Loading this candidate’s profile from the FEC filings and campaign records.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Loading this candidate’s profile from the FEC filings and campaign records.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Candidates › NC-04 race › 2025–2026
RepublicanU.S. House, NC-04North Carolina
Has not served in Congress
16 priorities from maxforcongress.com, in the order they are listed there. Every heading and the text under it is copied exactly, as one passage for each page it is from, and links to that place on the page; hover a source to see which passage it opens.
From Segregation to ZIP-Code Segregation: an underprivileged child's future shouldn't depend on their address. Education monopoly must be broken so that parents are free to choose the school that best serves them.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · maxforcongress.com/issues
Heading as listed on maxforcongress.com/issues ↗ (opens maxforcongress.com/issues at this heading)
Financial insecurity should not put lives at risk. We must put healthcare dollars directly in people's hands and cutout the middlemen. While encouraging employer provided insurance, we must have safety net for all citizens, who need it.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · maxforcongress.com/issues
Heading as listed on maxforcongress.com/issues ↗ (opens maxforcongress.com/issues at this heading) · “Max's Fresh Ideas to end inequality & unfairness” on maxforcongress.com/issues ↗ (opens maxforcongress.com/issues at this heading)
From Redlining to Credit Scoring: a new barrier for the underprivileged. A low credit score doesn't make you a bad driver or a bad homeowner. It is unfair to people who are already struggling financially.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · maxforcongress.com/issues
Heading as listed on maxforcongress.com/issues ↗ (opens maxforcongress.com/issues at this heading)
I believe Americans must start thinking outside the box about the future of education. Racial segregation may have ended on paper through laws, but in many ways, it still exists through “zip-code segregation,” where children are trapped in failing school districts simply because of where they live.
Every American child deserves the freedom to access a quality education, regardless of income or ZIP code. I believe expanding school choice and privatizing education would create more opportunities for students by encouraging schools that cater to different talents, career paths, and learning styles instead of a one-size-fits-all system. Greater competition would improve educational outcomes while also stimulating economic growth across multiple industries. More schools would mean more jobs in construction, education, transportation, apparel, and food services. Parents — not government bureaucracies or lobbyists — should have the ultimate authority over their children’s education.
My vision for school choice includes:
- Ending “zip-code segregation” by allowing parents to choose schools that best fit their children’s needs.
- Funding students directly through school vouchers applied through parents' tax-return.
- Encouraging the growth of private and vocational schools to create diverse educational opportunities.
- Evaluating school performance through standardized testing and measurable academic outcomes.
- Protecting parents’ rights to make educational decisions for their children.
- Reducing special-interest and lobbyist control over America’s education system.
True school choice would empower parents, improve accountability, expand opportunity, and help ensure that every child has access to a quality education, not just those who can afford to live in the “right” ZIP code.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · maxforcongress.com/issues
Heading as listed on maxforcongress.com/issues ↗ (opens maxforcongress.com/issues at this heading)
My healthcare plan puts patients, not bureaucrats, in control by providing healthcare vouchers directly to citizens through the tax-filing process, ensuring the money is in the hands of the people. These vouchers would be used exclusively to purchase health insurance, giving individuals the freedom to choose customized plans that best meet their needs, while requiring catastrophic coverage as a minimum standard. Americans should be able to purchase insurance from anywhere in the country to increase competition and lower costs. Policies should be sold through licensed insurance agents, with severe penalties for fraud and abuse. Healthcare billing must also become transparent, with patients receiving the full bill clearly showing the portion paid by the patient and the portion covered by the insurance company.
In addition, all legal visitors and illegal immigrants should be required to carry health insurance from their home country, or their government should be held financially responsible for their medical expenses. This market-driven approach would help reduce the growing burden on Medicare, Medicaid, and other taxpayer-funded healthcare programs.
