Loading this committee’s profile from its FEC filings.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Loading this committee’s profile from its FEC filings.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
PACs › Hybrid PAC (qualified) › 2025–2026
Hybrid PAC (qualified)Centreville, VirginiaActive
political action committee (Linked public record: Wikidata organization record)
FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026 · FEC bulk filing data · committee C00630665 · files quarterly
Notices dated after Oct 14, 2026 are added; earlier ones are already in the regular reports.
“To build people power in our country by electing a bloc of working class leaders in Congress who meet the urgency of our political moment and serve the people’s agenda — not the interests of big corporate donors.”
Justice Democrats PAC, on its own site, justicedemocrats.com
Quoted from the committee's site, or its sponsor's or funder's where its own says nothing. The statement is filed under topics from a fixed list, chosen by AI models when two of three agree; which side it takes is in its own words.
27 priorities from the committee’s own site, in the order they are listed there. Every heading and the text under it is copied exactly, as one passage for each page it is from, and links to that place on the page; hover a source to see which passage it opens.
It's time to usher in a new generation of diverse, progressive, working-class Democrats with a bold vision to transform our economy and democracy.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · justicedemocrats.com
Heading as listed on justicedemocrats.com ↗ (opens justicedemocrats.com at this heading)
We need a Democratic Party that fights for its voters, not corporate donors, and a new generation of leaders who will fight for our communities and an agenda that meets the scale of our problems.
Since our first elections in 2018, we have helped elect Congress’ most progressive members including leaders like Rashida Tlaib, Summer Lee, and Delia Ramirez to our progressive coalition.
The Squad is here to stay — and it's growing.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · justicedemocrats.com
Heading as listed on justicedemocrats.com ↗ (opens justicedemocrats.com at this heading)
Justice Democrats is working to elect a mission-driven caucus that will fight for bold, progressive solutions to match the scope and scale of our current crises: skyrocketing inequality, a climate catastrophe, deepening systemic racism and a corporate takeover of our democracy.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · justicedemocrats.com
Heading as listed on justicedemocrats.com ↗ (opens justicedemocrats.com at this heading)
We need a new generation of diverse, working-class leaders to build a strong, politically courageous bloc in Congress that can help build the movement and work to deliver on our most pressing, progressive priorities.
We recruited and helped candidates like Summer Lee, Cori Bush, Jamaal Bowman, and AOC pull off some of the biggest upsets in American history.
As long as the top of the Democratic Party — which is disproportionately wealthier, whiter, and more male than its base — is beholden to the interests of corporations, billionaires, and right-wing Super PACs, our work remains as urgent as ever.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · justicedemocrats.com
Heading as listed on justicedemocrats.com ↗ (opens justicedemocrats.com at this heading)
We need a bold vision for the future that centers working-class Americans, uplifts our communities, and creates millions of union jobs that pay a living wage by uniting all of us at the bottom against the top 1% robbing us blind and trying to divide us.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · justicedemocrats.com/platform
We need to build an America where everyone has the resources to live their lives with dignity and without their most basic needs tied to their paycheck — an America that finally belongs to and serves all of us, not just the wealthy and well-connected few.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · justicedemocrats.com/platform
We need to create a democracy that actually gives a voice to every person — not a megaphone to a handful of corporations, billionaires, and white supremacists.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · justicedemocrats.com/platform
It’s time to end the corporate takeover of our democracy.
In the past few Congressional cycles, we’ve had front-row seats to see the impact that unchecked, unregulated, and unlimited money can have on our democracy.
In a post-Citizens United world, we see billionaires buy elections, halt legislation that conflicts with their business interests, influence critical political decisions like cabinet appointments, and gut voting rights for communities that undermine their for-profit interests.
Now more than ever, we must run full-tilt towards the work needed to have a functioning democracy that represents the will of the people — and that means getting first and foremost getting big money out of politics and ensuring every person’s right to vote is protected.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · justicedemocrats.com/platform/dedemocracy
Our federal immigration system is broken and we need comprehensive immigration reform to resolve its systemic problems.
The right-wing response from both parties has been to fund billions in militarized police, militarized borders, and an endless deportation machine — which has done nothing to resolve underlying issues or end any bottlenecks in ou immigration system.
We must protect the 11 million undocumented immigrants in our country from deportation and provide them a pathway to citizenship.
Now, that demand is even more urgent.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · justicedemocrats.com/platform/dedemocracy
American foreign policy has always functioned as an agent of American imperialism.
