Loading this candidate’s profile from the FEC filings and campaign records.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Loading this candidate’s profile from the FEC filings and campaign records.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Candidates › AZ-06 race › 2025–2026
DemocraticU.S. House, AZ-06Arizona
Has not served in Congress
No campaign site or public profiles are attached to this record yet.
Mo Goldman’s words are not shown
Campaign committee · 2025–2026 · latest available filing · Official FEC bulk data
86¢ of every dollar raised has been spent across 7 reports ($238.5K of $276.4K). Cash on hand went from $196.4K on Jun 30, 2025 to $37.9K on Oct 14, 2026.
| Report | Raised in the period | Spent in the period | Cash on hand at its close |
|---|---|---|---|
| JULY QUARTERLY 2025 through Jun 30, 2025 | $253,921 | $57,513 | $196,409 |
| OCTOBER QUARTERLY 2025 through Sep 30, 2025 | $22,483 | $128,296 | $90,596 |
| YEAR-END 2025 through Dec 31, 2025 | $0 | $16,714 | $73,882 |
| APRIL QUARTERLY 2026 through Mar 31, 2026 | $0 | $6,249 | $67,633 |
| JULY QUARTERLY 2026 through Jun 30, 2026 | $0 | $2,097 | $65,536 |
| OCTOBER QUARTERLY 2026 through Sep 30, 2026 | $0 | $26,620 | $38,916 |
| PRE-GENERAL 2026 through Oct 14, 2026 | $0 | $1,000 | $37,916 |
Each report’s own period, as filed with the FEC; a report filed again counts once, as its latest copy.
No receipts reported
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
59% of the money placed by state came from inside Arizona: $117.7K of $199.5K.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 198 contributions · 59% | $117,724 |
| 20 contributions · 6.9% | $13,691 |
| 8 contributions · 6% | $12,025 |
| 19 contributions · 5.7% | $11,350 |
| 9 contributions · 3.3% | $6,500 |
| 4 contributions · 2.9% | $5,750 |
| 2 contributions · 1.9% | $3,750 |
| 2 contributions · 1.9% | $3,750 |
By the state each donor wrote on the filing, across 30 states and territories. Donors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized, so they cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
| Employer as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an employer · 98 contributions · 31% of ranked | $58,493 |
| Written instead of an employer · 56 contributions · 12% of ranked | $22,991 |
| 2 contributions · 2.4% of ranked | $4,500 |
| 2 contributions · 2.4% of ranked | $4,500 |
| 2 contributions · 2% of ranked | $3,750 |
| 3 contributions · 1.9% of ranked | $3,600 |
| 1 contribution · 1.8% of ranked | $3,500 |
| 1 contribution · 1.8% of ranked | $3,500 |
A further $8,550 came from donors whose answer names no employer (blank), so it is not ranked. Itemized gifts over $200, grouped by the words donors filed: not an industry classification, and a gift from an employee is not a gift from the employer. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
Money groups spent on their own, not through a campaign. Each ad is filed against the candidate it names, so money attacking an opponent shows on the opponent’s row. Open a candidate to see who spent it.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 7 payments | $73,190 |
| 3 payments | $25,765 |
| 5 payments | $19,753 |
| 7 payments | $19,430 |
| 5 payments | $18,315 |
| 18 payments | $10,077 |
| 1 payment | $10,000 |
| 5 payments | $7,712 |
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.
Not read yet
No ballot result matched to this candidate
Official FEC filing record for the current cycle. The priorities they publish are quoted from their own site, in their order.
No campaign pages quoted
| Occupation as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| 142 contributions · 41% of ranked | $78,161 |
| Written instead of an occupation · 37 contributions · 20% of ranked | $38,178 |
| Written instead of an occupation · 61 contributions · 11% of ranked | $20,315 |
| 3 contributions · 2.6% of ranked | $5,000 |
| 2 contributions · 2.4% of ranked | $4,500 |
| 1 contribution · 1.8% of ranked | $3,500 |
| 2 contributions · 1.6% of ranked | $3,000 |
| 2 contributions · 1.3% of ranked | $2,500 |
A further $8,550 came from donors whose answer names no occupation (blank), so it is not ranked. Itemized gifts over $200, grouped by the words donors filed: not an industry classification, and a gift from an employee is not a gift from the employer. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
Total itemized disbursements $199,745
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid.
All 68 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
1 payment was reported as a lump sum, such as a card or payroll bill, with the detail filed underneath as memo entries. Those entries, $315 in all, are counted under the payee and purpose they name rather than under the processor that was paid. The total is the same either way.