FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026 · FEC bulk filing data · committee C00140855 · files monthly
SummaryAt a glance
Why it exists
No statement of purpose found on its site.
Money
$427.7K raised, $548.9K spent, $2M cash on hand (through Oct 14, 2026). Where it comes from
Who funds it
81% from donors giving over $200 · 19% from donors giving $200 or less · largest donor Morgan E. Parke, $6.7K. See who funds it
Where it goes
$371.5K given to candidates and committees, the largest to NRSC ($30K) · 74% of its support to Republicans, 26% to Democrats. See where it goes
Lobbying
Firstenergy Services Co. lobbied on 8 issues. See lobbying
Its wordsWhat does this committee say it is for?
No published list of positions
This committee’s site publishes no list of positions we could read, and we found no statement of why it exists. We do not write one for it.
Who it gives toWhich candidates and committees get its money?
Each part reads different filings, so counts and totals can differ.
Party support distribution$164K to 31 candidates
Direct PAC contributions and independent expenditures explicitly reported as support, by the party of the candidate they went to.
For candidates $164,000
Republican 74%Democratic 26%
Support by the party of the candidate
Party of the candidate
Candidates
Direct
Independent
Amount
Share
Republican
20
$121,000
$0
$121,000
74%
Democratic
11
$43,000
$0
$43,000
26%
Shown support
31
$164,000
$0
$164,000
100%
Contributions are reported money, not endorsements; a PAC giving to both parties is common.
Who this PAC gave to$371,500 in 81 payments
Every contribution on line 23 of the committee’s own Schedule B, which is the filing its summary totals are built from. That line covers federal candidates, party committees and other political committees alike, so a super PAC funding other super PACs appears here rather than under candidate giving.
By recipient
Line 23 contributions by kind and party of recipient
Recipient
Count
Amount
Democratic candidates
11
$43K · 11%
Republican candidates
20
$121K · 32%
Other party committees
4
$75K · 20%
Other PACs and committees
17
$135K · 36%
All recipients
52
$374K
By the candidate’s state
Contributions to candidates by the candidate’s state
State
Candidates
Amount
Pennsylvania
8
$45K
New Jersey
7
$22.5K
West Virginia
3
$22.5K
Maryland
3
$17K
Missouri
1
$10K
Virginia
1
$10K
Arkansas
1
$10K
Ohio
2
$10K
The largest 8 of 13 states.
Recipients 52
Show candidate activity and the money network
Candidate and election activity as the recipients filed it
Jason T. Smith2 receipts, latest Jan 13, 2026Jason Smith for Congress · H4MO08162$10K
Riley Moore2 receipts, latest Jan 13, 2026Moore for West Virginia, Inc. · H4WV02205$10K
Brian Fitzpatrick2 receipts, latest Jan 13, 2026Brian Fitzpatrick for All of US · H6PA08277$10K
April McClain Delaney2 receipts, latest Jan 14, 2026April Mcclain Delaney for Congress · H4MD06340$10K
Bruce Westerman2 receipts, latest May 20, 2026Westerman for Congress · H4AR04048$10K
Candidate contribution rows come from candidate committee Schedule A filings, the same rows the party chart above counts.
Committee money network
Money moving between this committee and other committees, matched on FEC committee ID rather than the name each filing was typed under. Both sides exclude memo entries. The figures here count each committee once, from the itemized transfers read for this section, so they will not match the payment counts under Who this PAC gave to.
Committees funding this one
Committees that reported giving to this one on their own Schedule A filings, grouped by the giver’s committee ID.
No committee-to-committee receipts were itemized this cycle.
Committees this one funds
Disbursements this committee itemized to another committee: candidate contributions, party transfers and payments alike, not contributions only.
