Loading this committee’s profile from its FEC filings.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Loading this committee’s profile from its FEC filings.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
PACs › PAC (nonqualified) › 2025–2026
PAC (nonqualified)Trade associationWashington, District of ColumbiaActive
Connected organization: Chamber of Digital Commerce
FEC filings through Sep 30, 2026 · FEC bulk filing data · committee C00567412 · files quarterly
No published list of positions
Each part reads different filings, so counts and totals can differ.
Direct PAC contributions and independent expenditures explicitly reported as support, by the party of the candidate they went to.
| Party of the candidate | Candidates | Direct | Independent | Amount | Share |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democratic | 3 | $5,000 | $0 | $5,000 | 53% |
| Republican | 3 | $4,500 | $0 | $4,500 | 47% |
| Shown support | 6 | $9,500 | $0 | $9,500 | 100% |
Contributions are reported money, not endorsements; a PAC giving to both parties is common.
Every contribution on line 23 of the committee’s own Schedule B, which is the filing its summary totals are built from. That line covers federal candidates, party committees and other political committees alike, so a super PAC funding other super PACs appears here rather than under candidate giving.
| Recipient | Count | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| Democratic candidates | 3 | $5K · 21% |
| Republican candidates | 3 | $4.5K · 19% |
| Other PACs and committees | 5 | $14.5K · 60% |
| All recipients | 11 | $24K |
| State | Candidates | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| Wisconsin | 1 | $2.5K |
| Florida | 1 | $2.5K |
| Alabama | 1 | $1.5K |
| Nebraska | 1 | $1K |
| New York | 1 | $1K |
| Ohio | 1 | $1K |
Bars drawn to $5.5K, the largest gift total here. 2025–2026 filings.
Candidate contribution rows come from candidate committee Schedule A filings, the same rows the party chart above counts.
Money moving between this committee and other committees, matched on FEC committee ID rather than the name each filing was typed under. Both sides exclude memo entries. The figures here count each committee once, from the itemized transfers read for this section, so they will not match the payment counts under Who this PAC gave to.
Committees that reported giving to this one on their own Schedule A filings, grouped by the giver’s committee ID.
No committee-to-committee receipts were itemized this cycle.
Disbursements this committee itemized to another committee: candidate contributions, party transfers and payments alike, not contributions only.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| PAC (nonqualified) · 2 payments | $5.5K |
| PAC (nonqualified) · 1 payment | $5K |
| PAC (nonqualified) · 1 payment | $3K |
| House campaign committee · Connected to STEIL VICTORY FUND · 1 payment | $2.5K |
| House campaign committee · 1 payment |
Each as the committee named it on this line.
Total reported receipts $37,907
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. Open a source marked + to see who gave. FEC filings through Sep 30, 2026.
Total reported disbursements $35,181
Every dollar this committee reported spending this cycle, split by the lines it reports against. Open a line to see who was actually paid on it. FEC filings through Sep 30, 2026.
$35.2K spent from Jan 2025 to Sep 2026. Most in one report: $13.7K, Jul 1 – Dec 31, 2025.
The running total of what the committee’s FEC reports say it spent, independent expenditures included, with a point at the end of each report. The line is straight between reports because a report gives one total for its whole period.
Besides giving through its PAC, The Digital Chamber pays lobbyists to press Congress and federal agencies. Each quarter it, or a firm it hires, files a public report under the Lobbying Disclosure Act saying which topics it worked on, what it spent, and whom it contacted. This is what those reports say.
Each report files its work under official topics. The bar shows how often each topic came up across the reports; open one to read what was filed under it. Naming a bill says the organization lobbied on it, not which side it took.
The organization’s own reports give its total lobbying costs, including any firms it hired; each firm reports what this client paid it.
Matched by name: these reports are filed for “THE DIGITAL CHAMBER (FORMERLY KNOWN AS CHAMBER OF DIGITAL COMMERCE)”, found by searching “CHAMBER OF DIGITAL COMMERCE”. Lobbying and FEC records share no ID, so an organization that lobbies under another name is missed. Source: LDA.gov, accessed Oct 27, 2026. Senate Office of Public Records cannot vouch for the data or analyses derived from these data after the data have been retrieved from LDA.gov.
Chamber of Digital Commerce PAC is registered with the Federal Election Commission as a PAC (nonqualified). Its FEC record names Chamber of Digital Commerce as an affiliate. Official FEC summary: Federal Election Commission committee record.
No pages quoted
No approved organization identity yet
| $2.5K |
| House campaign committee · Connected to CLYBURN CLEAVER FIGURES VICTORY FUND · 2 payments | $1.5K |
| House campaign committee · Connected to MIKE FLOOD VICTORY FUND · 1 payment | $1K |
| House campaign committee · 1 payment | $1K |
| House campaign committee · Connected to CAREY VICTORY FUND · 1 payment | $1K |
| PAC (nonqualified) · 1 payment | $500 |
| PAC (qualified) · Connected to DEFEND DEMOCRACY NOW PAC · 1 payment | $500 |
$24K across 12 recipient committees, or 68% of everything this committee reports spending. The largest 11 are shown.
Built from FEC Schedule A and Schedule B filings for the selected cycle. A committee only appears here if the money was itemized under its FEC committee ID.
Total itemized disbursements $24,480
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Sep 30, 2026.
All 17 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 2 payments · 16% of all spending | $5,500 |
| 1 payment · 14% of all spending | $5,000 |
| 1 payment · 8.5% of all spending | $3,000 |
| 1 payment · 7.1% of all spending | $2,500 |
| 1 payment · 7.1% of all spending | $2,500 |
| 2 payments · 4.3% of all spending | $1,500 |
| 1 payment · 2.8% of all spending | $1,000 |
| 1 payment · 2.8% of all spending | $1,000 |
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.