Loading this committee’s profile from its FEC filings.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Loading this committee’s profile from its FEC filings.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
PACs › Hybrid PAC (qualified) › 2025–2026
FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026 · FEC bulk filing data · committee C00686832 · files monthly
1 priority from the committee’s own site, in the order they are listed there. Every heading and the text under it is copied exactly, as one passage for each page it is from, and links to that place on the page; hover a source to see which passage it opens.
Way to Lead PAC is a hybrid PAC, led by an Advisory Committee of movement leaders, that supports progressive candidates building governance power in strategic seats and states across the country.
Way to Lead PAC exists to ensure that organized communities have candidate champions who, once elected, govern to make real changes and push the boundaries of what has been politically possible.
Candidates endorsed by Way to Lead can receive direct funding from our federal PAC and state PACs, and support from our organizational partners.
They will fight for policies that:
- Limit income inequality and further economic justice, worker and union rights
- Take bold steps to protect the planet, avert the climate crisis, and promote environmental justice
- Defend a functioning and representative democracy
- Protect access to abortion and reproductive health care
- Seek racial justice and equality in the criminal, education, and economic systems for people of color and indigenous communities
- Reduce and prevent gun violence
- Support and protect LGBTQ+ rights
The Candidate ↗ (opens waytolead.us at this heading)
Displays a history of public service
The Campaign ↗ (opens waytolead.us at this heading)
Has a diverse staff or inclusive hiring practices
Is accountable to the community
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · waytolead.us
Heading as listed on waytolead.us ↗ (opens waytolead.us at this heading)
Each part reads different filings, so counts and totals can differ.
Direct PAC contributions and independent expenditures explicitly reported as support, by the party of the candidate they went to.
Contributions are reported money, not endorsements; a PAC giving to both parties is common.
Every contribution on line 23 of the committee’s own Schedule B, which is the filing its summary totals are built from. That line covers federal candidates, party committees and other political committees alike, so a super PAC funding other super PACs appears here rather than under candidate giving.
| Recipient | Count | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| Democratic candidates | 9 | $45.5K · 7.3% |
| Other PACs and committees | 4 | $575K · 93% |
| All recipients | 13 | $620.5K |
| State | Candidates | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| Texas | 4 | $18.5K |
| Arizona | 1 | $10K |
| Florida | 1 | $5K |
| Nevada | 1 | $5K |
| Mississippi | 1 | $5K |
| Illinois | 1 | $2K |
Candidate contribution rows come from candidate committee Schedule A filings, the same rows the party chart above counts.
Money moving between this committee and other committees, matched on FEC committee ID rather than the name each filing was typed under. Both sides exclude memo entries. The figures here count each committee once, from the itemized transfers read for this section, so they will not match the payment counts under Who this PAC gave to.
The 15 largest sources are listed. Each as the committee named it on this line, $1.1M from 6 sources in all, with its largest individual donors, whose gifts it files here too. Individuals' gifts on this line are not itemized in the data the site holds, so the list need not add up to the row.
Total reported receipts $2,580,434
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. Open a source marked + to see who gave. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 8 contributions · 54% | $710,450 |
| 5 contributions · 38% | $500,500 |
| 6 contributions · 6.1% | $80,300 |
| 2 contributions · 0.8% | $10,250 |
| 2 contributions · 0.6% | $7,750 |
| 1 contribution · 0.4% | $5,000 |
| 6 contributions · 0.3% | $3,400 |
Total reported disbursements $2,333,684
Every dollar this committee reported spending this cycle, split by the lines it reports against. Open a line to see who was actually paid on it. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
These are the payments the committee itemized to vendors, staff and other committees. Its $220,750 in independent expenditures is filed separately, against the candidate each was about, so it is counted in the split above and listed by candidate below, not here.
$2.3M spent from Jan 2025 to Oct 2026. Most in one report: $1.1M, September 2026.
The running total of what the committee’s FEC reports say it spent, independent expenditures included, with a point at the end of each report. The line is straight between reports because a report gives one total for its whole period.
