Loading this candidate’s profile from the FEC filings and campaign records.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Loading this candidate’s profile from the FEC filings and campaign records.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Candidates › NV-02 race › 2025–2026
D Democratic nominee for U.S. House, NV-02
Has not served in Congress
6 priorities from electteresa.com, in the order they are listed there. Every heading and the text under it is copied exactly, as one passage for each page it is from, and links to that place on the page; hover a source to see which passage it opens.
People across Northern Nevada are working harder and getting less. Groceries cost more, gas and diesel cost more, housing costs more…and every month, the math gets worse. My husband and I live this as we raise our four children, and I hear this from my friends and family and as I travel across Nevada. If elected to Congress, addressing costs for families will be my number one job, not defending some abstract “economy” (which too often in DC means “investor profits”).
We need to stabilize the cost of living, protect the jobs that Nevada has, and fight for the jobs that Nevada needs. That means undoing the damage inflicted by the Trump administration and its so-called “One Big Beautiful Bill” on working families and pushing back against hardline federal intrusion into our daily lives. Northern Nevada needs good-paying jobs and professional pathways to ensure our communities benefit from economic diversification instead of profits flowing out of state. That is what I will fight for in Congress.
I am running on an integrated plan: restore hundreds of millions of tax dollars stripped from Nevada by Elon Musk and DOGE; develop strong regulations to prevent massive job layoffs due to AI; and build workforce housing that everyday Nevandans can afford. The test for any federal solution is simple: Does it make daily life more affordable for a working Nevadan?
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · electteresa.com/policy
Heading as listed on electteresa.com/policy ↗ (opens electteresa.com/policy at this heading)
Public lands are foundational to Northern Nevada, and their preservation is embedded in our constitution. It’s important that we protect public lands and coordinate with federal partners to manage these lands. Land sales should occur only through collaboration with local and tribal stakeholders, as well as input from citizens and conservation groups — not through “dead of night” budget amendments and 500,000-acre fire sales to pay for tax cuts.
Nevada is home to 48 million acres of public land, and funding for federal agencies to manage this land is critical. These are the places where we enjoy hunting, fishing, and hiking, but they are also where wildland fires burn. The reduction — and in some cases elimination — of federal dollars and grants for wildfire capacity and flood mitigation must be reversed. The 2025 Nevada wildfire season saw hundreds of fires; the Conner Fire alone burned more than 17,000 acres in Douglas County.1 2 At the same time, the Trump administration’s DOGE-driven workforce cuts are hitting the exact federal workers who prevent fires from becoming catastrophes. In Tahoe National Forest, 21 U.S. Forest Service (USFS) staff were fired during Red Card recertification season — the window when wildland firefighters renew their certifications.3 The administration’s plan to consolidate federal firefighting into a new “U.S. Wildland Fire Service” is a reorganization at the exact moment we need stability, and it may strip the mitigation function — prescribed burns, fuels reduction — in favor of suppression alone.4
In May 2025, Rep. Mark Amodei introduced a “dead of night” amendment to a federal budget reconciliation bill authorizing the sale of nearly 500,000 acres of public land in Nevada and Utah.5 Senator Cortez Masto called it “one of the single biggest sell-offs of Nevada public lands in history” and “a land grab to fund Republicans’ billionaire giveaway tax bill.”6 The proposed parcels in the Senate version reportedly would have included Kiva Beach, much of Fallen Leaf Lake, Tallac Historic Site, and USFS-leased ski terrain.7 Interior Secretary Burgum and HUD Secretary Turner are running a joint task force to identify “underutilized” federal lands for residential development — a scheme dressed up as housing policy.5 And now, the Bureau of Land Managements is about to be run by Steve Pearce, who has a record of championing aggressive policies to sell public land. I will resist this reckless“divestment” of public land.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · electteresa.com/policy
Heading as listed on electteresa.com/policy ↗ (opens electteresa.com/policy at this heading)
American democracy is under pressure from three directions: foreign interference, Trump’s voter suppression efforts, and the corrosive effect of unlimited money in politics. Free, fair, accessible elections are the foundation of American democracy — and Congress has a direct and urgent obligation to protect them. That means opposing the SAVE Act and every other effort to institute onerous barriers to voter registration. It means expanding, not restricting, mail voting and early voting. It means modernizing election infrastructure and investing in cybersecurity. And it means passing the For the People Act framework — automatic voter registration, same-day registration, redistricting reform, and campaign finance disclosure — because that is the package voters actually want and allows the most eligible people to participate in the process.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · electteresa.com/policy
Heading as listed on electteresa.com/policy ↗ (opens electteresa.com/policy at this heading)
My position is simple: Healthcare should be as accessible and inexpensive as possible. Hospitals and providers should have dependable payer sources to ensure they can keep their clinic doors open. That means defending the Affordable Care Act, ensuring Medicaid covers mental and behavioral health issues, and protecting reproductive freedom through federal legislation.
