Loading this committee’s profile from its FEC filings.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Loading this committee’s profile from its FEC filings.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
PACs › Party committee (qualified) › 2025–2026
Party committee (qualified)Albany, New YorkActive
Connected organization: Republican National Committee
The Republican National Committee (RNC) is the primary committee of the Republican Party of the United States. Its members are chosen by the state delegations at the national convention every four years. It is responsible for developing and promoting the Republican brand and political platform, as well as assisting in fundraising and election strategy. It does not have direct authority over elected officials. It is also responsible for organizing and running the Republican National Convention. When a Republican is president, the White House controls the committee. According to Boris Heersink, "political scientists have traditionally described the parties' national committees as inconsequential but impartial service providers." Similar committees exist in every U.S. state and most U.S. counties, although in some states party organization is structured by congressional district, allied campaign organizations being governed by a national committee. Joe Gruters is the current committee chairman. The Democratic Party's counterpart to the RNC is the Democratic National Committee. (Linked public record: Wikipedia organization profile)
FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026 · FEC bulk filing data · committee C00055582 · files monthly
“The New York Republican Party is the party of taxpayers and commonsense. We are fighting to stop the tide of outmigration and end New York’s status as the highest taxed, least business friendly state in the nation. We believe in a limited government that is effective and efficient. We believe in the rule of law and stand proudly for our flag and our brave men and women in uniform. We believe in creating more school choice and parent’s rights. We believe that through smart Republican policies of lower taxes and less onerous regulations, we can unleash New York’s economy and create prosperity for generations of New Yorkers.”
NY Republican Federal Campaign Committee, on its own site, nygop.org
Quoted from the committee's site, or its sponsor's or funder's where its own says nothing. The statement is filed under topics from a fixed list, chosen by AI models when two of three agree; which side it takes is in its own words.
3 priorities from the committee’s own site, in the order they are listed there. Every heading and the text under it is copied exactly, as one passage for each page it is from, and links to that place on the page; hover a source to see which passage it opens.
Mamdani’s proposals read like a socialist wish list ↗ (opens nygop.org/fight-zohran at this heading)
reckless, unrealistic and devastating for New York.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · nygop.org/fight-zohran
Heading as listed on nygop.org/fight-zohran ↗ (opens nygop.org/fight-zohran at this heading) · “Say No to Extremism. Say Yes to a Safer, Saner New York.” on nygop.org/fight-zohran ↗ (opens nygop.org/fight-zohran at this heading)
$30/hour minimum wage by 2030 — a job-killing mandate.
Wealth tax: 2% flat tax every year on the top 1% – chasing more jobs out of New York.
Corporate tax hike: From 7.25% to 11.5%.
Rent freezes that would cripple housing supply.
City-owned grocery stores – replacing private industry with government-run shops.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · nygop.org/fight-zohran
Heading as listed on nygop.org/fight-zohran ↗ (opens nygop.org/fight-zohran at this heading)
Vocal supporter of the BDS Movement.
Sponsored the “Not On Our Dime Act” to punish charities supporting Israel — an assault on Jewish communities across New York.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · nygop.org/fight-zohran
Heading as listed on nygop.org/fight-zohran ↗ (opens nygop.org/fight-zohran at this heading)
Replace police with a “Department of Community Safety” to handle mental health calls.
Wants to keep the NYPD weak and neutered.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · nygop.org/fight-zohran
Heading as listed on nygop.org/fight-zohran ↗ (opens nygop.org/fight-zohran at this heading)
Ban ICE from City facilities.
Expand legal defense for illegal immigrants—paid for by you.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · nygop.org/fight-zohran
Heading as listed on nygop.org/fight-zohran ↗ (opens nygop.org/fight-zohran at this heading)
Free bus service across the city.
“Baby baskets” and taxpayer-funded childcare through age five.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · nygop.org/fight-zohran
Heading as listed on nygop.org/fight-zohran ↗ (opens nygop.org/fight-zohran at this heading)
Heading as listed on nygop.org/fight-zohran ↗ (opens nygop.org/fight-zohran at this heading)
The NYS Education Department’s proposed rule on school athletic activities is unfair to women. It changes the current policy prohibiting biological males from playing on women’s and girls’ teams to allowing biological males to play on teams based on gender preference.
This rule also states that regardless of chosen gender, boys can play on girls’ teams if the school does not offer a boys’ team in a selected sport.
