Loading this committee’s profile from its FEC filings.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Loading this committee’s profile from its FEC filings.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
PACs › Super PAC (independent expenditure-only) › 2025–2026
FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026 · FEC bulk filing data · committee C00640300 · files monthly
Notices dated after Oct 14, 2026 are added; earlier ones are already in the regular reports.
“Activate America empowers activists to help elect Democrats to the U.S. Senate and House of Representatives. The American public wants results, and Congressional Republicans want chaos and dysfunction. Democratic majorities in the House and Senate will help protect our freedoms, our country, and our planet.
Activate America coordinates with local, statewide, and national organizations to mobilize volunteers where they can do the most good. We provide postcarding, phone banking, texting, and canvassing programs to reach voters and help us hold seats we narrowly won and flip seats we narrowly lost. Activate America is an independent expenditure organization focused on electing Democrats to the U.S. Senate and House of Representatives. The larger our majority, the more we can make meaningful and lasting change possible for our country.”
Activate America, on its own site, activateamerica.vote
Quoted from the committee's site, or its sponsor's or funder's where its own says nothing. The statement is filed under topics from a fixed list, chosen by AI models when two of three agree; which side it takes is in its own words.
10 priorities from the committee’s own site, in the order they are listed there. Every heading and the text under it is copied exactly, as one passage for each page it is from, and links to that place on the page; hover a source to see which passage it opens.
For almost two months, Trump and his so-called “Department of War” has been engaged in military action against Iran.
Yet, the American public still hasn’t been given a clear explanation of the strategy, the objectives, or the exit plan.
Write to Congress today to demand an end to this foolish and pointless war that is costing us billions of dollars and accomplishing nothing.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · activateamerica.vote
Heading as listed on activateamerica.vote ↗ (opens activateamerica.vote at this heading)
Activate America empowers activists to help elect Democrats to the U.S. Senate and House of Representatives.
The American public wants results, and Congressional Republicans want chaos and dysfunction.
Democratic majorities in the House and Senate will help protect our freedoms, our country, and our planet.
Our values are your values.
Protecting our democracy
Strengthening voting rights
Defending abortion rights
Embracing civil rights and racial justice for everyone
Enacting commonsense gun violence prevention reforms
Supporting the rights of workers
Ensuring that everyone has quality and affordable health care
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · activateamerica.vote/what-we-do
Artificial Intelligence is developing at an alarming rate — and even employees of AI companies have asked Congress to pump the brakes.
Congress has no excuse to keep stalling!
We’re calling on Congress to end its recess and build an AI safety with real teeth to rein in an out-of-control industry.
Write to your Member of Congress today.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · activateamerica.vote/advocacy
For almost two months, Trump and his so-called “Department of War” has been engaged in military action against Iran.
Yet, the American public still hasn’t been given a clear explanation of the strategy, the objectives, or the exit plan.
Write to Congress today to demand an end to this foolish and pointless war that is costing us billions of dollars and accomplishing nothing.They are threatening a dangerous expansion of military force, with no clear limits and no public debate.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · activateamerica.vote/advocacy
DHS and its agencies, including ICE and Customs and Border Protection (CBP), have operated without real oversight for too long.
We’ve seen them abuse their power, target vulnerable communities, and violate the civil liberties of immigrants and U.S. citizens alike.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · activateamerica.vote/advocacy
The Trump Administration has made it clear: Venezuela is just the beginning.
Trump and his enablers have openly talked about further strikes in Mexico, Columbia, Cuba, and even Greenland, protected under the NATO alliance.
They are threatening a dangerous expansion of military force, with no clear limits and no public debate.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · activateamerica.vote/advocacy
Donald Trump has sent National Guard troops into Los Angeles without California's consent.
He's mobilizing Texas troops toward Chicago over Illinois's objections.
And he's signaled plans to do the same in Portland.
It's a continuation of using emergency powers to subvert the intent of the U.S. Constitution and federal laws.
This legal gray area is dangerous, and if left unchecked, future presidents could go even further.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · activateamerica.vote/advocacy
Across the country, ICE and other federal agents are detaining people on the street, at homes, and in workplaces, schools, hospitals, and places of worship.
Agents conducting these raids are frequently wearing masks, and they are frequently not wearing proper uniforms or badges that identify themselves or their agencies.
We must restore accountability and the rule of law to immigration enforcement.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · activateamerica.vote/advocacy
The Cook Political Report, a respected political analysis website, regularly assesses the competitiveness of critical House races across the country that will determine control of the House.
At Activate America, we are focused on uplifting Democrats in these races to give Democrats the greatest opportunity possible to retake Congress.
This year, we have a golden opportunity to elect leaders who will put people first.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · activateamerica.vote/house
Heading as listed on activateamerica.vote/house ↗ (opens activateamerica.vote/house at this heading)
The Cook Political Report, a respected political analysis website, regularly assesses the competitiveness of critical Senate races across the country that will determine control of the Senate.
At Activate America, we are focused on uplifting Democrats in these races to give Democrats the greatest opportunity possible to retake Congress.
This year, we have a golden opportunity to elect leaders who will put people first.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · activateamerica.vote/senate
Each part reads different filings, so counts and totals can differ.
Direct PAC contributions and independent expenditures explicitly reported as support, by the party of the candidate they went to.
| Party of the candidate | Candidates | Direct | Independent | Amount | Share |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other or unresolved | 3 | $0 | $58,452 | $58,452 | 62% |
| Democratic | 12 | $0 | $35,499 | $35,499 | 38% |
| Shown support | 15 | $0 | $93,951 | $93,951 | 100% |
Spending against candidates is drawn on its own bar and left out of the support totals.
