Loading this committee’s profile from its FEC filings.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Loading this committee’s profile from its FEC filings.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
PACs › House campaign committee › 2025–2026
House campaign committeePrincipal campaign committeeFriendswood, TexasActive
Connected organization: Weber Victory Fund
FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026 · FEC bulk filing data · committee C00502229 · files quarterly
No published list of positions
Each part reads different filings, so counts and totals can differ.
Direct PAC contributions and independent expenditures explicitly reported as support, by the party of the candidate they went to.
Contributions are reported money, not endorsements; a PAC giving to both parties is common.
Every contribution on line 23 of the committee’s own Schedule B, which is the filing its summary totals are built from. That line covers federal candidates, party committees and other political committees alike, so a super PAC funding other super PACs appears here rather than under candidate giving.
| Recipient | Count | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| Republican candidates | 23 | $55K · 47% |
| Other or unresolved candidates | 1 | $2K · 1.7% |
| Republican party committees | 1 | $460 · 0.4% |
| Other party committees | 1 | $50K · 43% |
| Other PACs and committees | 4 | $9K · 7.7% |
| All recipients | 30 | $116.5K |
| State | Candidates | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| Texas | 6 | $14K |
| Pennsylvania | 3 | $9K |
| Oklahoma | 1 | $4K |
| Iowa | 2 | $4K |
| Virginia | 1 | $3K |
| Wisconsin | 1 | $3K |
| Tennessee | 1 | $2K |
| Louisiana | 1 | $2K |
The largest 8 of 16 states.
Candidate contribution rows come from candidate committee Schedule A filings, the same rows the party chart above counts.
Money moving between this committee and other committees, matched on FEC committee ID rather than the name each filing was typed under. Both sides exclude memo entries. The figures here count each committee once, from the itemized transfers read for this section, so they will not match the payment counts under Who this PAC gave to.
Committees that reported giving to this one on their own Schedule A filings, grouped by the giver’s committee ID.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| PAC (nonqualified) · 13 payments | $217.9K |
| PAC (qualified) · Connected to SPACE EXPLORATION TECHNOLOGIES CORP. · 3 payments | $15K |
| PAC (qualified) · Connected to CHENIERE ENERGY INC. · 5 payments | $10K |
| PAC (qualified) · Connected to AIR CONDITIONING CONTRACTORS OF AMERICA · 3 payments | $10K |
| PAC (qualified) · Connected to RTX CORPORATION · 2 payments | $10K |
The 11 largest committees by total given are listed. Counted from the givers' own filings, which can run above the total this committee reports.
A donor who gave several times appears once. The 12 largest donors by total given are listed. In all, 242 itemized contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $244.7K. FEC contributor lists are public records and cannot be used for commercial solicitation.
Total reported receipts $1,132,032
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. Open a source marked + to see who gave. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 165 contributions · 59% | $144,330 |
| 17 contributions · 9.4% | $23,000 |
| 8 contributions · 6.5% | $16,001 |
| 14 contributions · 4.4% | $10,650 |
| 7 contributions · 4.1% | $10,100 |
| 4 contributions · 3.7% | $9,000 |
Total reported disbursements $823,759
Every dollar this committee reported spending this cycle, split by the lines it reports against. Open a line to see who was actually paid on it. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
$823.8K spent from Jan 2025 to Oct 2026. Most in one report: $205.1K, Feb 12 – Mar 31, 2026.
The running total of what the committee’s FEC reports say it spent, independent expenditures included, with a point at the end of each report. The line is straight between reports because a report gives one total for its whole period.
Published by the Commission against this committee’s own FEC ID. An audit is a periodic examination that reports findings; an administrative fine is a penalty for filing a specific report late or not at all. They are separate instruments and are not combined into a score here.
2020 cycleReport released Sep 1, 2022
Late 48H report, 2020$8.5K assessed
Case 4397 at the FEC ↗Source: the Commission’s audit-case and administrative-fine records, joined on this committee’s FEC ID, imported Oct 26, 2026. Enforcement matters (MURs) are published only against respondent names, with no committee identifier, so they are not shown here rather than being matched by name.
No lobbying disclosures matched
Weber for Congress is registered with the Federal Election Commission as a House campaign committee. It is a principal campaign committee. Its FEC record names Weber Victory Fund as an affiliate. Official FEC summary: Federal Election Commission committee record.