I have been fighting for quality health care for a long time: I voted to create public-option healthcare program, which covers 10,000 people through the Battle Born State Plan; made sure you can’t be charged out of pocket cost for contraception and extended the period of time you can get a prescription for contraception; voted for measures to address Nevada’s high maternal mortality rates; and voted for a package of legislation to create transparency in drug pricing. We have made real strides in Nevada, but Trump’s agenda keeps pulling us backward. We need to elect someone to Congress who will fight for our access to affordable healthcare, not against it.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · electteresa.com/policy
Heading as listed on electteresa.com/policy ↗ (opens electteresa.com/policy at this heading)
The last few years have made it clear that the policies of the Netanyahu government — the death of more than 70,000 Palestinian civilians in Gaza, the use of American weapons in those deaths, increased extremist actions in the West Bank, the war of choice in Iran — has crossed lines that most Americans are not willing to look away from. The United States has a long relationship with Israel, but a real relationship is not based on unconditional support for whatever any foreign government does, any time, without question.
My position is that U.S. military aid to Israel should not be unconditional and that Israel should not receive blank checks from the United States. This is why I support phasing out direct financial support for offensive arms sales to Israel. I also support conditional arms sales when they are consistent with American law – this means no arm sales for countries that have a pattern of violating international human rights and no arm sales to countries that block humanitarian aid. Additionally, it means not accepting campaign money from organizations who don’t support this change, including AIPAC.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · electteresa.com/policy
Heading as listed on electteresa.com/policy ↗ (opens electteresa.com/policy at this heading)
Acts of antisemitic violence and harassment have been on the rise in the United States. Three lives were taken in 2025, and more than 6,000 incidents were recorded by the Anti-Defamation League, including bomb threats. This cannot be tolerated.
In Congress, I will support: ↗ (opens electteresa.com/policy at this heading)
- Increasing funding for grants to prevent and prosecute hate crimes, such as the Edward Bryne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant.
- Implementing the Sacred Act, which creates buffer zones to make places of worship safer from attacks.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · electteresa.com/policy
Heading as listed on electteresa.com/policy ↗ (opens electteresa.com/policy at this heading)
FEC filings, Feb 17, 2026 to Oct 14, 2026 · Official FEC bulk data · committee C00939488
83¢ of every dollar raised has been spent across 5 reports ($872.6K of $1.1M). Cash on hand went from $53.3K on Mar 31, 2026 to $181.8K on Oct 14, 2026.
| Report | Raised in the period | Spent in the period | Cash on hand at its close |
|---|---|---|---|
| APRIL QUARTERLY 2026 through Mar 31, 2026 | $57,121 | $3,808 | $53,313 |
| PRE-PRIMARY 2026 through May 20, 2026 | $45,085 | $49,771 | $48,627 |
| JULY QUARTERLY 2026 through Jun 30, 2026 | $154,881 | $62,901 | $140,607 |
| OCTOBER QUARTERLY 2026 through Sep 30, 2026 | $533,391 | $443,299 | $230,699 |
| PRE-GENERAL 2026 through Oct 14, 2026 | $263,990 | $312,840 | $181,849 |
Each report’s own period, as filed with the FEC; a report filed again counts once, as its latest copy.
6 endorsers listed on Teresa Benitez-Thompson’s own campaign site: 3 unions, 3 organizations.
