Loading this candidate’s profile from the FEC filings and campaign records.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Loading this candidate’s profile from the FEC filings and campaign records.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Candidates › Wyoming U.S. Senate race › 2025–2026
D Democratic nominee for U.S. Senate, Wyoming
Has not served in Congress
5 priorities from byrdforsenate.com, in the order they are listed there. Every heading and the text under it is copied exactly, as one passage for each page it is from, and links to that place on the page; hover a source to see which passage it opens.
Wyoming families and businesses shouldn't have to choose between filling up the tank, stocking the fridge, and paying the bills. Years of rising costs have hit rural states hardest, where fewer grocery options and longer supply routes mean price increases land even harder on the family budget. James Byrd will fight to lower energy costs for everyday Wyomingites by supporting responsible domestic production, cutting the red tape that drives prices up, and ending the wasteful foreign wars that leave us footing the bill overseas instead of investing at home. On groceries, he'll push back against corporate consolidation in food and agriculture that lets a handful of companies set prices while family producers get squeezed on both ends. Wyoming powers this country and feeds plenty of it too. It's time Washington made sure that work pays off at the register and at the pump, not just for corporations or foreign wars.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · byrdforsenate.com/blank
Heading as listed on byrdforsenate.com/blank ↗ (opens byrdforsenate.com/blank at this heading)
Wyoming's public lands are our heritage, our economy, and our way of life. James Byrd will fight to keep them public and open for hunting, fishing, grazing, and recreation, not sold off to the highest bidder.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · byrdforsenate.com
Wyoming's public lands aren't just scenery. They're our heritage, our economy, and our way of life. James Byrd will stand against efforts to sell off or privatize the lands that belong to every Wyomingite, while working to keep them open for hunting, fishing, grazing, and recreation. Washington doesn't get to decide what our land is worth. We do.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · byrdforsenate.com/blank
Heading as listed on byrdforsenate.com ↗ (opens byrdforsenate.com at this heading)
No one in Wyoming should go bankrupt because they got sick. James Byrd will push to lower drug costs, protect rural hospitals, and make insurance actually work for the people paying into it.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · byrdforsenate.com
No one in Wyoming should go bankrupt because they got sick or have to drive hours just to see a doctor. James Byrd will push to lower prescription drug costs, protect rural hospitals from closure, and make sure insurance actually works for the people paying into it. Healthcare should be a right you can count on, not a bill you dread.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · byrdforsenate.com/blank
Heading as listed on byrdforsenate.com ↗ (opens byrdforsenate.com at this heading)
James Byrd is skeptical of the rush to bring data centers into Wyoming. He won't support sweetheart tax deals or projects that strain the grid and drain water supplies just to benefit outside investors. If a project can't prove it pays its fair share and protects local resources, it doesn't belong here.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · byrdforsenate.com/blank
Heading as listed on byrdforsenate.com/blank ↗ (opens byrdforsenate.com/blank at this heading)
James Byrd has called out federal neglect of Wyoming's ranching industry, from biosecurity gaps to unfair trade rules that leave local ranchers competing on an uneven playing field. He supports honest country-of-origin labeling and pushes back on regulatory overreach that burdens family operations without protecting anyone.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · byrdforsenate.com/blank
Heading as listed on byrdforsenate.com/blank ↗ (opens byrdforsenate.com/blank at this heading)
FEC filings, Jan 1, 2026 to Oct 14, 2026 · Official FEC bulk data · committee C00938738
87¢ of every dollar raised has been spent across 5 reports ($46.6K of $53.6K). Cash on hand went from $1.8K on Mar 31, 2026 to $7.9K on Oct 14, 2026.
| Report | Raised in the period | Spent in the period | Cash on hand at its close |
|---|---|---|---|
| APRIL QUARTERLY 2026 through Mar 31, 2026 | $9,653 | $8,320 | $1,823 |
| JULY QUARTERLY 2026 through Jun 30, 2026 | $9,923 | $10,056 | $1,689 |
| PRE-PRIMARY 2026 through Jul 29, 2026 | $2,983 | $4,916 | $356 |
| OCTOBER QUARTERLY 2026 through Sep 30, 2026 | $18,801 | $14,889 | $4,106 |
| PRE-GENERAL 2026 through Oct 14, 2026 | $12,200 | $8,379 | $7,927 |
Each report’s own period, as filed with the FEC; a report filed again counts once, as its latest copy.