This does not ‘follow the science.’ Biological males have physical advantages over females and pharmacologic interventions will not change that. They also have a better chance of making a team and taking a woman’s place competing for the same spot.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · nygop.org/protect-womens-sports
Each part reads different filings, so counts and totals can differ.
Direct PAC contributions and independent expenditures explicitly reported as support, by the party of the candidate they went to.
| Party of the candidate | Candidates | Direct | Independent | Amount | Share |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 2 | $12,500 | $0 | $12,500 | 56% |
| Other or unresolved | 1 | $10,000 | $0 | $10,000 | 44% |
| Shown support | 3 | $22,500 | $0 | $22,500 | 100% |
Contributions are reported money, not endorsements; a PAC giving to both parties is common.
Every contribution on line 23 of the committee’s own Schedule B, which is the filing its summary totals are built from. That line covers federal candidates, party committees and other political committees alike, so a super PAC funding other super PACs appears here rather than under candidate giving.
| Recipient | Count | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| Republican candidates | 2 | $12.5K · 45% |
| Other or unresolved candidates | 1 | $10K · 36% |
| Other PACs and committees | 1 | $5K · 18% |
| All recipients | 4 | $27.5K |
| State | Candidates | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| New York | 3 | $22.5K |
Bars drawn to $10K, the largest gift total here. 2025–2026 filings.
Candidate contribution rows come from candidate committee Schedule A filings, the same rows the party chart above counts.
Money moving between this committee and other committees, matched on FEC committee ID rather than the name each filing was typed under. Both sides exclude memo entries. The figures here count each committee once, from the itemized transfers read for this section, so they will not match the payment counts under Who this PAC gave to.
Committees that reported giving to this one on their own Schedule A filings, grouped by the giver’s committee ID.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| House campaign committee · 1 payment |
A donor who gave several times appears once. The 12 largest donors by total given are listed. In all, 1,131 itemized contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $1.4M. FEC contributor lists are public records and cannot be used for commercial solicitation.
The 3 largest committees by total given are listed. Counted from the givers' own filings, which can run above the total this committee reports.
Total reported receipts $8,207,803
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. Open a source marked + to see who gave. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 1,030 contributions · 73% | $998,512 |
| 18 contributions · 6.1% | $83,832 |
| 16 contributions · 5.7% | $78,433 |
| 25 contributions · 5.7% | $78,381 |
| 5 contributions · 2.2% | $30,350 |
| 11 contributions · 2% | $27,531 |
Total reported disbursements $7,368,417
Every dollar this committee reported spending this cycle, split by the lines it reports against. Open a line to see who was actually paid on it. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
$7.4M spent from Jan 2025 to Oct 2026. Most in one report: $1.1M, Oct 1 – Oct 14, 2026.
The running total of what the committee’s FEC reports say it spent, independent expenditures included, with a point at the end of each report. The line is straight between reports because a report gives one total for its whole period.
Published by the Commission against this committee’s own FEC ID. An audit is a periodic examination that reports findings; an administrative fine is a penalty for filing a specific report late or not at all. They are separate instruments and are not combined into a score here.
2012 cycleReport released Feb 14, 2018
Source: the Commission’s audit-case and administrative-fine records, joined on this committee’s FEC ID, imported Oct 26, 2026. Enforcement matters (MURs) are published only against respondent names, with no committee identifier, so they are not shown here rather than being matched by name.
No lobbying disclosures matched
The Republican National Committee (RNC) is the primary committee of the Republican Party of the United States. Its members are chosen by the state delegations at the national convention every four years. It is responsible for developing and promoting the Republican brand and political platform, as well as assisting in fundraising and election strategy. It does not have direct authority over elected officials. It is also responsible for organizing and running the Republican National Convention. When a Republican is president, the White House controls the committee. According to Boris Heersink, "political scientists have traditionally described the parties' national committees as inconsequential but impartial service providers." Similar committees exist in every U.S. state and most U.S. counties, although in some states party organization is structured by congressional district, allied campaign organizations being governed by a national committee. Joe Gruters is the current committee chairman. The Democratic Party's counterpart to the RNC is the Democratic National Committee. Linked public record: Wikipedia organization profile.
Statements are quoted from these pages exactly. Headings, order and wording are the committee’s or its sponsor’s; the record marking is ours.
