Loading this committee’s profile from its FEC filings.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Loading this committee’s profile from its FEC filings.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
PACs › Hybrid PAC (qualified) › 2025–2026
FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026 · FEC bulk filing data · committee C00716423 · files quarterly
“The Next 50 prepares candidates to win America’s toughest races—and to build elected Democratic majorities in every state.”
The Next 50 PAC, on its own site, thenext50.us
Quoted from the committee's site, or its sponsor's or funder's where its own says nothing. The statement is filed under topics from a fixed list, chosen by AI models when two of three agree; which side it takes is in its own words.
5 priorities from the committee’s own site, in the order they are listed there. Every heading and the text under it is copied exactly, as one passage for each page it is from, and links to that place on the page; hover a source to see which passage it opens.
No great, emerging leader should be inhibited from running a successful campaign because they do not have access to a fundraising network.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · thenext50.us
Heading as listed on thenext50.us ↗ (opens thenext50.us at this heading)
We are dedicated to building a stronger bench and a brighter future. We do so by investing in the next generation of political leadership.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · thenext50.us/about
Heading as listed on thenext50.us/about ↗ (opens thenext50.us/about at this heading)
The Next 50 identifies and invests in the next generation of Democratic leaders who will shape the next decades in American politics.
The leaders who can define our party and our country are already doing the work in their communities today.
They are state legislators, mayors, community leaders, and public servants building trust, solving problems, and earning the opportunity to lead at the next level.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · thenext50.us/about
Heading as listed on thenext50.us/about ↗ (opens thenext50.us/about at this heading)
The Next 50 takes a long-term approach to political leadership.
We don’t just look at whether a candidate can win their next race—we look at whether they have the potential to shape the future of the Democratic Party and the communities they serve for decades to come.
Our work is rooted in identifying leaders with the character, talent, and determination to meet this moment and the challenges ahead.
We look for leaders who are:
Principled in what they stand for.
They lead with integrity, conviction, and a commitment to public service.
Pragmatic in how they solve problems.
Energetic in how they lead.
Focused on doing the work.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · thenext50.us/about
Heading as listed on thenext50.us/about ↗ (opens thenext50.us/about at this heading)
The future of Democratic leadership is not something we can wait for.
The Next 50 is committed to finding exceptional leaders early, investing in their success, and helping build a stronger bench of Democratic talent ready to lead at every level of government.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · thenext50.us/about
Heading as listed on thenext50.us/about ↗ (opens thenext50.us/about at this heading)
Each part reads different filings, so counts and totals can differ.
Direct PAC contributions and independent expenditures explicitly reported as support, by the party of the candidate they went to.
Contributions are reported money, not endorsements; a PAC giving to both parties is common.
Every contribution on line 23 of the committee’s own Schedule B, which is the filing its summary totals are built from. That line covers federal candidates, party committees and other political committees alike, so a super PAC funding other super PACs appears here rather than under candidate giving.
| Recipient | Count | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| Democratic candidates | 10 | $72K · 74% |
| Other PACs and committees | 4 | $25K · 26% |
| All recipients | 14 | $97K |
| State | Candidates | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| Michigan | 2 | $20K |
| New York | 2 | $11K |
| Iowa | 1 | $10K |
| Pennsylvania | 1 | $10K |
| New Jersey | 1 | $10K |
| Washington | 1 | $5K |
| New Hampshire | 1 | $5K |
| Delaware | 1 | $1K |
The 5 largest sources are listed. Each as the committee named it on this line, $289.5K from 5 sources in all.
A donor who gave several times appears once. The 10 largest donors by total given are listed. In all, 253 itemized contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $434.3K. These gifts, as the FEC's contributor file lists them, come to more than the $312.6K the committee's own summary reports for this line; the two filings disagree. FEC contributor lists are public records and cannot be used for commercial solicitation.
The largest of the committees is listed. Counted from the givers' own filings, which can run above the total this committee reports.
Total reported receipts $1,577,097
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. Open a source marked + to see who gave. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 59 contributions · 61% | $265,833 |
| 68 contributions · 28% | $119,587 |
| 17 contributions · 2.6% | $11,502 |
| 2 contributions · 1.2% | $5,250 |
| 1 contribution · 1.2% |
Total reported disbursements $1,469,983
Every dollar this committee reported spending this cycle, split by the lines it reports against. Open a line to see who was actually paid on it. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
$1.5M spent from Jan 2025 to Oct 2026. Most in one report: $430.8K, Jul 1 – Sep 30, 2026.
The running total of what the committee’s FEC reports say it spent, independent expenditures included, with a point at the end of each report. The line is straight between reports because a report gives one total for its whole period.
