Loading this candidate’s profile from the FEC filings and campaign records.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Loading this candidate’s profile from the FEC filings and campaign records.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Candidates › PA-14 race › 2025–2026
D Democratic nominee for U.S. House, PA-14
Has not served in Congress
8 priorities from bradstockforcongress.com, in the order they are listed there. Every heading and the text under it is copied exactly, as one passage for each page it is from, and links to that place on the page; hover a source to see which passage it opens.
Raising wages, supporting small businesses, and standing up for working families across the 14th District.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · bradstockforcongress.com
We must create an economy that works for everyone, not just the wealthy and well-connected. Too many Americans are working harder than ever yet still struggle to afford housing, healthcare, childcare, and education. I call for policies that raise wages, strengthen workers’ rights, and expand opportunities for small businesses and entrepreneurs. By ensuring that economic growth benefits working families and communities across the country, my campaign seeks to close the gap between those at the top and everyone else.
A fair economy also means addressing systemic inequities and ensuring that every American has a real chance to succeed. This includes investing in job training, modern infrastructure, and education to prepare workers for the jobs of the future, while reforming the tax code so it rewards work rather than just wealth. American workers are working harder than ever and getting less and less for their effort. This is a result of a decades-long effort by corporate special interests and right-wing politicians to undermine the power and protections of workers.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · bradstockforcongress.com/issues
Heading as listed on bradstockforcongress.com ↗ (opens bradstockforcongress.com at this heading)
Making healthcare affordable and accessible for every American by lowering costs and ending medical debt.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · bradstockforcongress.com
America spends more on health care than any other nation, yet we get worse results—shorter life expectancy, higher infant and maternal mortality, more chronic disease, and millions left uninsured. Families are drowning in medical debt, premiums keep rising, and too many people live with the fear that one job change or serious illness could take away their coverage. In the richest country on earth, no one should go bankrupt just because they got sick.
It’s time to guarantee health care as a right, not a privilege. A universal system would cover every American, lower out-of-pocket costs, and make prescriptions and emergency care affordable. By cutting waste and standing up to drug companies, we can reduce costs while keeping people healthier. No family should ever have to choose between paying for medicine and putting food on the table. With universal health care, we’ll build stronger communities, a fairer economy, and a future where every American can live with dignity and security.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · bradstockforcongress.com/issues
Heading as listed on bradstockforcongress.com ↗ (opens bradstockforcongress.com at this heading)
Defending the Constitution and ensuring no one—no matter their position—is above accountability.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · bradstockforcongress.com
Donald Trump’s second term has made it clear: when leaders trample constitutional norms, our democracy itself is at risk. He’s pushed the limits of presidential power, attacked independent institutions, and treated the rule of law as optional. That’s not leadership—it’s abuse of power. Our Constitution was designed to prevent exactly this kind of unchecked authority, and we must act to restore the guardrails that protect our freedoms.
No American should accept a system where the powerful live by a different set of rules. Yet Trump has tried to put himself above the law, weaken checks and balances, and erode trust in our institutions. We need leaders who will defend judicial independence, enforce anti-corruption laws, and make sure accountability applies to everyone—no exceptions. This election is about protecting our democracy, safeguarding constitutional rights, and ensuring that no president—Republican or Democrat—can ever put themselves above the people.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · bradstockforcongress.com/issues
Heading as listed on bradstockforcongress.com ↗ (opens bradstockforcongress.com at this heading)
A belief that government should be led with integrity, accountability, and real-world experience—not political gamesmanship.
We need leaders who embody honesty, integrity, and accountability in public service. Voters are tired of corruption, empty promises, and partisan games that put politics above people. I pledge to raise the standard of conduct in Washington by insisting that elected officials and public servants act with transparency, keep their word, and put the nation’s interests before personal or political gain.
I will help restore competence by ensuring that government decisions are guided by expertise, evidence, and practical solutions rather than ideology or political theater. I will work to strengthen oversight and accountability mechanisms, and focus on results that improve people’s everyday lives. By pairing ethical leadership with capable governance, my campaign offers voters a vision of a government that not only does the right thing but does it well—delivering effective policies, protecting freedoms, and earning the confidence of the American people.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · bradstockforcongress.com/issues
A plan to make government work better by cutting waste, modernizing systems, and delivering results that improve people’s daily lives.
