Loading the public record
Loading the public record
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
All recent votes112th CongressSenate
Expresses the sense of the Senate that any agreement to reduce the budget deficit should require that those earning $1 million or more per year make a more meaningful contribution to the deficit reduction effort.
Written by the nonpartisan Congressional Research Service, describing S. 1323 as introduced in Senate on Jun 30, 2011. It is not the text of the measure; a later amendment may have changed what it does.
Jul 5, 2011Each bar: ✓ Yea from the bottom, ✕ Nay aboveJul 29, 2011
Senate Jul 5, 2011 · the primary vote
Motion to Instruct the Sergeant at Arms to Request Absent Senators
Motion Agreed to
83 Yea 8 Nay 9 not voting
Crossed both parties 8 of 91 voting members broke with their own party: 8 Republicans.
DemocratsIndependentsOtherRepublicansFilled: YeaRing: NayGrey: not voting or present
100 members on this roll call, from the official Senate record. Party majorities need at least five voting members, so an independent never counts as breaking with a party.
Signing on is not a vote: a member can cosponsor S. 1323 and vote against it. 0 signed when it was filed.
Organizations that named S. 1323 in a lobbying disclosure. Only those that cited the bill by number appear, so this is a floor, not a full list.
22 disclosures name this measure. Retrieved from LDA.gov on 2026-10-05. Senate Office of Public Records cannot vouch for the data or analyses derived from these data after the data have been retrieved from LDA.gov.