But millions of Americans are not interested in seeing our government use billions of our tax dollars to fund genocide or wage endless wars abroad.
Our foreign policy should lead with diplomacy and prioritize peace.
We must end all US military funding for violence abroad — from Israel’s ongoing genocide, apartheid, and annexation to the UAE’s funding of genocide and war crimes in Sudan to Saudi Arabia’s human rights abuses and funding for war in Yemen.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · justicedemocrats.com/platform/dedemocracy
We have never completed the project of Reconstruction.
The First Reconstruction was stymied by violent terrorism in the 19th century.
The Second Reconstruction was stopped by the white backlash to the civil rights movement.
America must reconcile with our past by creating a national Truth and Reconciliation Commission to lead our nation through a process that investigates the generational harms caused by slavery and Jim Crow and propose necessary reparations.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · justicedemocrats.com/platform/society
We have the largest prison population in the world.
We must end the War on Drugs, end mandatory minimum sentencing and cash bail, end solitary confinement, end private prisons, end the school-to-prison pipeline and end our justice system’s reliance on incarceration — which has clearly failed — and move toward a system based in redemption and reinvestment, not punishment.
In this unjust criminal legal system, policing has been used as a violent enforcer of a broken, classist, and racist system that has proven unsuccessful even in its own stated goals of protecting communities.
Law enforcement should not be a catch-all for all of society’s problems.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · justicedemocrats.com/platform/society
Each part reads different filings, so counts and totals can differ.
Direct PAC contributions and independent expenditures explicitly reported as support, by the party of the candidate they went to.
Spending against candidates is drawn on its own bar and left out of the support totals.
Contributions are reported money, not endorsements; a PAC giving to both parties is common.
Every contribution on line 23 of the committee’s own Schedule B, which is the filing its summary totals are built from. That line covers federal candidates, party committees and other political committees alike, so a super PAC funding other super PACs appears here rather than under candidate giving.
| Recipient | Count | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| Democratic candidates | 18 | $87.5K · 72% |
| Other PACs and committees | 1 | $33.5K · 28% |
| All recipients | 19 | $121K |
| State | Candidates | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| Pennsylvania | 2 | $15K |
| California | 2 | $10K |
| Michigan | 2 | $10K |
| New York | 2 | $10K |
| Texas | 2 | $7.5K |
| Tennessee | 1 | $5K |
| Illinois | 1 | $5K |
| North Carolina | 1 | $5K |
The largest 8 of 13 states.
The 15 largest sources are listed. Each as the committee named it on this line, $1.8M from 11 sources in all, with its largest individual donors, whose gifts it files here too. Individuals' gifts on this line are not itemized in the data the site holds, so the list need not add up to the row.
Total reported receipts $7,525,767
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. Open a source marked + to see who gave. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 2,465 contributions · 75% | $2,847,769 |
| 1,351 contributions · 4.5% | $171,517 |
Total reported disbursements $7,367,776
Every dollar this committee reported spending this cycle, split by the lines it reports against. Open a line to see who was actually paid on it. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
These are the payments the committee itemized to vendors, staff and other committees. Its $4,663,038 in independent expenditures is filed separately, against the candidate each was about, so it is counted in the split above and listed by candidate below, not here.
$7.4M spent from Jan 2025 to Oct 2026. Most in one report: $3.9M, Apr 1 – Jun 30, 2026.
The running total of what the committee’s FEC reports say it spent, independent expenditures included, with a point at the end of each report. The line is straight between reports because a report gives one total for its whole period. Numbered lines mark the elections that drew the most independent spending. Each expenditure counts toward the next election on its seat after the day it was made, and a seat is named when it drew at least a tenth of that spending.
No lobbying disclosures matched
political action committee Linked public record: Wikidata organization record.
Statements are quoted from these pages exactly. Headings, order and wording are the committee’s or its sponsor’s; the record marking is ours.
Justice Democrats PAC is matched to organization records using the FEC committee identity, structured identifiers, and corroborated organization data.
Bars drawn to $33.5K, the largest gift total here. 2025–2026 filings.
Candidate contribution rows come from candidate committee Schedule A filings, the same rows the party chart above counts.
Money moving between this committee and other committees, matched on FEC committee ID rather than the name each filing was typed under. Both sides exclude memo entries. The figures here count each committee once, from the itemized transfers read for this section, so they will not match the payment counts under Who this PAC gave to.
