Loading this committee’s profile from its FEC filings.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Loading this committee’s profile from its FEC filings.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
PACs › PAC (qualified) › 2025–2026
PAC (qualified)Lobbyist/registrant PACTrade associationWashington, District of ColumbiaActive
Connected organization: Independent Community Bankers of America
Political fund of Independent Community Bankers of America
FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026 · FEC bulk filing data · committee C00032698 · files monthly
“The Independent Community Bankers of America® has one mission: to create and promote an environment where community banks flourish. We power the potential of the nation’s community banks through effective advocacy, education, and innovation.”
Independent Community Bankers of America, the organization this committee is the political fund of, icba.org
Quoted from the committee's site, or its sponsor's or funder's where its own says nothing. The statement is filed under topics from a fixed list, chosen by AI models when two of three agree; which side it takes is in its own words.
55 priorities from the site of Independent Community Bankers of America, the organization this committee is the political fund of, in the order they are listed there. Every heading and the text under it is copied exactly, as one passage for each page it is from, and links to that place on the page; hover a source to see which passage it opens.
Consumers, businesses, and the broader economy can only thrive in a competitive landscape for financial services.
Robust competition among numerous providers and a level playing field ensure favorable pricing and innovative, quality services and minimize systemic risk.
The competitive advantages enjoyed by tax-exempt credit unions and Farm Credit System lenders warrant special scrutiny.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · icba.org/policy-positions
Heading as listed on icba.org/policy-positions ↗ (opens icba.org/policy-positions at this heading)
Advocate for commonsense and appropriately tailored laws and regulations for community banks
ICBA believes that regulation should be calibrated to risk posed to consumers and to the financial system.
Regulation that may be appropriate for a large, systemically risky bank with dedicated and expansive compliance resources is an unwarranted burden for a community bank and a diversion of critical resources.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · icba.org/policy-positions
Heading as listed on icba.org/policy-positions ↗ (opens icba.org/policy-positions at this heading)
Each part reads different filings, so counts and totals can differ.
Direct PAC contributions and independent expenditures explicitly reported as support, by the party of the candidate they went to.
| Party of the candidate | Candidates | Direct | Independent | Amount | Share |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 96 | $344,000 | $0 | $344,000 | 53% |
| Democratic | 78 | $266,500 | $0 | $266,500 | 41% |
| Other or unresolved | 12 | $38,500 | $0 | $38,500 | 5.9% |
| Shown support | 186 | $649,000 | $0 | $649,000 | 100% |
Contributions are reported money, not endorsements; a PAC giving to both parties is common.
Every contribution on line 23 of the committee’s own Schedule B, which is the filing its summary totals are built from. That line covers federal candidates, party committees and other political committees alike, so a super PAC funding other super PACs appears here rather than under candidate giving.
| Recipient | Count | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| Democratic candidates | 78 | $266.5K · 22% |
| Republican candidates | 94 | $342K · 29% |
| Other or unresolved candidates | 14 | $40.5K · 3.4% |
| Democratic party committees | 1 | $15K · 1.3% |
| Republican party committees | 1 | $30K · 2.5% |
| Other party committees | 4 | $120K · 10% |
| Other PACs and committees | 75 | $378K · 32% |
| All recipients | 267 | $1.2M |
| State | Candidates | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| California | 18 | $55K |
| New York | 12 | $46.5K |
| Illinois | 11 | $41.5K |
| Wisconsin | 7 | $29.5K |
| Texas | 9 | $27K |
| Louisiana | 6 | $25K |
A donor who gave several times appears once. The 12 largest donors by total given are listed. In all, 2,318 itemized contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $1.2M. FEC contributor lists are public records and cannot be used for commercial solicitation.
The largest of the committees is listed. Counted from the givers' own filings, which can run above the total this committee reports.
Each as the committee named it on this line.
Total reported receipts $1,644,144
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. Open a source marked + to see who gave. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 172 contributions · 8.2% | $96,389 |
| 257 contributions · 7% | $82,245 |
| 144 contributions · 6.8% |
Total reported disbursements $1,211,991
Every dollar this committee reported spending this cycle, split by the lines it reports against. Open a line to see who was actually paid on it. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
$1.2M spent from Jan 2025 to Oct 2026. Most in one report: $130.6K, March 2026.
The running total of what the committee’s FEC reports say it spent, independent expenditures included, with a point at the end of each report. The line is straight between reports because a report gives one total for its whole period.
Besides giving through its PAC, Independent Community Bankers of America pays lobbyists to press Congress and federal agencies. Each quarter it, or a firm it hires, files a public report under the Lobbying Disclosure Act saying which topics it worked on, what it spent, and whom it contacted. This is what those reports say.
Each report files its work under official topics. The bar shows how often each topic came up across the reports; open one to read what was filed under it. Naming a bill says the organization lobbied on it, not which side it took.
The organization’s own reports give its total lobbying costs, including any firms it hired; each firm reports what this client paid it.
Reported twice a year by the lobbying filer. $319.5K is political giving that also appears in FEC filings.
Matched by name: these reports are filed for “INDEPENDENT COMMUNITY BANKERS OF AMERICA”, found by searching “INDEPENDENT COMMUNITY BANKERS OF AMERICA”. Lobbying and FEC records share no ID, so an organization that lobbies under another name is missed. Source: LDA.gov, accessed Oct 27, 2026. Senate Office of Public Records cannot vouch for the data or analyses derived from these data after the data have been retrieved from LDA.gov.
