Loading this committee’s profile from its FEC filings.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Loading this committee’s profile from its FEC filings.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
PACs › PAC (qualified) › 2025–2026
PAC (qualified)Washington, District of ColumbiaActive
Connected organization: Democratic Moms PAC
FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026 · FEC bulk filing data · committee C00651042 · files quarterly
“Here at Moms Fed Up, we believe that the power of motherhood can create positive change in our society. Our mission is to support and empower moms to seek and hold political office, advocating for policies that enhance the lives of families across the nation. We are dedicated to implementing crucial initiatives such as paid family leave policies, affordable childcare, reproductive healthcare freedom, and promoting women’s representation in government.”
Moms FED UP, on its own site, momsfedup.org
Quoted from the committee's site, or its sponsor's or funder's where its own says nothing. The statement is filed under topics from a fixed list, chosen by AI models when two of three agree; which side it takes is in its own words.
8 priorities from the committee’s own site, in the order they are listed there. Every heading and the text under it is copied exactly, as one passage for each page it is from, and links to that place on the page; hover a source to see which passage it opens.
You may know that women make up only 27% of Congress.
But did you know that moms with young children make up less than 10% of Congress?
That’s why we founded Moms Fed Up.
Because we’re FED UP with watching decisions that impact our children and grandchildren be made without a fair representation of moms in the room.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · momsfedup.org
Heading as listed on momsfedup.org ↗ (opens momsfedup.org at this heading)
The well-being of working families should be a top priority, and better paid family leave policies at the state and federal levels are crucial for achieving this.
Adequate paid family leave allows individuals to care for their loved ones without financial strain.
States can improve their policies by extending the duration of leave and expanding coverage to include a wider range of caregivers.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · momsfedup.org/issues
Heading as listed on momsfedup.org/issues ↗ (opens momsfedup.org/issues at this heading)
Ensuring reproductive health care freedom for women is essential for their autonomy and well-being.
All people should have the right to make informed decisions about their bodies, including reproductive choices, without unnecessary barriers or judgment.
To achieve this, both state and federal governments must take proactive steps.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · momsfedup.org/issues
Heading as listed on momsfedup.org/issues ↗ (opens momsfedup.org/issues at this heading)
Expanding access to affordable childcare is crucial to support working families and promote economic stability.
Affordable and high-quality childcare enables parents to pursue their careers while providing their children with a safe and nurturing environment for early development.
To achieve this, both state and federal governments must take proactive measures.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · momsfedup.org/issues
Heading as listed on momsfedup.org/issues ↗ (opens momsfedup.org/issues at this heading)
Our organization recognizes the importance of a government that reflects the diversity and experiences of our nation.
By supporting more moms in power, we strive to create a political landscape that understands and prioritizes the needs of families.
We believe that moms bring a compassionate, nurturing, and solution-oriented approach to governance, tackling issues like paid family leave, affordable childcare, and reproductive healthcare freedom head-on.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · momsfedup.org/about
Heading as listed on momsfedup.org/about ↗ (opens momsfedup.org/about at this heading)
Each part reads different filings, so counts and totals can differ.
Direct PAC contributions and independent expenditures explicitly reported as support, by the party of the candidate they went to.
Contributions are reported money, not endorsements; a PAC giving to both parties is common.
Every contribution on line 23 of the committee’s own Schedule B, which is the filing its summary totals are built from. That line covers federal candidates, party committees and other political committees alike, so a super PAC funding other super PACs appears here rather than under candidate giving.
| Recipient | Count | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| Democratic candidates | 42 | $280K · 60% |
| Other or unresolved candidates | 2 | $10K · 2.2% |
| Democratic party committees | 3 | $15K · 3.2% |
| Other party committees | 2 | $70K · 15% |
| Other PACs and committees | 17 | $90K · 19% |
| All recipients | 66 | $465K |
| State | Candidates | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| Michigan | 4 | $25K |
| Colorado | 4 | $22.5K |
| Iowa | 3 | $22.5K |
| Arizona | 2 | $20K |
| Ohio | 2 | $20K |
| Nevada | 2 | $20K |
| Virginia | 2 | $17.5K |
| New Jersey | 2 | $15K |
The largest 8 of 22 states.
A donor who gave several times appears once. The 12 largest donors by total given are listed. In all, 55,327 itemized contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $962.1K. FEC contributor lists are public records and cannot be used for commercial solicitation.
Each as the committee named it on this line.
Total reported receipts $3,913,391
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. Open a source marked + to see who gave. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 10,616 contributions · 21% | $204,297 |
| 3,587 contributions · 5.8% | $56,066 |
Total reported disbursements $3,555,395
Every dollar this committee reported spending this cycle, split by the lines it reports against. Open a line to see who was actually paid on it. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
$3.6M spent from Jan 2025 to Oct 2026. Most in one report: $717.2K, Jan 1 – Mar 31, 2025.
The running total of what the committee’s FEC reports say it spent, independent expenditures included, with a point at the end of each report. The line is straight between reports because a report gives one total for its whole period.
