FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026 · FEC bulk filing data · committee C00039503 · files monthly
SummaryAt a glance
Why it exists
No statement of purpose found on its site.
Money
$63.4K raised, $108K spent, $196.4K cash on hand (through Oct 14, 2026). Where it comes from
Who funds it
87% from donors giving over $200 · 13% from donors giving $200 or less · largest donor Kelly C. Op De Weegh, $3K. See who funds it
Where it goes
$108K given to candidates and committees, the largest to Johnson Leadership Fund ($10K) · 63% of its support to Republicans, 31% to Democrats. See where it goes
This committee’s site publishes no list of positions we could read, and we found no statement of why it exists. We do not write one for it.
Who it gives toWhich candidates and committees get its money?
Each part reads different filings, so counts and totals can differ.
Party support distribution$76.5K to 27 candidates
Direct PAC contributions and independent expenditures explicitly reported as support, by the party of the candidate they went to.
For candidates $76,500
Republican 63%
Democratic 31%
Support by the party of the candidate
Party of the candidate
Candidates
Direct
Independent
Amount
Share
Republican
15
$48,500
$0
$48,500
63%
Democratic
9
$24,000
$0
$24,000
31%
Other or unresolved
3
$4,000
$0
$4,000
5.2%
Shown support
27
$76,500
$0
$76,500
100%
Contributions are reported money, not endorsements; a PAC giving to both parties is common.
Who this PAC gave to$108,000 in 43 payments
Every contribution on line 23 of the committee’s own Schedule B, which is the filing its summary totals are built from. That line covers federal candidates, party committees and other political committees alike, so a super PAC funding other super PACs appears here rather than under candidate giving.
By recipient
Line 23 contributions by kind and party of recipient
Recipient
Count
Amount
Democratic candidates
9
$24K · 22%
Republican candidates
15
$48.5K · 45%
Other or unresolved candidates
3
$4K · 3.7%
Other PACs and committees
8
$31.5K · 29%
All recipients
35
$108K
By the candidate’s state
Contributions to candidates by the candidate’s state
State
Candidates
Amount
Texas
5
$15.5K
Alaska
2
$12.5K
California
3
$8.5K
Louisiana
1
$7.5K
West Virginia
2
$7K
Oklahoma
2
$4.5K
Arkansas
1
$3.5K
Minnesota
1
$3.5K
The largest 8 of 18 states.
Recipients 35
Show candidate activity and the money network
Candidate and election activity as the recipients filed it
Dan Sullivan2 receipts, latest Aug 31, 2026Alaskans for Dan Sullivan · S4AK00214$10K
Julia Letlow2 receipts, latest Aug 28, 2026Julia Letlow for Louisiana · S6LA00664$7.5K
Sylvia R. Garcia1 receipt, latest Aug 31, 2026Sylvia Garcia for Congress · H8TX29052$5K
Pete Aguilar1 receipt, latest Jun 29, 2026Pete Aguilar for Congress · H2CA31125$5K
Shelley Moore Capito1 receipt, latest Sep 10, 2026Capito for West Virginia · S4WV00159$5K
Candidate contribution rows come from candidate committee Schedule A filings, the same rows the party chart above counts.
Committee money network
Money moving between this committee and other committees, matched on FEC committee ID rather than the name each filing was typed under. Both sides exclude memo entries. The figures here count each committee once, from the itemized transfers read for this section, so they will not match the payment counts under Who this PAC gave to.
Committees funding this one
Committees that reported giving to this one on their own Schedule A filings, grouped by the giver’s committee ID.
No committee-to-committee receipts were itemized this cycle.
Committees this one funds
Disbursements this committee itemized to another committee: candidate contributions, party transfers and payments alike, not contributions only.