No pages quoted
No approved organization identity yet
Bars drawn to $50K, the largest gift total here. 2025–2026 filings.
| $10K |
| PAC (qualified) · Connected to PHILLIPS 66 · 5 payments | $10K |
| PAC (qualified) · Connected to ENTERGY CORPORATION · 3 payments | $10K |
| PAC (qualified) · Connected to MARATHON PETROLEUM CORPORATION · 2 payments | $10K |
| PAC (qualified) · Connected to VALERO ENERGY CORPORATION · 2 payments | $10K |
| PAC (qualified) · 4 payments | $10K |
| PAC (qualified) · Connected to TEXAS FARM BUREAU · 2 payments | $9.6K |
$745.8K from 159 committees, counting every itemized receipt this cycle. The largest 12 are shown.
Disbursements this committee itemized to another committee: candidate contributions, party transfers and payments alike, not contributions only.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| Party committee (qualified) · Connected to COLE COMBINED COMMITTEE · 1 payment | $50K |
| PAC (qualified) · Connected to SPACE EXPLORATION TECHNOLOGIES CORP. · 1 payment | $5K |
| PAC (qualified) · 2 payments | $4K |
| House campaign committee · Connected to TEAM MONICA VICTORY · 2 payments | $4K |
| House campaign committee · Connected to COLE COMBINED COMMITTEE · 2 payments | $4K |
| House campaign committee · Connected to ADVANCE THE MAJORITY VICTORY COMMITTEE · 3 payments | $3K |
| House campaign committee · Connected to MACKENZIE FOR PA-07 REPUBLICAN NOMINEE FUND 2024 · 3 payments | $3K |
| House campaign committee · Connected to PROTECT THE HOUSE 2024 · 3 payments | $3K |
| House campaign committee · Connected to EMMER MAJORITY BUILDERS · 3 payments | $3K |
| House campaign committee · Connected to 2A DEFENSE FUND · 3 payments | $3K |
| PAC (nonqualified) · 1 payment | $2K |
| House campaign committee · Connected to JACE VICTORY FUND · 1 payment | $2K |
$118.5K across 30 recipient committees, or 14% of everything this committee reports spending. The largest 12 are shown.
Built from FEC Schedule A and Schedule B filings for the selected cycle. A committee only appears here if the money was itemized under its FEC committee ID.
| 8 contributions · 3.2% | $7,800 |
| 1 contribution · 2% | $5,000 |
By the state each contributor wrote on the filing. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line together, so one committee or organization transfer can account for a whole state. Contributors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized and cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
| Employer as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an employer · 52 contributions · 14% of ranked | $31,770 |
| Written instead of an employer · 20 contributions · 8.7% of ranked | $20,163 |
| 2 contributions · 4.3% of ranked | $10,000 |
| Written instead of an employer · 4 contributions · 4.1% of ranked | $9,500 |
| 2 contributions · 3% of ranked | $7,000 |
| 2 contributions · 2.8% of ranked | $6,600 |
| 2 contributions · 2.1% of ranked | $5,000 |
| 1 contribution · 2.1% of ranked | $5,000 |
A further $12,000 came from donors whose answer names no employer (blank), so it is not ranked. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($2,650) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
| Occupation as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an occupation · 53 contributions · 15% of ranked | $35,270 |
| 13 contributions · 9.1% of ranked | $21,235 |
| 8 contributions · 6.6% of ranked | $15,443 |
| 12 contributions · 5.4% of ranked | $12,543 |
| Written instead of an occupation · 8 contributions · 5.3% of ranked | $12,280 |
| 8 contributions · 4.7% of ranked | $10,943 |
| Written instead of an occupation · 4 contributions · 4.1% of ranked | $9,500 |
| 2 contributions · 3% of ranked | $7,000 |
A further $12,000 came from donors whose answer names no occupation (blank), so it is not ranked. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($2,650) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
Total itemized disbursements $570,068
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
All 815 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
32 payments were reported as a lump sum, such as a card or payroll bill, with the detail filed underneath as memo entries. Those entries, $33,609 in all, are counted under the payee and purpose they name rather than under the processor that was paid. The total is the same either way.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 24 payments · 24% of all spending | $200,164 |
| 19 payments · 6.9% of all spending | $56,757 |
| 1 payment · 6.1% of all spending | $50,000 |
| 38 payments · 2.6% of all spending | $21,601 |
| 1 payment · 2.1% of all spending | $17,554 |
| 18 payments · 2% of all spending | $16,800 |
| 21 payments · 1.9% of all spending | $15,776 |
| 23 payments · 1.8% of all spending | $14,830 |
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.