Employers, as they do today, would continue to be incentivized to provide health insurance to their employees, further reducing the burden on taxpayer-funded programs. This plan would especially benefit working families and those below the poverty line by giving them greater healthcare freedom and access to regular preventive care, helping detect problems early and avoid catastrophic medical events. At the same time, mandatory catastrophic coverage would provide a vital safety net against medical bankruptcy during major illnesses or emergencies. By putting patients first, increasing competition, and reducing government dependency, we can create a more affordable and transparent healthcare system. With the support of citizens, we can take on the healthcare lobbyists and return control of healthcare decisions to the American people.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · maxforcongress.com/issues
Heading as listed on maxforcongress.com/issues ↗ (opens maxforcongress.com/issues at this heading)
Being in the construction industry, I see firsthand how rising material, labor, and regulatory costs are driving up home prices, while high interest rates are making it harder for working Americans to achieve the financial independence that comes with the American Dream of homeownership. Another major challenge is “zip code segregation” for schools, where families are effectively priced out of desirable school districts because home values are tied to access to better-performing schools.
At the same time, large corporations should not be allowed to buy up single-family homes and convert them into rental properties, because it artificially drives up prices and pushes real families out of the market. To restore affordability and encourage long-term investment in communities, I believe we should:
- Reduce unnecessary regulations and costs that inflate home construction prices.
- Promote policies that increase housing supply and homeownership opportunities.
- Address “zip code segregation” that locks families out of quality schools through inflated housing markets.
- Prevent corporations from purchasing single-family homes for rental portfolios.
- Eliminate capital gains taxes on long-term real-estate appreciation to help families build generational wealth.
- Reduce mortgage interest rate for low-income families.
- Eliminate taxes on energy and food to bring down costs of living.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · maxforcongress.com/issues
Heading as listed on maxforcongress.com/issues ↗ (opens maxforcongress.com/issues at this heading)
Yesterday's red lines were drawn on maps. Todays are drawn through credit scores. In both cases, the people who can least afford it end up paying the highest price.
For decades, many minority and low-income communities suffered under the practice of redlining, where insurers and lenders either denied services or charged higher rates based largely on where people lived. The practice was widely condemned because it unfairly penalized entire neighborhoods and limited economic opportunity for generations.
While formal redlining has largely disappeared, many critics argue that credit-based insurance scoring has become a modern substitute. Instead of using ZIP codes or neighborhood maps, insurers rely on credit scores that are often influenced by income, wealth, access to credit, medical debt, and financial setbacks. The result can be strikingly similar: poorer communities and minority households frequently end up paying higher insurance premiums regardless of whether they are actually riskier drivers or homeowners.
A low credit score does not cause car accidents. It does not make a roof more likely to leak. It does not make someone irresponsible or dishonest. Yet people with lower credit scores can pay hundreds or even thousands of dollars more for the same insurance coverage than someone with a higher score and an otherwise similar risk profile.
This creates a troubling cycle. Families facing financial hardship are charged more precisely because they are struggling financially. Higher premiums leave them with less money to save, invest, improve their homes, or pay down debt—making it even harder to improve their financial standing. Rather than helping people climb the economic ladder, the system can pull the ladder farther away.
America rejected redlining because we recognized that people should be judged as individuals, not by broad economic or demographic characteristics. Insurance should return to that principle. Rates should be based on actual risk factors—driving records, claims history, property conditions, and personal responsibility—not financial circumstances that often reflect past hardship rather than future risk.
If we believe in economic mobility and equal opportunity, we should not replace one form of economic discrimination with another. Insurance should measure risk, not poverty.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · maxforcongress.com/issues
Heading as listed on maxforcongress.com/issues ↗ (opens maxforcongress.com/issues at this heading)
If you believe the U.S. Constitution is the supreme law of the land and must not be altered to accommodate foreign laws or ideologies incompatible with a civilized society, I’m your candidate. Common sense tells us freedoms shrink whenever and wherever Sharia and socialism are imposed.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · maxforcongress.com/issues
Heading as listed on maxforcongress.com/issues ↗ (opens maxforcongress.com/issues at this heading)
If you believe working families should keep more of their hard-earned money, I’m your candidate. Common sense tells us higher taxes drive jobs and businesses away—leaving fewer opportunities and greater hardship behind.