Where the money came from $63,426 reported receipts
Itemized (over $200)Donors who have given more than $200 this cycle, so the FEC itemizes (names) them.$54,86887%
Largest donors
Kelly C. Op De Weegh30 contributions, latest May 29, 2026 · DIRECTOR EXTERNAL RELATIONS · SHELL USA INC. · KATY, TX$3,000
Scott R. Salmon30 contributions, latest May 29, 2026 · SENIOR ADVISOR FEDERAL GOV REL · SHELL USA INC. · ARLINGTON, VA$3,000
Kevin C. Simpson30 contributions, latest May 29, 2026 · REGULATORY POLICY TEAM LEAD · SHELL USA INC. · NEW ORLEANS, LA$3,000
Camden Toohey24 contributions, latest May 29, 2026 · DIRECTOR STATE GOV RELATIONS · SHELL USA INC. · WASHINGTON, DC$2,850
John P. Morris22 contributions, latest May 29, 2026 · MANAGING COUNSEL · SHELL USA INC. · METAIRIE, LA$2,200
Charles S. Shull16 contributions, latest May 29, 2026 · EXECUTIVE · SHELL USA INC. · GAITHERSBURG, MD$2,200
Joni L. Tuck22 contributions, latest May 29, 2026 · SENIOR CORPORATE RELATIONS ADVISOR · SHELL USA INC. · METAIRIE, LA$2,200
John T. Hines28 contributions, latest May 29, 2026 · GOVERNMENT RELATIONS MANAGER · SHELL USA INC. · PALMYRA, PA$1,680
Stacie T. Pitts5 contributions, latest Aug 31, 2026 · EXECUTIVE · SHELL TRADING SERVICES CO · HOUSTON, TX$1,248
Travis A. Torrence6 contributions, latest Aug 31, 2026 · EXECUTIVE · SHELL USA INC. · HOUSTON, TX$1,248
Charles S. Shull6 contributions, latest Aug 31, 2026 · EXECUTIVE · SHELL USA INC. · HOUSTON, TX$1,240
Colette B. Hirstius6 contributions, latest Aug 31, 2026 · EXECUTIVE · SHELL ENERGY RESOURCES CO · HOUSTON, TX$1,212
A donor who gave several times appears once. The 12 largest donors by total given are listed. In all, 443 itemized contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $45.8K. FEC contributor lists are public records and cannot be used for commercial solicitation.
Unitemized ($200 or less)Donors who have given $200 or less this cycle, so the FEC does not itemize (name) them.$8,50713%
Other receiptsInterest, dividends and other income the committee files on a line of its own.$31<0.1%
Not itemized by sourceReported receipts that none of the summary's lines accounts for.$20<0.1%
Total reported receipts $63,426
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. Open a source marked + to see who gave. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
Who donated: where they live, their employers and jobs
Where the donors live $45,836 placed by state
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
under $975
$975+
$3.9K+
$8.8K+
$15.6K+
none
Top states
Top donor states
Name
Amount
Texas205 contributions · 53%
$24,376
Louisiana85 contributions · 18%
$8,370
Virginia65 contributions · 9.4%
$4,300
District of Columbia32 contributions · 7.8%
$3,570
Maryland16 contributions · 4.8%
$2,200
Pennsylvania28 contributions · 3.7%
$1,680
Alaska5 contributions · 2.2%
$1,000
New Jersey3 contributions · 0.7%
SpendingWhere does the money go?
How the spending splits $108,030 reported
Contributions to candidates and other committeesMoney given to federal candidates, party committees and other PACs.$108,00099.9%
Operating expendituresThe committee's own running costs.$30<0.1%
Total reported disbursements $108,030
Every dollar this committee reported spending this cycle, split by the lines it reports against. Open a line to see who was actually paid on it. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
What the payments were for $108,000 itemized
Given to othersContributions to other candidates, party committees, and PACs.$108,000100%
Filed as
CONTRIBUTION$108,000
Paid to
Johnson Leadership Fund$10,000
Alaskans for Dan Sullivan$10,000
Julia Letlow for Louisiana$7,500
Westerman Victory Fund$6,500
Elizabeth Pannill Fletcher for Congress$5,000
Sylvia Garcia for Congress$5,000
Total itemized disbursements $108,000
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
All 43 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
$108K spent from Jan 2025 to Oct 2026. Most in one report: $34K, August 2026.
$108K
Jan 2025Oct 2026
The running total of what the committee’s FEC reports say it spent, independent expenditures included, with a point at the end of each report. The line is straight between reports because a report gives one total for its whole period.
1050 K STREET NW, SUITE 700WASHINGTON, DC, 20001-4449
Audits and penalties
1 administrative fine
Audits and penalties
Published by the Commission against this committee’s own FEC ID. An audit is a periodic examination that reports findings; an administrative fine is a penalty for filing a specific report late or not at all. They are separate instruments and are not combined into a score here.
