Loading this candidate’s profile from the FEC filings and campaign records.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Loading this candidate’s profile from the FEC filings and campaign records.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Candidates › CA-05 race › 2025–2026
D Democratic nominee for U.S. House, CA-05
Has not served in Congress
10 priorities from votemasuda.com, in the order they are listed there. Every heading and the text under it is copied exactly, as one passage for each page it is from, and links to that place on the page; hover a source to see which passage it opens.
Affordability isn’t one issue, it’s the combined pressure of housing, healthcare, energy, and everyday costs hitting families all at once.Across CA-5, people are working hard and still falling behind. In rural communities, that pressure is even greater, from rising insurance costs to longer drives for care and fewer housing options.
My focus is on lowering costs where the federal government can make a real impact and making sure those benefits actually reach our communities.
Key Priorities
- Lower The Cost of Living
- Target major cost drivers: housing, healthcare, and energy
- Reduce out-of-pocket expenses without shifting costs elsewhere
- Increase transparency where pricing is disconnected from real costs
- Expand Housing Access
- Support programs for rural and first-time home buyers
- Reduce barriers to responsible development in smaller communities
- Align infrastructure funding with housing needs
- Lower Healthcare Costs
- Continue efforts to reduce prescription drug prices
- Strengthen rural access through clinics and telehealth
- Improve accountability across the healthcare system
- Support Local Economies and Agriculture
- Ensure farmers have access to water, markets, and infrastructure
- Strengthen local food systems to reduce cost volatility
- Avoid policies that increase costs on producers or consumers
- Reduce Energy Costs & Improve Reliability
- Invest in grid modernization and wildfire risk reduction
- Support locally driven energy solutions, including biomass
- Focus on stable, predictable energy costs
- Make Federal Programs Work Locally
- Improve access to funding for rural communities
- Cut delays and administrative barriers
- Deliver disaster and economic support faster and more reliably
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · votemasuda.com/issues
Heading as listed on votemasuda.com/issues ↗ (opens votemasuda.com/issues at this heading)
Wildfire is no longer seasonal, it’s a year-round threat across CA-5 and the West. Protecting our communities and addressing rising insurance costs requires a smarter, more coordinated approach that reduces risk and ensures resources reach the ground.
Key Priorities
- Strengthen Forest Management & Fuels Reduction
- Expand science-based thinning and prescribed fire
- Increase staffing and funding for federal land agencies like theU.S. Forest Service, National Park Service, and Bureau of Land Management to address wildfire threats
- Improve coordination between federal, state, local, and tribal partners and streamline delayed projects
- Invest in Community-Level Protection
- Support defensible space, home hardening, and Firewise programs
- Expand access to grants for rural and high-risk communities
- Prioritize projects that directly protect homes and infrastructure
- Support Firefighter Readiness & Local Capacity
- Provide modern training, equipment, and staffing support
- Align federal resources with local and state response needs
- Ensure strong healthcare and mental health support for firefighters
- Improve Federal Funding & Coordination
- Make funding faster, simpler, and available before fire season
- Reduce agency overlap and delays
- Strengthen FEMA and disaster response timelines
- Protect Infrastructure
- Reduce ignition risk from power lines and critical systems
- Invest in grid hardening and resilience projects
- Partner with state and local agencies on long-term solutions
- Address Insurance & Recovery
- Incentivize home hardening to lower insurance costs
- Deliver faster, more reliable disaster assistance
- Support long-term recovery for communities and small businesses
- Local Jobs while reducing risk
- Build a year-round workforce for fuel reduction and fuel breaks
- Cut red tape so local contractors can compete for projects
- Invest in infrastructure upgrades that prevent wildfires
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · votemasuda.com/issues
Heading as listed on votemasuda.com/issues ↗ (opens votemasuda.com/issues at this heading)
Healthcare is about security, the ability to get care when you need it without worrying about cost, distance, or access.
