
Source: the Commission’s audit-case and administrative-fine records, joined on this committee’s FEC ID, imported Oct 26, 2026. Enforcement matters (MURs) are published only against respondent names, with no committee identifier, so they are not shown here rather than being matched by name.
No lobbying disclosures matched
Maine Democratic Party is registered with the Federal Election Commission as a party committee (qualified). Its FEC record names DNC Services Corp. / Democratic National Committee as an affiliate. Official FEC summary: Federal Election Commission committee record.
Statements are quoted from these pages exactly. Headings, order and wording are the committee’s or its sponsor’s; the record marking is ours.
Maine Democratic Party is matched to organization records using the FEC committee identity, structured identifiers, and corroborated organization data.
| $154.4K |
| PAC (nonqualified) · 1 payment | $63.5K |
| PAC (nonqualified) · 3 payments | $40K |
| PAC (nonqualified) · 3 payments | $37.7K |
| Senate campaign committee · 1 payment | $33.3K |
| Senate campaign committee · Connected to FIGHT AND WIN FUND · 1 payment | $25K |
| Party committee (nonqualified) · Connected to DNC SERVICES CORP / DEMOCRATIC NATIONAL COMMITTEE · 1 payment | $17.4K |
| PAC (nonqualified) · 1 payment | $10K |
| PAC (nonqualified) · 1 payment | $8.1K |
$2.1M from 24 committees, counting every itemized receipt this cycle. The largest 12 are shown.
Disbursements this committee itemized to another committee: candidate contributions, party transfers and payments alike, not contributions only.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| Party committee (qualified) · Connected to DEMOCRATIC GRASSROOTS VICTORY FUND · 7 payments | $124.6K |
| PAC (nonqualified) · 6 payments | $109.2K |
| Party committee (nonqualified) · Connected to DNC SERVICES CORP / DEMOCRATIC NATIONAL COMMITTEE · 7 payments | $28.6K |
| 1 payment | $17.6K |
$280K across 4 recipient committees, or 5.1% of everything this committee reports spending.
Built from FEC Schedule A and Schedule B filings for the selected cycle. A committee only appears here if the money was itemized under its FEC committee ID.
The 15 largest sources are listed. Each as the committee named it on this line, $125.2K from 15 sources in all.
| $74,124 |
| 89 contributions · 5.5% | $59,860 |
| 90 contributions · 3.8% | $41,002 |
| 59 contributions · 2.6% | $28,743 |
| 40 contributions · 2.2% | $23,540 |
| 22 contributions · 2% | $21,250 |
By the state each contributor wrote on the filing. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line together, so one committee or organization transfer can account for a whole state. Contributors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized and cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
| Employer as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an employer · 308 contributions · 32% of ranked | $151,131 |
| 1 contribution · 5.3% of ranked | $25,000 |
| 5 contributions · 3.2% of ranked | $15,000 |
| 1 contribution · 2.1% of ranked | $10,000 |
| 1 contribution · 2.1% of ranked | $10,000 |
| 1 contribution · 2.1% of ranked | $10,000 |
| 1 contribution · 2.1% of ranked | $10,000 |
| 1 contribution · 2.1% of ranked | $10,000 |
A further $610,641 came from donors whose answer names no employer (N/A, None, blank), so it is not ranked. Ranked from the largest 200 of 201 employer spellings filed; each share is of the money in those. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($1,012,130) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
| Occupation as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an occupation · 1,825 contributions · 48% of ranked | $501,682 |
| Written instead of an occupation · 204 contributions · 6.8% of ranked | $70,538 |
| 131 contributions · 3.9% of ranked | $40,081 |
| 4 contributions · 3.7% of ranked | $38,000 |
| 27 contributions · 3% of ranked | $31,490 |
| 35 contributions · 2.5% of ranked | $25,768 |
| 17 contributions · 1.6% of ranked | $16,687 |
| 5 contributions · 1.4% of ranked | $15,000 |
A further $47,194 came from donors whose answer names no occupation (blank), so it is not ranked. Ranked from the largest 200 of 201 occupation spellings filed; each share is of the money in those. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($1,012,130) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
Total itemized disbursements $436,158
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
All 62 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 7 payments · 2.3% of all spending | $124,593 |
| 6 payments · 2% of all spending | $109,200 |
| 21 payments · 1.2% of all spending | $67,593 |
| 1 payment · 0.9% of all spending | $50,000 |
| 7 payments · 0.5% of all spending | $28,625 |
| 7 payments · 0.4% of all spending | $24,035 |
| 1 payment · 0.3% of all spending | $17,557 |
| 1 payment · <0.1% of all spending | $2,994 |
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.