No lobbying disclosures matched
Moms FED UP is registered with the Federal Election Commission as a PAC (qualified). Its FEC record names Democratic Moms PAC as an affiliate. Official FEC summary: Federal Election Commission committee record.
Statements are quoted from these pages exactly. Headings, order and wording are the committee’s or its sponsor’s; the record marking is ours.
Moms FED UP is matched to organization records using the FEC committee identity, structured identifiers, and corroborated organization data.
Bars drawn to $40K, the largest gift total here. 2025–2026 filings.
Candidate contribution rows come from candidate committee Schedule A filings, the same rows the party chart above counts.
Money moving between this committee and other committees, matched on FEC committee ID rather than the name each filing was typed under. Both sides exclude memo entries. The figures here count each committee once, from the itemized transfers read for this section, so they will not match the payment counts under Who this PAC gave to.
Committees that reported giving to this one on their own Schedule A filings, grouped by the giver’s committee ID.
No committee-to-committee receipts were itemized this cycle.
Disbursements this committee itemized to another committee: candidate contributions, party transfers and payments alike, not contributions only.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| Party committee (qualified) · 3 payments | $40K |
| Party committee (qualified) · 2 payments | $30K |
| House campaign committee · Connected to DEMOCRATIC FUTURE LEADERSHIP FUND · 4 payments | $10K |
| House campaign committee · 3 payments | $10K |
| House campaign committee · 2 payments | $10K |
| House campaign committee · Connected to FRONTLINE ORGANIZING FOR REPRESENTATION, CHANGE & EQUITY (FORCE) PAC · 3 payments | $10K |
| House campaign committee · Connected to NEW POLITICS NEXT MISSION FUND · 2 payments | $10K |
| House campaign committee · 3 payments | $10K |
| House campaign committee · Connected to EDW HOLD THE HOUSE FUND · 4 payments | $10K |
| House campaign committee · Connected to DEMOCRACY SUMMER 2026 · 3 payments | $10K |
| House campaign committee · Connected to BLUE TO THE FUTURE 2024 · 3 payments | $10K |
| House campaign committee · Connected to JEFFRIES BATTLEGROUND PROTECTION FUND · 4 payments | $10K |
From the 65 largest of 66 recipient committees: $465K, or 13% of everything this committee reports spending. The largest 12 are shown.
Built from FEC Schedule A and Schedule B filings for the selected cycle. A committee only appears here if the money was itemized under its FEC committee ID.
| 2,821 contributions · 5.7% | $55,156 |
| 1,775 contributions · 5.7% | $54,531 |
| 1,619 contributions · 4.4% | $42,147 |
| 2,835 contributions · 4% | $38,416 |
| 2,373 contributions · 3.9% | $37,816 |
| 2,198 contributions · 3.6% | $34,475 |
By the state each contributor wrote on the filing. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line together, so one committee or organization transfer can account for a whole state. Contributors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized and cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
| Employer as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an employer · 44,493 contributions · 86% of ranked | $746,962 |
| Written instead of an employer · 1,532 contributions · 3.5% of ranked | $30,661 |
| 524 contributions · 1.8% of ranked | $15,855 |
| 85 contributions · 0.4% of ranked | $3,464 |
| 105 contributions · 0.3% of ranked | $2,685 |
| 221 contributions · 0.3% of ranked | $2,432 |
| 87 contributions · 0.2% of ranked | $2,182 |
| 5 contributions · 0.2% of ranked | $1,800 |
A further $84,655 came from donors whose answer names no employer (N/A, None, blank), so it is not ranked. Ranked from the largest 200 of 201 employer spellings filed; each share is of the money in those. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($2,989,242) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
| Occupation as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an occupation · 43,187 contributions · 82% of ranked | $722,589 |
| Written instead of an occupation · 1,343 contributions · 2.7% of ranked | $23,802 |
| 535 contributions · 1.9% of ranked | $16,362 |
| 255 contributions · 1% of ranked | $8,396 |
| 175 contributions · 0.7% of ranked | $5,763 |
| 428 contributions · 0.5% of ranked | $4,553 |
| 152 contributions · 0.5% of ranked | $4,542 |
| 103 contributions · 0.5% of ranked | $4,261 |
A further $84,157 came from donors whose answer names no occupation (blank), so it is not ranked. Ranked from the largest 200 of 201 occupation spellings filed; each share is of the money in those. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($2,989,242) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
Total itemized disbursements $3,055,117
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
All 731 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
7 payments were reported as a lump sum, such as a card or payroll bill, with the detail filed underneath as memo entries. Those entries, $4,507 in all, are counted under the payee and purpose they name rather than under the processor that was paid. The total is the same either way.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 76 payments · 46% of all spending | $1,624,816 |
| 36 payments · 9% of all spending | $319,386 |
| 28 payments · 4.3% of all spending | $152,500 |
| 112 payments · 4.2% of all spending | $147,600 |
| 24 payments · 2.9% of all spending | $104,509 |
| 9 payments · 1.8% of all spending | $63,660 |
| 8 payments · 1.6% of all spending | $56,700 |
| 3 payments · 1.1% of all spending | $40,000 |
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.