Loading this candidate’s profile from the FEC filings and campaign records.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Loading this candidate’s profile from the FEC filings and campaign records.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Candidates › UT-01 race › 2025–2026
R Republican nominee for U.S. House, UT-01
Has not served in Congress
4 priorities from utahriley.com, in the order they are listed there. Every heading and the text under it is copied exactly, as one passage for each page it is from, and links to that place on the page; hover a source to see which passage it opens.
Riley is an advocate for Utah families and communities. He is committed to building the economic tools that support Utahns wanting to start or grow their families. Riley is also committed to protecting our young people by building safeguards around social media and technology use.
Riley Owen is building a future that allows Utah communities to thrive.
Riley will advocate for expanded tax credits to businesses offering 6 weeks of Paid Maternity Leave.
Riley will fight for affordable housing through conditionalizing federal funding to localities implementing common-sense zoning reform.
Riley will sponsor legislation requiring age verification for social media use for ages 16+.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · utahriley.com/issues
Heading as listed on utahriley.com/issues ↗ (opens utahriley.com/issues at this heading)
Riley believes that elected officials should serve the people, not themselves. There should be greater accountability for elected officials and a system that leads to a more representative government. Washington needs fresh faces, new ideas, and innovative approaches, not more career politicians.
Riley Owen is building a system that supports ethical and fair governance.
Riley will sponsor legislation to end congressional stock trading for members and staffers.
Riley will fight for a constitutional amendment to eliminate political corruption by overturning Citizens United AND establishing term limits of 6 for representatives and 3 for senators.
Riley will fix our broken immigration system by maintaining the rule of law while enabling our communities to prosper socially and economically.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · utahriley.com/issues
Heading as listed on utahriley.com/issues ↗ (opens utahriley.com/issues at this heading)
Riley understands that a strong economy and a secure nation go hand in hand. Having helped manage America's industrial policy during its greatest stress test of the 21st century, Riley knows that what we build at home determines how safe we are abroad, and he will fight to ensure the next generation of Utahns can earn a living securing America's future. Riley also believes that America First does not mean America alone.
Riley Owen is building a safe economic future for all Americans.
Riley will push for modernizing our military to reduce costs and prioritize attritable, unmanned systems over expensive legacy platforms.
Riley will push to modernize government software systems, integrating AI to eliminate waste, fraud, and abuse while streamlining service delivery.
Riley will build apprenticeship partnerships between Utah colleges and advanced manufacturers.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · utahriley.com/issues
Heading as listed on utahriley.com/issues ↗ (opens utahriley.com/issues at this heading)
Riley understands that our planet is not partisan and believes we should use our natural resources while growing and protecting them for future generations to enjoy. Riley is personally invested and has firsthand experience through starting a world-class wildlife foundation leveraging cutting-edge technology to empower those who protect our critical ecosystems.
Riley Owen is building protections for a world that generations to come may enjoy.
Riley will convene local stakeholders and national agencies to save the Great Salt Lake.
Riley will fight to expand and protect Utah's ability to manage its own public lands.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · utahriley.com/issues
Heading as listed on utahriley.com/issues ↗ (opens utahriley.com/issues at this heading)
FEC filings, Jan 1, 2026 to Oct 14, 2026 · Official FEC bulk data · committee C00940411
94¢ of every dollar raised has been spent across 4 reports ($154.6K of $164.1K). Cash on hand went from $13.7K on Apr 5, 2026 to $9.5K on Oct 14, 2026.
| Report | Raised in the period | Spent in the period | Cash on hand at its close |
|---|---|---|---|
| PRE-CONVENTION 2026 through Apr 5, 2026 | $98,334 | $84,658 | $13,676 |
| JULY QUARTERLY 2026 through Jun 30, 2026 | $34,199 | $38,307 | $9,568 |
| OCTOBER QUARTERLY 2026 through Sep 30, 2026 | $17,022 | $11,460 | $15,130 |
| PRE-GENERAL 2026 through Oct 14, 2026 | $14,515 | $20,142 | $9,503 |
Each report’s own period, as filed with the FEC; a report filed again counts once, as its latest copy.
