Loading this committee’s profile from its FEC filings.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Loading this committee’s profile from its FEC filings.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
PACs › Party committee (qualified) › 2025–2026
Party committee (qualified)Minneapolis, MinnesotaActive
Connected organization: Protect the House 2024
FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026 · FEC bulk filing data · committee C00001313 · files monthly
1 priority from the committee’s own site, in the order they are listed there. Every heading and the text under it is copied exactly, as one passage for each page it is from, and links to that place on the page; hover a source to see which passage it opens.
2026 Official Party Platform Adopted by the Republican Party of Minnesota Statement of Principles H Promote Economic Prosperity We believe economic prosperity is driven by individuals, not government.
We support lowering the tax burden, exercising spending restraint, and creating and maintaining a fair, honest and competitive business environment to promote economic prosperity.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · mngop.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/Republican-Party-of-Minnesota_2026_PlatformPDF.pdf
2026 Action Agenda Adopted by the Republican Party of Minnesota Action Agenda The following Action Agenda sets forth specific legislative and policy priorities supported by the Republican Party of Minnesota for 2026.
H We support eliminating the Alternative Minimum Tax.
H We support cutting property taxes on agricultural land.
H We support the sale and advertising of raw milk.
H We oppose partial birth abortions.
H We oppose abortions performed on minors without parental consent.
H We call for overturning the Doe v. Gomez decision.
H We support the repeal of McCain-Feingold.
H We oppose reinstatement of the so-called “Fairness Doctrine.”
H We reject Internet anti-piracy laws that violate online privacy.
H We support abolishing the TSA and privatizing airport security.
H We oppose warrantless NSA data collection on electronic communications.
H We oppose a government backdoor into personal electronics.
H We support passage of a Concealed Carry Reciprocity law.
H We support reinstating the Positive Alternatives Act.
H We support abolishing government-mandated employee benefits.
H We support expanding health savings accounts.
H We support making all health insurance premiums tax exempt.
H We support medical malpractice reform.
H We opposing determining Medicare reimbursement by the provider’s location.
H We oppose government mandated vaccinations.
H We support allowing veterans to access their benefits locally.
H We recognize a right to voluntary reparative therapy.
H We support repealing the bureaucratic anti-bullying law.
H We believe tenure should be reformed.
H We support limiting public school teachers’ right to strike.
H We support prohibiting commercial surrogacy contracts.
H We support establishing substantially higher sentences for repeat offenders.
H We support ending probation for violent criminals.
H We support stricter penalties for assaults on police.
H We oppose legalizing recreational marijuana.
H We support a transparent public judge evaluation process.
H A judge’s signature on all rulings, orders, and opinions.
H A documented finding of fact for each order.
H Making transcripts available from the appellate court.
H We believe all conservation easements must have a sunset.
H We support eliminating the Metropolitan Council.
H We would eliminate Local Government Aid.
H We support maintaining and preserving the current caucus-primary system.
H We believe voting machines must provide a printed receipt.
H We believe county auditors should be an elected position.
H We support establishing sunset provisions on entitlement state programs.
H We support ending all automatic voter registration.
H We support the exclusive use of watermarked paper ballots.
H We support passage of the SAVE act.
H We support ending birthright citizenship.
H We support printing all government forms in English only.
H We oppose un-vetted refugees from entering the country.
H We oppose the Law of the Seas Treaty (L.O.S.T.).
H We oppose the UN Rights of the Child Treaty.
H We oppose the World Bank and International Monetary Fund.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · mngop.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/Republican-Party-of-Minnesota_2026_Action_Agenda.pdf
Each part reads different filings, so counts and totals can differ.
Direct PAC contributions and independent expenditures explicitly reported as support, by the party of the candidate they went to.
No candidate-directed contributions or explicitly supportive independent expenditures were returned.
Contributions are reported money, not endorsements; a PAC giving to both parties is common.
Every contribution on line 23 of the committee’s own Schedule B, which is the filing its summary totals are built from. That line covers federal candidates, party committees and other political committees alike, so a super PAC funding other super PACs appears here rather than under candidate giving.
No contributions itemized
Nothing loaded
Candidate contribution rows come from candidate committee Schedule A filings, the same rows the party chart above counts.
Money moving between this committee and other committees, matched on FEC committee ID rather than the name each filing was typed under. Both sides exclude memo entries. The figures here count each committee once, from the itemized transfers read for this section, so they will not match the payment counts under Who this PAC gave to.
Committees that reported giving to this one on their own Schedule A filings, grouped by the giver’s committee ID.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| Party committee (nonqualified) · Connected to REPUBLICAN PARTY OF MINNESOTA · 3 payments | $175K |
| PAC (nonqualified) · 5 payments | $136.9K |
| Party committee (qualified) · Connected to DEFEND OUR MAJORITY · 8 payments | $85K |
| Party committee (nonqualified) · 3 payments | $77.5K |
| PAC (nonqualified) · 1 payment | $41.7K |
| Party committee (qualified) · Connected to REPUBLICAN PARTY OF MINNESOTA - FEDERAL · 1 payment | $30.3K |
| Party committee (nonqualified) · Connected to REPUBLICAN PARTY OF MINNESOTA · 3 payments | $22.5K |
$668.7K from 18 committees, counting every itemized receipt this cycle. The largest 12 are shown.
