Loading this committee’s profile from its FEC filings.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Loading this committee’s profile from its FEC filings.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
PACs › PAC (qualified) › 2025–2026
PAC (qualified)Lobbyist/registrant PACTrade associationWashington, District of ColumbiaActive
Connected organization: United States Beet Sugar Association
FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026 · FEC bulk filing data · committee C00063586 · files quarterly
No published list of positions
Each part reads different filings, so counts and totals can differ.
Direct PAC contributions and independent expenditures explicitly reported as support, by the party of the candidate they went to.
| Party of the candidate | Candidates | Direct | Independent | Amount | Share |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other or unresolved | 4 | $12,000 | $0 | $12,000 | 40% |
| Democratic | 5 | $10,000 | $0 | $10,000 | 33% |
| Republican | 5 | $8,000 | $0 | $8,000 | 27% |
| Shown support | 14 | $30,000 | $0 | $30,000 | 100% |
Contributions are reported money, not endorsements; a PAC giving to both parties is common.
Every contribution on line 23 of the committee’s own Schedule B, which is the filing its summary totals are built from. That line covers federal candidates, party committees and other political committees alike, so a super PAC funding other super PACs appears here rather than under candidate giving.
| Recipient | Count | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| Democratic candidates | 5 | $10K · 20% |
| Republican candidates | 5 | $8K · 16% |
| Other or unresolved candidates | 4 | $12K · 24% |
| Other PACs and committees | 5 | $20K · 40% |
| All recipients | 19 | $50K |
| State | Candidates | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| Michigan | 3 | $7K |
| South Dakota | 1 | $5K |
| Minnesota | 2 | $4K |
| West Virginia | 2 | $4K |
| California | 1 | $2.5K |
| Idaho | 1 | $2.5K |
| North Carolina | 2 | $2.5K |
| Colorado | 1 | $1.5K |
The largest 8 of 9 states.
Candidate contribution rows come from candidate committee Schedule A filings, the same rows the party chart above counts.
Money moving between this committee and other committees, matched on FEC committee ID rather than the name each filing was typed under. Both sides exclude memo entries. The figures here count each committee once, from the itemized transfers read for this section, so they will not match the payment counts under Who this PAC gave to.
Committees that reported giving to this one on their own Schedule A filings, grouped by the giver’s committee ID.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| PAC (qualified) · Connected to AMERICAN CRYSTAL SUGAR COMPAY · 2 payments | $10K |
| PAC (qualified) · Connected to MINN-DAK FARMERS COOPERATIVE · 2 payments | $10K |
| PAC (qualified) · Connected to AMALGAMATED SUGAR COMPANY · 2 payments | $10K |
| PAC (qualified) · Connected to WESTERN SUGAR COOPERATIVE · 2 payments | $10K |
| PAC (qualified) · Connected to SOUTHERN MINNESOTA BEET SUGAR COOPERATIVE · 3 payments | $5K |
The 6 largest committees by total given are listed. Counted from the givers' own filings, which can run above the total this committee reports. Here they come to $50K, more than the $45K this committee's own reports show on the line.
Total reported receipts $51,000
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. Open a source marked + to see who gave. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
Total reported disbursements $51,000
Every dollar this committee reported spending this cycle, split by the lines it reports against. Open a line to see who was actually paid on it. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
Total itemized disbursements $45,000
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
All 24 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
$51K spent from Jan 2025 to Oct 2026. Most in one report: $19K, Oct 1 – Oct 14, 2026.
The running total of what the committee’s FEC reports say it spent, independent expenditures included, with a point at the end of each report. The line is straight between reports because a report gives one total for its whole period.
Published by the Commission against this committee’s own FEC ID. An audit is a periodic examination that reports findings; an administrative fine is a penalty for filing a specific report late or not at all. They are separate instruments and are not combined into a score here.
Late 30G report, 2006$250 assessed
Case 1688 at the FEC ↗Source: the Commission’s audit-case and administrative-fine records, joined on this committee’s FEC ID, imported Oct 26, 2026. Enforcement matters (MURs) are published only against respondent names, with no committee identifier, so they are not shown here rather than being matched by name.
No lobbying disclosures matched
United States Beet Sugar Association PAC is registered with the Federal Election Commission as a PAC (qualified). It is a lobbyist/registrant PAC. Its FEC record names United States Beet Sugar Association as an affiliate. Official FEC summary: Federal Election Commission committee record.
No pages quoted
No approved organization identity yet
Bars drawn to $5K, the largest gift total here. 2025–2026 filings.
| PAC (qualified) · Connected to MICHIGAN SUGAR COMPANY GROWERS ASSOCIATION · 1 payment | $5K |
$50K from 6 committees, counting every itemized receipt this cycle.
Disbursements this committee itemized to another committee: candidate contributions, party transfers and payments alike, not contributions only.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| PAC (qualified) · 3 payments | $6K |
| Senate campaign committee · Connected to THUNE VICTORY COMMITTEE · 1 payment | $5K |
| PAC (qualified) · 1 payment | $5K |
| PAC (nonqualified) · 1 payment | $5K |
| House campaign committee · 1 payment | $2.5K |
| Senate campaign committee · Connected to ONE TEAM SENATE MAJORITY · 1 payment | $2.5K |
| PAC (qualified) · Connected to HOEVEN · 1 payment | $2.5K |
| House campaign committee · 1 payment | $2.5K |
| Senate campaign committee · Connected to STEVENS FOR MICHIGAN VICTORY FUND · 1 payment | $2.5K |
| House campaign committee · 1 payment | $2.5K |
| Senate campaign committee · Connected to RECLAIM THE MAJORITY · 2 payments | $2K |
| House campaign committee · Connected to TEAM RILEY · 1 payment | $2K |
$48.5K across 20 recipient committees, or 95% of everything this committee reports spending. The largest 12 are shown.
Built from FEC Schedule A and Schedule B filings for the selected cycle. A committee only appears here if the money was itemized under its FEC committee ID.
| Name | Amount |
|---|
| 3 payments · 12% of all spending | $6,000 |
| 1 payment · 9.8% of all spending | $5,000 |
| 1 payment · 9.8% of all spending | $5,000 |
| 1 payment · 9.8% of all spending | $5,000 |
| 1 payment · 4.9% of all spending | $2,500 |
| 1 payment · 4.9% of all spending | $2,500 |
| 1 payment · 4.9% of all spending | $2,500 |
| 1 payment · 4.9% of all spending | $2,500 |
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.