I am committed to ensuring that Washington works for the people, not against them. I saw first hand that much of the federal government is weighed down by outdated systems, bloated bureaucracy, and programs that consume taxpayer dollars without delivering meaningful results. I will work to streamline operations, cut red tape, and use modern technology to make government more transparent, accountable, and cost-effective. By doing so, it seeks to reduce waste, improve access to services, and ensure that every dollar spent serves a clear purpose in improving people’s lives.
At its core, I will work to make government effective by focusing on outcomes and measuring success by results delivered to communities. Strong oversight of federal agencies, elimination of duplication, and smart investments in infrastructure and innovation would be key components.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · bradstockforcongress.com/issues
A focus on bringing people together, lowering political division, and finding practical solutions that put communities over party.
We must return to cooperation and civility in American politics. Most citizens share common values—such as safe communities, good jobs, affordable healthcare, and quality education—even if they disagree on how to achieve them. I reject the toxic politics of division and instead will focus on building coalitions, listening to diverse perspectives, and finding practical solutions that benefit the majority of Americans. By emphasizing shared priorities, I am seeking to restore trust in government and show that progress is possible when leaders put people above party.
Reducing partisan extremism also means standing up against the forces that thrive on gridlock, outrage, and polarization. I will support reforms that encourage dialogue, accountability, and bipartisan cooperation, ensuring that Congress is a place for problem-solving rather than political theater. By promoting respectful debate and common-sense compromise, this vision aims to lower the temperature of national politics and deliver results that improve everyday lives.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · bradstockforcongress.com/issues
A plan to get money out of politics by increasing transparency, limiting dark money, and ensuring elected officials answer to voters.
We must restore government to the hands of the people rather than powerful special interests. For too long, wealthy donors and corporate lobbyists have held outsized influence over policy decisions, drowning out the voices of ordinary citizens. I call for stronger campaign finance laws, greater transparency in political donations, and limits on the power of dark money groups. By reducing the sway of big money, the goal is to ensure that elected officials answer to voters—not to the highest bidder.
In addition to campaign finance reform, I will emphasize the importance of leveling the playing field so that candidates from all backgrounds have a fair chance to compete. By tackling the corrupting influence of money in politics, my campaign seeks to rebuild public trust, make elections more competitive, and put the focus back on policies that serve communities. Ultimately, this vision empowers citizens by reaffirming that democracy should be driven by people’s voices, not by the size of a checkbook.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · bradstockforcongress.com/issues
A forward-looking approach to artificial intelligence and disinformation that protects jobs, privacy, and trust in our democracy.
I recognize both the opportunities and risks that emerging technologies and disinformation pose to American democracy. Artificial intelligence has the potential to transform industries, improve healthcare, and strengthen national security, but without thoughtful oversight it can also threaten jobs, privacy, and public trust.We need proactive policies that encourage innovation while setting responsible guardrails—protecting workers, safeguarding personal data, and ensuring AI is developed and used in ways that align with American values and human rights.
At the same time, the spread of “alternative facts” and disinformation undermines faith in institutions and weakens our ability to make informed decisions as a nation. I pledge to confront these challenges by promoting media literacy, increasing transparency in online platforms, and supporting policies that hold bad actors accountable without infringing on free speech. By tackling both AI and disinformation with forward-looking solutions, I will work to position the U.S. to meet the challenges of the 21st century while protecting democracy, strengthening trust, and empowering citizens with the truth.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · bradstockforcongress.com/issues
FEC filings, Jul 1, 2025 to Oct 14, 2026 · Official FEC bulk data · committee C00913376
82¢ of every dollar raised has been spent across 7 reports ($333.2K of $406K). Cash on hand went from $5.8K on Sep 30, 2025 to $72.8K on Oct 14, 2026.
| Report | Raised in the period | Spent in the period | Cash on hand at its close |
|---|---|---|---|
| OCTOBER QUARTERLY 2025 through Sep 30, 2025 | $6,550 | $711 | $5,839 |
| YEAR-END 2025 through Dec 31, 2025 | $37,647 | $12,608 | $30,878 |
| APRIL QUARTERLY 2026 through Mar 31, 2026 | $70,984 | $54,327 | $47,535 |
| PRE-PRIMARY 2026 through Apr 29, 2026 | $14,526 | $19,977 | $42,083 |
| JULY QUARTERLY 2026 through Jun 30, 2026 | $71,714 | $79,089 | $34,707 |
| OCTOBER QUARTERLY 2026 through Sep 30, 2026 | $168,608 | $139,105 | $64,210 |
| PRE-GENERAL 2026 through Oct 14, 2026 | $35,997 | $27,371 | $72,837 |
Each report’s own period, as filed with the FEC; a report filed again counts once, as its latest copy.