No lobbying disclosures matched
Way to Lead PAC is registered with the Federal Election Commission as a Hybrid PAC (qualified). Official FEC summary: Federal Election Commission committee record.
Statements are quoted from these pages exactly. Headings, order and wording are the committee’s or its sponsor’s; the record marking is ours.
Way to Lead PAC is matched to organization records using the FEC committee identity, structured identifiers, and corroborated organization data.
LittleSis data is shared under CC BY-SA 4.0.
Bars drawn to $400K, the largest gift total here. 2025–2026 filings.
Committees that reported giving to this one on their own Schedule A filings, grouped by the giver’s committee ID.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| Super PAC (independent expenditure-only) · 1 payment | $10.7K |
$10.7K from 1 committee, counting every itemized receipt this cycle.
Disbursements this committee itemized to another committee: candidate contributions, party transfers and payments alike, not contributions only.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| Super PAC (independent expenditure-only) · 1 payment | $400K |
| Hybrid PAC (nonqualified) · 3 payments | $85K |
| Super PAC (independent expenditure-only) · 1 payment | $85K |
| House campaign committee · Connected to NEW POLITICS NEXT MISSION FUND · 2 payments | $10K |
| PAC (qualified) · Connected to BATTLEGROUND BLUE PAC · 1 payment | $5K |
| House campaign committee · 1 payment | $5K |
| Senate campaign committee · Connected to THE BENCH FUND · 1 payment | $5K |
| Senate campaign committee · 1 payment | $5K |
| House campaign committee · Connected to ELECT TERESA VICTORY FUND · 1 payment | $5K |
| Senate campaign committee · Connected to COLOM VICTORY FUND · 1 payment | $5K |
| House campaign committee · Connected to IMPOSSIBLE TO INEVITABLE · 1 payment | $5K |
| House campaign committee · Connected to CASAR VICTORY FUND · 1 payment | $3.5K |
$620.5K across 14 recipient committees, or 27% of everything this committee reports spending. The largest 12 are shown.
Built from FEC Schedule A and Schedule B filings for the selected cycle. A committee only appears here if the money was itemized under its FEC committee ID.
| $2,500 |
By the state each contributor wrote on the filing. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line together, so one committee or organization transfer can account for a whole state. Contributors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized and cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
| Employer as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an employer · 20 contributions · 52% of ranked | $687,500 |
| Written instead of an employer · 6 contributions · 38% of ranked | $507,500 |
| 2 contributions · 3.8% of ranked | $50,000 |
| 1 contribution · 1.9% of ranked | $25,000 |
| 1 contribution · 1.9% of ranked | $25,000 |
| 1 contribution · 1.9% of ranked | $25,000 |
| 2 contributions · <0.1% of ranked | $1,262 |
| 1 contribution · <0.1% of ranked | $1,000 |
A further $500 came from donors whose answer names no employer (blank), so it is not ranked. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($23,407) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
| Occupation as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an occupation · 7 contributions · 51% of ranked | $674,400 |
| 4 contributions · 38% of ranked | $500,000 |
| 2 contributions · 3.8% of ranked | $50,000 |
| 1 contribution · 1.9% of ranked | $25,000 |
| 1 contribution · 1.9% of ranked | $25,000 |
| 1 contribution · 1.9% of ranked | $25,000 |
| Written instead of an occupation · 13 contributions · 1% of ranked | $13,100 |
| 1 contribution · 0.4% of ranked | $5,000 |
A further $500 came from donors whose answer names no occupation (blank), so it is not ranked. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($23,407) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
Total itemized disbursements $677,628
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
All 100 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 1 payment · 17% of all spending | $400,000 |
| 3 payments · 3.6% of all spending | $85,000 |
| 1 payment · 3.6% of all spending | $85,000 |
| 1 payment · 2.1% of all spending | $48,122 |
| 2 payments · 0.4% of all spending | $10,000 |
| 2 payments · 0.4% of all spending | $10,000 |
| 1 payment · 0.2% of all spending | $5,000 |
| 1 payment · 0.2% of all spending | $5,000 |
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.