- Tax-free at sixty-three - eliminate income taxes for individuals over 63, so seniors can enjoy their sunset years with dignity and financial security.
- Eliminate capital gains tax on the sale of a primary home, protecting the value-appreciation of their American Dream.
- Eliminate income taxes on export earnings for small businesses, empowering American entrepreneurs to compete and thrive in global markets.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · maxforcongress.com/issues
Heading as listed on maxforcongress.com/issues ↗ (opens maxforcongress.com/issues at this heading)
Everything has gone up in prices - except our paychecks :( If you believe we need to be realistic about affordability of consumer goods for everyday Americans, I’m your candidate. Prices that surged during COVID were because of supply chain disruptions and rising energy costs, yet even as energy prices have returned to pre-pandemic levels, everyday goods remain expensive, continuing to strain American families. Tariffs imposed by the current administration may have raised government revenue and signaled toughness to global trade partners, but in practice they function as taxes on American importers and consumers, driving up the cost of goods at home.
Update: Tariffs raised prices for American consumers. Now that the courts have invalidated those tariffs, refunds are going to importers—not consumers. That's fundamentally unfair: consumers paid the price, but importers got the money back.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · maxforcongress.com/issues
Heading as listed on maxforcongress.com/issues ↗ (opens maxforcongress.com/issues at this heading)
If you believe America should prioritize diplomacy to resolve conflicts and trade disputes, I’m your candidate. Military force must always remain an option — but only as a last resort. Our goal should be to protect American lives, avoid unnecessary entanglements, and use force only when there is a clear mission and a clear exit strategy.
Common sense tells us that American blood, resources, and resolve should be committed only when our national interests are clear and the path forward is defined.
The same principle applies to trade policy. Tariffs may sound tough, but when poorly designed they often function as taxes on American consumers through higher prices. Before imposing policies that disrupt markets and raise costs, our leaders must carefully consider the consequences for hardworking American families. Diplomacy and negotiation should be our first tools for resolving trade disputes, with economic penalties used strategically and only when the benefits clearly outweigh the costs to the American people.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · maxforcongress.com/issues
Heading as listed on maxforcongress.com/issues ↗ (opens maxforcongress.com/issues at this heading)
If you believe safe district is essential for residents, businesses, and tourism in NC-04, I’m your candidate. Common sense tells us no one wants to live or invest in unsafe, no-go zones, and sanctuary cities. Crime hurts families, jobs, and our economy. From the U.S. Armed Forces to local first responders, those who keep us safe deserve our respect and support. Service earned it, America owes it, and I will leave no veteran behind.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · maxforcongress.com/issues
Heading as listed on maxforcongress.com/issues ↗ (opens maxforcongress.com/issues at this heading)
If you believe our daughters and women deserve privacy, dignity, and safety in sports and private spaces, I’m your candidate. Common sense tells us God made us who we are, we should cherish that gift. Also, women in domestic violence situations and suffering from Battered Woman Syndrome must be rescued. Click here to see the teaser of a feature film we are producing to bring awareness to Battered Woman Syndrome and domestic violence.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · maxforcongress.com/issues
Heading as listed on maxforcongress.com/issues ↗ (opens maxforcongress.com/issues at this heading)
As an immigrant myself, I believe in common-sense immigration. I believe that U.S. Citizenship is an honor & must be earned. If you want immigration based on merit, the rule of law, and assimilation, I am your candidate. Common sense tells us that a shared language (English) and respect for American values unite us as one nation.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · maxforcongress.com/issues
Heading as listed on maxforcongress.com/issues ↗ (opens maxforcongress.com/issues at this heading)
If you believe American farmers, construction, and hospitality industries need access to seasonal workers, and that there should be a legal, orderly way to hire them when needed — I’m your candidate. Common sense tells us a Labor Exchange system can be a win-win for all. By vetting seasonal workers through U.S. embassies, businesses can fill temporary labor needs legally, temp-immigrant workers are protected from exploitation, and participants return to their home countries once the work is complete. This approach strengthens key industries, respects the rule of law, and brings fairness and transparency to the system.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · maxforcongress.com/issues