In CA-5, that security isn’t guaranteed. Rural communities face long travel times, provider shortages, rising costs, and uncertainty around local hospitals. My focus is lowering costs, strengthening rural care, and putting patients first.
Key Priorities
- Lower costs and improve accountability
- Reduce prescription drug and out-of-pocket costs
- Increase price transparency for patients
- Strengthen oversight to address cost drivers
- Protect rural hospitals and expand access
- Stabilize rural hospitals and clinics
- Expand telehealth to reduce travel barriers
- Improve reimbursement in underserved areas
- Incentivize providers to serve rural communities
- Strengthen Coverage for Families
- Protect Medicare and Medi-Cal
- Reduce barriers to obtaining and keeping coverage
- Improve continuity of care
- Expand Mental Health & Addiction Care
- Increase access in rural and underserved areas
- Support treatment and recovery-focused programs
- Expand both in-person and telehealth services
- Support maternal and community-based care
- Improve access to maternity care in rural areas
- Invest in workforce development
- Strengthen community-based care models
- Support Veterans’ Healthcare
- Improve access to VA services, especially in rural areas
- Reduce delays and expand mental health support
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · votemasuda.com/issues
Heading as listed on votemasuda.com/issues ↗ (opens votemasuda.com/issues at this heading)
CA-5 has the workforce, resources, and industries to grow, but federal policy hasn’t kept pace with how our local economy actually works. Across the district, people want good-paying jobs, the ability to stay in their communities, and an economy built on local strengths, not one-size-fits-all solutions.
My focus is on strengthening key industries, investing in workforce development, and connecting growth to real needs on the ground.
Key Priorities
- Build Jobs in Wildfire Resilience
- Expand fuels reduction, forest management, and restoration jobs
- Train local workers for forestry, equipment, and logistics roles
- Grow biomass and related industries
- Support home hardening and defensible space as job creators
- Strengthen Workforce Training and Local Hiring
- Expand apprenticeships and job training tied to local industries
- Partner with community colleges and trade programs
- Prioritize local hiring in federally supported projects
- Support Small Business & Local Economies
- Improve access to capital and federal resources
- Reduce barriers for rural businesses
- Support main street and locally driven growth
- Invest in Infrastructure for Growth
- Improve roads, water systems, and transportation
- Expand reliable rural broadband
- Focus on long-term, job-generating projects
- Strengthen Agriculture & Local Production
- Support food processing and value-added agriculture
- Improve supply chains and market access
- Promote stability for producers facing rising costs
- Support Tourism & Outdoor Economies
- Invest in infrastructure for gateway communities
- Ensure tourism growth benefits local residents
- Balance economic development with land management
“We don’t need to reinvent our economy, we need to invest in what we already do well and connect it to real opportunities.”
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · votemasuda.com/issues
Heading as listed on votemasuda.com/issues ↗ (opens votemasuda.com/issues at this heading)
Housing costs in CA-5 come down to a simple problem: we’re not building enough homes, and the ones we do build are too expensive.In rural communities, rising construction costs, workforce shortages, and the wildfire insurance crisis are making it harder to buy, rent, or stay in a home. My focus is increasing supply, lowering building costs, and making sure families aren’t priced out of their own communities.
Key Priorities
- Increase housing supply
- Expand proven federal programs that finance affordable housing
- Encourage a mix of housing types, including entry-level and multi-family
- Prioritize building in communities falling behind demand
- Lower the cost of building
- Address material and supply chain cost drivers
- Streamline federal delays, especially in rural areas
- Support modular and factory-built housing
- Expand home ownership opportunities
- Strengthen rural programs for first-time buyers
- Support targeted financing tools and tax relief
- Help seniors maintain and upgrade their homes
- Build the construction workforce
- Expand apprenticeship and trade programs
- Partner with community colleges and local training programs
- Align workforce development with housing demand
- Address Insurance & Wildfire Risk
- Stabilize access to home insurance in high-risk areas
- Invest in home hardening and defensible space
- Align housing policy with wildfire mitigation
- Address homelessness
- Support prevention-focused programs to keep people housed
- Expand access to mental health and transitional services
- Ensure rural communities receive targeted support
“If we’re serious about affordability, we have to build more housing, make it less expensive to build, and make sure families can actually afford to stay in the communities they call home.”