No endorsements page
Lost · 133,354 votes (40%) · 2 of 5 · Full results ↗
Every contest for this seat that named this candidate, most recent last; a result is shown once the race is called. Election dates and results from civicAPI (civicapi.org). civicAPI aggregates results from Secretaries of State and equivalent election bodies, and makes its own race calls. civicapi.org ↗
Latest poll · Lighthouse Research, Sep 10, 2026 · too few nonpartisan polls for a lead
A poll is a snapshot, not a forecast.
Official FEC filing record for the current cycle. The priorities they publish are quoted from their own site, in their order.
Statements are quoted from these pages exactly. Headings, order and wording are the campaign’s; the record marking is ours.
A donor who gave several times appears once. The 12 largest donors by total given are listed. In all, 51 itemized contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $102.3K.
The 3 largest committees by total given are listed. In all, 6 committee contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $9.5K. Counted from the givers' own filings, which can run above the total the campaign itself reports.
Total reported receipts $164,070
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. Open a source marked + to see who gave. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
47% of the money placed by state came from inside Utah: $48K of $102.3K.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 30 contributions · 47% | $48,000 |
| 11 contributions · 35% | $36,249 |
| 2 contributions · 14% | $14,000 |
| 1 contribution · 2% | $2,000 |
| 1 contribution · 0.5% | $500 |
| 2 contributions · 0.5% | $500 |
| 1 contribution · 0.3% | $300 |
| 1 contribution · 0.2% | $250 |
By the state each donor wrote on the filing, across 10 states and territories. Donors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized, so they cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
| Employer as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| 1 contribution · 15% of ranked | $10,500 |
| 1 contribution · 15% of ranked | $10,500 |
| 1 contribution · 9.9% of ranked | $7,000 |
| 1 contribution · 9.9% of ranked | $7,000 |
| Written instead of an employer · 2 contributions · 8.4% of ranked | $6,000 |
| 2 contributions · 7% of ranked | $5,000 |
| Written instead of an employer · 8 contributions · 5.9% of ranked | $4,200 |
| 1 contribution · 4.9% of ranked | $3,500 |
A further $31,250 came from donors whose answer names no employer (N/A, blank), so it is not ranked. Itemized gifts over $200, grouped by the words donors filed: not an industry classification, and a gift from an employee is not a gift from the employer. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($6,696) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
Money groups spent on their own, not through a campaign. Each ad is filed against the candidate it names, so money attacking an opponent shows on the opponent’s row. Open a candidate to see who spent it.
The campaign also refunded $7,050 in contributions, which the categories below do not include.
Total itemized disbursements $101,946
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
All 56 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
2 payments were reported as a lump sum, such as a card or payroll bill, with the detail filed underneath as memo entries. Those entries, $8,635 in all, are counted under the payee and purpose they name rather than under the processor that was paid. The total is the same either way.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 2 payments · 54% of all spending | $84,000 |
| 2 payments · 5.9% of all spending | $9,134 |
| 2 payments · 3.2% of all spending | $4,974 |
| 1 payment · 0.9% of all spending | $1,375 |
| 42 payments · 0.9% of all spending | $1,353 |
| 2 payments · 0.7% of all spending | $1,110 |
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.
| Occupation as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| 1 contribution · 15% of ranked | $10,500 |
| 1 contribution · 15% of ranked | $10,500 |
| Written instead of an occupation · 3 contributions · 10% of ranked | $7,000 |
| 1 contribution · 10% of ranked | $7,000 |
| 1 contribution · 10% of ranked | $7,000 |
| 5 contributions · 8.1% of ranked | $5,600 |
| 1 contribution · 5.1% of ranked | $3,500 |
| 1 contribution · 3.6% of ranked | $2,500 |
A further $33,000 came from donors whose answer names no occupation (N/A, blank), so it is not ranked. Itemized gifts over $200, grouped by the words donors filed: not an industry classification, and a gift from an employee is not a gift from the employer. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($6,696) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.