Loading this committee’s profile from its FEC filings.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Loading this committee’s profile from its FEC filings.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
PACs › PAC (nonqualified) › 2025–2026
FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026 · FEC bulk filing data · committee C00830679 · files quarterly
“Congresswoman Elise Stefanik represents New York's 21st District and serves as Chair of House Republican Leadership. When she was first elected, Stefanik made history as the youngest woman ever elected to Congress. Stefanik served as the highest-ranking woman in Congress and is widely recognized as one of the most effective and bipartisan elected officials in America. Elise has served for over a decade on the House Armed Services Committee, the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, and the Committee on Education and the Workforce. Congresswoman Stefanik is widely recognized as one of the most effective questioners in Congressional hearings. She was featured on TIME's 100 List as one of the most influential leaders in the world and is frequently named on the Most Powerful Women in Washington List by Washingtonian magazine. She is a graduate of Harvard College.”
Team Elise, on its own site, elisestefanik.com
Quoted from the committee's site, or its sponsor's or funder's where its own says nothing. The statement is filed under topics from a fixed list, chosen by AI models when two of three agree; which side it takes is in its own words.
No published list of positions
Each part reads different filings, so counts and totals can differ.
Direct PAC contributions and independent expenditures explicitly reported as support, by the party of the candidate they went to.
Contributions are reported money, not endorsements; a PAC giving to both parties is common.
Every contribution on line 23 of the committee’s own Schedule B, which is the filing its summary totals are built from. That line covers federal candidates, party committees and other political committees alike, so a super PAC funding other super PACs appears here rather than under candidate giving.
| Recipient | Count | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| Other or unresolved candidates | 1 | $1 · <0.1% |
| Republican party committees | 1 | $1 · <0.1% |
| Other PACs and committees | 1 | $164.3K · 99.9% |
| All recipients | 3 | $164.3K |
| State | Candidates | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| New York | 1 | $1 |
Bars drawn to $164.3K, the largest gift total here. 2025–2026 filings.
Candidate contribution rows come from candidate committee Schedule A filings, the same rows the party chart above counts.
Money moving between this committee and other committees, matched on FEC committee ID rather than the name each filing was typed under. Both sides exclude memo entries. The figures here count each committee once, from the itemized transfers read for this section, so they will not match the payment counts under Who this PAC gave to.
Committees that reported giving to this one on their own Schedule A filings, grouped by the giver’s committee ID.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| PAC (qualified) · 1 payment | $10K |
| PAC (qualified) · Connected to TEAM HAGERTY VICTORY · 1 payment | $10K |
| PAC (nonqualified) · Connected to MEUSER · 1 payment | $2.5K |
$22.5K from 3 committees, counting every itemized receipt this cycle.
A donor who gave several times appears once. The 12 largest donors by total given are listed. In all, 76,859 itemized contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $2.2M. FEC contributor lists are public records and cannot be used for commercial solicitation.
The 3 largest committees by total given are listed. Counted from the givers' own filings, which can run above the total this committee reports.
Total reported receipts $4,636,847
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. Open a source marked + to see who gave. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 5,461 contributions · 13% | $294,433 |
| 8,068 contributions · 13% |
Total reported disbursements $4,611,878
Every dollar this committee reported spending this cycle, split by the lines it reports against. Open a line to see who was actually paid on it. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
$4.6M spent from Jan 2025 to Oct 2026. Most in one report: $1.2M, Apr 1 – Jun 30, 2025.
The running total of what the committee’s FEC reports say it spent, independent expenditures included, with a point at the end of each report. The line is straight between reports because a report gives one total for its whole period.
No lobbying disclosures matched
Team Elise is registered with the Federal Election Commission as a PAC (nonqualified). It is a joint fundraiser. Official FEC summary: Federal Election Commission committee record.
Statements are quoted from these pages exactly. Headings, order and wording are the committee’s or its sponsor’s; the record marking is ours.
Team Elise is matched to organization records using the FEC committee identity, structured identifiers, and corroborated organization data.
LittleSis data is shared under CC BY-SA 4.0.
Disbursements this committee itemized to another committee: candidate contributions, party transfers and payments alike, not contributions only.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| House campaign committee · Connected to TEAM ELISE · 17 payments | $1.5M |
| PAC (qualified) · Connected to STEFANIK · 9 payments | $832.9K |
| Party committee (qualified) · Connected to REPUBLICAN NATIONAL COMMITTEE · 5 payments | $144.1K |
$2.5M across 3 recipient committees, or 54% of everything this committee reports spending.
Built from FEC Schedule A and Schedule B filings for the selected cycle. A committee only appears here if the money was itemized under its FEC committee ID.
| $288,109 |
| 6,916 contributions · 11% | $236,538 |
| 9,163 contributions · 10% | $229,738 |
| 2,827 contributions · 3.7% | $81,781 |
| 2,539 contributions · 3.3% | $72,265 |
| 2,121 contributions · 2.8% | $61,961 |
| 2,452 contributions · 2.6% | $56,981 |
By the state each contributor wrote on the filing. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line together, so one committee or organization transfer can account for a whole state. Contributors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized and cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
| Employer as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an employer · 64,866 contributions · 77% of ranked | $1,597,214 |
| Written instead of an employer · 2,677 contributions · 6.8% of ranked | $141,167 |
| 3 contributions · 0.6% of ranked | $12,075 |
| 1 contribution · 0.6% of ranked | $12,000 |
| 18 contributions · 0.5% of ranked | $9,360 |
| Written instead of an employer · 91 contributions · 0.4% of ranked | $8,998 |
| 272 contributions · 0.4% of ranked | $8,590 |
| 333 contributions · 0.3% of ranked | $6,624 |
A further $19,436 came from donors whose answer names no employer (N/A, None, blank), so it is not ranked. Ranked from the largest 200 of 201 employer spellings filed; each share is of the money in those. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($2,218,507) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
| Occupation as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an occupation · 65,102 contributions · 75% of ranked | $1,601,951 |
| 280 contributions · 1.6% of ranked | $33,697 |
| 253 contributions · 1.4% of ranked | $30,176 |
| 241 contributions · 0.9% of ranked | $19,488 |
| 212 contributions · 0.8% of ranked | $16,067 |
| 31 contributions · 0.7% of ranked | $15,489 |
| 135 contributions · 0.7% of ranked | $15,342 |
| 235 contributions · 0.7% of ranked | $14,840 |
A further $12,264 came from donors whose answer names no occupation (None, blank), so it is not ranked. Ranked from the largest 200 of 201 occupation spellings filed; each share is of the money in those. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($2,218,507) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
Total itemized disbursements $4,434,237
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
All 208 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 17 payments · 33% of all spending | $1,528,032 |
| 84 payments · 32% of all spending | $1,484,004 |
| 9 payments · 18% of all spending | $832,932 |
| 5 payments · 3.1% of all spending | $144,082 |
| 18 payments · 2.9% of all spending | $135,000 |
| 16 payments · 2.6% of all spending | $121,874 |
| 12 payments · 1.4% of all spending | $65,441 |
| 18 payments · 1.1% of all spending | $52,918 |
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.