Loading this candidate’s profile from the FEC filings and campaign records.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Loading this candidate’s profile from the FEC filings and campaign records.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Candidates › CA-34 race › 2025–2026
D Democratic nominee for U.S. House, CA-34
Has not served in Congress
25 priorities from angela4congress.com, in the order they are listed there. Every heading and the text under it is copied exactly, as one passage for each page it is from, and links to that place on the page; hover a source to see which passage it opens.
Abolish Super PACs and end the era of billionaires buying elections. Democracy should answer to voters, not donors.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · angela4congress.com/issues
Heading as listed on angela4congress.com/issues ↗ (opens angela4congress.com/issues at this heading)
Housing, healthcare, and education shouldn't be luxuries. Fight for costs working families can actually afford.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · angela4congress.com/issues
Heading as listed on angela4congress.com/issues ↗ (opens angela4congress.com/issues at this heading)
Progressive tax policies and a billionaire tax to make the wealthy pay their fair share and fund the priorities above.
Washington cuts Medicaid and SNAP while billionaires get tax breaks. Angela supports a federal wealth tax to make the ultra-rich pay their fair share and fund housing, healthcare, and education for the rest of us.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · angela4congress.com/issues
Make the wealthy pay their fair share.
Washington is cutting Medicaid and SNAP while billionaires get tax breaks. The American people, across all parties and backgrounds, agrees this has to change — a 2025 Harris Poll found 71% of respondents support a billionaire tax.
- Support a federal wealth tax on the ultra-rich. Angela will support Bernie Sanders’ and Ro Khanna’s Make Billionaires Pay Their Fair Share Act.
- Fund housing, healthcare, education, and climate resilience with the revenue
- Californians should vote Yes on Prop 40 this November; the one-time 5% billionaire tax that will help fund hospitals, food assistant programs, and public education across the state.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · angela4congress.com/issues/tax-the-rich-not-the-rest-of-us
Heading as listed on angela4congress.com/issues ↗ (opens angela4congress.com/issues at this heading)
Bold investment in climate response and resilience to protect communities and build a sustainable future.
Environmental justice can't wait, especially in CA-34, where Boyle Heights carries a pollution burden far above the county average. Angela is fighting for a community-driven Green New Deal, a climate emergency declaration, and holding Big Oil financially accountable for the damage it's caused.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · angela4congress.com/issues
The climate crisis is a daily reality in CA-34. From polluted air and toxic runoff to the urban heat island effect, working-class and immigrant communities across our district are disproportionately impacted by environmental harm — the result of decades of environmental racism, underinvestment, and corporate influence on policy. Boyle Heights alone carries a pollution burden about 63% above the county average.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · angela4congress.com/issues/climate-action
Heading as listed on angela4congress.com/issues ↗ (opens angela4congress.com/issues at this heading)
Redirect resources from endless wars to investing in working families at home.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · angela4congress.com/issues
Heading as listed on angela4congress.com/issues ↗ (opens angela4congress.com/issues at this heading)
Democracy should answer to voters, not donors. Angela refuses corporate PAC and Super PAC money, and she's fighting to abolish Super PACs, overturn Citizens United, and ban utilities and major government contractors from bankrolling the campaigns of the officials who oversee their contracts.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · angela4congress.com/issues
Democracy should answer to voters, not donors.
Super PACs poured $2.6 billion into the 2024 elections, and twice as much of that money was used to attack Democratic candidates as Republican ones. Angela's campaign is powered by everyday Angelenos — not AIPAC, crypto, or Big Tech. In Congress, she'll fight to end the era of billionaires buying elections.
- Support legislation to abolish Super PACs by capping their donations at $5,000, the same limit as regular PACs
- Refuse corporate PAC and Super PAC money
- Push for a binding, enforceable ethics code for elected officials and the courts
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · angela4congress.com/issues/get-money-out-of-politics
Heading as listed on angela4congress.com/issues ↗ (opens angela4congress.com/issues at this heading)
Everyone deserves a safe, stable, affordable place to call home. Angela grew up in Section 8 housing after her father was deported, and she's fighting for a federal housing system built on vouchers as a guarantee, community land trusts, and permanently affordable housing, not speculation and profit.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · angela4congress.com/issues
Everyone deserves a safe, stable, and affordable place to call home. Yet millions of people across the country are living paycheck to paycheck, struggling to keep up with rising rents, or experiencing homelessness entirely. In CA-34, we see this crisis firsthand — from families forced to live in their cars to seniors being priced out of their longtime neighborhoods.
