Loading this committee’s profile from its FEC filings.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Loading this committee’s profile from its FEC filings.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
PACs › Hybrid PAC (qualified) › 2025–2026
Hybrid PAC (qualified)San Diego, CaliforniaActive
Track AIPAC is a grassroots effort to reveal and counter the influence of AIPAC and the Israel lobby by systematically documenting their financial contributions to our federal officials. We advocate for and support candidates who refuse support from the Israel lobby and champion Palestinian rights. (Linked public record: LittleSis organization profile)
FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026 · FEC bulk filing data · committee C00879080 · files monthly
Notices dated after Oct 14, 2026 are added; earlier ones are already in the regular reports.
“We are a national grassroots organization tracking AIPAC's influence and building political power to challenge it. Our work combines investigative research, electoral organizing, and direct accountability campaigns.”
Citizens Against AIPAC Corruption, on its own site, citizensagainstaipac.com
Quoted from the committee's site, or its sponsor's or funder's where its own says nothing. The statement is filed under topics from a fixed list, chosen by AI models when two of three agree; which side it takes is in its own words.
5 priorities from the committee’s own site, in the order they are listed there. Every heading and the text under it is copied exactly, as one passage for each page it is from, and links to that place on the page; hover a source to see which passage it opens.
Citizens Against AIPAC Corruption leveling the playing field against AIPAC's millions.
We follow every dollar, expose every vote, and give you the tools to hold genocide enablers accountable.
Reject AIPAC · Enforce FARA · Overturn Citizens United
Reject AIPAC Enforce FARA Overturn Citizens United Reject AIPAC Enforce FARA Overturn Citizens United Reject AIPAC Enforce FARA Overturn Citizens United Reject AIPAC Enforce FARA Overturn Citizens United Reject AIPAC Enforce FARA Overturn Citizens United Reject AIPAC Enforce FARA Overturn Citizens United
Every number we cite comes with a source. The data speaks for itself. ↗ (opens citizensagainstaipac.com at this heading)
These numbers aren't abstractions – they're the proof of complicity.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · citizensagainstaipac.com
The genocide in Gaza and ethnic cleansing in the West Bank demands nothing less than a fundamental shift in U.S. foreign policy toward justice and human rights.
We didn't create the rules of political influence – but with your help, we can use them to win.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · citizensagainstaipac.com
Heading as listed on citizensagainstaipac.com ↗ (opens citizensagainstaipac.com at this heading)
Heading as listed on citizensagainstaipac.com ↗ (opens citizensagainstaipac.com at this heading)
We expose every member of Congress and federal candidates who accept money from AIPAC and their allies and organize voters in their districts to hold them accountable at the ballot box.
District-level research dossiers delivered to organizers and reporters
Rapid response teams tracking floor votes and key moments in real time
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · citizensagainstaipac.com
Heading as listed on citizensagainstaipac.com ↗ (opens citizensagainstaipac.com at this heading)
We endorse and back AIPAC-free champions, getting resources to principled candidates who refuse to be bought.
Our candidates reject support from AIPAC and their allies.
Digital ad programs that turn every AIPAC dollar into a liability
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · citizensagainstaipac.com
Heading as listed on citizensagainstaipac.com ↗ (opens citizensagainstaipac.com at this heading)
We refuse to normalize genocide and apartheid.
Every alert, briefing, and action we publish keeps human rights at the forefront and confronts U.S. complicity head-on.
Accountability briefings for organizers and members of Congress
Tracking the connections between Israel lobby money and suffering and chaos throughout the Middle East.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · citizensagainstaipac.com
Heading as listed on citizensagainstaipac.com ↗ (opens citizensagainstaipac.com at this heading)
Heading as listed on citizensagainstaipac.com ↗ (opens citizensagainstaipac.com at this heading)
Track AIPAC money in real time, publish verified dossiers on every recipient, and deploy viral rapid response infrastructure that makes corruption trend before lobbyists can spin.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · citizensagainstaipac.com/about
Combine transparency with electoral organizing.
We support primary challengers to AIPAC-funded incumbents, mobilize pledge signers, and fund candidates who refuse AIPAC money.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · citizensagainstaipac.com/about
Gaza is facing genocide sponsored by American tax dollars.
Every politician who takes AIPAC money is complicit.
We refuse to let that complicity hide."
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · citizensagainstaipac.com/about
Each part reads different filings, so counts and totals can differ.
Direct PAC contributions and independent expenditures explicitly reported as support, by the party of the candidate they went to.
Spending against candidates is drawn on its own bar and left out of the support totals.
Contributions are reported money, not endorsements; a PAC giving to both parties is common.
Every contribution on line 23 of the committee’s own Schedule B, which is the filing its summary totals are built from. That line covers federal candidates, party committees and other political committees alike, so a super PAC funding other super PACs appears here rather than under candidate giving.
| Recipient | Count | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| Democratic candidates | 3 | $9.5K · 100% |
| All recipients | 3 | $9.5K |
| State | Candidates | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| New York | 2 | $7K |
| Florida | 1 | $2.5K |
Bars drawn to $3.5K, the largest gift total here. 2025–2026 filings.
Candidate contribution rows come from candidate committee Schedule A filings, the same rows the party chart above counts.
Money moving between this committee and other committees, matched on FEC committee ID rather than the name each filing was typed under. Both sides exclude memo entries. The figures here count each committee once, from the itemized transfers read for this section, so they will not match the payment counts under Who this PAC gave to.