No endorsements page
Advanced · 48,303 votes (100%) · 1 of 1 · Full results ↗
Election not held yet · Full results ↗
Every contest for this seat that named this candidate, most recent last; a result is shown once the race is called. Election dates and results from civicAPI (civicapi.org). civicAPI aggregates results from Secretaries of State and equivalent election bodies, and makes its own race calls. civicapi.org ↗
Official FEC filing record for the current cycle. The priorities they publish are quoted from their own site, in their order.
Statements are quoted from these pages exactly. Headings, order and wording are the campaign’s; the record marking is ours.
A donor who gave several times appears once. The 12 largest donors by total given are listed. In all, 259 itemized contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $126.8K.
The 6 largest committees by total given are listed. In all, 8 committee contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $22K. Counted from the givers' own filings, which can run above the total the campaign itself reports.
Total reported receipts $406,026
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. Open a source marked + to see who gave. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
81% of the money placed by state came from inside Pennsylvania: $102.3K of $126.8K.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 237 contributions · 81% | $102,336 |
| 4 contributions · 8% | $10,100 |
| 2 contributions · 2.8% | $3,500 |
| 4 contributions · 2.2% | $2,800 |
| 1 contribution · 2% | $2,500 |
| 2 contributions · 1.2% | $1,500 |
| 1 contribution · 0.8% | $1,000 |
| 1 contribution · 0.8% | $1,000 |
By the state each donor wrote on the filing, across 14 states and territories. Donors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized, so they cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
| Employer as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an employer · 119 contributions · 46% of ranked | $36,571 |
| Written instead of an employer · 15 contributions · 13% of ranked | $10,250 |
| 2 contributions · 4.4% of ranked | $3,500 |
| 1 contribution · 3.8% of ranked | $3,000 |
| 1 contribution · 3.1% of ranked | $2,500 |
| 1 contribution · 3.1% of ranked | $2,500 |
| 6 contributions · 3% of ranked | $2,350 |
| 1 contribution · 2.5% of ranked | $2,000 |
A further $47,135 came from donors whose answer names no employer (N/A, None, blank), so it is not ranked. Itemized gifts over $200, grouped by the words donors filed: not an industry classification, and a gift from an employee is not a gift from the employer. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($106,415) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
Money groups spent on their own, not through a campaign. Each ad is filed against the candidate it names, so money attacking an opponent shows on the opponent’s row. Open a candidate to see who spent it.
The campaign also refunded $10 in contributions, which the categories below do not include.
Total itemized disbursements $328,037
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
All 332 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 19 payments · 19% of all spending | $63,382 |
| 9 payments · 12% of all spending | $40,000 |
| 18 payments · 7.3% of all spending | $24,405 |
| 8 payments · 6.9% of all spending | $23,000 |
| 3 payments · 5.4% of all spending | $18,000 |
| 12 payments · 4.6% of all spending | $15,434 |
| 10 payments · 4.5% of all spending | $14,964 |
| 10 payments · 3.2% of all spending | $10,500 |
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.
| Occupation as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an occupation · 45 contributions · 39% of ranked | $48,985 |
| Written instead of an occupation · 121 contributions · 29% of ranked | $36,871 |
| 19 contributions · 11% of ranked | $13,800 |
| 1 contribution · 2.4% of ranked | $3,000 |
| 1 contribution · 2% of ranked | $2,500 |
| 1 contribution · 2% of ranked | $2,500 |
| 4 contributions · 1.6% of ranked | $2,000 |
| 3 contributions · 1.2% of ranked | $1,500 |
A further $150 came from donors whose answer names no occupation (blank), so it is not ranked. Itemized gifts over $200, grouped by the words donors filed: not an industry classification, and a gift from an employee is not a gift from the employer. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($106,415) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.