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · votemasuda.com/issues
Heading as listed on votemasuda.com/issues ↗ (opens votemasuda.com/issues at this heading)
Education is the foundation of opportunity and in CA-5, our schools are central to our communities and local economy. Across the district, educators are being stretched thin as resources fail to keep up with growing student needs, especially in rural areas.
My focus is strengthening public education, supporting educators, and ensuring every student has access to the tools they need to succeed.
Key Priorities
- Strengthen classrooms and student support
- Increase investment in special education and student services
- Reduce class sizes to improve learning and reduce burnout
- Expand access to counselors, mental health, and early intervention
- Support and retain educators
- Address teacher shortages, especially in rural communities
- Strengthen local recruitment and retention pathways
- Invest in professional development and support systems
- Expand Career and Technical Education (CTE)
- Grow hands-on training tied to local industries
- Align education with workforce needs, including trades and healthcare
- Support partnerships with community colleges and employers
- Ensure Stable, Equitable Funding
- Strengthen programs like Title I and IDEA
- Improve funding delivery to rural and underserved districts
- Provide stability for long-term planning
- Improve school safety and student well-being
- Expand school-based mental health services
- Support prevention-focused approaches to student safety
- Maintain safe environments without disrupting learning
- Fund Special Education
- Ensure federal commitments are met
- Prevent schools from diverting general funds to cover shortfalls
- Deliver consistent support for students with special needs
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · votemasuda.com/issues
Heading as listed on votemasuda.com/issues ↗ (opens votemasuda.com/issues at this heading)
Agriculture is the backbone of CA-5; supporting jobs, driving our economy, and feeding communities across the country. Farmers here already face enough uncertainty, from markets to water to labor. What they need from Washington is consistency and policies they can plan around. My approach is simple: support practical solutions and ensure federal policy works for, not against, our agricultural communities.
Key Priorities
- Promote market Stability
- Support reliable access to domestic and international markets
- Avoid sudden policy shifts that create uncertainty
- Ensure federal programs reflect California’s specialty crops
- Strengthen water reliability
- Improve coordination across federal, state, and local agencies
- Invest in water storage, infrastructure, and drought resilience
- Support balanced, science-based water management
- Improve coordination across agencies
- Support the agricultural workforce
- Ensure a stable and reliable workforce
- Recognize the role of both farmworkers and operators
- Advance practical, lawful workforce solution
- Improve access to federal programs
- Simplify access to conservation and disaster programs
- Deliver funding and assistance faster
- Reduce administrative delays
- Invest in rural infrastructure
- Strengthen water, transportation, and energy systems
- Support local supply chains and processing
- Align agriculture with broader rural economic growth
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · votemasuda.com/issues
Heading as listed on votemasuda.com/issues ↗ (opens votemasuda.com/issues at this heading)
America is a nation of laws, and a nation built by people who come here to work and contribute. Today, our immigration system is failing on both fronts. The border is inconsistent, legal pathways are backlogged, and enforcement lacks focus; creating disorder, uncertainty for employers, and unfair conditions for workers.
My approach is simple: secure the border, enforce the law, and fix the system so it is orderly, timely, and works for our economy.