Committees this one funds
Name
Amount
NRSCParty committee (qualified) · Connected to YOUNG VICTORY COMMITTEE · 2 payments
$30K
National Republican Congressional Committee1 payment
Where the money came from $427,652 reported receipts
Itemized (over $200)Donors who have given more than $200 this cycle, so the FEC itemizes (names) them.$347,85581%
Largest donors
Morgan E. Parke16 contributions, latest Aug 31, 2026 · VICE PRESIDENT ASSOCIATE · FIRSTENERGY · AKRON, OH$6,720
Allan Smith16 contributions, latest Aug 31, 2026 · PRESIDENT FE UTILITIES - · FIRSTENERGY · AKRON, OH$6,720
K. J. Taylor16 contributions, latest Aug 31, 2026 · SENIOR VICE PRESIDENT CFO · FIRSTENERGY · AKRON, OH$6,720
Brian X. Tierney16 contributions, latest Aug 31, 2026 · BOARD CHAIR & PRESIDENT & · FIRSTENERGY · AKRON, OH$6,720
Mark Mroczynski16 contributions, latest Aug 31, 2026 · PRESIDENT TRANSMISSION - · FIRSTENERGY · AKRON, OH$6,650
Nicholas Pearson14 contributions, latest Aug 31, 2026 · VICE PRESIDENT FEDERAL EX · FIRSTENERGY · WASHINGTON, DC$4,650
Harry Papademas17 contributions, latest Aug 31, 2026 · MANAGER SITE CONSTRUCTION · FIRSTENERGY · MORRISTOWN, NJ$4,625
Louis M. D'Alessandris16 contributions, latest Aug 31, 2026 · DIRECTOR LEGISLATIVE REGU · FIRSTENERGY · AKRON, OH$4,375
Gregory J. Gawlik13 contributions, latest Aug 31, 2026 · VICE PRESIDENT ASSISTANT · FIRSTENERGY · AKRON, OH$4,350
Jeremy W. Hay12 contributions, latest Mar 31, 2026 · VICE PRESIDENT CONSTRUCTI · FIRSTENERGY · AKRON, OH$4,250
James A. Arcuri16 contributions, latest Aug 31, 2026 · VICE PRESIDENT ASSOCIATE · FIRSTENERGY · AKRON, OH$4,200
Santino L. Fanelli13 contributions, latest Aug 31, 2026 · DIRECTOR RATES & REGULATO · FIRSTENERGY · AKRON, OH$3,770
A donor who gave several times appears once. The 12 largest donors by total given are listed. In all, 2,637 itemized contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $326.5K. FEC contributor lists are public records and cannot be used for commercial solicitation.
Unitemized ($200 or less)Donors who have given $200 or less this cycle, so the FEC does not itemize (name) them.$79,79719%
Total reported receipts $427,652
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. Open a source marked + to see who gave. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
Who donated: where they live, their employers and jobs
Where the donors live $326,478 placed by state
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
under $9.9K
$9.9K+
$39.4K+
$88.7K+
$157.6K+
none
Top states
Top donor states
Name
Amount
Ohio1,913 contributions · 75%
$246,314
Pennsylvania326 contributions · 9%
$29,522
New Jersey166 contributions · 6.9%
$22,480
West Virginia190 contributions · 6.3%
$20,504
District of Columbia18 contributions · 1.5%
$4,998
Maryland21 contributions · 0.6%
$1,960
Connecticut3 contributions · 0.2%
$700
By the state each contributor wrote on the filing. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line together, so one committee or organization transfer can account for a whole state. Contributors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized and cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
SpendingWhere does the money go?
