Loading this committee’s profile from its FEC filings.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Loading this committee’s profile from its FEC filings.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
PACs › PAC (qualified) › 2025–2026
FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026 · FEC bulk filing data · committee C00542365 · files monthly
4 priorities from the site of Toyota Motor North America, Inc, the organization this committee is the political fund of, in the order they are listed there. Every heading and the text under it is copied exactly, as one passage for each page it is from, and links to that place on the page; hover a source to see which passage it opens.
Respect for the Planet is one of Toyota’s core values.
We demonstrate this value by striving to achieve our environmental sustainability targets as well as looking for new ways to make a positive impact on our planet and society.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · toyota.com/usa/environmentalsustainability/environmental-strategy
We are pursuing a Circular Economy by finding innovative ways to keep materials in use and out of landfills, ensuring that today's resources become the building blocks for tomorrow's mobility.
HOW CIRCULAR ECONOMY IS TIED TO RESOURCE CONSERVATION ↗ (opens toyota.com/usa/environmentalsustainability/circular-economy at this heading)
Conserving resources through reuse and recycling slows the rate of consumption of finite resources.
In other words, a circular economy relies on materials being used many times in lieu of being disposed, so that fewer raw materials need to be extracted and processed.
TOYOTA’S APPROACH TO RESOURCE CONSERVATION ↗ (opens toyota.com/usa/environmentalsustainability/circular-economy at this heading)
Toyota has four levers for conserving resources:
- Increasing the amount of recycled content used in new vehicles
- Developing a battery-to-battery recycling supply chain
- Establishing best practices for dismantling end-of-life vehicles
- Reducing the amount of waste generated
It is also going to take time.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · toyota.com/usa/environmentalsustainability/circular-economy
Encouraging our major suppliers and dealers to adopt these same commitments.
TMNA’s Green Supplier Requirements require suppliers to track water withdrawal, discharge and consumption volumes.
We also request that they develop water reduction plans and targets.
For more information on this project, read our story here.
This is a 6.7% reduction compared to the target baseline.
Across North America, we are focusing on:
- Avoidance of negative impacts on threatened or protected species
- Restoration of degraded habitat Our focused approach to this involves working with stakeholders, including employees, communities and nonprofit organizations, on biodiversity projects on our sites and in our communities. We also engage with suppliers. In the most recent edition of our Green Supplier Requirements, we request all suppliers to support the development of wildlife corridors and consider identifying biodiversity risks in their supply chains.Commitment to Harmony with Nature GRI 101-1Biodiversity Targets GRI 101-1 Our biodiversity target for fiscal years 2022 to 2026 is to support the development of at least 26,000 acres of pollinator habitat in North America.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · toyota.com/content/dam/tusa/environmentreport/downloads/2025NAER_Final_2.pdf
TMNA is evaluating the downstream impacts on nature of the use of sold vehicles.
In the U.S., there are 4 million miles of public roads.
As road networks expand to meet population growth and urban development needs, understanding how these roads affect their surrounding environment and wildlife populations is important for developing appropriate mitigation strategies.
TMNA’s focus is on reducing wildlife/vehicle collisions.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · toyota.com/content/dam/tusa/environmentreport/downloads/2025NAER_Final_2.pdf
Each part reads different filings, so counts and totals can differ.
Direct PAC contributions and independent expenditures explicitly reported as support, by the party of the candidate they went to.
| Party of the candidate | Candidates | Direct | Independent | Amount | Share |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 133 | $457,500 | $0 | $457,500 | 49% |
| Democratic | 98 | $362,000 | $0 | $362,000 | 39% |
| Other or unresolved | 44 | $108,000 | $0 | $108,000 | 12% |
| Shown support | 275 | $927,500 | $0 | $927,500 | 100% |
Contributions are reported money, not endorsements; a PAC giving to both parties is common.
Every contribution on line 23 of the committee’s own Schedule B, which is the filing its summary totals are built from. That line covers federal candidates, party committees and other political committees alike, so a super PAC funding other super PACs appears here rather than under candidate giving.
| Recipient | Count | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| Democratic candidates | 99 | $366.5K · 30% |
| Republican candidates | 132 | $455K · 37% |
| Other or unresolved candidates | 45 | $110.5K · 8.9% |
| Other PACs and committees | 71 | $308.5K · 25% |
| All recipients | 347 | $1.2M |
| State | Candidates | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| Texas | 31 | $123.5K |
| California | 27 | $83K |
| Michigan | 9 | $59.5K |
| New York | 14 | $56.5K |
| North Carolina | 12 | $43.5K |
| Florida | 17 | $43.5K |
| Pennsylvania | 7 | $41K |
| Ohio | 8 | $33.5K |
The largest 8 of 47 states.
A donor who gave several times appears once. The 12 largest donors by total given are listed. In all, 21,677 itemized contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $1M. FEC contributor lists are public records and cannot be used for commercial solicitation.
Total reported receipts $1,504,425
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. Open a source marked + to see who gave. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 21,509 contributions · 98% | $1,014,474 |
| 96 contributions · 1% | $10,797 |
| 36 contributions · 0.3% | $3,492 |
| 36 contributions · 0.3% | $3,492 |
By the state each contributor wrote on the filing. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line together, so one committee or organization transfer can account for a whole state. Contributors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized and cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
| Employer as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| 5,767 contributions · 30% of ranked | $313,131 |
Total reported disbursements $1,314,263
Every dollar this committee reported spending this cycle, split by the lines it reports against. Open a line to see who was actually paid on it. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
Total itemized disbursements $1,231,083
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
All 728 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
| Name |
|---|
$1.3M spent from Jan 2025 to Oct 2026. Most in one report: $150K, March 2025.