Heading as listed on maxforcongress.com/issues ↗ (opens maxforcongress.com/issues at this heading)
If you believe entrepreneurs deserve fewer regulations and lower barriers to start and grow businesses, I’m your candidate. Common sense tells us excessive regulations protect big crony corporations — not small competitors.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · maxforcongress.com/issues
Heading as listed on maxforcongress.com/issues ↗ (opens maxforcongress.com/issues at this heading)
If you believe American tax dollars should be spent here at home — benefiting American citizens — I’m your candidate. Common sense tells us too much foreign aid never reaches the people it’s meant to help. Helping Americans succeed means restoring independence and dignity, not fostering dependency.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · maxforcongress.com/issues
Heading as listed on maxforcongress.com/issues ↗ (opens maxforcongress.com/issues at this heading)
If you believe America should trade with countries that respect human rights and treat American products fairly, I’m your candidate. Free and fair trade strengthens our economy, supports American workers, and keeps prices affordable for families. Common sense tells us that excessive tariffs and protectionism often raise costs for consumers and small businesses the most. Also, excessive pressure on trade partners and allies can backfire, pushing them toward our adversaries and ultimately harming U.S. economic and national security interests. Strong trade policy does not have to mean blunt force. Recent tensions with strategic partners like India show why diplomacy matters.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · maxforcongress.com/issues
Heading as listed on maxforcongress.com/issues ↗ (opens maxforcongress.com/issues at this heading)
If you want smaller, limited government, I am your candidate. Lawlessness and corruption lead to bloated government. Businesses and residents leave to stretch their dollars elsewhere, while those left behind pay the price. Common sense tells us smaller, accountable governments work better for everyone.
The federal leviathan must end baseline budgeting and return to true, need-based budgeting that justifies every dollar spent. Agencies should prepare and submit their budgets to Congress at least six months before the end of the fiscal year, allowing proper review, transparency, and accountability. Responsible planning will reduce last-minute brinkmanship and help eliminate the constant reliance on Continuing Resolutions, which too often become political bargaining chips that leave the nation in a financially fragile position.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · maxforcongress.com/issues
Heading as listed on maxforcongress.com/issues ↗ (opens maxforcongress.com/issues at this heading)
America’s gun violence stems from moral decline and a growing mental-health crisis. Common sense tells us when criminals and unstable individuals are armed, law-abiding citizens must have the right to protect themselves — without unnecessary restrictions.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · maxforcongress.com/issues
Heading as listed on maxforcongress.com/issues ↗ (opens maxforcongress.com/issues at this heading)
Power is addictive. Politicians rarely give it up willingly—that’s why We the People must set limits.
- Term Limits: 6 terms in the House, 2 terms in the Senate
- No Stock Trading: Members of Congress shouldn’t profit from inside access
- No Pay-to-Play Deals: Public office is not a path to personal wealth
Elected officials should serve the public, not themselves. Period.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · maxforcongress.com/issues
Heading as listed on maxforcongress.com/issues ↗ (opens maxforcongress.com/issues at this heading)
This is a deeply personal and painful issue that deserves compassion, humility, and respect for life and individual circumstances. My faith discourages abortion, and personally I do not support it; however, in tragic cases such as rape, incest, or when a mother’s life is at risk, I believe these decisions should remain within the family, guided by medical professionals.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · maxforcongress.com/issues
Heading as listed on maxforcongress.com/issues ↗ (opens maxforcongress.com/issues at this heading)
Heading as listed on maxforcongress.com/issues ↗ (opens maxforcongress.com/issues at this heading)
The picture on the left is my youngest son at 4 years old. He watched his sister dress up in different outfits while everyone called her cute. One day, he asked me, “Why am I not a girl?”
