Loading this committee’s profile from its FEC filings.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Loading this committee’s profile from its FEC filings.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
PACs › Super PAC (independent expenditure-only) › 2025–2026
FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026 · FEC bulk filing data · committee C00524181 · files monthly
Notices dated after Oct 14, 2026 are added; earlier ones are already in the regular reports.
“SCA is the Super PAC arm of the Senate Conservatives Fund (SCF), which is a national organization that promotes conservative policies and helps elect principled candidates to the United States Senate.
SCA helps candidates by running hard-hitting, independent ads to promote them while SCF helps raise money directly for their campaigns by bundling contributions from thousands of freedom-loving Americans across the country.”
Senate Conservatives Action, on its own site, senateaction.com
Quoted from the committee's site, or its sponsor's or funder's where its own says nothing. The statement is filed under topics from a fixed list, chosen by AI models when two of three agree; which side it takes is in its own words.
8 priorities from the committee’s own site, in the order they are listed there. Every heading and the text under it is copied exactly, as one passage for each page it is from, and links to that place on the page; hover a source to see which passage it opens.
Congress must be forced to cut spending.
We support a constitutional amendment to balance the federal budget without raising taxes.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · senateaction.com
Heading as listed on senateaction.com ↗ (opens senateaction.com at this heading)
Obamacare has reduced choices and dramatically driven up costs.
We support repealing this dangerous and disasterous law.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · senateaction.com
Heading as listed on senateaction.com ↗ (opens senateaction.com at this heading)
The federal government has failed to enforce our nation's immigration laws.
We support real border enforcement and oppose amnesty.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · senateaction.com
Heading as listed on senateaction.com ↗ (opens senateaction.com at this heading)
Washington is controlled by career politicians.
We support a constitutional amendment limiting time in office in the House and Senate.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · senateaction.com
Heading as listed on senateaction.com ↗ (opens senateaction.com at this heading)
Bailouts force taxpayers to reward failure and punish success.
We oppose bailouts and believe corporations should be forced to compete.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · senateaction.com
Heading as listed on senateaction.com ↗ (opens senateaction.com at this heading)
Earmarks are a gateway drug to higher spending.
We support a permanent ban on earmarks to break DC's addiction to pork.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · senateaction.com
Heading as listed on senateaction.com ↗ (opens senateaction.com at this heading)
Americans should not be forced to fund activities they find morally objectionable.
We oppose taxpayer funding for abortion.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · senateaction.com
Heading as listed on senateaction.com ↗ (opens senateaction.com at this heading)
The 2nd Amendment protects our freedom to keep and bear arms.
We oppose any and all efforts to undermine this Constitutional right.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · senateaction.com
Heading as listed on senateaction.com ↗ (opens senateaction.com at this heading)
Each part reads different filings, so counts and totals can differ.
Direct PAC contributions and independent expenditures explicitly reported as support, by the party of the candidate they went to.
| Party of the candidate | Candidates | Direct | Independent | Amount | Share |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 16 | $0 | $580,484 | $580,484 | 70% |
| Other or unresolved | 9 | $0 | $242,922 | $242,922 | 30% |
| Shown support | 25 | $0 | $823,406 | $823,406 | 100% |
Contributions are reported money, not endorsements; a PAC giving to both parties is common.
Every contribution on line 23 of the committee’s own Schedule B, which is the filing its summary totals are built from. That line covers federal candidates, party committees and other political committees alike, so a super PAC funding other super PACs appears here rather than under candidate giving.
No contributions itemized
Nothing loaded
Candidate contribution rows come from candidate committee Schedule A filings, the same rows the party chart above counts.
Money moving between this committee and other committees, matched on FEC committee ID rather than the name each filing was typed under. Both sides exclude memo entries. The figures here count each committee once, from the itemized transfers read for this section, so they will not match the payment counts under Who this PAC gave to.
Committees that reported giving to this one on their own Schedule A filings, grouped by the giver’s committee ID.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| Senate campaign committee · Connected to FINANCIAL INNOVATION VICTORY COMMITTEE · 1 payment | $50K |
$50K from 1 committee, counting every itemized receipt this cycle.
Disbursements this committee itemized to another committee: candidate contributions, party transfers and payments alike, not contributions only.
No disbursements to other committees were itemized this cycle.