Disbursements this committee itemized to another committee: candidate contributions, party transfers and payments alike, not contributions only.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| Party committee (qualified) · Connected to YOUNG VICTORY COMMITTEE · 6 payments | $173.3K |
| Party committee (qualified) · Connected to DEFEND OUR MAJORITY · 1 payment | $41.7K |
| 1 payment | $155 |
From the 3 largest of 4 recipient committees: $215.2K, or 5.5% of everything this committee reports spending.
Built from FEC Schedule A and Schedule B filings for the selected cycle. A committee only appears here if the money was itemized under its FEC committee ID.
A donor who gave several times appears once. The 12 largest donors by total given are listed. In all, 6,209 itemized contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $1M. FEC contributor lists are public records and cannot be used for commercial solicitation.
The 3 largest committees by total given are listed. Counted from the givers' own filings, which can run above the total this committee reports.
Each as the committee named it on this line.
Total reported receipts $4,081,571
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. Open a source marked + to see who gave. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 2,061 contributions · 81% | $822,996 |
| 635 contributions · 4% | $40,160 |
| 448 contributions · 1.7% |
Total reported disbursements $3,880,190
Every dollar this committee reported spending this cycle, split by the lines it reports against. Open a line to see who was actually paid on it. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
$3.9M spent from Jan 2025 to Oct 2026. Most in one report: $995.6K, Jul 1 – Dec 31, 2025.
The running total of what the committee’s FEC reports say it spent, independent expenditures included, with a point at the end of each report. The line is straight between reports because a report gives one total for its whole period.
Published by the Commission against this committee’s own FEC ID. An audit is a periodic examination that reports findings; an administrative fine is a penalty for filing a specific report late or not at all. They are separate instruments and are not combined into a score here.
2018 cycleReport released Feb 11, 2022
2008 cycleReport released Mar 1, 2011
1976 cycleReport released Apr 23, 1979
Late 12G report, 2000$16K assessed
Case 236 at the FEC ↗Source: the Commission’s audit-case and administrative-fine records, joined on this committee’s FEC ID, imported Oct 26, 2026. Enforcement matters (MURs) are published only against respondent names, with no committee identifier, so they are not shown here rather than being matched by name.
No lobbying disclosures matched
Republican Party of Minnesota is registered with the Federal Election Commission as a party committee (qualified). Its FEC record names Protect the House 2024 as an affiliate. Official FEC summary: Federal Election Commission committee record.
Statements are quoted from these pages exactly. Headings, order and wording are the committee’s or its sponsor’s; the record marking is ours.
Republican Party of Minnesota is matched to organization records using the FEC committee identity, structured identifiers, and corroborated organization data.
| $21.5K |
| Senate campaign committee · Connected to ADAM SCHWARZE VICTORY FUND · 9 payments | $15.4K |
| Senate campaign committee · 6 payments | $10.7K |
| Senate campaign committee · Connected to TEAM TAFOYA · 3 payments | $10.6K |
| Party committee (qualified) · 2 payments | $10K |
| $17,733 |
| 450 contributions · 1.3% | $13,629 |
| 27 contributions · 1.2% | $12,215 |
| 80 contributions · 1% | $9,674 |
| 180 contributions · 0.9% | $9,147 |
| 272 contributions · 0.8% | $8,365 |
By the state each contributor wrote on the filing. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line together, so one committee or organization transfer can account for a whole state. Contributors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized and cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
| Employer as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an employer · 4,283 contributions · 39% of ranked | $344,699 |
| Written instead of an employer · 429 contributions · 9.9% of ranked | $86,274 |
| 2 contributions · 3.4% of ranked | $30,000 |
| Written instead of an employer · 28 contributions · 3.3% of ranked | $29,174 |
| 4 contributions · 1.8% of ranked | $15,750 |
| 2 contributions · 1.7% of ranked | $15,000 |
| 6 contributions · 1.2% of ranked | $10,577 |
| Written instead of an employer · 24 contributions · 1.2% of ranked | $10,418 |
A further $44,589 came from donors whose answer names no employer (None, blank), so it is not ranked. Ranked from the largest 200 of 201 employer spellings filed; each share is of the money in those. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($1,093,518) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
| Occupation as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an occupation · 4,286 contributions · 40% of ranked | $364,804 |
| 35 contributions · 5.2% of ranked | $47,519 |
| 59 contributions · 4.1% of ranked | $37,816 |
| 72 contributions · 4% of ranked | $36,891 |
| 10 contributions · 3.9% of ranked | $35,837 |
| 2 contributions · 3.3% of ranked | $30,000 |
| Written instead of an occupation · 27 contributions · 3.2% of ranked | $28,974 |
| 13 contributions · 2.4% of ranked | $22,147 |
A further $36,653 came from donors whose answer names no occupation (blank), so it is not ranked. Ranked from the largest 200 of 201 occupation spellings filed; each share is of the money in those. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($1,093,518) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
Total itemized disbursements $2,065,153
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
All 1,379 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
33 payments were reported as a lump sum, such as a card or payroll bill, with the detail filed underneath as memo entries. Those entries, $52,430 in all, are counted under the payee and purpose they name rather than under the processor that was paid. The total is the same either way.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 9 payments · 6% of all spending | $234,364 |
| 3 payments · 5.7% of all spending | $219,891 |
| 6 payments · 4.5% of all spending | $173,321 |
| 99 payments · 4.3% of all spending | $167,452 |
| 22 payments · 3.3% of all spending | $127,158 |
| 3 payments · 1.9% of all spending | $74,757 |
| 71 payments · 1.8% of all spending | $70,677 |
| 9 payments · 1.8% of all spending | $70,436 |
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.