How the spending splits $548,925 reported
Contributions to candidates and other committeesMoney given to federal candidates, party committees and other PACs.$431,00079%
Paid to
NRSC2 payments · latest Jan 13, 2026 · CONTRIBUTION$30,000
National Republican Congressional Committee1 payment · latest Feb 17, 2025 · CONTRIBUTION$15,000
Other disbursementsEverything the committee reports outside the lines above.$114,42521%
Operating expendituresThe committee's own running costs.$2,6080.5%
Paid to
Huntington National Bank14 payments · latest Aug 17, 2026 · BANK FEES$2,193
Contribution refundsMoney returned to the people and committees that gave it.$8920.2%
Total reported disbursements $548,925
Every dollar this committee reported spending this cycle, split by the lines it reports against. Open a line to see who was actually paid on it. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
What the payments were for $373,693 itemized
Given to othersContributions to other candidates, party committees, and PACs.$371,50099%
Filed as
CONTRIBUTION$371,500
Paid to
NRSC$30,000
National Republican Congressional Committee$15,000
Democratic Congressional Campaign COM.$15,000
NRCC$15,000
DSCC$15,000
DCCC$15,000
Taxes, fees, and bank chargesPayroll and income taxes, filing fees, bank and merchant processing charges.$2,0720.6%
Filed as
BANK FEES$2,072
Paid to
Huntington National Bank$2,072
OtherPayments whose filed description does not match any category above. Every one is listed so it can be read directly.$121<0.1%
Filed as
BANK FESS$121
Paid to
Huntington National Bank$121
Total itemized disbursements
Spending over time
$549.8K spent from Jan 2025 to Oct 2026. Most in one report: $122.1K, January 2026.
$549.8K
Jan 2025Oct 2026
The running total of what the committee’s FEC reports say it spent, independent expenditures included, with a point at the end of each report. The line is straight between reports because a report gives one total for its whole period.
What Firstenergy Services Company lobbies on 2026 reports
Besides giving through its PAC, Firstenergy Services Company pays lobbyists to press Congress and federal agencies. Each quarter it, or a firm it hires, files a public report under the Lobbying Disclosure Act saying which topics it worked on, what it spent, and whom it contacted. This is what those reports say.
Spent on lobbying in 2026
$1.1M
Quarterly reports read
6
Bills it named
44
Topics it lobbied on
Each report files its work under official topics. The bar shows how often each topic came up across the reports; open one to read what was filed under it. Naming a bill says the organization lobbied on it, not which side it took.
Budget/Appropriationsin 6 report entries · 9 bills named
In its own words
H.R. 4553, Energy and Water Development and Related Agencies Act, 2026 (loan programs office, grid resiliency);
H.R. 4754/S. 2431, Department of Interior, Environment, and Related Agencies Act, 2026 (national forests and support for permitting staff);
H.R. 5342/S.2354, Commerce, Justice, Science, and Related Agencies Act, 2026 (energy issues);
H.R. 5304/S. 2587, Departments of Labor, Health and Human Services, and Education, and Related Agencies Act, 2026 (LIHEAP issues);
H.R. 4016/S. 2572, Department of Defense Act, 2026 (siting of energy projects on military bases and base resiliency);
H.R. 161, New Source Review Permitting Improvement Act (all provisions);
Wildfires and other natural disasters;
EPA regulations generally;
Good Neighbor Rule;
Coal combustion residuals;
Effluent Limitation Guidelines;
Rights-of-way;
Categorical exclusions;
Siting and permitting generally;
National Environmental Policy Act;
Clean Water Act generally;
Endangered Species Act generally;
Power demand generally;
National Historic Preservation Act generally;
Water Resources Development Act generally;
Clean Air Act generally.
Bipartisan American Affordability and Jobs Act of 2026 (BAAJA;
S. 5653) S. 4944, the American Energy and Mineral Infrastructure Act of 2026, generally HR 471/S. 1462 - the Fix our Forest Act SEC 111 Good Neighbor Vegetation management, generally NEPA, generally Permitting, generally
S. 4944, the American Energy and Mineral Infrastructure Act of 2026, generally HR 471/S. 1462 - the Fix our Forest Act SEC 111 Good Neighbor Vegetation management, generally NEPA, generally Permitting, generally
HR 471/S. 1462 - the Fix our Forest Act SEC 111 Good Neighbor Vegetation management, generally NEPA, generally Permitting, generally
Taxation/Internal Revenue Codein 6 report entries · 6 bills named
In its own words
H.R. 1, The One Big Beautiful Bill Act (energy provisions);
H.R. 2872, the RESILIENCE Act of 2025 (all provisions);
S. 448, the CIRCUIT Act (all provisions);
H.R.5376, Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 (energy provisions);
Resiliency issues generally;
Distribution transformer issues generally;
Transmission and distribution issues generally;
Inflation Reduction Act Implementation;
Tax Cuts and Jobs Act issues generally;
Inflation Reduction Act Implementation.