NY Republican Federal Campaign Committee is matched to organization records using the FEC committee identity, structured identifiers, and corroborated organization data.
| $640K |
| Party committee (qualified) · Connected to DEFEND OUR MAJORITY · 18 payments | $554.4K |
| PAC (nonqualified) · 11 payments | $428.8K |
| House campaign committee · Connected to GARBARINO VICTORY FUND · 1 payment | $403K |
| PAC (nonqualified) · 6 payments | $382.4K |
| Party committee (nonqualified) · 6 payments | $279K |
| PAC (nonqualified) · 6 payments | $160.4K |
| House campaign committee · Connected to TENNEY VAN DUYNE VICTORY FUND · 1 payment | $160K |
| PAC (nonqualified) · 5 payments | $144.1K |
| Party committee (nonqualified) · 4 payments | $118.4K |
| PAC (nonqualified) · 7 payments | $106K |
| PAC (nonqualified) · 5 payments | $85.1K |
$3.6M from 23 committees, counting every itemized receipt this cycle. The largest 12 are shown.
Disbursements this committee itemized to another committee: candidate contributions, party transfers and payments alike, not contributions only.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| Party committee (qualified) · Connected to COLE COMBINED COMMITTEE · 1 payment | $400K |
| Party committee (qualified) · Connected to YOUNG VICTORY COMMITTEE · 6 payments | $152K |
| Party committee (nonqualified) · 2 payments | $35K |
| Party committee (nonqualified) · 3 payments | $30K |
| Party committee (qualified) · Connected to DEFEND OUR MAJORITY · 1 payment | $27.2K |
| House campaign committee · Connected to TEAM ELISE · 2 payments | $10K |
| House campaign committee · Connected to OBERACKER VICTORY · 2 payments | $10K |
| PAC (qualified) · 1 payment | $5K |
| House campaign committee · 1 payment | $2.5K |
$671.7K across 9 recipient committees, or 9.1% of everything this committee reports spending.
Built from FEC Schedule A and Schedule B filings for the selected cycle. A committee only appears here if the money was itemized under its FEC committee ID.
| 3 contributions · 0.8% | $11,082 |
| 3 contributions · 0.8% | $10,750 |
By the state each contributor wrote on the filing. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line together, so one committee or organization transfer can account for a whole state. Contributors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized and cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
| Employer as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an employer · 435 contributions · 17% of ranked | $217,335 |
| Written instead of an employer · 111 contributions · 12% of ranked | $152,915 |
| 4 contributions · 1.6% of ranked | $21,000 |
| 2 contributions · 1.5% of ranked | $20,000 |
| 2 contributions · 1.5% of ranked | $20,000 |
| 2 contributions · 1.5% of ranked | $20,000 |
| 2 contributions · 1.5% of ranked | $20,000 |
| 2 contributions · 1.5% of ranked | $20,000 |
A further $52,649 came from donors whose answer names no employer (None, blank), so it is not ranked. Ranked from the largest 200 of 201 employer spellings filed; each share is of the money in those. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($401,805) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
| Occupation as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an occupation · 431 contributions · 17% of ranked | $224,547 |
| 42 contributions · 11% of ranked | $149,074 |
| 68 contributions · 7.8% of ranked | $103,695 |
| 21 contributions · 4.3% of ranked | $56,666 |
| Written instead of an occupation · 11 contributions · 2.5% of ranked | $32,481 |
| 11 contributions · 2.4% of ranked | $31,515 |
| 4 contributions · 2.1% of ranked | $28,300 |
| 4 contributions · 2% of ranked | $25,850 |
A further $51,399 came from donors whose answer names no occupation (None, blank), so it is not ranked. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($401,805) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
Total itemized disbursements $1,639,031
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
All 596 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
4 payments were reported as a lump sum, such as a card or payroll bill, with the detail filed underneath as memo entries. Those entries, $19,414 in all, are counted under the payee and purpose they name rather than under the processor that was paid. The total is the same either way.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 1 payment · 5.4% of all spending | $400,000 |
| 32 payments · 2.4% of all spending | $176,254 |
| 6 payments · 2.1% of all spending | $151,998 |
| 2 payments · 1.4% of all spending | $100,099 |
| 2 payments · 1.2% of all spending | $90,000 |
| 5 payments · 1.1% of all spending | $80,047 |
| 27 payments · 0.8% of all spending | $59,830 |
| 11 payments · 0.8% of all spending | $59,345 |
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.