The running total of what the committee’s FEC reports say it spent, independent expenditures included, with a point at the end of each report. The line is straight between reports because a report gives one total for its whole period.
Besides giving through its PAC, Toyota Motor North America Inc pays lobbyists to press Congress and federal agencies. Each quarter it, or a firm it hires, files a public report under the Lobbying Disclosure Act saying which topics it worked on, what it spent, and whom it contacted. This is what those reports say.
Each report files its work under official topics. The bar shows how often each topic came up across the reports; open one to read what was filed under it. Naming a bill says the organization lobbied on it, not which side it took.
The organization’s own reports give its total lobbying costs, including any firms it hired; each firm reports what this client paid it.
Reported twice a year by the lobbying filer. $311.5K is political giving that also appears in FEC filings.
Matched by name: these reports are filed for “TOYOTA MOTOR NORTH AMERICA INC (TMA)”, found by searching “TOYOTA MOTOR NORTH AMERICA”. Lobbying and FEC records share no ID, so an organization that lobbies under another name is missed. Source: LDA.gov, accessed Oct 27, 2026. Senate Office of Public Records cannot vouch for the data or analyses derived from these data after the data have been retrieved from LDA.gov.
Toyota Motor North America, Inc PAC is registered with the Federal Election Commission as a PAC (qualified). It is a lobbyist/registrant PAC. Its FEC record names Toyota Motor North America, Inc as an affiliate. Official FEC summary: Federal Election Commission committee record.
Statements are quoted from these pages exactly. Headings, order and wording are the committee’s or its sponsor’s; the record marking is ours.
Toyota Motor North America, Inc PAC is matched to organization records using the FEC committee identity, structured identifiers, and corroborated organization data.
LittleSis data is shared under CC BY-SA 4.0.
Bars drawn to $10K, the largest gift total here. 2025–2026 filings.
Candidate contribution rows come from candidate committee Schedule A filings, the same rows the party chart above counts.
Money moving between this committee and other committees, matched on FEC committee ID rather than the name each filing was typed under. Both sides exclude memo entries. The figures here count each committee once, from the itemized transfers read for this section, so they will not match the payment counts under Who this PAC gave to.
Committees that reported giving to this one on their own Schedule A filings, grouped by the giver’s committee ID.
No committee-to-committee receipts were itemized this cycle.
Disbursements this committee itemized to another committee: candidate contributions, party transfers and payments alike, not contributions only.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| PAC (qualified) · Connected to ELECT DIVERSE DEMOCRATS PAC · 2 payments | $10K |
| PAC (qualified) · 2 payments | $10K |
| PAC (qualified) · Connected to AMERICAN FINANCIAL SERVICES ASSOCIATION · 2 payments | $10K |
| PAC (qualified) · 2 payments | $10K |
| Hybrid PAC (qualified) · 2 payments | $10K |
| PAC (qualified) · Connected to DEFEND DEMOCRACY NOW PAC · 2 payments | $10K |
| PAC (qualified) · Connected to WICKER VICTORY COMMITTEE · 2 payments | $10K |
| PAC (qualified) · 2 payments | $10K |
| PAC (qualified) · Connected to PRO-CHOICE WOMEN · 2 payments | $10K |
| PAC (qualified) · Connected to ALLIANCE FOR AUTOMOTIVE INNOVATION · 2 payments | $10K |
| Hybrid PAC (qualified) · 2 payments | $10K |
| PAC (qualified) · Connected to MORENO · 2 payments | $10K |
$1.2M across 346 recipient committees, or 94% of everything this committee reports spending. The largest 12 are shown.
Built from FEC Schedule A and Schedule B filings for the selected cycle. A committee only appears here if the money was itemized under its FEC committee ID.
| 5,464 contributions · 26% of ranked | $267,954 |
| 4,200 contributions · 19% of ranked | $196,109 |
| 3,810 contributions · 17% of ranked | $171,524 |
| 530 contributions · 2.1% of ranked | $21,876 |
| 168 contributions · 1.7% of ranked | $17,781 |
| 222 contributions · 1.2% of ranked | $11,923 |
| 241 contributions · 0.5% of ranked | $4,955 |
A further $180 came from donors whose answer names no employer (blank), so it is not ranked. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($359,964) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
| Occupation as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| 864 contributions · 8.4% of ranked | $74,545 |
| 1,538 contributions · 6% of ranked | $53,607 |
| 340 contributions · 5.9% of ranked | $52,066 |
| 2,020 contributions · 4.9% of ranked | $43,439 |
| 899 contributions · 3.7% of ranked | $32,721 |
| 156 contributions · 3.1% of ranked | $27,822 |
| 642 contributions · 2.5% of ranked | $22,018 |
| 615 contributions · 1.5% of ranked | $12,990 |
Ranked from the largest 200 of 201 occupation spellings filed; each share is of the money in those. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($359,964) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
| Amount |
|---|
| 2 payments · 0.8% of all spending | $10,000 |
| 2 payments · 0.8% of all spending | $10,000 |
| 2 payments · 0.8% of all spending | $10,000 |
| 2 payments · 0.8% of all spending | $10,000 |
| 2 payments · 0.8% of all spending | $10,000 |
| 2 payments · 0.8% of all spending | $10,000 |
| 2 payments · 0.8% of all spending | $10,000 |
| 2 payments · 0.8% of all spending | $10,000 |
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.