Key Priorities
- Secure the border and restore order
- Invest in modern border security and drug detection technology
- Upgrade ports of entry to manage legal crossings efficiently
- Target trafficking, cartel activity, and illegal drugs
- Enforce laws with focus and accountability
- Prioritize removal of individuals who pose public safety risks
- Improve coordination across agencies
- Maintain clear standards to build public trust
- Fix the legal immigration system
- Expand and modernize legal pathways
- Reduce backlogs for families and employers
- Ensure a predictable, enforceable system
- Support Agriculture & Workforce Needs
- Create workable legal pathways for agricultural labor
- Protect workers from exploitation
- Align policy with real workforce demands in CA-5
- Provide an earned, lawful path forward
- Establish a structured process for long-term, law-abiding individuals
- Maintain background checks and eligibility requirements
- Provide certainty for Dreamers
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · votemasuda.com/issues
Heading as listed on votemasuda.com/issues ↗ (opens votemasuda.com/issues at this heading)
LGBTQ+ rights are rooted in the fundamental American principles of freedom, dignity, and equal protection under the law. Everyone deserves to live safely, be treated fairly, and have access to the same opportunities, no matter who they are.
Key Priorities
- Protect Equal Rights
- Enforce civil rights laws in schools, workplaces, and public spaces
- Prevent discrimination and violence
- Promote equal access to opportunity
- Support Youth & Community Safety
- Address youth homelessness and mental health needs
- Strengthen community-based support systems
- Expand crisis response resources
- Ensure Access to Healthcare
- Protect access to medically appropriate care
- Support patient decision-making with qualified providers
- Expand access in rural and underserved communities
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · votemasuda.com/issues
Heading as listed on votemasuda.com/issues ↗ (opens votemasuda.com/issues at this heading)
Strong foreign policy isn’t about rhetoric, it’s about results. As an engineer who developed defense technology to protect U.S. troops and a diplomat who negotiated on behalf of American interests, I’ve seen what works.
The goal is clear: protect American security, strengthen our economy, and prevent conflicts before they put our troops at risk.
Key Priorities
- Prevent Conflict Through Diplomacy
- Invest in diplomacy and development to reduce conflict risk
- Ensure the U.S. has the personnel and resources to protect its interests
- Maintain strong Congressional oversight
- Protect Agriculture Through Trade
- Expand and defend export markets for California producers
- Oppose unpredictable tariffs that raise costs and hurt farmers
- Enforce fair trade standards
- Strengthen Alliances
- Reinforce NATO and Indo-Pacific partnerships
- Support targeted security assistance to deter conflict
- Ensure U.S. engagement is strategic and accountable
- Lead in Critical Technologies
- Invest in research and development
- Protect infrastructure and innovation from adversaries
- Strengthen the workforce to stay globally competitive
- Smart, Accountable Leadership
- Prioritize prevention to avoid costly conflicts
- Focus resources where they are most effective
- Treat national security as both a safety and fiscal responsibility
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · votemasuda.com/issues
Heading as listed on votemasuda.com/issues ↗ (opens votemasuda.com/issues at this heading)
FEC filings, Apr 1, 2025 to Oct 14, 2026 · Official FEC bulk data · committee C00905133
90¢ of every dollar raised has been spent across 8 reports ($522K of $581.6K). Cash on hand went from $13.7K on Jun 30, 2025 to $59.7K on Oct 14, 2026.
| Report | Raised in the period | Spent in the period | Cash on hand at its close |
|---|---|---|---|
| JULY QUARTERLY 2025 through Jun 30, 2025 | $23,039 | $9,325 | $13,715 |
| OCTOBER QUARTERLY 2025 through Sep 30, 2025 | $24,859 | $25,609 | $12,964 |
| YEAR-END 2025 through Dec 31, 2025 | $61,781 | $57,388 | $17,357 |
| APRIL QUARTERLY 2026 through Mar 31, 2026 | $99,840 | $57,790 | $59,407 |
| PRE-PRIMARY 2026 through May 13, 2026 | $62,645 | $74,539 | $47,513 |
| JULY QUARTERLY 2026 through Jun 30, 2026 | $89,571 | $47,632 | $89,452 |
| OCTOBER QUARTERLY 2026 through Sep 30, 2026 | $180,226 | $135,497 | $134,181 |
| PRE-GENERAL 2026 through Oct 14, 2026 | $39,660 | $114,175 | $59,666 |
Each report’s own period, as filed with the FEC; a report filed again counts once, as its latest copy.