I asked him why he would want to be one. His answer was simple and innocent: because his sister got to wear all kinds of stylish clothes, while all he ever wore were “shorts and t-shirts.” He repeated “shorts and t-shirts” three times just to make sure I understood how bored he was with them.
Instead of acting like a foolish parent (or a deranged adult) and believing my son somehow wanted to become a girl, I understood what was really happening — a child being a child. So, I played along and told him to wear his shorts through one leg opening like a skirt. He laughed, loved the idea, and moved on with life.
Today, at 21 years old, he is chasing girls (metaphorically speaking).
The moral of the story: let kids be kids. Every child goes through phases, curiosities, and moments of imagination. Most of us (not all) grow wiser and more grounded as we mature. But when society pushes children (or supports physically grown-ups) against the natural grain of life, the result is often confusion, anger, frustration, sadness, and unhappiness.
God does not make mistakes. He made us in His image. He has given us almost everything we need in life — except one thing: satisfaction. That is something each of us must find for ourselves.
Once you find satisfaction, life becomes blissful.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · maxforcongress.com/issues
Heading as listed on maxforcongress.com/issues ↗ (opens maxforcongress.com/issues at this heading)
Go ask an Indian what it is like to live under the pressure of enforced Sharia law in regions where it takes hold. Radicals exploit weak law enforcement and political divisions to advance their agenda. Socialist politicians look at vote-banks and allow weakened law enforcement with little or no concern for the We the People.
Concerns about border security and national safety are often tied to broader debates about immigration policy. Have past global events such as 9/11 not taught us the cost of complacency? The only option, We the People, have is to manage the decline by denying the radicals and their supporters, political offices to implement Sharia law in the USA.
Americans must stop being "useful idiots" to a self-destructive cause. Tolerance is one thing; being willingly exploited is another.
Americans must ask themselves: when do we put national interests first?
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · maxforcongress.com/go-ask-an-indian
Go ask an Indian what it was like to live in India, under socialist govt. with constant blackouts when energy demand spikes. Ask entrepreneurs, manufacturers, and farmers how unreliable power cripples productivity.
Energy is the engine of growth. Energy drives opportunity — when energy fails, economies stall. The result: fewer jobs, rising hardship, and people becoming dependent on government handouts. Remember, those who control energy control the people.
Economic destitution hands governments immense power over people’s lives – exactly what the socialists demand. Many left countries like India to escape that cycle.
Do Americans really want to risk their prosperity?
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · maxforcongress.com/go-ask-an-indian
Go ask an Indian how adulteration works in India. When regulations choke and taxes crush, survival instincts take over. Small businesses, desperate to stay afloat, begin adulterating food and goods with inferior—or even dangerous—substitutes just to survive. Corrupt government officials enable it by taking bribes and looking the other way while public safety is compromised.
Then the government steps in as the “savior” for the very problem it created. It takes control of the food supply in the name of fairness and public protection. Soon, food rots in government warehouses while bureaucrats fight among themselves for their share of the system.
The result: integrity is punished, corruption is rewarded, and ordinary citizens pay the price. When rules become impossible to follow, lawbreaking becomes routine, and society splits into two classes—the hunters and the hunted.