Fines assessed
1
Administrative fines
Late 12G report, 2008
Determined May 7, 2009 · Needn't Pay · Challenged: No Fine Assessed at Final Determination
Source: the Commission’s audit-case and administrative-fine records, joined on this committee’s FEC ID, imported Oct 26, 2026. Enforcement matters (MURs) are published only against respondent names, with no committee identifier, so they are not shown here rather than being matched by name.
LobbyingWhat does its sponsor lobby on?
What Shell USA, Inc. lobbies on 2026 reports
Besides giving through its PAC, Shell USA, Inc. pays lobbyists to press Congress and federal agencies. Each quarter it, or a firm it hires, files a public report under the Lobbying Disclosure Act saying which topics it worked on, what it spent, and whom it contacted. This is what those reports say.
Spent on lobbying in 2026
$3.9M
Quarterly reports read
12
Bills it named
16
Topics it lobbied on
Each report files its work under official topics. The bar shows how often each topic came up across the reports; open one to read what was filed under it. Naming a bill says the organization lobbied on it, not which side it took.
Energy/Nuclearin 12 report entries · 4 bills named
In its own words
Issues related to the importance of clean H2, and ongoing Department of Energy (DOE) support for clean H2, to the U.S. economy, global competitiveness, and energy dominance;
Issues related to opposition of Oil and Gas export bans;
Issues related to LNG development;
Issues related to energy load growth and competitive power markets, including H.R. 1047/S. 465 - Guaranteeing Reliability through the Interconnection of Dispatchable (GRID) Power Act;
Issues related to the Department of Energys Office of Clean Energy Demonstrations grant programs and coal to solar grants;
Issues related to solar development on BLM lands;
Issues related to permitting reform, including H.R. 4776 - SPEED Act.
General issues in energy;
Issues related to fuel sales and pricing;
Issues related to chemicals production;
Issues related to energy related trade policy, infrastructure, refining, and energy related regulatory issues;
Issues related to international LNG markets;
Issues related to international diesel markets;
Issues related to permitting reform;
Issues related to potential federal restrictions on diesel and other refined petroleum products;
Issues related to energy affordability;
Issues related to refining utilization;
Issues related to supply and logistics issues.
HR 1, One Big Beautiful Bill Act Upstream oil and gas Natural gas/LNG Offshore wind Federal royalty relief Energy storage Royalty relief Financial assurance Issues related to Climate change policies Clean Energy Standard Legislation regarding energy import and export Infrastructure project delivery/permitting reform
Issues related to LNG advocacy;
Issues related to energy markets and movement of products across the world;
Issues related to oil & gas export bans;
General issues related to energy;
Issues related to fuel sales;
Issues related to impacts from closure of the Strait of Horumuz and potential policy responses.
Upstream oil and gas Natural gas/LNG Offshore wind Federal royalty relief Energy storage Royalty relief Financial assurance Issues related to Climate change policies Clean Energy Standard Legislation regarding energy import and export Infrastructure project delivery/permitting reform
Oil and gas energy infrastructure; priorities for Shell tied to the expanded lease sales under the Trump Admin; Support for the OCS five-year plan; bonding and assurance (BOEM); stranded assets
Environment/Superfundin 11 report entries · 3 bills named
In its own words
Issues related to implementation of the Endangered Species Act of 1973;
Issues related to H.R. 7567 - Farm, Food, and National Security Act of 2026;
Issues related to renewable portfolio standards and biofuel feedstocks, including E15 and the small refinery exemption;
Issues related to federal permitting reform;
Issues related to H.R. 4776 - SPEED Act;
Issues related to S. 4944 - the American Energy and Mineral Infrastructure Act of 2026;
Issues related to Sections 401 and 404 of the Clean Water Act;
Issues related to the National Environmental Policy Act;
Issues related to the National Historic Preservation Act;
Issues related to judicial review;
Issues related to remand without vacatur;
Issues related to project certainty.
Issues related to renewable energy.
Offshore energy permitting issues (National Marine Fisheries Service) Taking and Importing Marine Mammals;
Taking Marine Mammals Incidental to Geophysical Surveys Related to Oil and Gas Activities in the Gulf of Mexico.