Contributions are reported money, not endorsements; a PAC giving to both parties is common.
Every contribution on line 23 of the committee’s own Schedule B, which is the filing its summary totals are built from. That line covers federal candidates, party committees and other political committees alike, so a super PAC funding other super PACs appears here rather than under candidate giving.
No contributions itemized
Nothing loaded
Candidate contribution rows come from candidate committee Schedule A filings, the same rows the party chart above counts.
Money moving between this committee and other committees, matched on FEC committee ID rather than the name each filing was typed under. Both sides exclude memo entries. The figures here count each committee once, from the itemized transfers read for this section, so they will not match the payment counts under Who this PAC gave to.
Committees that reported giving to this one on their own Schedule A filings, grouped by the giver’s committee ID.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| Super PAC (independent expenditure-only) · 1 payment | $10.2K |
$10.2K from 1 committee, counting every itemized receipt this cycle.
Disbursements this committee itemized to another committee: candidate contributions, party transfers and payments alike, not contributions only.
No disbursements to other committees were itemized this cycle.
Built from FEC Schedule A and Schedule B filings for the selected cycle. A committee only appears here if the money was itemized under its FEC committee ID.
A donor who gave several times appears once. The 12 largest donors by total given are listed. In all, 2,664 itemized contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $1.5M. FEC contributor lists are public records and cannot be used for commercial solicitation.
The largest of the committees is listed. Counted from the givers' own filings, which can run above the total this committee reports.
The 3 largest sources are listed. Each as the committee named it on this line, $26.8K from 3 sources in all.
Total reported receipts $2,197,134
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. Open a source marked + to see who gave. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 2,151 contributions · 93% | $1,344,996 |
| 87 contributions · 3.3% | $48,382 |
| 11 contributions · 0.7% | $10,590 |
| 87 contributions · 0.5% | $7,160 |
| 52 contributions · 0.5% |
Total reported disbursements $1,810,741
Every dollar this committee reported spending this cycle, split by the lines it reports against. Open a line to see who was actually paid on it. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
These are the payments the committee itemized to vendors, staff and other committees. Its $148,175 in independent expenditures is filed separately, against the candidate each was about, so it is counted in the split above and listed by candidate below, not here.
$1.8M spent from Jan 2025 to Oct 2026. Most in one report: $595.7K, Jul 1 – Dec 31, 2025.
The running total of what the committee’s FEC reports say it spent, independent expenditures included, with a point at the end of each report. The line is straight between reports because a report gives one total for its whole period.
No lobbying disclosures matched
Activate America is registered with the Federal Election Commission as a Super PAC (independent expenditure-only). Official FEC summary: Federal Election Commission committee record.
Statements are quoted from these pages exactly. Headings, order and wording are the committee’s or its sponsor’s; the record marking is ours.
Activate America is matched to organization records using the FEC committee identity, structured identifiers, and corroborated organization data.
| $7,150 |
| 10 contributions · 0.3% | $4,950 |
| 56 contributions · 0.3% | $4,909 |
| 3 contributions · 0.2% | $3,500 |
By the state each contributor wrote on the filing. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line together, so one committee or organization transfer can account for a whole state. Contributors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized and cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
| Employer as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| 1 contribution · 14% of ranked | $20,000 |
| 1 contribution · 7.2% of ranked | $10,000 |
| 1 contribution · 7.2% of ranked | $10,000 |
| 1 contribution · 3.6% of ranked | $5,000 |
| 1 contribution · 3.6% of ranked | $5,000 |
| 1 contribution · 3.6% of ranked | $5,000 |
| 1 contribution · 3.6% of ranked | $5,000 |
| 1 contribution · 3.6% of ranked | $5,000 |
A further $1,310,907 came from donors whose answer names no employer (N/A, blank), so it is not ranked. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($383,511) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
| Occupation as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an occupation · 938 contributions · 75% of ranked | $1,081,321 |
| Written instead of an occupation · 1,132 contributions · 15% of ranked | $217,136 |
| 1 contribution · 1.4% of ranked | $20,000 |
| 2 contributions · 0.7% of ranked | $10,250 |
| 1 contribution · 0.7% of ranked | $10,000 |
| 3 contributions · 0.6% of ranked | $8,000 |
| 1 contribution · 0.3% of ranked | $5,000 |
| 1 contribution · 0.3% of ranked | $5,000 |
A further $11,955 came from donors whose answer names no occupation (blank), so it is not ranked. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($383,511) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
Total itemized disbursements $1,343,979
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
All 2,386 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
212 payments were reported as a lump sum, such as a card or payroll bill, with the detail filed underneath as memo entries. Those entries, $112,493 in all, are counted under the payee and purpose they name rather than under the processor that was paid. The total is the same either way.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 46 payments · 7.9% of all spending | $143,260 |
| 36 payments · 7.3% of all spending | $132,500 |
| 21 payments · 4.3% of all spending | $77,998 |
| 57 payments · 4.2% of all spending | $75,653 |
| 19 payments · 4.2% of all spending | $75,500 |
| 36 payments · 4% of all spending | $72,150 |
| 28 payments · 3.3% of all spending | $59,500 |
| 13 payments · 3.3% of all spending | $59,375 |
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.