Loading this committee’s profile from its FEC filings.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Loading this committee’s profile from its FEC filings.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
PACs › Hybrid PAC (qualified) › 2025–2026
FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026 · FEC bulk filing data · committee C00692319 · files monthly
Notices dated after Oct 14, 2026 are added; earlier ones are already in the regular reports.
“Advocating for an aggressive agenda to expand voting rights by supporting candidates that are champions for voter equality. We are leading the charge against Republicans at the state and federal level who seek to suppress our right to vote by taking electoral action.”
VPP, on its own site, protectvoting.org.
Quoted from the committee's site, or its sponsor's or funder's where its own says nothing. The statement is filed under topics from a fixed list, chosen by AI models when two of three agree; which side it takes is in its own words.
1 priority from the committee’s own site, in the order they are listed there. Every heading and the text under it is copied exactly, as one passage for each page it is from, and links to that place on the page; hover a source to see which passage it opens.
Automatic voter registration and easy online registration
The option to vote by mail without unnecessary barriers
Enough polling locations, trained staff, and voting equipment
Restoration of voting rights for people who have completed their sentences
Pre-paid postage for mail ballots
The removal of restrictive voter ID barriers
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · protectvoting.org./about
Heading as listed on protectvoting.org./about ↗ (opens protectvoting.org./about at this heading)
Each part reads different filings, so counts and totals can differ.
Direct PAC contributions and independent expenditures explicitly reported as support, by the party of the candidate they went to.
Spending against candidates is drawn on its own bar and left out of the support totals.
Contributions are reported money, not endorsements; a PAC giving to both parties is common.
Every contribution on line 23 of the committee’s own Schedule B, which is the filing its summary totals are built from. That line covers federal candidates, party committees and other political committees alike, so a super PAC funding other super PACs appears here rather than under candidate giving.
| Recipient | Count | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| Democratic candidates | 39 | $111.5K · 89% |
| Other or unresolved candidates | 2 | $5.5K · 4.4% |
| Other party committees | 1 | $250 · 0.2% |
| Other PACs and committees | 4 | $8.2K · 6.5% |
| All recipients | 46 | $125.5K |
| State | Candidates | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| California | 11 | $32K |
| Nevada | 3 | $14K |
| Michigan | 2 | $10K |
| Arizona | 3 | $9.5K |
| Pennsylvania | 3 | $7K |
| Colorado | 2 | $6K |
| North Carolina | 2 | $6K |
| Georgia | 1 | $5K |
The largest 8 of 19 states.
The 6 largest sources are listed. Each as the committee named it on this line, $842.2K from 6 sources in all.
A donor who gave several times appears once. The 10 largest donors by total given are listed. In all, 25,339 itemized contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $565K. FEC contributor lists are public records and cannot be used for commercial solicitation.
Total reported receipts $3,992,250
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. Open a source marked + to see who gave. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 4,428 contributions · 27% | $153,919 |
| 2,408 contributions · 8.1% | $45,647 |
Total reported disbursements $3,911,191
Every dollar this committee reported spending this cycle, split by the lines it reports against. Open a line to see who was actually paid on it. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
These are the payments the committee itemized to vendors, staff and other committees. Its $593,605 in independent expenditures is filed separately, against the candidate each was about, so it is counted in the split above and listed by candidate below, not here.
$3.9M spent from Jan 2025 to Oct 2026. Most in one report: $444.6K, September 2026.
The running total of what the committee’s FEC reports say it spent, independent expenditures included, with a point at the end of each report. The line is straight between reports because a report gives one total for its whole period.
No lobbying disclosures matched
VPP is registered with the Federal Election Commission as a Hybrid PAC (qualified). Its FEC record names Unitedemocrats PAC as an affiliate. Official FEC summary: Federal Election Commission committee record.
Statements are quoted from these pages exactly. Headings, order and wording are the committee’s or its sponsor’s; the record marking is ours.
VPP is matched to organization records using the FEC committee identity, structured identifiers, and corroborated organization data.
Bars drawn to $7K, the largest gift total here. 2025–2026 filings.
Candidate contribution rows come from candidate committee Schedule A filings, the same rows the party chart above counts.
Money moving between this committee and other committees, matched on FEC committee ID rather than the name each filing was typed under. Both sides exclude memo entries. The figures here count each committee once, from the itemized transfers read for this section, so they will not match the payment counts under Who this PAC gave to.