If Americans think this cannot happen here, they are living in a fool’s paradise.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · maxforcongress.com/go-ask-an-indian
Heading as listed on maxforcongress.com/go-ask-an-indian ↗ (opens maxforcongress.com/go-ask-an-indian at this heading) · “Homework: Understand YOUR Cause & Effect of YOUR Decision” on maxforcongress.com/go-ask-an-indian ↗ (opens maxforcongress.com/go-ask-an-indian at this heading)
FEC filings, Jan 1, 2025 to Oct 14, 2026 · Official FEC bulk data · committee C00769463
$1.34 has been spent for every dollar raised across 9 reports ($24.9K of $18.6K). Cash on hand went from $15.2K on Mar 31, 2025 to $9K on Oct 14, 2026.
| Report | Raised in the period | Spent in the period | Cash on hand at its close |
|---|---|---|---|
| APRIL QUARTERLY 2025 through Mar 31, 2025 | $0 | $0 | $15,244 |
| JULY QUARTERLY 2025 through Jun 30, 2025 | $1,750 | $1,500 | $15,494 |
| OCTOBER QUARTERLY 2025 through Sep 30, 2025 | $200 | $150 | $15,544 |
| YEAR-END 2025 through Dec 31, 2025 | $2,003 | $818 | $16,729 |
| PRE-PRIMARY 2026 through Feb 18, 2026 | $0 | $0 | $16,729 |
| APRIL QUARTERLY 2026 through Mar 31, 2026 | $1,578 | $1,017 | $17,399 |
| JULY QUARTERLY 2026 through Jun 30, 2026 | $6,386 | $6,817 | $16,967 |
| OCTOBER QUARTERLY 2026 through Sep 30, 2026 | $6,651 | $6,777 | $16,842 |
| PRE-GENERAL 2026 through Oct 14, 2026 | $0 | $7,841 | $9,001 |
Each report’s own period, as filed with the FEC; a report filed again counts once, as its latest copy.
A donor who gave several times appears once. The 10 largest donors by total given are listed. In all, 19 itemized contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $7.3K.
1 endorser listed on Mahesh Ganorkar’s own campaign site.
This is the campaign's claim, checked by an editor against its page; the endorsers have not confirmed it to us. Each name opens the campaign’s page with that name highlighted.
a combat veteran and a proud American construction worker
Unconfirmed match. This filing was tied to the ballot entries below by surname alone, because the filed forename does not appear on the ballot. They may belong to someone else with the same surname.
Election not held yet · Full results ↗
Every contest for this seat that named this candidate, most recent last; a result is shown once the race is called. Election dates and results from civicAPI (civicapi.org). civicAPI aggregates results from Secretaries of State and equivalent election bodies, and makes its own race calls. civicapi.org ↗
Official FEC filing record for the current cycle. The priorities they publish are quoted from their own site, in their order.
Statements are quoted from these pages exactly. Headings, order and wording are the campaign’s; the record marking is ours.
The largest of the committees is listed. In all, 1 committee contribution was filed this cycle, totaling $2K. Counted from the givers' own filings, which can run above the total the campaign itself reports.
Total reported receipts $18,568
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. Open a source marked + to see who gave. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
100% of the money placed by state came from inside North Carolina: $7.3K of $7.3K.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 19 contributions · 100% | $7,342 |
By the state each donor wrote on the filing, across 1 states and territories. Donors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized, so they cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
| Occupation as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an occupation · 2 contributions · 100% of ranked | $500 |
A further $6,842 came from donors whose answer names no occupation (blank), so it is not ranked. Itemized gifts over $200, grouped by the words donors filed: not an industry classification, and a gift from an employee is not a gift from the employer. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($3,169) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
Money groups spent on their own, not through a campaign. Each ad is filed against the candidate it names, so money attacking an opponent shows on the opponent’s row. Open a candidate to see who spent it.
Total itemized disbursements $23,026
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
All 105 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 4 payments · 30% of all spending | $7,367 |
| 12 payments · 15% of all spending | $3,683 |
| 6 payments · 9.8% of all spending | $2,450 |
| 5 payments · 9.2% of all spending | $2,305 |
| 39 payments · 9% of all spending | $2,236 |
| 2 payments · 4.9% of all spending | $1,218 |
| 11 payments · 4.3% of all spending | $1,077 |
| 14 payments · 3.3% of all spending | $830 |
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.