National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Issues related to renewable natural gas Issues related to solar energy Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS) Reform of the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) Permitting reform legislation (SPEED Act)
Fuel/Gas/Oilin 8 report entries · 1 bill named
In its own words
Issues related to the renewable fuel standard and small refinery exemption reallocation;
Issues related to renewable volume obligations;
Issues related to low-carbon fuels;
Issues related to traditional fossil fuels;
Issues related to LNG opportunities in North Africa;
Issues related to gas opportunities in the Middle East;
Issues related to potential government actions regarding fuels;
Issues related to LNG and crude oil opportunities in Latin America;
Issues related to European Union methane regulations;
Issues related to year-round E15;
Issues related to legislative and EPA actions regarding fuel.
Issues related to low carbon fuels and sustainable aviation fuels;
Issues related to marine fuels, including H.R. 1896 - The Renewable Fuels for Ocean-Going Vessels Act;
Issues related to North Africa natural gas development;
Issues related to European Union methane regulations.
Issues associated with refineries and downstream oil and gas SAF E15
Issues associated with refineries and downstream oil and gas
Funding and policy matters relative to energy and safety. Infrastructure project delivery/permitting reform Issues associated with the Marine Mammal Protection Act and the Endangered Species Act
Funding and policy matters relative to energy and safety.
Funding and policy matters relative to energy and safety
Offices it contacted
HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
SENATE
Taxation/Internal Revenue Codein 6 report entries
In its own words
Issues related to the implementation of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (P.L. 119-21);
Issues related to budget reconciliation;
Issues related to Section 899 of the Internal Revenue Code and base erosion and anti-abuse tax.
Issues related to international corporate taxes; Issues related to Section 45Z of the U.S. Internal Revenue Code; Issues related to Section 45Q of the U.S. Internal Revenue Code.
Issues related to the implementation of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (P.L. 119-21).
General corporate tax issues
Offices it contacted
HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
SENATE
Treasury, Dept of
Trade (domestic/foreign)in 6 report entries
In its own words
Issues related to The United States, Mexico, and Canada Agreement;
Issues related to Section 201 of the Trade Act of 1974, including forced-labor and structural excess-capacity measures;
Issues related to Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974;
Issues relating to domestic refining capacity;
Issues related to Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act of 1962 measures;
Issues related to USTR vessel fees;
Issues related to tariff exposure affecting the Sparta Floating Production Unit and Shell imports.
General issues related to trade policy and trade agreements;
Issues related to domestic content requirements; issues related to tariffs, including supply line issues, and issues related to Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act of 1962 and Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974;
Issues related to US sanctions in the energy sector.
Issues related to Shell's role in the commercial development of natural gas in the Dragon gas field offshore Venezuela and Trinidad and Tobago pursuant to a license issued by OFAC.
Issues related to The United States, Mexico, and Canada Agreement; Issues related to Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act; Issues related to Section 301 of the Trade Act.
Offices it contacted
HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
SENATE
Commerce, Dept of (DOC)
Transportationin 6 report entries
In its own words
Water transportation/freight Jones Act and associated maritime issues
Offices it contacted
HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
SENATE
Defensein 4 report entries · 2 bills named
In its own words
Issues related to H.R. 8800/S.4784 - National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2027; Issues related to stock buyback provisions impacting fuel sales to the Department of War.
Alpine Group Partners, LLC.Lobbying firm · 3 reports$150K
Contributions on the LD-203 report
Reported twice a year by the lobbying filer. $25K is political giving that also appears in FEC filings. $150K is honorary, presidential-library and event money disclosed only here.
Sec. Chris Wright$125K
Rep. Glenn Thompson; Rep. Gabe Vasquez$25K
Rep. Julia Letlow$5K
Rep. Pete Aguilar$5K
Sen. Dan Sullivan$5K
Rep. Vicente Gonzalez Jr.$2.5K
Sen. John Thune$2.5K
Sen. Dave McCormick$2K
Rep. Nicholas Begich$1K
Rep. Pete Stauber$1K
Matched by name: these reports are filed for “SHELL USA, INC. (FKA SHELL OIL COMPANY)”, found by searching “SHELL USA”. Lobbying and FEC records share no ID, so an organization that lobbies under another name is missed. Source: LDA.gov, accessed Oct 26, 2026. Senate Office of Public Records cannot vouch for the data or analyses derived from these data after the data have been retrieved from LDA.gov.
