Loading this committee’s profile from its FEC filings.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Loading this committee’s profile from its FEC filings.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
PACs › PAC (nonqualified) › 2025–2026
FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026 · FEC bulk filing data · committee C00837492 · files quarterly
“In 2022, New York delivered the House Majority and became the nation’s top battleground for control of the House of Representatives. In order to Save America, we need your help to Save New York!”
House GOP Battleground Fund, on its own site, gopbattlegroundfund.com
Quoted from the committee's site, or its sponsor's or funder's where its own says nothing. The statement is filed under topics from a fixed list, chosen by AI models when two of three agree; which side it takes is in its own words.
5 priorities from the committee’s own site, in the order they are listed there. Every heading and the text under it is copied exactly, as one passage for each page it is from, and links to that place on the page; hover a source to see which passage it opens.
Flip NY-18 from Blue to Red to expand our house majority.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · gopbattlegroundfund.com/home-2
Hold all republican held New York seats.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · gopbattlegroundfund.com/home-2
Build out campaign field programs and fund offices for NY Republican candidates.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · gopbattlegroundfund.com/home-2
Focus on early voting, legal ballot harvesting, and educating voters on casting their vote via absentee ballot.
New York delivered the House Majority in 2022 and it will be the nation’s top battleground for control of the House in 2024.
Your support is critical to helping us save New York and save America.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · gopbattlegroundfund.com/home-2
Liberal Elites have pledged $45 million from their dark money Super PAC to defeat Republicans in New York.
We must stop the Far Left Deomcrats from controlling the House of Representatives and destroying our great Republic.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · gopbattlegroundfund.com/home-2
Each part reads different filings, so counts and totals can differ.
Direct PAC contributions and independent expenditures explicitly reported as support, by the party of the candidate they went to.
No candidate-directed contributions or explicitly supportive independent expenditures were returned.
Contributions are reported money, not endorsements; a PAC giving to both parties is common.
Every contribution on line 23 of the committee’s own Schedule B, which is the filing its summary totals are built from. That line covers federal candidates, party committees and other political committees alike, so a super PAC funding other super PACs appears here rather than under candidate giving.
No contributions itemized
Nothing loaded
Candidate contribution rows come from candidate committee Schedule A filings, the same rows the party chart above counts.
Money moving between this committee and other committees, matched on FEC committee ID rather than the name each filing was typed under. Both sides exclude memo entries. The figures here count each committee once, from the itemized transfers read for this section, so they will not match the payment counts under Who this PAC gave to.
Committees that reported giving to this one on their own Schedule A filings, grouped by the giver’s committee ID.
No committee-to-committee receipts were itemized this cycle.
Disbursements this committee itemized to another committee: candidate contributions, party transfers and payments alike, not contributions only.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| Party committee (qualified) · Connected to REPUBLICAN NATIONAL COMMITTEE · 11 payments | $428.8K |
| PAC (qualified) · Connected to STEFANIK · 7 payments | $123.8K |
| House campaign committee · Connected to TEAM ELISE · 8 payments | $8.9K |
$561.5K across 3 recipient committees, or 32% of everything this committee reports spending.
Built from FEC Schedule A and Schedule B filings for the selected cycle. A committee only appears here if the money was itemized under its FEC committee ID.
A donor who gave several times appears once. The 12 largest donors by total given are listed. In all, 6,666 itemized contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $684.7K. FEC contributor lists are public records and cannot be used for commercial solicitation.
Total reported receipts $1,675,486
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. Open a source marked + to see who gave. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 902 contributions · 29% | $197,838 |
| 862 contributions · 16% | $106,346 |
Total reported disbursements $1,756,494
Every dollar this committee reported spending this cycle, split by the lines it reports against. Open a line to see who was actually paid on it. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
$1.8M spent from Jan 2025 to Oct 2026. Most in one report: $374.5K, Oct 1 – Dec 31, 2025.
The running total of what the committee’s FEC reports say it spent, independent expenditures included, with a point at the end of each report. The line is straight between reports because a report gives one total for its whole period.
No lobbying disclosures matched
House GOP Battleground Fund is registered with the Federal Election Commission as a PAC (nonqualified). It is a joint fundraiser. Official FEC summary: Federal Election Commission committee record.
Statements are quoted from these pages exactly. Headings, order and wording are the committee’s or its sponsor’s; the record marking is ours.
House GOP Battleground Fund is matched to organization records using the FEC committee identity, structured identifiers, and corroborated organization data.
LittleSis data is shared under CC BY-SA 4.0.
| 735 contributions · 9.7% |
| $66,222 |
| 701 contributions · 7.7% | $52,744 |
| 351 contributions · 4.2% | $28,993 |
| 187 contributions · 2.9% | $19,558 |
| 165 contributions · 2.5% | $17,051 |
| 250 contributions · 2.4% | $16,123 |
By the state each contributor wrote on the filing. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line together, so one committee or organization transfer can account for a whole state. Contributors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized and cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
| Employer as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an employer · 4,847 contributions · 57% of ranked | $385,123 |
| Written instead of an employer · 473 contributions · 9.1% of ranked | $62,305 |
| 2 contributions · 3.5% of ranked | $24,000 |
| 1 contribution · 1.5% of ranked | $10,000 |
| 1 contribution · 1.5% of ranked | $10,000 |
| 1 contribution · 1.5% of ranked | $10,000 |
| 9 contributions · 1.3% of ranked | $8,588 |
| 8 contributions · 1.2% of ranked | $8,000 |
A further $2,138 came from donors whose answer names no employer (None), so it is not ranked. Ranked from the largest 200 of 201 employer spellings filed; each share is of the money in those. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($846,620) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
| Occupation as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an occupation · 4,881 contributions · 56% of ranked | $380,220 |
| 64 contributions · 3.1% of ranked | $21,110 |
| 20 contributions · 2.8% of ranked | $19,208 |
| 31 contributions · 2.4% of ranked | $16,500 |
| 14 contributions · 2.2% of ranked | $14,731 |
| 80 contributions · 2.1% of ranked | $14,192 |
| 54 contributions · 1.9% of ranked | $12,947 |
| 1 contribution · 1.8% of ranked | $12,000 |
A further $285 came from donors whose answer names no occupation (None), so it is not ranked. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($846,620) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
Total itemized disbursements $1,613,749
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
All 240 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 84 payments · 33% of all spending | $583,030 |
| 11 payments · 24% of all spending | $428,824 |
| 8 payments · 7.1% of all spending | $124,521 |
| 7 payments · 7% of all spending | $123,811 |
| 19 payments · 5.8% of all spending | $101,000 |
| 6 payments · 4.1% of all spending | $71,504 |
| 18 payments · 3% of all spending | $52,970 |
| 20 payments · 2.9% of all spending | $50,412 |
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.