No lobbying disclosures matched
The Next 50 PAC is registered with the Federal Election Commission as a Hybrid PAC (qualified). Its FEC record names Next Generation Majority Fund as an affiliate. Official FEC summary: Federal Election Commission committee record.
Statements are quoted from these pages exactly. Headings, order and wording are the committee’s or its sponsor’s; the record marking is ours.
The Next 50 PAC is matched to organization records using the FEC committee identity, structured identifiers, and corroborated organization data.
LittleSis data is shared under CC BY-SA 4.0.
Bars drawn to $10K, the largest gift total here. 2025–2026 filings.
Candidate contribution rows come from candidate committee Schedule A filings, the same rows the party chart above counts.
Money moving between this committee and other committees, matched on FEC committee ID rather than the name each filing was typed under. Both sides exclude memo entries. The figures here count each committee once, from the itemized transfers read for this section, so they will not match the payment counts under Who this PAC gave to.
Committees that reported giving to this one on their own Schedule A filings, grouped by the giver’s committee ID.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| PAC (qualified) · 2 payments | $16K |
| PAC (qualified) · 1 payment | $5K |
| PAC (qualified) · 1 payment | $1.5K |
$22.5K from 3 committees, counting every itemized receipt this cycle.
Disbursements this committee itemized to another committee: candidate contributions, party transfers and payments alike, not contributions only.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| Hybrid PAC (nonqualified) · 2 payments | $10K |
| Senate campaign committee · Connected to MCMORROW VICTORY FUND · 2 payments | $10K |
| House campaign committee · Connected to NEW POLITICS NEXT MISSION FUND · 2 payments | $10K |
| House campaign committee · Connected to NEW POLITICS HELLCATS · 2 payments | $10K |
| House campaign committee · Connected to HINES VICTORY FUND · 2 payments | $10K |
| House campaign committee · 2 payments | $10K |
| House campaign committee · Connected to NEW POLITICS NEXT MISSION FUND · 2 payments | $10K |
| PAC (qualified) · Connected to GALLEGO · 1 payment | $5K |
| PAC (nonqualified) · 1 payment | $5K |
| PAC (qualified) · Connected to SLOTKIN · 1 payment | $5K |
| House campaign committee · Connected to DEMOCRATIC FUTURE LEADERSHIP FUND · 1 payment | $5K |
| Senate campaign committee · Connected to CHRIS PAPPAS VICTORY FUND · 1 payment | $5K |
$97K across 14 recipient committees, or 6.6% of everything this committee reports spending. The largest 12 are shown.
Built from FEC Schedule A and Schedule B filings for the selected cycle. A committee only appears here if the money was itemized under its FEC committee ID.
| $5,000 |
| 11 contributions · 0.9% | $3,975 |
| 1 contribution · 0.6% | $2,500 |
| 10 contributions · 0.6% | $2,500 |
By the state each contributor wrote on the filing. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line together, so one committee or organization transfer can account for a whole state. Contributors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized and cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
| Employer as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| 1 contribution · 31% of ranked | $100,000 |
| 4 contributions · 29% of ranked | $95,000 |
| 1 contribution · 9.3% of ranked | $30,000 |
| 1 contribution · 7.7% of ranked | $25,000 |
| 2 contributions · 4.6% of ranked | $15,000 |
| 1 contribution · 2.3% of ranked | $7,480 |
| 2 contributions · 1.7% of ranked | $5,333 |
| Written instead of an employer · 11 contributions · 1.6% of ranked | $5,300 |
A further $111,583 came from donors whose answer names no employer (N/A, blank), so it is not ranked. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($596,523) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
| Occupation as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| 1 contribution · 23% of ranked | $100,000 |
| Written instead of an occupation · 157 contributions · 22% of ranked | $95,983 |
| 7 contributions · 22% of ranked | $95,750 |
| 4 contributions · 9.3% of ranked | $40,250 |
| 1 contribution · 6.9% of ranked | $30,000 |
| Written instead of an occupation · 10 contributions · 3.1% of ranked | $13,350 |
| 2 contributions · 2.9% of ranked | $12,480 |
| 2 contributions · 1.2% of ranked | $5,333 |
A further $2,000 came from donors whose answer names no occupation (None, blank), so it is not ranked. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($596,523) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
Total itemized disbursements $170,292
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
All 56 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 2 payments · 2% of all spending | $30,126 |
| 3 payments · 0.9% of all spending | $13,597 |
| 1 payment · 0.8% of all spending | $11,900 |
| 2 payments · 0.7% of all spending | $10,000 |
| 2 payments · 0.7% of all spending | $10,000 |
| 2 payments · 0.7% of all spending | $10,000 |
| 2 payments · 0.7% of all spending | $10,000 |
| 2 payments · 0.7% of all spending | $10,000 |
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.