Loading this committee’s profile from its FEC filings.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Loading this committee’s profile from its FEC filings.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
PACs › Senate campaign committee › 2025–2026
Senate campaign committeePrincipal campaign committeeRoyal Oak, MichiganActive
Connected organization: Mcmorrow Victory Fund
FEC filings through Sep 30, 2026 · FEC bulk filing data · committee C00901173 · files quarterly
No published list of positions
Each part reads different filings, so counts and totals can differ.
Direct PAC contributions and independent expenditures explicitly reported as support, by the party of the candidate they went to.
No candidate-directed contributions or explicitly supportive independent expenditures were returned.
Contributions are reported money, not endorsements; a PAC giving to both parties is common.
Every contribution on line 23 of the committee’s own Schedule B, which is the filing its summary totals are built from. That line covers federal candidates, party committees and other political committees alike, so a super PAC funding other super PACs appears here rather than under candidate giving.
| Recipient | Count | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| Democratic party committees | 4 | $7.4K · 100% |
| All recipients | 4 | $7.4K |
No recipient here is matched to a candidate with a state on record.
Bars drawn to $5.8K, the largest gift total here. 2025–2026 filings.
Nothing loaded
Candidate contribution rows come from candidate committee Schedule A filings, the same rows the party chart above counts.
Money moving between this committee and other committees, matched on FEC committee ID rather than the name each filing was typed under. Both sides exclude memo entries. The figures here count each committee once, from the itemized transfers read for this section, so they will not match the payment counts under Who this PAC gave to.
Committees that reported giving to this one on their own Schedule A filings, grouped by the giver’s committee ID.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| Senate campaign committee · 1 payment | $16.8K |
| Hybrid PAC (qualified) · Connected to NEXT GENERATION MAJORITY FUND · 2 payments | $10K |
| PAC (nonqualified) · 1 payment | $7K |
| PAC (qualified) · 1 payment | $5K |
| PAC (qualified) · 1 payment | $5K |
| PAC (qualified) · Connected to SMART TD · 1 payment | $5K |
| PAC (qualified) · Connected to UTILITY WORKERS UNION OF AMERICA (THE UNION) · 1 payment | $5K |
| PAC (qualified) · Connected to MURPHY · 3 payments | $5K |
| Hybrid PAC (qualified) · 1 payment | $5K |
| Senate campaign committee · Connected to FIGHT AND WIN FUND · 2 payments | $4K |
| Hybrid PAC (qualified) · 1 payment | $2.5K |
| Hybrid PAC (qualified) · 1 payment | $2.5K |
$75.8K from 16 committees, counting every itemized receipt this cycle. The largest 12 are shown.
Disbursements this committee itemized to another committee: candidate contributions, party transfers and payments alike, not contributions only.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| Party committee (qualified) · Connected to DNC VICTORY FUND · 2 payments | $5.8K |
| Party committee (qualified) · Connected to MICHIGAN DEMOCRATIC STATE CENTRAL COMMITTEE · 2 payments | $600 |
| Party committee (qualified) · 1 payment | $500 |
| Party committee (qualified) · Connected to MICHIGAN DEMOCRATIC STATE CENTRAL COMMITTEE · 1 payment | $500 |
$7.4K across 4 recipient committees, or <0.1% of everything this committee reports spending. A further $6.5K was filed as memo entries, which FEC reports separately to avoid counting it twice.
Built from FEC Schedule A and Schedule B filings for the selected cycle. A committee only appears here if the money was itemized under its FEC committee ID.
A donor who gave several times appears once. The 12 largest donors by total given are listed. In all, 29,926 itemized contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $5.7M. FEC contributor lists are public records and cannot be used for commercial solicitation.
The 10 largest committees by total given are listed. Counted from the givers' own filings, which can run above the total this committee reports.
Total reported receipts $11,405,912
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. Open a source marked + to see who gave. FEC filings through Sep 30, 2026.
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 12,680 contributions · 39% | $2,189,924 |
| 3,606 contributions · 19% |
Total reported disbursements $10,992,326
Every dollar this committee reported spending this cycle, split by the lines it reports against. Open a line to see who was actually paid on it. FEC filings through Sep 30, 2026.
$11M spent from Mar 2025 to Sep 2026. Most in one report: $4.2M, Apr 1 – Jun 30, 2026.
The running total of what the committee’s FEC reports say it spent, independent expenditures included, with a point at the end of each report. The line is straight between reports because a report gives one total for its whole period.
No lobbying disclosures matched
Mcmorrow for Michigan is registered with the Federal Election Commission as a Senate campaign committee. It is a principal campaign committee. Its FEC record names Mcmorrow Victory Fund as an affiliate. Official FEC summary: Federal Election Commission committee record.
No pages quoted
No approved organization identity yet
| $1,071,694 |
| 1,251 contributions · 8.7% | $495,495 |
| 982 contributions · 4.6% | $262,399 |
| 920 contributions · 3.9% | $220,913 |
| 810 contributions · 2.2% | $122,622 |
| 656 contributions · 2% | $116,314 |
| 750 contributions · 1.9% | $107,630 |
By the state each contributor wrote on the filing. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line together, so one committee or organization transfer can account for a whole state. Contributors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized and cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
| Employer as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an employer · 21,097 contributions · 64% of ranked | $3,036,037 |
| Written instead of an employer · 2,188 contributions · 13% of ranked | $639,675 |
| 12 contributions · 0.9% of ranked | $42,000 |
| Written instead of an employer · 48 contributions · 0.8% of ranked | $40,625 |
| 101 contributions · 0.7% of ranked | $35,174 |
| 6 contributions · 0.4% of ranked | $21,000 |
| 12 contributions · 0.4% of ranked | $20,335 |
| 91 contributions · 0.3% of ranked | $16,375 |
A further $105,623 came from donors whose answer names no employer (N/A, None, blank), so it is not ranked. Ranked from the largest 200 of 201 employer spellings filed; each share is of the money in those. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($5,548,722) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
| Occupation as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an occupation · 17,358 contributions · 40% of ranked | $2,153,079 |
| Written instead of an occupation · 3,776 contributions · 17% of ranked | $928,458 |
| 966 contributions · 6.7% of ranked | $360,533 |
| 507 contributions · 1.7% of ranked | $89,712 |
| 174 contributions · 1.3% of ranked | $69,460 |
| 370 contributions · 1.3% of ranked | $69,301 |
| 161 contributions · 1.2% of ranked | $64,850 |
| 97 contributions · 1.2% of ranked | $64,169 |
A further $79,326 came from donors whose answer names no occupation (blank), so it is not ranked. Ranked from the largest 200 of 201 occupation spellings filed; each share is of the money in those. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($5,548,722) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
Total itemized disbursements $9,412,024
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Sep 30, 2026.
All 2,600 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
111 payments were reported as a lump sum, such as a card or payroll bill, with the detail filed underneath as memo entries. Those entries, $1,420,585 in all, are counted under the payee and purpose they name rather than under the processor that was paid. The total is the same either way.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 18 payments · 27% of all spending | $2,965,586 |
| 91 payments · 16% of all spending | $1,719,739 |
| 20 payments · 9.3% of all spending | $1,021,994 |
| 5 payments · 5.7% of all spending | $630,933 |
| 2 payments · 4.3% of all spending | $470,608 |
| 7 payments · 2.8% of all spending | $311,542 |
| 81 payments · 2.8% of all spending | $304,777 |
| 14 payments · 2.3% of all spending | $252,495 |
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.