To tackle this crisis head-on, Angela is fighting for a federal housing system that prioritizes people, not profit. That means moving away from short-term fixes and investing in long-term solutions that treat housing as a human right. Angela grew up in Section 8 housing after her father was deported, and she knows what it takes to fight for a home in this city.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · angela4congress.com/issues/issue-1
Heading as listed on angela4congress.com/issues ↗ (opens angela4congress.com/issues at this heading)
Working families in CA-34 are doing everything right and still falling behind. Angela is fighting for a Guaranteed Basic Income pilot, the right to unionize for gig workers, and real paid leave and childcare support, so economic dignity isn't a privilege.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · angela4congress.com/issues
In CA-34, working families are doing everything right — working long hours, juggling multiple jobs, and still struggling to make ends meet. That's because our economy is not built to support the people who power it. Wages have stagnated while housing, food, and childcare costs have soared. Corporate profits continue to rise, but working families are left behind.
Angela believes that economic dignity means more than just having a job — it means being able to support your family, take time off when you're sick, afford childcare, and build a secure future.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · angela4congress.com/issues/issue-2
Heading as listed on angela4congress.com/issues ↗ (opens angela4congress.com/issues at this heading)
Healthcare is a human right, not a privilege. Angela will co-sponsor Medicare for All, cancel medical debt, break up the healthcare monopolies driving up costs, and invest in local clinics and mental health care that serve everyone, regardless of status or income.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · angela4congress.com/issues
Healthcare is a human right — not a privilege reserved for the wealthy or well-connected. In CA-34, too many people are forced to skip doctor visits, ration prescriptions, or avoid care altogether because they simply can't afford it. Angela is fighting for a healthcare system that works for everyone — no premiums, no copays, no exclusions based on income, immigration status, or employment.
- CA-34's uninsured rate is 15.6%, well above the national average of 9.8%
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · angela4congress.com/issues/your-issue-title-here
Heading as listed on angela4congress.com/issues ↗ (opens angela4congress.com/issues at this heading)
Too many CA-34 students are held back by underfunded schools and crushing debt. Angela is fighting to fully fund early childhood and special education, cancel student debt, make public college tuition-free, and open higher education as a path to rehabilitation, not just punishment.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · angela4congress.com/issues
In CA-34, too many young people are being denied the future they deserve because of systemic disparities in our education system. Underfunded schools, overcrowded classrooms, and the crushing burden of student debt disproportionately impact working-class families, students of color, and those with disabilities or justice system involvement.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · angela4congress.com/issues/education-youth-empowerment
Heading as listed on angela4congress.com/issues ↗ (opens angela4congress.com/issues at this heading)
Angela is the daughter of a deportee, born before ICE existed. She'll fight to abolish ICE, win a pathway to citizenship, protect schools and workplaces from enforcement actions, and build an immigration system based on dignity, not fear.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · angela4congress.com/issues
CA-34 is home to one of the largest immigrant populations in the country — and our district's strength is rooted in the diversity, resilience, and contributions of immigrant families. Angela is the daughter of a deportee, born before ICE existed, and she has seen what family separation does to a household.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · angela4congress.com/issues/immigration-reform-community-advocacy
Heading as listed on angela4congress.com/issues ↗ (opens angela4congress.com/issues at this heading)
FEC filings, Apr 1, 2025 to Oct 14, 2026 · Official FEC bulk data · committee C00901652
79¢ of every dollar raised has been spent across 7 reports ($404.9K of $509.8K). Cash on hand went from $67K on Sep 30, 2025 to $104.8K on Oct 14, 2026.
| Report | Raised in the period | Spent in the period | Cash on hand at its close |
|---|---|---|---|
| OCTOBER QUARTERLY 2025 through Sep 30, 2025 | $76,335 | $9,371 | $66,964 |
| YEAR-END 2025 through Dec 31, 2025 | $54,858 | $97,561 | $24,261 |
| APRIL QUARTERLY 2026 through Mar 31, 2026 | $34,710 | $37,969 | $21,001 |
| PRE-PRIMARY 2026 through May 13, 2026 | $29,181 | $12,959 | $37,223 |
| JULY QUARTERLY 2026 through Jun 30, 2026 | $33,641 | $26,794 | $44,070 |
| OCTOBER QUARTERLY 2026 through Sep 30, 2026 | $221,230 | $117,883 | $147,416 |
| PRE-GENERAL 2026 through Oct 14, 2026 | $59,798 | $102,396 | $104,818 |
Each report’s own period, as filed with the FEC; a report filed again counts once, as its latest copy.
17 endorsers listed on Angela Gonzales-Torres’ own campaign site: 4 officials, 13 people.