64 endorsers listed on Michael Masuda’s own campaign site: 4 parties, 9 officials, 8 unions, 19 organizations, 24 people.
This is the campaign's claim, checked by an editor against its page; the endorsers have not confirmed it to us. Each name opens the campaign’s page with that name highlighted.
US Senator
Mayor of Sonora
Madera City Council
Modesto City Council
“To keep that momentum going, Modesto needs a true partner in Congress—someone who will advocate for our city, bring resources home, and work collaboratively to deliver results. Michael Masuda will make Modesto a priority, and that’s exactly why I’m proud to support him.”
Board President Stanislaus Union School District
Modesto City Council
Tuolumne County Supervisor
Former Jackson Mayor
Michael is proud to be a part of the Federal Workers United Congressional Slate.
National Security Leaders for America
NSL4A
“Michael Masuda has demonstrated the judgment, integrity, and commitment to public service that voters in California’s 5th District deserve,” said NSL4A Member and former Deputy Assistant Secretary of State Joseph Sullivan. “At a time when America’s security depends on principled leadership and respect for constitutional norms, Michael is the clear choice.” "I’m proud to be endorsed by National Security Leaders for America,” said Masuda. “Voters in the fifth district understand the importance of steady, principled leadership—Michael Masuda represents the kind of leadership we need in Congress,” added Sullivan.”
Local Organizer, Amador
“I am very happy to endorse Michael Masuda for Congress! Michael has the moral integrity that is so needed in congress today. He doesn't put party over respect for the Constitution and is truly interested in representing all of District 5, not just the most extreme among us, by addressing the most pressing issues affecting us all. He will help restore trust in our Congress to uphold the law while rebuilding our credibility on the world stage.”
Fresno Community Member
“I am proud to endorse Michael Masuda for Congress.”
Former Chair, Tuolumne County Democratic Central Committee
“Since meeting early last year, I have found Michael to be principled, strategic, capable, and strongly committed to fighting for all of us in this region. He cares about our local priorities from growing up here and understands how national policy gets done through his economic development work in the State Department. From my perspective as a Sonora-born and raised mother, policy professional, and Democratic delegate at the local, state, and federal levels, I am energized by Michael's campaign and hope everyone who's disappointed in our current leadership will join me in getting out the vote”
Former Chair & Vice Chair, Tuolumne County DCC
“I've worked on multiple campaigns to rid ourselves of the useless "Representative McClintock." I'm excited about Michael's campaign: his background and experiences with the State Department will benefit us. He cares about the same things we do: affordability of housing, health care, homeowners insurance, Wildfires. He's worked in DC, grew up here and is ready to take his background and fight for us. I'm a long time community organizer, and he's got a great team behind him. His fight for us isn't partisan; it's common sense "What's best for our District." We deserve better. Let's elect Michael!”
Community Organizer
“I am happy to endorse Michael Masuda.”
RN, FNP, MSN, Retired
“I am writing to you today not just as a retired Public Health nurse, small business owner, and long-term resident, but as a concerned citizen who believes in the power of strong, common-sense leadership. That is why I am so proud to formally endorse Michael Masuda for Congress in the California 5th Congressional District.”
Theatre Arts Educator
“Michael Masuda is the man that we need to help bring change to Congress. I am happy to endorse him.”
Community Organizer, Calaveras
“As a local organizer I am excited to endorse Michael Masuda because he is truly dedicated to making sure the people of this district are represented by someone who not only cares about our quality of life but listens to us with sincerity and respect. I respect the tremendous effort Michael has put in to meet the people of this district in our communities. With someone like Michael as our representative our calls will be answered and our voices will be heard.”