1 endorser listed on James W. Byrd’s own campaign site.
This is the campaign's claim, checked by an editor against its page; the endorsers have not confirmed it to us. Each name opens the campaign’s page with that name highlighted.
Advanced · 9,589 votes (79%) · 1 of 2 · Full results ↗
Election not held yet · Full results ↗
Every contest for this seat that named this candidate, most recent last; a result is shown once the race is called. Election dates and results from civicAPI (civicapi.org). civicAPI aggregates results from Secretaries of State and equivalent election bodies, and makes its own race calls. civicapi.org ↗
Official FEC filing record for the current cycle. The priorities they publish are quoted from their own site, in their order.
Statements are quoted from these pages exactly. Headings, order and wording are the campaign’s; the record marking is ours.
A donor who gave several times appears once. The 12 largest donors by total given are listed. In all, 51 itemized contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $22.8K.
The largest of the committees is listed. In all, 1 committee contribution was filed this cycle, totaling $5K. Counted from the givers' own filings, which can run above the total the campaign itself reports.
Total reported receipts $53,560
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. Open a source marked + to see who gave. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
91% of the money placed by state came from inside Wyoming: $20.8K of $22.8K.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 45 contributions · 91% | $20,771 |
| 2 contributions · 3.9% | $900 |
| 1 contribution · 1.8% | $416 |
| 1 contribution · 1.1% | $250 |
| 1 contribution · 1.1% | $250 |
| 1 contribution · 0.9% | $200 |
By the state each donor wrote on the filing, across 6 states and territories. Donors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized, so they cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
| Employer as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an employer · 22 contributions · 34% of ranked | $6,975 |
| Written instead of an employer · 4 contributions · 16% of ranked | $3,200 |
| Written instead of an employer · 3 contributions · 8.6% of ranked | $1,750 |
| 1 contribution · 7.4% of ranked | $1,500 |
| 1 contribution · 4.9% of ranked | $1,000 |
| 1 contribution · 4.9% of ranked | $1,000 |
| 1 contribution · 4.9% of ranked | $1,000 |
| 2 contributions · 4% of ranked | $800 |
A further $2,550 came from donors whose answer names no employer (N/A, None), so it is not ranked. Itemized gifts over $200, grouped by the words donors filed: not an industry classification, and a gift from an employee is not a gift from the employer. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($20,440) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
Money groups spent on their own, not through a campaign. Each ad is filed against the candidate it names, so money attacking an opponent shows on the opponent’s row. Open a candidate to see who spent it.
The campaign also refunded $400 in contributions, which the categories below do not include.
Total itemized disbursements $37,201
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
All 87 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 5 payments · 24% of all spending | $11,370 |
| 11 payments · 12% of all spending | $5,500 |
| 2 payments · 6.8% of all spending | $3,180 |
| 3 payments · 6.4% of all spending | $3,000 |
| 2 payments · 3.5% of all spending | $1,642 |
| 2 payments · 3.5% of all spending | $1,622 |
| 2 payments · 3.3% of all spending | $1,516 |
| 1 payment · 2.1% of all spending | $1,000 |
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.
| Occupation as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an occupation · 19 contributions · 26% of ranked | $5,725 |
| Written instead of an occupation · 10 contributions · 22% of ranked | $4,800 |
| 3 contributions · 10% of ranked | $2,250 |
| 3 contributions · 7% of ranked | $1,560 |
| 1 contribution · 6.7% of ranked | $1,500 |
| 1 contribution · 4.5% of ranked | $1,000 |
| 1 contribution · 4.5% of ranked | $1,000 |
| 1 contribution · 4.5% of ranked | $1,000 |
A further $500 came from donors whose answer names no occupation (blank), so it is not ranked. Itemized gifts over $200, grouped by the words donors filed: not an industry classification, and a gift from an employee is not a gift from the employer. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($20,440) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.