Loading this candidate’s profile from the FEC filings and campaign records.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Loading this candidate’s profile from the FEC filings and campaign records.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Candidates › CA-47 race › 2025–2026
R Republican nominee for U.S. House, CA-47
Has not served in Congress
8 priorities from jennyraeca.com, in the order they are listed there. Every heading and the text under it is copied exactly, as one passage for each page it is from, and links to that place on the page; hover a source to see which passage it opens.
Every dollar Sacramento burns on fraud, duplication, and bureaucratic bloat is a dollar that isn't going toward lower gas prices, lower insurance premiums, or a housing market families can actually afford. Jenny Rae has spent the past year at CAL DOGE finding that waste line by line – and she knows exactly how much it's costing you.
This isn't an abstract fight about the size of government. It's about your grocery bill, your gas tank, and your rent. Jenny Rae knows what works, and she's running for Congress to put that discipline to work for CA-47 – cutting the waste that's driving up the cost of living here.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · jennyraeca.com
Heading as listed on jennyraeca.com ↗ (opens jennyraeca.com at this heading)
California policies and inflationary spending in Washington, D.C. have made Orange County one of the most expensive places to live in America. Today, only 18% of Orange County households can afford a median-priced home and a renter needs to earn $55 per hour just to afford the average monthly rent of $2,857.
In Congress, Jenny Rae will work to rein in federal spending, which has caused this inflation crisis that has driven up the cost of groceries and gas. She will push for permitting reform to cut the federal red tape that makes new housing construction unnecessarily costly and slow. She will incentivize American investment, reducing the cost of gas and growing our economy. Jenny Rae will also fight to reduce the tax burden on small businesses so they can invest in raising wages for the working families they employ.
Finally, she will demand full transparency on every federal program that affects our cost of living. We have the tools to eliminate fraud — we must ensure Congress uses them.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · jennyraeca.com/issues
Heading as listed on jennyraeca.com/issues ↗ (opens jennyraeca.com/issues at this heading)
Legal immigration built Orange County. Generations of immigrants who played by the rules have made this district the thriving, entrepreneurial community it is today. Jenny Rae honors that legacy — after all, her husband Paul is a legal immigrant — which is exactly why she will not accept a broken federal system that rewards illegal entry and punishes those who wait in line. In 2024 alone, there were more than 562,000 illegal border crossings through California. When the federal government actually enforced the law last year, the San Diego Sector saw a 93% drop in apprehensions after just two months, proving that federal policy, not geography, determines outcomes.
Jenny Rae supports fully funding border security, ending catch-and-release, and closing the asylum loopholes exploited by criminal smuggling organizations. She opposes federal funding for sanctuary cities and states that actively keep dangerous criminals in our community. She will support a legal immigration process that is clear and fair, and she will fight for public reporting on how federal immigration enforcement dollars are spent so voters can see results.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · jennyraeca.com/issues
Heading as listed on jennyraeca.com/issues ↗ (opens jennyraeca.com/issues at this heading)
As the Director of CAL DOGE, Jenny Rae Le Roux has been at the forefront of rooting out waste, fraud, and abuse in California's government. CAL DOGE has uncovered $370 million in cannabis tax revenue siphoned off into a Democrat Party voter registration slush fund, exposed fraudulent hospice billing networks operating in plain sight, and referred homelessness and green energy shell game cases to the Department of Justice for prosecution.
Jenny Rae's work with CAL DOGE inspired her to run for Congress. The same rot that has made California's fraud epidemic so bad is infecting Washington, D.C. too. Jenny Rae is running for Congress to change how we follow the money.
In Congress, Jenny Rae will demand mandatory, publicly accessible spending reports for every major federal program. She will support reducing federal prosecution thresholds so fraud schemes under $1 million don't slip through the cracks, and she will champion FOIA reform to give watchdogs, journalists, and citizens faster and cheaper access to federal records. She will also push for independent, real-time audits of high-risk federal programs before the money is gone. It's time to open the books in DC.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · jennyraeca.com/issues
Heading as listed on jennyraeca.com/issues ↗ (opens jennyraeca.com/issues at this heading)
The world our kids are growing up in is harder than it has ever been. Acceptance rates at top universities have plummeted, and one acceptance letter can change an entire career. Yet right now in California, the DOJ is investigating the UC system, and a federal lawsuit alleges the University of California is quietly using race in admissions despite voters banning the practice not once, but twice. Parents who have done everything right are watching their children compete on an uneven playing field, and nobody in Sacramento or Washington will give them a straight answer.
In Congress, Jenny Rae will demand full transparency in admissions at UC, CSU, and every federally funded university. She will require institutions to publish their criteria and data so families can judge for themselves, and she will support federal enforcement of the Civil Rights Act against public universities that use race-based decision-making.