SHELL USA, INC. EMPLOYEE POLITICAL AWARENESS COMMITTEE
Filings covered
Through Oct 14, 2026
Data source
FEC bulk filing data
Shell USA, Inc. Employee Political Awareness Committee is registered with the Federal Election Commission as a PAC (qualified). It is a lobbyist/registrant PAC. Its FEC record names Shell as an affiliate. Official FEC summary: Federal Election Commission committee record.
Pages quoted 0 pages
No pages quoted
Nothing from this committee’s or its sponsor’s site is quoted yet.
Linked public records
No approved organization identity yet
The official FEC committee record remains available under Filings.
DSDan SullivanRepublican · U.S. Senate · AK · via Alaskans For Dan Sullivan2 payments, latest Aug 31, 2026 · CONTRIBUTION · FEC filing, Aug 31, 2026$10K
JLJulia LetlowRepublican · U.S. Senate · LA · via Julia Letlow For Louisiana2 payments, latest Aug 28, 2026 · CONTRIBUTION · FEC filing, Aug 28, 2026$7.5K
LFLizzie FletcherDemocratic · U.S. House · TX-07 · via Elizabeth Pannill Fletcher For Congress1 payment, latest Aug 31, 2026 · CONTRIBUTION · FEC filing, Aug 31, 2026$5K
PAPete AguilarDemocratic · U.S. House · CA-33 · via Pete Aguilar For Congress1 payment, latest Jun 29, 2026 · CONTRIBUTION · FEC filing, Jun 29, 2026$5K
Common Values PACPAC or other committee1 payment, latest Sep 10, 2026 · CONTRIBUTION$5K
SCShelley Moore CapitoRepublican · U.S. Senate · WV · via Capito For West Virginia1 payment, latest Sep 10, 2026 · CONTRIBUTION$5K
$108K across 35 recipient committees, or 99.9% of everything this committee reports spending. The largest 12 are shown.
Built from FEC Schedule A and Schedule B filings for the selected cycle. A committee only appears here if the money was itemized under its FEC committee ID.
$300
By the state each contributor wrote on the filing. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line together, so one committee or organization transfer can account for a whole state. Contributors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized and cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
Donors’ employers as filed
Donors’ employers
Employer as filed
Amount
Shell USA INC382 contributions · 79% of ranked
$36,347
Shell Energy Resources Co15 contributions · 5.9% of ranked
$2,682
Shell E&P Co (sepco)21 contributions · 5.4% of ranked
$2,483
Shell OIL Company (soc)13 contributions · 3.5% of ranked
$1,620
Shell Trading Services Co5 contributions · 2.7% of ranked
$1,248
Shell GBL Solutns (us)inc5 contributions · 2.3% of ranked
$1,040
Shell Chemical LP1 contribution · 0.5% of ranked
$208
Shell OIL Products US1 contribution · 0.5% of ranked
$208
Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($8,507) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
Donors’ occupations as filed
Donors’ occupations
Occupation as filed
Amount
Executive112 contributions · 33% of ranked
$15,182
Director State GOV Relations35 contributions · 9.1% of ranked
$4,150
Director External Relations36 contributions · 9% of ranked
$4,140
Regulatory Policy Team Lead36 contributions · 8.6% of ranked
$3,924
Senior Advisor Federal GOV REL36 contributions · 7.9% of ranked
$3,600
Salaried Staff22 contributions · 6.2% of ranked
$2,850
Managing Counsel28 contributions · 6.1% of ranked
$2,800
Senior Corporate Relations Advisor28 contributions · 6.1% of ranked
$2,800
Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($8,507) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.
Issues related to the Clean Water Act;
Issues related to the National Petroleum Reserve in Alaska;
Issues related to renewable portfolio standards and biofuel feedstocks;
Issues related to European Union environmental regulations.
Energy transition Infrastructure project delivery/permitting reform Permitting issues associated with the Marine Mammal Protection Act and Endangered Species Act
Energy transition Infrastructure project delivery/permitting reform Permitting issues associated with the Marine Mammal Protection Act