Committees that reported giving to this one on their own Schedule A filings, grouped by the giver’s committee ID.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| House campaign committee · Connected to THE EMPOWERMENT FUND · 3 payments | $450K |
| House campaign committee · Connected to RUSTBELT ROSEBUDS · 1 payment | $100K |
| Hybrid PAC (qualified) · 1 payment | $6K |
| Hybrid PAC (qualified) · 1 payment | $5K |
| House campaign committee · 1 payment | $3.8K |
$564.8K from 5 committees, counting every itemized receipt this cycle.
Disbursements this committee itemized to another committee: candidate contributions, party transfers and payments alike, not contributions only.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| Super PAC (independent expenditure-only) · 4 payments | $33.5K |
| House campaign committee · 2 payments | $10K |
| House campaign committee · 1 payment | $5K |
| House campaign committee · 1 payment | $5K |
| House campaign committee · Connected to ROOTED WITH THE PEOPLE · 1 payment | $5K |
| House campaign committee · Connected to THE EMPOWERMENT FUND · 1 payment | $5K |
| House campaign committee · Connected to RUSTBELT ROSEBUDS · 1 payment | $5K |
Built from FEC Schedule A and Schedule B filings for the selected cycle. A committee only appears here if the money was itemized under its FEC committee ID.
| 307 contributions · 3% | $115,075 |
| 301 contributions · 2.9% | $108,149 |
| 132 contributions · 2% | $76,128 |
| 668 contributions · 1.8% | $69,157 |
| 533 contributions · 1.3% | $49,027 |
| 241 contributions · 1.2% | $43,608 |
By the state each contributor wrote on the filing. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line together, so one committee or organization transfer can account for a whole state. Contributors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized and cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
| Employer as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| 2 contributions · 54% of ranked | $2,000,000 |
| Written instead of an employer · 4,575 contributions · 28% of ranked | $1,049,953 |
| Written instead of an employer · 846 contributions · 4.5% of ranked | $164,087 |
| 2 contributions · 2.7% of ranked | $100,000 |
| 1 contribution · 1.4% of ranked | $50,000 |
| 66 contributions · 0.8% of ranked | $30,138 |
| 1 contribution · 0.7% of ranked | $25,000 |
| 2 contributions · 0.7% of ranked | $25,000 |
A further $18,746 came from donors whose answer names no employer (Information requested, blank), so it is not ranked. Ranked from the largest 200 of 201 employer spellings filed; each share is of the money in those. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($1,355,640) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
| Occupation as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| 8 contributions · 54% of ranked | $2,000,550 |
| Written instead of an occupation · 1,038 contributions · 21% of ranked | $802,477 |
| Written instead of an occupation · 3,611 contributions · 6.8% of ranked | $252,440 |
| 18 contributions · 4% of ranked | $150,270 |
| 148 contributions · 1.3% of ranked | $50,146 |
| 302 contributions · 0.7% of ranked | $27,307 |
| 92 contributions · 0.7% of ranked | $27,238 |
| 6 contributions · 0.7% of ranked | $26,500 |
A further $17,749 came from donors whose answer names no occupation (Information requested, blank), so it is not ranked. Ranked from the largest 200 of 201 occupation spellings filed; each share is of the money in those. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($1,355,640) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
Total itemized disbursements $1,530,161
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
All 506 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
14 payments were reported as a lump sum, such as a card or payroll bill, with the detail filed underneath as memo entries. Those entries, $107,027 in all, are counted under the payee and purpose they name rather than under the processor that was paid. The total is the same either way.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 17 payments · 5.5% of all spending | $405,966 |
| 40 payments · 3.3% of all spending | $245,869 |
| 20 payments · 2.1% of all spending | $158,362 |
| 12 payments · 1.4% of all spending | $100,089 |
| 18 payments · 1.2% of all spending | $86,765 |
| 4 payments · 0.9% of all spending | $68,500 |
| 141 payments · 0.8% of all spending | $57,817 |
| 2 payments · 0.8% of all spending | $56,750 |
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.
| $5K |
| House campaign committee · Connected to AVILA CHEVALIER AND VALDEZ VICTORY FUND · 1 payment | $5K |
| House campaign committee · 1 payment | $5K |
| House campaign committee · 1 payment | $5K |
| House campaign committee · 1 payment | $5K |
$121K across 20 recipient committees, or 1.6% of everything this committee reports spending. The largest 12 are shown. A further $70K was filed as memo entries, which FEC reports separately to avoid counting it twice.