Loading this committee’s profile from its FEC filings.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Loading this committee’s profile from its FEC filings.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
PACs › PAC (nonqualified) › 2025–2026
FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026 · FEC bulk filing data · committee C00893578 · files monthly
No published list of positions
Each part reads different filings, so counts and totals can differ.
Direct PAC contributions and independent expenditures explicitly reported as support, by the party of the candidate they went to.
| Party of the candidate | Candidates | Direct | Independent | Amount | Share |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 14 | $44,500 | $0 | $44,500 | 50% |
| Democratic | 13 | $32,000 | $0 | $32,000 | 36% |
| Other or unresolved | 3 | $13,100 | $0 | $13,100 | 15% |
| Shown support | 30 | $89,600 | $0 | $89,600 | 100% |
Contributions are reported money, not endorsements; a PAC giving to both parties is common.
Every contribution on line 23 of the committee’s own Schedule B, which is the filing its summary totals are built from. That line covers federal candidates, party committees and other political committees alike, so a super PAC funding other super PACs appears here rather than under candidate giving.
| Recipient | Count | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| Democratic candidates | 13 | $32K · 26% |
| Republican candidates | 14 | $44.5K · 37% |
| Other or unresolved candidates | 3 | $13.1K · 11% |
| Other party committees | 1 | $2.5K · 2.1% |
| Other PACs and committees | 9 | $29K · 24% |
| All recipients | 40 | $121.1K |
| State | Candidates | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| California | 6 | $12K |
| Montana | 3 | $11.6K |
| Idaho | 2 | $11.5K |
| Oregon | 4 | $9.5K |
| Wyoming | 2 | $7.5K |
| Utah | 1 | $7K |
| Colorado | 1 | $5K |
| Ohio | 1 | $3.5K |
The largest 8 of 18 states.
Candidate contribution rows come from candidate committee Schedule A filings, the same rows the party chart above counts.
Money moving between this committee and other committees, matched on FEC committee ID rather than the name each filing was typed under. Both sides exclude memo entries. The figures here count each committee once, from the itemized transfers read for this section, so they will not match the payment counts under Who this PAC gave to.
Committees that reported giving to this one on their own Schedule A filings, grouped by the giver’s committee ID.
No committee-to-committee receipts were itemized this cycle.
Disbursements this committee itemized to another committee: candidate contributions, party transfers and payments alike, not contributions only.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| Senate campaign committee · Connected to SHEEHY VICTORY COMMITTEE · 3 payments | $7.6K |
| House campaign committee · Connected to RISE PROJECT · 4 payments | $7K |
| House campaign committee · Connected to TEAM CELESTE · 5 payments | $7K |
| PAC (qualified) · 1 payment | $5K |
| PAC (nonqualified) · 1 payment |
A donor who gave several times appears once. The 12 largest donors by total given are listed. In all, 36 itemized contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $135.5K. FEC contributor lists are public records and cannot be used for commercial solicitation.
Total reported receipts $146,700
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. Open a source marked + to see who gave. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 36 contributions · 100% | $135,500 |
By the state each contributor wrote on the filing. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line together, so one committee or organization transfer can account for a whole state. Contributors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized and cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
| Employer as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| 26 contributions · 65% of ranked | $88,000 |
| Written instead of an employer · 7 contributions · 26% of ranked | $35,000 |
| 1 contribution · 3.7% of ranked | $5,000 |
| Written instead of an employer · 1 contribution · 3.7% of ranked | $5,000 |
Total reported disbursements $127,100
Every dollar this committee reported spending this cycle, split by the lines it reports against. Open a line to see who was actually paid on it. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
Total itemized disbursements $121,100
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
All 60 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 3 payments · 6% of all spending | $7,600 |
| 4 payments · 5.5% of all spending | $7,000 |
$127.1K spent from Jan 2025 to Oct 2026. Most in one report: $39K, June 2026.
The running total of what the committee’s FEC reports say it spent, independent expenditures included, with a point at the end of each report. The line is straight between reports because a report gives one total for its whole period.
Besides giving through its PAC, Perimeter Solutions pays lobbyists to press Congress and federal agencies. Each quarter it, or a firm it hires, files a public report under the Lobbying Disclosure Act saying which topics it worked on, what it spent, and whom it contacted. This is what those reports say.
Each report files its work under official topics. The bar shows how often each topic came up across the reports; open one to read what was filed under it. Naming a bill says the organization lobbied on it, not which side it took.
The organization’s own reports give its total lobbying costs, including any firms it hired; each firm reports what this client paid it.
Reported twice a year by the lobbying filer. $5K is political giving that also appears in FEC filings.
Matched by name: these reports are filed for “PERIMETER SOLUTIONS”, found by searching “PERIMETER SOLUTIONS”. Lobbying and FEC records share no ID, so an organization that lobbies under another name is missed. Source: LDA.gov, accessed Oct 26, 2026. Senate Office of Public Records cannot vouch for the data or analyses derived from these data after the data have been retrieved from LDA.gov.
Perimeter Solutions Inc. PAC is registered with the Federal Election Commission as a PAC (nonqualified). Official FEC summary: Federal Election Commission committee record.
No pages quoted
No approved organization identity yet
Bars drawn to $7.6K, the largest gift total here. 2025–2026 filings.
| $5K |
| PAC (qualified) · 1 payment | $5K |
| Senate campaign committee · Connected to FINANCIAL INNOVATION VICTORY COMMITTEE · 2 payments | $5K |
| House campaign committee · Connected to MAJORITY FUND · 2 payments | $5K |
| House campaign committee · Connected to GT FARM TEAM · 2 payments | $4.5K |
| PAC (qualified) · 2 payments | $3.5K |
| House campaign committee · 1 payment | $3.5K |
| House campaign committee · Connected to BAUMGARTNER VANGUARD SOCIETY · 1 payment | $3.5K |
$121.1K across 42 recipient committees, or 95% of everything this committee reports spending. The largest 12 are shown.
Built from FEC Schedule A and Schedule B filings for the selected cycle. A committee only appears here if the money was itemized under its FEC committee ID.
| 1 contribution · 1.8% of ranked | $2,500 |
Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
| Occupation as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an occupation · 8 contributions · 30% of ranked | $40,000 |
| 2 contributions · 7.4% of ranked | $10,000 |
| 3 contributions · 4.4% of ranked | $6,000 |
| 1 contribution · 3.7% of ranked | $5,000 |
| 1 contribution · 3.7% of ranked | $5,000 |
| 1 contribution · 3.7% of ranked | $5,000 |
| 1 contribution · 3.7% of ranked | $5,000 |
| 1 contribution · 3.7% of ranked | $5,000 |
Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
| 5 payments · 5.5% of all spending | $7,000 |
| 1 payment · 3.9% of all spending | $5,000 |
| 1 payment · 3.9% of all spending | $5,000 |
| 1 payment · 3.9% of all spending | $5,000 |
| 2 payments · 3.9% of all spending | $5,000 |
| 2 payments · 3.9% of all spending | $5,000 |
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.