Committees that reported giving to this one on their own Schedule A filings, grouped by the giver’s committee ID.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| Hybrid PAC (qualified) · 1 payment |
Each as the committee named it on this line.
A donor who gave several times appears once. The 12 largest donors by total given are listed. In all, 4,727 itemized contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $716.6K. FEC contributor lists are public records and cannot be used for commercial solicitation.
The largest of the committees is listed. Counted from the givers' own filings, which can run above the total this committee reports. Here they come to $5K, more than the $4K this committee's own reports show on the line.
Total reported receipts $1,957,957
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. Open a source marked + to see who gave. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 997 contributions · 30% | $216,447 |
| 193 contributions · 8.2% | $58,749 |
Total reported disbursements $1,821,829
Every dollar this committee reported spending this cycle, split by the lines it reports against. Open a line to see who was actually paid on it. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
These are the payments the committee itemized to vendors, staff and other committees. Its $142,336 in independent expenditures is filed separately, against the candidate each was about, so it is counted in the split above and listed by candidate below, not here.
$1.8M spent from Jan 2025 to Oct 2026. Most in one report: $308.8K, Jul 1 – Dec 31, 2025.
The running total of what the committee’s FEC reports say it spent, independent expenditures included, with a point at the end of each report. The line is straight between reports because a report gives one total for its whole period.
No lobbying disclosures matched
Track AIPAC is a grassroots effort to reveal and counter the influence of AIPAC and the Israel lobby by systematically documenting their financial contributions to our federal officials. We advocate for and support candidates who refuse support from the Israel lobby and champion Palestinian rights. Linked public record: LittleSis organization profile.
Statements are quoted from these pages exactly. Headings, order and wording are the committee’s or its sponsor’s; the record marking is ours.
Citizens Against AIPAC Corruption is matched to organization records using the FEC committee identity, structured identifiers, and corroborated organization data.
LittleSis data is shared under CC BY-SA 4.0.
| $5K |
$5K from 1 committee, counting every itemized receipt this cycle.
Disbursements this committee itemized to another committee: candidate contributions, party transfers and payments alike, not contributions only.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| Hybrid PAC (nonqualified) · 1 payment | $3.5K |
| House campaign committee · 1 payment | $3.5K |
| Senate campaign committee · 1 payment | $2.5K |
| Hybrid PAC (qualified) · 2 payments | $50 |
$9.6K across 8 recipient committees, or 0.5% of everything this committee reports spending. The largest 4 are shown. A further $7K was filed as memo entries, which FEC reports separately to avoid counting it twice.
Built from FEC Schedule A and Schedule B filings for the selected cycle. A committee only appears here if the money was itemized under its FEC committee ID.
| $56,586 |
| 199 contributions · 7.6% | $54,248 |
| 337 contributions · 5.1% | $36,215 |
| 183 contributions · 3.9% | $28,203 |
| 144 contributions · 3% | $21,292 |
| 315 contributions · 2.7% | $19,278 |
By the state each contributor wrote on the filing. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line together, so one committee or organization transfer can account for a whole state. Contributors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized and cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
| Employer as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an employer · 2,490 contributions · 43% of ranked | $289,302 |
| Written instead of an employer · 581 contributions · 15% of ranked | $103,636 |
| 1 contribution · 7.4% of ranked | $50,000 |
| 3 contributions · 1.6% of ranked | $11,000 |
| 2 contributions · 1.5% of ranked | $10,000 |
| 4 contributions · 1% of ranked | $7,000 |
| 4 contributions · 1% of ranked | $6,750 |
| 15 contributions · 1% of ranked | $6,750 |
A further $14,326 came from donors whose answer names no employer (N/A, None, blank), so it is not ranked. Ranked from the largest 200 of 201 employer spellings filed; each share is of the money in those. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($668,310) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
| Occupation as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an occupation · 2,501 contributions · 40% of ranked | $285,174 |
| 1 contribution · 7% of ranked | $50,000 |
| 34 contributions · 5.9% of ranked | $41,750 |
| 311 contributions · 5% of ranked | $35,656 |
| 19 contributions · 4.5% of ranked | $31,850 |
| 213 contributions · 2.9% of ranked | $20,979 |
| 82 contributions · 2.3% of ranked | $16,060 |
| Written instead of an occupation · 91 contributions · 2.1% of ranked | $14,737 |
A further $3,017 came from donors whose answer names no occupation (N/A, blank), so it is not ranked. Ranked from the largest 200 of 201 occupation spellings filed; each share is of the money in those. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($668,310) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
Total itemized disbursements $970,828
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
All 1,338 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
23 payments were reported as a lump sum, such as a card or payroll bill, with the detail filed underneath as memo entries. Those entries, $73,193 in all, are counted under the payee and purpose they name rather than under the processor that was paid. The total is the same either way.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 33 payments · 12% of all spending | $213,987 |
| 11 payments · 7.5% of all spending | $137,016 |
| 23 payments · 4.3% of all spending | $78,931 |
| 734 payments · 4% of all spending | $72,982 |
| 13 payments · 3.7% of all spending | $66,844 |
| 169 payments · 2.4% of all spending | $44,104 |
| 12 payments · 2.1% of all spending | $38,750 |
| 8 payments · 1.6% of all spending | $29,000 |
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.