This is the campaign's claim, checked by an editor against its page; the endorsers have not confirmed it to us. Each name opens the campaign’s page with that name highlighted.
Advanced · 20,450 votes (46%) · 1 of 11 · Full results ↗
Election not held yet · Full results ↗
Every contest for this seat that named this candidate, most recent last; a result is shown once the race is called. Election dates and results from civicAPI (civicapi.org). civicAPI aggregates results from Secretaries of State and equivalent election bodies, and makes its own race calls. civicapi.org ↗
Official FEC filing record for the current cycle. The priorities they publish are quoted from their own site, in their order.
Statements are quoted from these pages exactly. Headings, order and wording are the campaign’s; the record marking is ours.
A donor who gave several times appears once. The 12 largest donors by total given are listed. In all, 356 itemized contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $156.7K.
The 12 largest committees by total given are listed. In all, 55 committee contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $155.6K. Counted from the givers' own filings, which can run above the total the campaign itself reports.
Total reported receipts $1,054,467
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. Open a source marked + to see who gave. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
87% of the money placed by state came from inside Nevada: $137.1K of $156.7K.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 330 contributions · 87% | $137,069 |
| 15 contributions · 7.4% | $11,600 |
| 1 contribution · 2.2% | $3,500 |
| 1 contribution · 0.6% | $1,000 |
| 2 contributions · 0.5% | $750 |
| 1 contribution · 0.3% | $500 |
| 1 contribution · 0.3% | $500 |
| 1 contribution · 0.3% | $500 |
By the state each donor wrote on the filing, across 12 states and territories. Donors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized, so they cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
| Employer as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an employer · 194 contributions · 48% of ranked | $75,339 |
| Written instead of an employer · 41 contributions · 12% of ranked | $19,350 |
| 1 contribution · 2.2% of ranked | $3,500 |
| 1 contribution · 2.2% of ranked | $3,500 |
| 1 contribution · 2.2% of ranked | $3,500 |
| 3 contributions · 1.9% of ranked | $3,000 |
| 1 contribution · 1.6% of ranked | $2,500 |
| 1 contribution · 1.3% of ranked | $2,000 |
A further $175 came from donors whose answer names no employer (blank), so it is not ranked. Itemized gifts over $200, grouped by the words donors filed: not an industry classification, and a gift from an employee is not a gift from the employer. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($179,647) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
Money groups spent on their own, not through a campaign. Each ad is filed against the candidate it names, so money attacking an opponent shows on the opponent’s row. Open a candidate to see who spent it.
The campaign also refunded $9,325 in contributions, which the categories below do not include.
Total itemized disbursements $420,492
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
All 123 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
7 payments were reported as a lump sum, such as a card or payroll bill, with the detail filed underneath as memo entries. Those entries, $13,195 in all, are counted under the payee and purpose they name rather than under the processor that was paid. The total is the same either way.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 4 payments · 31% of all spending | $274,838 |
| 23 payments · 6.1% of all spending | $53,137 |
| 14 payments · 2.3% of all spending | $20,158 |
| 17 payments · 2% of all spending | $17,348 |
| 31 payments · 1.5% of all spending | $12,997 |
| 4 payments · 1.1% of all spending | $10,000 |
| 7 payments · 1.1% of all spending | $9,729 |
| 5 payments · 0.8% of all spending | $7,281 |
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.
| Occupation as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an occupation · 157 contributions · 39% of ranked | $60,364 |
| Written instead of an occupation · 37 contributions · 9.6% of ranked | $14,975 |
| 21 contributions · 7.8% of ranked | $12,250 |
| 9 contributions · 4.4% of ranked | $6,850 |
| 6 contributions · 4% of ranked | $6,250 |
| 3 contributions · 3% of ranked | $4,750 |
| 10 contributions · 2.4% of ranked | $3,750 |
| 1 contribution · 2.2% of ranked | $3,500 |
A further $175 came from donors whose answer names no occupation (blank), so it is not ranked. Itemized gifts over $200, grouped by the words donors filed: not an industry classification, and a gift from an employee is not a gift from the employer. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($179,647) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.