This country was built by families who came here with nothing and built something. Their children should not be penalized for that success. Jenny Rae will fight for one standard, applied honestly, for every child in this district, because in America your future should be earned, not assigned.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · jennyraeca.com/issues
Heading as listed on jennyraeca.com/issues ↗ (opens jennyraeca.com/issues at this heading)
California has spent $37 billion since 2019 trying to address homelessness — but the problem has only gotten worse. California's homeless population represents nearly 25% of the entire U.S. homeless population, in a state with just 12% of the nation's residents. Federal dollars are flowing into California without requiring results, and our kids who walk once-safe streets now littered with needles and human feces are paying the price.
In Congress, Jenny Rae will push for outcome-based requirements attached to every federal homelessness grant. If a program can't show it is actually removing people from the streets, it won't get renewed. We will fund what works, and stop funding what isn't.
She will also fight to ensure that federal mental health and addiction treatment funding, including fentanyl crisis resources, reaches the communities that need it most. Jenny Rae will use every transparency tool available to shine a light on where federal homelessness dollars actually go so taxpayers can judge for themselves whether they're getting results they are paying for.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · jennyraeca.com/issues
Heading as listed on jennyraeca.com/issues ↗ (opens jennyraeca.com/issues at this heading)
Safe communities are non-negotiable. When we don't feel safe in our neighborhoods, when violent offenders cycle back onto the streets, when fentanyl floods our communities, we need to fix how we govern and return to the rule of law.
In Congress, Jenny Rae will fully fund federal law enforcement and oppose any effort to defund the agencies that protect our communities. She will support federal anti-trafficking legislation that prosecutes the criminal networks exploiting vulnerable people right here in Orange County. She will oppose federal funding to jurisdictions that make prosecution of theft, assault, and drug offenses harder. We can't reward lax enforcement with taxpayer dollars.
Fentanyl is now the leading cause of death for Americans aged 18 to 45, and that demands urgency. Jenny Rae will back legislation that holds fentanyl traffickers to the harshest federal penalties available.
The rule of law applies at the top, too. Jenny Rae will sponsor a bill to end congressional insider trading the day she is sworn into office. Members of Congress who profit from information gathered in office are betraying their constituents and she will fight for a full ban on individual stock trading by members and real-time financial disclosure requirements.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · jennyraeca.com/issues
Heading as listed on jennyraeca.com/issues ↗ (opens jennyraeca.com/issues at this heading)
Israel is the United States' greatest ally in the Middle East, and our support must be unwavering. Our two countries share Judeo-Christian values, a commitment to democracy, and a common interest in stability and security in the Middle East. Abandoning that support would embolden our enemies, put American lives at risk, and create instability across the globe.
Jenny Rae has traveled to Israel and knows this alliance firsthand. The October 7, 2023 massacre made one thing clear: Israel will never be safe so long as terrorist organizations committed to the destruction of the Jewish people are allowed to operate freely. She will advocate in Congress for the permanent disarmament of Hamas, fully supports Israel's right to defend itself, and will fight any effort to divide or weaken the relationship between our countries. Jenny Rae opposes the BDS movement and she will fight the rapid rise of antisemitism in our country by supporting the adoption of the IHRA Definition of Antisemitism into federal law.
Jenny Rae will also never allow a nuclear Iran. She opposes any agreement that does not permanently and verifiably dismantle Iran's nuclear program and will not return to anything resembling the failed Iran Nuclear Deal. She supports robust international sanctions and all necessary pressure to ensure Iran never achieves its nuclear ambitions. She also supports a free, democratic Iran.
Jenny Rae believes the United States should actively work to expand the Abraham Accords to include Saudi Arabia and other regional partners, creating the conditions for lasting peace.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · jennyraeca.com/issues
Heading as listed on jennyraeca.com/issues ↗ (opens jennyraeca.com/issues at this heading)
FEC filings, Jan 1, 2026 to Oct 14, 2026 · Official FEC bulk data · committee C00940130
77¢ of every dollar raised has been spent across 5 reports ($456.3K of $592K). Cash on hand went from $200.7K on Mar 31, 2026 to $135.8K on Oct 14, 2026.
| Report | Raised in the period | Spent in the period | Cash on hand at its close |
|---|---|---|---|
| APRIL QUARTERLY 2026 through Mar 31, 2026 | $207,241 | $6,500 | $200,740 |
| PRE-PRIMARY 2026 through May 13, 2026 | $61,843 | $110,638 | $151,945 |
| JULY QUARTERLY 2026 through Jun 30, 2026 | $106,800 | $130,212 | $128,533 |
| OCTOBER QUARTERLY 2026 through Sep 30, 2026 | $177,589 | $150,660 | $155,461 |
| PRE-GENERAL 2026 through Oct 14, 2026 | $38,569 | $58,256 | $135,774 |
Each report’s own period, as filed with the FEC; a report filed again counts once, as its latest copy.
34 endorsers listed on Jenny Le Roux’s own campaign site: 1 party, 22 officials, 7 organizations, 4 people.
This is the campaign's claim, checked by an editor against its page; the endorsers have not confirmed it to us. Each name opens the campaign’s page with that name highlighted.