Inflation Reduction Act Implementation One Big Beautiful Bill (OBBB, HR 1) implementation, including changes to CAMT S. 1559. Book Minimum Tax Repeal Act (Barrasso) HR 3210 Book Minimum Tax Repeal Act (Arrington)
The organization’s own reports give its total lobbying costs, including any firms it hired; each firm reports what this client paid it.
Firstenergy CorpIts own staff · 3 reports$1.1M
SBL Strategies, LLCLobbying firm · 3 reports$150K
Contributions on the LD-203 report
Reported twice a year by the lobbying filer. $8.5K is political giving that also appears in FEC filings.
Hern for Senate$2.5K
Bice for Congress$1K
Cindy Hyde Smith for US Senate$1K
Families for James Lankford$1K
Friends of John Barrasso$1K
Alfonso for Congress$500
Common Sense for America PAC$500
Josh Hawley Victory Committee$500
Moody for Florida$500
Matched by name: these reports are filed for “FIRSTENERGY SERVICES COMPANY”, found by searching “FIRSTENERGY”. Lobbying and FEC records share no ID, so an organization that lobbies under another name is missed. Source: LDA.gov, accessed Oct 26, 2026. Senate Office of Public Records cannot vouch for the data or analyses derived from these data after the data have been retrieved from LDA.gov.
Firstenergy Corp PAC is registered with the Federal Election Commission as a PAC (qualified). It is a lobbyist/registrant PAC. Its FEC record names Firstenergy Corp. as an affiliate. Official FEC summary: Federal Election Commission committee record.
Pages quoted 0 pages
No pages quoted
Nothing from this committee’s or its sponsor’s site is quoted yet.
Linked public records
No approved organization identity yet
The official FEC committee record remains available under Filings.
$374K across 53 recipient committees, or 68% of everything this committee reports spending. The largest 12 are shown.
Built from FEC Schedule A and Schedule B filings for the selected cycle. A committee only appears here if the money was itemized under its FEC committee ID.
Donors’ employers as filed
Donors’ employers
Employer as filed
Amount
Firstenergy2,632 contributions · 100% of ranked
$327,292
Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($79,797) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
Donors’ occupations as filed
Donors’ occupations
Occupation as filed
Amount
Local Engagement Speciali132 contributions · 3.5% of ranked
$11,515
Associate General Counsel37 contributions · 3.1% of ranked
$10,198
President FE Utilities -20 contributions · 2.6% of ranked
$8,448
Senior Vice President CFO20 contributions · 2.6% of ranked
$8,448
President Transmission -20 contributions · 2.6% of ranked
$8,360
Board Chair & President &18 contributions · 2.3% of ranked
$7,488
Director Rates & Regulato22 contributions · 1.8% of ranked
$6,020
Director Operations - OH54 contributions · 1.7% of ranked
$5,700
Ranked from the largest 200 of 201 occupation spellings filed; each share is of the money in those. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($79,797) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
$373,693
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
All 95 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.
Power reliability issues generally;
Transmission issues generally;
Artificial intelligence issues generally;
Load growth, reliability, and resource adequacy generally;
Data center issues generally;
Energy security issues generally;
Issues related to energy grid supply chain;
Issues related to energy sector impacts from tariff policies;
Issues related to affordability;
Issues related to energy efficiency;
Distribution transformers;
Draft legislation on transmission;
Draft legislation on permitting reform;
Electric grid/energy infrastructure cybersecurity issues generally.
HR 9340, the Rate Payer Protection Act, generally HR 4776, SPEED act Sec 2, NEPA reform.
Sec. 3, Judicial Review Transmission issues generally;
Load growth, reliability, resource adequacy issues, generally: Senate Draft permitting reform (S. 4753 from the 118th congress), generally: Data centers, generally S. 3947, REWIRE Act, SEC. 3, Categorical exclusions for reconductoring SEC 5, State Energy Programs Wood pole supply issues, generally