Advanced · 51,418 votes (24%) · 2 of 4 · Full results ↗
Election not held yet · Full results ↗
Every contest for this seat that named this candidate, most recent last; a result is shown once the race is called. Election dates and results from civicAPI (civicapi.org). civicAPI aggregates results from Secretaries of State and equivalent election bodies, and makes its own race calls. civicapi.org ↗
Official FEC filing record for the current cycle. The priorities they publish are quoted from their own site, in their order.
Statements are quoted from these pages exactly. Headings, order and wording are the campaign’s; the record marking is ours.
A donor who gave several times appears once. The 12 largest donors by total given are listed. In all, 1,214 itemized contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $197.7K.
The 7 largest committees by total given are listed. In all, 11 committee contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $23.5K. Counted from the givers' own filings, which can run above the total the campaign itself reports.
Total reported receipts $581,621
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. Open a source marked + to see who gave. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
79% of the money placed by state came from inside California: $155.4K of $197.7K.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 1,147 contributions · 79% | $155,375 |
| 7 contributions · 4.5% | $8,800 |
| 7 contributions · 3.8% | $7,529 |
| 3 contributions · 3.5% | $7,000 |
| 2 contributions · 3.5% | $6,998 |
| 4 contributions · 2.4% | $4,750 |
| 16 contributions · 1.5% | $2,930 |
| 3 contributions · 1.3% | $2,520 |
By the state each donor wrote on the filing, across 15 states and territories. Donors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized, so they cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
| Employer as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an employer · 84 contributions · 20% of ranked | $19,128 |
| 3 contributions · 7.1% of ranked | $6,999 |
| 2 contributions · 7.1% of ranked | $6,998 |
| 2 contributions · 6.9% of ranked | $6,800 |
| 3 contributions · 3.6% of ranked | $3,500 |
| 1 contribution · 3.6% of ranked | $3,500 |
| 3 contributions · 3.1% of ranked | $3,000 |
| 1 contribution · 2.5% of ranked | $2,500 |
A further $99,620 came from donors whose answer names no employer (N/A, blank), so it is not ranked. Itemized gifts over $200, grouped by the words donors filed: not an industry classification, and a gift from an employee is not a gift from the employer. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($194,676) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
Money groups spent on their own, not through a campaign. Each ad is filed against the candidate it names, so money attacking an opponent shows on the opponent’s row. Open a candidate to see who spent it.
The campaign also refunded $1,436 in contributions, which the categories below do not include.
Total itemized disbursements $378,372
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
All 362 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
45 payments were reported as a lump sum, such as a card or payroll bill, with the detail filed underneath as memo entries. Those entries, $52,946 in all, are counted under the payee and purpose they name rather than under the processor that was paid. The total is the same either way.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 16 payments · 18% of all spending | $95,500 |
| 29 payments · 16% of all spending | $85,330 |
| 55 payments · 8.5% of all spending | $44,394 |
| 14 payments · 3.6% of all spending | $18,986 |
| 7 payments · 3.5% of all spending | $18,319 |
| 7 payments · 3.4% of all spending | $18,000 |
| 6 payments · 2.2% of all spending | $11,694 |
| 69 payments · 2.2% of all spending | $11,300 |
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.
| Occupation as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an occupation · 588 contributions · 35% of ranked | $69,415 |
| Written instead of an occupation · 236 contributions · 15% of ranked | $30,180 |
| 8 contributions · 3.8% of ranked | $7,473 |
| 8 contributions · 3.7% of ranked | $7,390 |
| 4 contributions · 3.7% of ranked | $7,299 |
| 18 contributions · 2.3% of ranked | $4,600 |
| 3 contributions · 2.3% of ranked | $4,500 |
| 10 contributions · 2% of ranked | $3,965 |
A further $25 came from donors whose answer names no occupation (blank), so it is not ranked. Itemized gifts over $200, grouped by the words donors filed: not an industry classification, and a gift from an employee is not a gift from the employer. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($194,676) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.