Republican Party of Orange County
Official County Organization for the Republican Party
U.S. Representative (CA-40)
U.S. Representative (CA-41)
U.S. Representative (CA-1)
Orange County Republican Organization
California Hispanic Republican Club
Statewide Republican Organization
California Rifle and Pistol Association PAC
Statewide Second Amendment Advocacy PAC
California Women's Leadership Association PAC
Statewide Women's Leadership PAC
Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association PAC
Statewide Taxpayer Advocacy PAC
National Hindu American Advocacy PAC
Radio Host & Government Reform Advocate
Political Commentator & Former Senior Advisor to the UK Prime Minister
Community Religious Leader
2022 Candidate for California Superintendent of Schools
Advanced · 49,231 votes (25%) · 2 of 9 · Full results ↗
Election not held yet · Full results ↗
Every contest for this seat that named this candidate, most recent last; a result is shown once the race is called. Election dates and results from civicAPI (civicapi.org). civicAPI aggregates results from Secretaries of State and equivalent election bodies, and makes its own race calls. civicapi.org ↗
Official FEC filing record for the current cycle. The priorities they publish are quoted from their own site, in their order.
Statements are quoted from these pages exactly. Headings, order and wording are the campaign’s; the record marking is ours.
A donor who gave several times appears once. The 12 largest donors by total given are listed. In all, 195 itemized contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $200.7K.
Each loan as the campaign’s report through Oct 14, 2026 lists it, with what is still owed. A loan from an earlier cycle can appear here, and one repaid in full drops off the report, so the list need not add up to the row.
The 7 largest committees by total given are listed. In all, 7 committee contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $16.8K. Counted from the givers' own filings, which can run above the total the campaign itself reports.
Money moved in from the candidate’s other authorized committees, such as a joint fundraising committee. It was raised once and is reported again here on arrival. The largest of the sources is listed. In all, 2 transfers were filed this cycle, totaling $10K.
Total reported receipts $592,041
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. Open a source marked + to see who gave. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
96% of the money placed by state came from inside California: $192.2K of $200.7K.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 157 contributions · 96% | $192,236 |
| 1 contribution · 1.2% | $2,500 |
| 3 contributions · 1% | $2,100 |
| 6 contributions · 0.3% | $618 |
| 16 contributions · 0.3% | $553 |
| 1 contribution · 0.3% | $520 |
| 1 contribution · 0.2% | $500 |
| 1 contribution · 0.2% | $500 |
By the state each donor wrote on the filing, across 12 states and territories. Donors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized, so they cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
| Employer as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an employer · 71 contributions · 24% of ranked | $43,168 |
| 4 contributions · 7.9% of ranked | $14,000 |
| 3 contributions · 4% of ranked | $7,000 |
| 2 contributions · 4% of ranked | $7,000 |
| 2 contributions · 4% of ranked | $7,000 |
| 3 contributions · 4% of ranked | $6,999 |
| 2 contributions · 2.8% of ranked | $5,000 |
| 2 contributions · 2.8% of ranked | $5,000 |
A further $23,976 came from donors whose answer names no employer (None, blank), so it is not ranked. Itemized gifts over $200, grouped by the words donors filed: not an industry classification, and a gift from an employee is not a gift from the employer. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($62,907) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
Money groups spent on their own, not through a campaign. Each ad is filed against the candidate it names, so money attacking an opponent shows on the opponent’s row. Open a candidate to see who spent it.
The campaign also refunded $15,041 in contributions, which the categories below do not include.
Total itemized disbursements $290,565
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
All 143 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
5 payments were reported as a lump sum, such as a card or payroll bill, with the detail filed underneath as memo entries. Those entries, $4,670 in all, are counted under the payee and purpose they name rather than under the processor that was paid. The total is the same either way.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 10 payments · 14% of all spending | $64,953 |
| 11 payments · 12% of all spending | $53,098 |
| 20 payments · 11% of all spending | $48,724 |
| 6 payments · 4.6% of all spending | $20,878 |
| 4 payments · 4.3% of all spending | $19,500 |
| 2 payments · 3.6% of all spending | $16,549 |
| 7 payments · 3% of all spending | $13,781 |
| 2 payments · 2.5% of all spending | $11,530 |
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.
| Occupation as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an occupation · 73 contributions · 24% of ranked | $44,603 |
| 22 contributions · 23% of ranked | $42,799 |
| 6 contributions · 6.5% of ranked | $12,000 |
| Written instead of an occupation · 3 contributions · 4% of ranked | $7,500 |
| 6 contributions · 3.8% of ranked | $7,000 |
| 2 contributions · 3.8% of ranked | $7,000 |
| 7 contributions · 2.8% of ranked | $5,254 |
| 2 contributions · 2.7% of ranked | $5,000 |
A further $15,041 came from donors whose answer names no occupation (blank), so it is not ranked. Itemized gifts over $200, grouped by the words donors filed: not an industry classification, and a gift from an employee is not a gift from the employer. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($62,907) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.