Built from FEC Schedule A and Schedule B filings for the selected cycle. A committee only appears here if the money was itemized under its FEC committee ID.
A donor who gave several times appears once. The 12 largest donors by total given are listed. In all, 171 itemized contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $999.6K. FEC contributor lists are public records and cannot be used for commercial solicitation.
The largest of the committees is listed. Counted from the givers' own filings, which can run above the total this committee reports.
Each as the committee named it on this line.
Total reported receipts $1,270,645
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. Open a source marked + to see who gave. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 8 contributions · 57% | $566,600 |
| 52 contributions · 27% | $268,000 |
| 1 contribution · 5% | $50,000 |
| 4 contributions · 4.6% | $46,000 |
| 3 contributions · 2.1% | $20,750 |
Total reported disbursements $1,573,452
Every dollar this committee reported spending this cycle, split by the lines it reports against. Open a line to see who was actually paid on it. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
These are the payments the committee itemized to vendors, staff and other committees. Its $783,406 in independent expenditures is filed separately, against the candidate each was about, so it is counted in the split above and listed by candidate below, not here.
$1.6M spent from Jan 2025 to Oct 2026. Most in one report: $265.9K, August 2026.
The running total of what the committee’s FEC reports say it spent, independent expenditures included, with a point at the end of each report. The line is straight between reports because a report gives one total for its whole period. Numbered lines mark the elections that drew the most independent spending. Each expenditure counts toward the next election on its seat after the day it was made, and a seat is named when it drew at least a tenth of that spending.
No lobbying disclosures matched
Senate Conservatives Action is registered with the Federal Election Commission as a Super PAC (independent expenditure-only). Official FEC summary: Federal Election Commission committee record.
Statements are quoted from these pages exactly. Headings, order and wording are the committee’s or its sponsor’s; the record marking is ours.
Senate Conservatives Action is matched to organization records using the FEC committee identity, structured identifiers, and corroborated organization data.
LittleSis data is shared under CC BY-SA 4.0.
| 21 contributions · 2.1% | $20,500 |
| 35 contributions · 0.6% | $6,450 |
| 4 contributions · 0.5% | $5,000 |
By the state each contributor wrote on the filing. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line together, so one committee or organization transfer can account for a whole state. Contributors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized and cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
| Employer as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an employer · 92 contributions · 72% of ranked | $697,060 |
| Written instead of an employer · 12 contributions · 16% of ranked | $155,640 |
| 1 contribution · 5.2% of ranked | $50,000 |
| 2 contributions · 4.1% of ranked | $40,000 |
| Written instead of an employer · 4 contributions · 2.1% of ranked | $20,000 |
| 12 contributions · <0.1% of ranked | $600 |
| 1 contribution · <0.1% of ranked | $500 |
| 1 contribution · <0.1% of ranked | $500 |
A further $33,680 came from donors whose answer names no employer (blank), so it is not ranked. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($97,737) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
| Occupation as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an occupation · 92 contributions · 72% of ranked | $697,060 |
| 7 contributions · 20% of ranked | $195,000 |
| 1 contribution · 5.2% of ranked | $50,000 |
| Written instead of an occupation · 4 contributions · 2.1% of ranked | $20,000 |
| 11 contributions · <0.1% of ranked | $550 |
| 1 contribution · <0.1% of ranked | $500 |
| 1 contribution · <0.1% of ranked | $500 |
| 1 contribution · <0.1% of ranked | $500 |
A further $33,680 came from donors whose answer names no occupation (blank), so it is not ranked. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($97,737) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
Total itemized disbursements $789,277
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
All 230 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
18 payments were reported as a lump sum, such as a card or payroll bill, with the detail filed underneath as memo entries. Those entries, $1,782 in all, are counted under the payee and purpose they name rather than under the processor that was paid. The total is the same either way.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 24 payments · 12% of all spending | $189,676 |
| 22 payments · 7.8% of all spending | $122,970 |
| 22 payments · 7.3% of all spending | $115,349 |
| 22 payments · 7.3% of all spending | $114,152 |
| 21 payments · 5.4% of all spending | $85,362 |
| 1 payment · 2.1% of all spending | $32,785 |
| 1 payment · 1.5% of all spending | $24,088 |
| 2 payments · 1.4% of all spending | $21,418 |
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.