Loading this candidate’s profile from the FEC filings and campaign records.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Loading this candidate’s profile from the FEC filings and campaign records.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Candidates › NH-01 race › 2025–2026
R Republican nominee for U.S. House, NH-01
Has not served in Congress
1 priority from dilorenzoforcongress.com, in the order they are listed there. Every heading and the text under it is copied exactly, as one passage for each page it is from, and links to that place on the page; hover a source to see which passage it opens.
Reduce costs, increase wages, and improve quality of life.
Balance the federal budget by supporting a Balanced Budget Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.
Protect the 2017 tax cuts and the elimination of taxes on tips, overtime, and social security.
Fully support Social Security and Medicare for our citizens.
-Promote policies that bring clarity and common-sense practices to digital asset markets.
Secure the southern AND northern borders from illegal crossings, drug smuggling, and human trafficking.
Pass common sense immigration reform.
Protect women's sports and locker rooms.
Expand vocational training and STEM education for our students.
Oppose federal abortion legislation and respect New Hampshire's laws.
Make healthcare more affordable and increase access.
Fully Support Law Enforcement and First Responders.
Ensure America's energy independence by utilizing all options without subsidies.
Support peace efforts, especially in the Middle East and Ukraine.
Oppose Chinese efforts to undermine our currency, steal our technology, and buy our land/infrastructure.
Defend every law-abiding citizen's right to possess/own a firearm.
Rebuild our military to meet the global conflicts of the future.
Attack the Opioid crisis on all fronts.
Honor our commitment to our veterans.
Ensure our elections are safe and secure.
Treat everyone with dignity and respect as we solve our nation's most difficult issues.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · dilorenzoforcongress.com/issues
FEC filings, Oct 1, 2025 to Oct 14, 2026 · Official FEC bulk data · committee C00923367
85¢ of every dollar raised has been spent across 6 reports ($5.8M of $6.7M). Cash on hand went from $690.1K on Dec 31, 2025 to $978.8K on Oct 14, 2026.
| Report | Raised in the period | Spent in the period | Cash on hand at its close |
|---|---|---|---|
| YEAR-END 2025 through Dec 31, 2025 | $847,649 | $157,589 | $690,060 |
| APRIL QUARTERLY 2026 through Mar 31, 2026 | $442,827 | $305,619 | $827,267 |
| JULY QUARTERLY 2026 through Jun 30, 2026 | $1,036,311 | $676,137 | $1,187,441 |
| PRE-PRIMARY 2026 through Aug 19, 2026 | $173,992 | $1,172,347 | $189,086 |
| OCTOBER QUARTERLY 2026 through Sep 30, 2026 | $2,550,103 | $2,147,968 | $591,221 |
| PRE-GENERAL 2026 through Oct 14, 2026 | $1,694,666 | $1,307,091 | $978,796 |
Each report’s own period, as filed with the FEC; a report filed again counts once, as its latest copy.
Each loan as the campaign’s report through Oct 14, 2026 lists it, with what is still owed. A loan from an earlier cycle can appear here, and one repaid in full drops off the report, so the list need not add up to the row.
50 endorsers listed on Anthony Dilorenzo’s own campaign site: 11 officials, 1 organization, 38 people.
This is the campaign's claim, checked by an editor against its page; the endorsers have not confirmed it to us. Each name opens the campaign’s page with that name highlighted.
Advanced · 29,409 votes (52%) · 1 of 5 · Full results ↗
Election not held yet · Full results ↗
Every contest for this seat that named this candidate, most recent last; a result is shown once the race is called. Election dates and results from civicAPI (civicapi.org). civicAPI aggregates results from Secretaries of State and equivalent election bodies, and makes its own race calls. civicapi.org ↗
Latest poll · St. Anselm, Oct 20, 2026 · too few nonpartisan polls for a lead
A poll is a snapshot, not a forecast.
Official FEC filing record for the current cycle. The priorities they publish are quoted from their own site, in their order.
Statements are quoted from these pages exactly. Headings, order and wording are the campaign’s; the record marking is ours.
A donor who gave several times appears once. The 12 largest donors by total given are listed. In all, 528 itemized contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $599.6K.
The 12 largest committees by total given are listed. In all, 34 committee contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $110.2K. Counted from the givers' own filings, which can run above the total the campaign itself reports.
Total reported receipts $6,762,643
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. Open a source marked + to see who gave. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
75% of the money placed by state came from inside New Hampshire: $450.2K of $599.6K.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 248 contributions · 75% | $450,207 |
| 31 contributions · 16% | $97,365 |
| 5 contributions · 1.6% | $9,716 |
| 16 contributions · 1.3% | $7,970 |
| 1 contribution · 1.2% | $7,000 |
| 1 contribution · 1.2% | $7,000 |
| 90 contributions · 1% | $6,028 |
| 31 contributions · 0.7% | $3,908 |
By the state each donor wrote on the filing, across 21 states and territories. Donors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized, so they cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
| Employer as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an employer · 260 contributions · 13% of ranked | $63,280 |
| Written instead of an employer · 26 contributions · 5.5% of ranked | $26,253 |
| 2 contributions · 2.5% of ranked | $12,000 |
| 10 contributions · 2% of ranked | $9,648 |
| 2 contributions · 1.7% of ranked | $8,000 |
| 2 contributions · 1.7% of ranked | $8,000 |
| 3 contributions · 1.6% of ranked | $7,624 |
| 1 contribution · 1.5% of ranked | $7,000 |
A further $121,000 came from donors whose answer names no employer (blank), so it is not ranked. Itemized gifts over $200, grouped by the words donors filed: not an industry classification, and a gift from an employee is not a gift from the employer. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($124,646) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
Money groups spent on their own, not through a campaign. Each ad is filed against the candidate it names, so money attacking an opponent shows on the opponent’s row. Open a candidate to see who spent it.
The campaign also refunded $15,250 in contributions, which the categories below do not include.
Total itemized disbursements $3,602,525
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
All 657 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
14 payments were reported as a lump sum, such as a card or payroll bill, with the detail filed underneath as memo entries. Those entries, $53,316 in all, are counted under the payee and purpose they name rather than under the processor that was paid. The total is the same either way.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 10 payments · 32% of all spending | $1,857,521 |
| 17 payments · 8.4% of all spending | $486,306 |
| 1 payment · 2.5% of all spending | $145,530 |
| 8 payments · 2.3% of all spending | $135,456 |
| 6 payments · 2.3% of all spending | $135,281 |
| 101 payments · 2.1% of all spending | $122,485 |
| 3 payments · 1.4% of all spending | $82,500 |
| 4 payments · 1.3% of all spending | $76,174 |
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.
| Occupation as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an occupation · 260 contributions · 13% of ranked | $63,280 |
| 24 contributions · 12% of ranked | $57,396 |
| 14 contributions · 9.8% of ranked | $46,291 |
| 4 contributions · 3.9% of ranked | $18,500 |
| 5 contributions · 3.5% of ranked | $16,500 |
| Written instead of an occupation · 3 contributions · 3.3% of ranked | $15,500 |
| 2 contributions · 3% of ranked | $14,000 |
| 2 contributions · 2.2% of ranked | $10,500 |
A further $127,200 came from donors whose answer names no occupation (blank), so it is not ranked. Itemized gifts over $200, grouped by the words donors filed: not an industry classification, and a gift from an employee is not a gift from the employer. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($124,646) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.