Committees that reported giving to this one on their own Schedule A filings, grouped by the giver’s committee ID.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| Hybrid PAC (qualified) · Connected to VOTER PROTECTION PROJECT · 6 payments | $96K |
| PAC (qualified) · 1 payment | $7.3K |
$103.3K from 2 committees, counting every itemized receipt this cycle.
Disbursements this committee itemized to another committee: candidate contributions, party transfers and payments alike, not contributions only.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| House campaign committee · 2 payments | $7K |
| House campaign committee · Connected to SEEC VICTORY FUND · 3 payments | $6K |
| House campaign committee · Connected to CALIFORNIA HOUSE MAJORITY FUND · 4 payments | $5.5K |
| PAC (nonqualified) · 1 payment | $5K |
| House campaign committee · Connected to CLARK CROW VICTORY FUND · 1 payment | $5K |
| Senate campaign committee · Connected to STEVENS FOR MICHIGAN VICTORY FUND · 1 payment | $5K |
| House campaign committee · 2 payments | $5K |
| Senate campaign committee · 1 payment | $5K |
| House campaign committee · 3 payments | $5K |
| Senate campaign committee · 1 payment | $5K |
| House campaign committee · Connected to CALIFORNIA HOUSE MAJORITY FUND · 2 payments | $5K |
| House campaign committee · Connected to JEFFRIES BATTLEGROUND PROTECTION FUND · 2 payments | $4.5K |
$125.5K across 47 recipient committees, or 3.2% of everything this committee reports spending. The largest 12 are shown. A further $1K was filed as memo entries, which FEC reports separately to avoid counting it twice.
Built from FEC Schedule A and Schedule B filings for the selected cycle. A committee only appears here if the money was itemized under its FEC committee ID.
| 1,130 contributions · 5.2% | $29,418 |
| 1,239 contributions · 5.1% | $29,071 |
| 1,220 contributions · 4.7% | $26,418 |
| 1,161 contributions · 4% | $22,770 |
| 739 contributions · 3.4% | $19,296 |
| 1,631 contributions · 3.1% | $17,773 |
By the state each contributor wrote on the filing. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line together, so one committee or organization transfer can account for a whole state. Contributors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized and cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
| Employer as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an employer · 22,105 contributions · 84% of ranked | $446,296 |
| Written instead of an employer · 690 contributions · 5.7% of ranked | $30,239 |
| 1 contribution · 0.9% of ranked | $4,950 |
| 1 contribution · 0.7% of ranked | $4,000 |
| 1 contribution · 0.5% of ranked | $2,500 |
| 1 contribution · 0.5% of ranked | $2,500 |
| 93 contributions · 0.3% of ranked | $1,476 |
| 63 contributions · 0.2% of ranked | $1,325 |
A further $30,630 came from donors whose answer names no employer (blank), so it is not ranked. Ranked from the largest 200 of 201 employer spellings filed; each share is of the money in those. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($2,488,466) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
| Occupation as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an occupation · 20,801 contributions · 79% of ranked | $423,291 |
| Written instead of an occupation · 1,283 contributions · 4.2% of ranked | $22,619 |
| 203 contributions · 1.1% of ranked | $5,978 |
| 1 contribution · 0.9% of ranked | $4,950 |
| 105 contributions · 0.9% of ranked | $4,705 |
| 1 contribution · 0.7% of ranked | $4,000 |
| 103 contributions · 0.6% of ranked | $3,298 |
| 17 contributions · 0.5% of ranked | $2,643 |
A further $30,630 came from donors whose answer names no occupation (blank), so it is not ranked. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($2,488,466) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
Total itemized disbursements $2,977,244
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
All 1,682 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
57 payments were reported as a lump sum, such as a card or payroll bill, with the detail filed underneath as memo entries. Those entries, $350,263 in all, are counted under the payee and purpose they name rather than under the processor that was paid. The total is the same either way.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 45 payments · 21% of all spending | $816,187 |
| 156 payments · 16% of all spending | $613,013 |
| 22 payments · 11% of all spending | $423,736 |
| 593 payments · 6.7% of all spending | $260,687 |
| 19 payments · 5.8% of all spending | $226,622 |
| 183 payments · 2.9% of all spending | $114,566 |
| 28 payments · 2.8% of all spending | $107,560 |
| 6 payments · 1.6% of all spending | $63,025 |
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.