Independent Community Bankers of America PAC is registered with the Federal Election Commission as a PAC (qualified). It is a lobbyist/registrant PAC. Its FEC record names Independent Community Bankers of America as an affiliate. Official FEC summary: Federal Election Commission committee record.
Statements are quoted from these pages exactly. Headings, order and wording are the committee’s or its sponsor’s; the record marking is ours.
Independent Community Bankers of America PAC is matched to organization records using the FEC committee identity, structured identifiers, and corroborated organization data.
| Pennsylvania | 10 | $25K |
|---|
| Georgia | 5 | $24.5K |
|---|
The largest 8 of 45 states.
Bars drawn to $30K, the largest gift total here. 2025–2026 filings.
Candidate contribution rows come from candidate committee Schedule A filings, the same rows the party chart above counts.
Money moving between this committee and other committees, matched on FEC committee ID rather than the name each filing was typed under. Both sides exclude memo entries. The figures here count each committee once, from the itemized transfers read for this section, so they will not match the payment counts under Who this PAC gave to.
Committees that reported giving to this one on their own Schedule A filings, grouped by the giver’s committee ID.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| PAC (qualified) · Connected to INDIANA BANKERS ASSOCIATION · 1 payment | $50K |
| PAC (qualified) · Connected to WISCONSIN BANKERS ASSOCIATION · 2 payments | $34.1K |
| PAC (qualified) · Connected to AMERICAN BANKERS ASSOCIATION PAC (BANKPAC) · 1 payment | $32.5K |
| PAC (qualified) · 1 payment | $5K |
| PAC (qualified) · 1 payment | $5K |
$126.6K from 5 committees, counting every itemized receipt this cycle.
Disbursements this committee itemized to another committee: candidate contributions, party transfers and payments alike, not contributions only.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| Party committee (qualified) · Connected to DEFEND OUR MAJORITY · 2 payments | $30K |
| Party committee (qualified) · 2 payments | $30K |
| Party committee (qualified) · Connected to COLE COMBINED COMMITTEE · 2 payments | $30K |
| Party committee (qualified) · 2 payments | $30K |
| Party committee (qualified) · Connected to YOUNG VICTORY COMMITTEE · 2 payments | $30K |
| Party committee (qualified) · Connected to DEMOCRATIC GRASSROOTS VICTORY FUND · 1 payment | $15K |
| 1 payment | $15K |
Built from FEC Schedule A and Schedule B filings for the selected cycle. A committee only appears here if the money was itemized under its FEC committee ID.
| $79,240 |
| 54 contributions · 5% | $57,965 |
| 88 contributions · 4.7% | $55,186 |
| 108 contributions · 4.3% | $50,116 |
| 167 contributions · 4% | $46,863 |
| 56 contributions · 3.9% | $46,204 |
By the state each contributor wrote on the filing. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line together, so one committee or organization transfer can account for a whole state. Contributors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized and cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
| Employer as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| 392 contributions · 5.3% of ranked | $59,056 |
| 30 contributions · 2.6% of ranked | $29,278 |
| Written instead of an employer · 11 contributions · 2.6% of ranked | $28,670 |
| 153 contributions · 2.5% of ranked | $27,908 |
| 33 contributions · 2.2% of ranked | $24,720 |
| 52 contributions · 2.1% of ranked | $23,111 |
| 14 contributions · 1.7% of ranked | $19,160 |
| 11 contributions · 1.6% of ranked | $17,195 |
Ranked from the largest 200 of 201 employer spellings filed; each share is of the money in those. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($308,715) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
| Occupation as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| 428 contributions · 14% of ranked | $163,458 |
| 189 contributions · 14% of ranked | $162,233 |
| 119 contributions · 7.3% of ranked | $83,835 |
| 117 contributions · 4.9% of ranked | $56,596 |
| 83 contributions · 4.3% of ranked | $49,103 |
| 50 contributions · 3.5% of ranked | $40,190 |
| Written instead of an occupation · 11 contributions · 2.5% of ranked | $28,670 |
| 69 contributions · 2.4% of ranked | $27,828 |
A further $403 came from donors whose answer names no occupation (blank), so it is not ranked. Ranked from the largest 200 of 201 occupation spellings filed; each share is of the money in those. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($308,715) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
Total itemized disbursements $1,209,150
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
All 583 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 2 payments · 2.5% of all spending | $30,000 |
| 2 payments · 2.5% of all spending | $30,000 |
| 2 payments · 2.5% of all spending | $30,000 |
| 2 payments · 2.5% of all spending | $30,000 |
| 2 payments · 2.5% of all spending | $30,000 |
| 1 payment · 1.2% of all spending | $15,000 |
| 1 payment · 1.2% of all spending | $15,000 |
| 5 payments · 0.9% of all spending | $11,433 |
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.
| PAC (qualified) · 2 payments |
| $10K |
| PAC (qualified) · 2 payments | $10K |
| PAC (qualified) · 2 payments | $10K |
| PAC (qualified) · 2 payments | $10K |
| PAC (qualified) · Connected to DEFEND DEMOCRACY NOW PAC · 2 payments | $10K |
$1.2M across 267 recipient committees, or 98% of everything this committee reports spending. The largest 12 are shown.