This is the campaign's claim, checked by an editor against its page; the endorsers have not confirmed it to us. Each name opens the campaign’s page with that name highlighted.
*LA City Controller
*Former New York Congressman
*Former Mayor of Burbank
CA State Senator
*Board member, Korean-American Dem. Committee
*Founder, Leaders We Deserve & March for Our Lives
*Former Candidate Lt Governor of California
*Former Congressional Candidate CA-11
Congressional Candidate MI-13
*Former LA Mayoral Candidate
*President, East Area Progressive Democrats
President Korean American Democratic Committee
Advanced · 36,708 votes (31%) · 2 of 6 · Full results ↗
Election not held yet · Full results ↗
Every contest for this seat that named this candidate, most recent last; a result is shown once the race is called. Election dates and results from civicAPI (civicapi.org). civicAPI aggregates results from Secretaries of State and equivalent election bodies, and makes its own race calls. civicapi.org ↗
Latest poll · USC Democracy and Fair Elections Lab, Oct 24, 2026 · too few nonpartisan polls for a lead
A poll is a snapshot, not a forecast.
Official FEC filing record for the current cycle. The priorities they publish are quoted from their own site, in their order.
Statements are quoted from these pages exactly. Headings, order and wording are the campaign’s; the record marking is ours.
A donor who gave several times appears once. The 12 largest donors by total given are listed. In all, 277 itemized contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $111.3K.
The 3 largest committees by total given are listed. In all, 3 committee contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $13K. Counted from the givers' own filings, which can run above the total the campaign itself reports.
Total reported receipts $509,752
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. Open a source marked + to see who gave. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
72% of the money placed by state came from inside California: $79.8K of $111.3K.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 217 contributions · 72% | $79,803 |
| 4 contributions · 5.5% | $6,083 |
| 8 contributions · 5.3% | $5,850 |
| 10 contributions · 3.9% | $4,345 |
| 3 contributions · 3.1% | $3,500 |
| 1 contribution · 2.7% | $3,000 |
| 3 contributions · 2.5% | $2,750 |
| 6 contributions · 1% | $1,070 |
By the state each donor wrote on the filing, across 18 states and territories. Donors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized, so they cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
| Employer as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an employer · 124 contributions · 50% of ranked | $55,924 |
| Written instead of an employer · 28 contributions · 13% of ranked | $14,658 |
| 2 contributions · 6.3% of ranked | $7,000 |
| 2 contributions · 6.3% of ranked | $7,000 |
| 2 contributions · 3.2% of ranked | $3,583 |
| 1 contribution · 3.1% of ranked | $3,500 |
| 1 contribution · 2.2% of ranked | $2,500 |
| 1 contribution · 1.3% of ranked | $1,500 |
A further $100 came from donors whose answer names no employer (blank), so it is not ranked. Itemized gifts over $200, grouped by the words donors filed: not an industry classification, and a gift from an employee is not a gift from the employer. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($254,283) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
Money groups spent on their own, not through a campaign. Each ad is filed against the candidate it names, so money attacking an opponent shows on the opponent’s row. Open a candidate to see who spent it.
The campaign also refunded $2,012 in contributions, which the categories below do not include.
Total itemized disbursements $285,148
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
All 340 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
15 payments were reported as a lump sum, such as a card or payroll bill, with the detail filed underneath as memo entries. Those entries, $30,889 in all, are counted under the payee and purpose they name rather than under the processor that was paid. The total is the same either way.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 22 payments · 17% of all spending | $68,957 |
| 9 payments · 14% of all spending | $57,998 |
| 51 payments · 11% of all spending | $43,940 |
| 11 payments · 7.3% of all spending | $29,361 |
| 4 payments · 2.8% of all spending | $11,375 |
| 54 payments · 2.6% of all spending | $10,726 |
| 4 payments · 2.2% of all spending | $8,800 |
| 7 payments · 1.3% of all spending | $5,190 |
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.
| Occupation as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an occupation · 67 contributions · 31% of ranked | $34,552 |
| Written instead of an occupation · 57 contributions · 19% of ranked | $21,372 |
| 2 contributions · 6.3% of ranked | $7,000 |
| 2 contributions · 6.3% of ranked | $7,000 |
| 19 contributions · 4.4% of ranked | $4,842 |
| 1 contribution · 3.1% of ranked | $3,500 |
| 1 contribution · 3.1% of ranked | $3,500 |
| 1 contribution · 3% of ranked | $3,333 |
A further $100 came from donors whose answer names no occupation (blank), so it is not ranked. Itemized gifts over $200, grouped by the words donors filed: not an industry classification, and a gift from an employee is not a gift from the employer. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($254,283) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.