Loading this candidate’s profile from the FEC filings and campaign records.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Loading this candidate’s profile from the FEC filings and campaign records.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Candidates › Kansas U.S. Senate race › 2025–2026
R Republican nominee for U.S. Senate, Kansas
Senator since 2021
The same platforms’ other accounts, such as a congressional office’s or an earlier campaign’s.
Roger Marshall’s words are not shown
99.6% of their votes went with their party’s majority; they broke with it 4 times in the 119th Congress.
Senate Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry
Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions
Matching this candidate against the House and Senate voting records…
The CRS policy areas of Marshall’s 214 substantive sponsored measures, Congresses 117, 118, 119; the figure is how many fall in each. Sponsorship indicates legislative focus, not every policy position. GovInfo source ↗
FEC filings, Jan 1, 2025 to Oct 14, 2026 · Official FEC bulk data · committee C00576173
$1.17 has been spent for every dollar raised across 9 reports ($6.2M of $5.4M). Cash on hand went from $2.2M on Mar 31, 2025 to $809.8K on Oct 14, 2026.
| Report | Raised in the period | Spent in the period | Cash on hand at its close |
|---|---|---|---|
| APRIL QUARTERLY 2025 through Mar 31, 2025 | $573,919 | $35,740 | $2,243,198 |
| JULY QUARTERLY 2025 through Jun 30, 2025 | $562,231 | $74,333 | $2,731,096 |
| OCTOBER QUARTERLY 2025 through Sep 30, 2025 | $681,720 | $44,022 | $3,368,793 |
| YEAR-END 2025 through Dec 31, 2025 | $745,277 | $41,775 | $4,072,296 |
| APRIL QUARTERLY 2026 through Mar 31, 2026 | $768,816 | $59,853 | $4,781,259 |
| JULY QUARTERLY 2026 through Jun 30, 2026 | $611,448 | $66,260 | $5,326,447 |
| PRE-PRIMARY 2026 through Jul 15, 2026 | $65,663 | $4,032 | $5,388,078 |
| OCTOBER QUARTERLY 2026 through Sep 30, 2026 | $800,618 | $5,266,608 | $922,088 |
| PRE-GENERAL 2026 through Oct 14, 2026 | $540,371 | $652,653 | $809,806 |
Each report’s own period, as filed with the FEC; a report filed again counts once, as its latest copy.
3 endorsers listed on Roger Marshall’s own campaign site: 2 unions, 1 organization.
This is the campaign's claim, checked by an editor against its page; the endorsers have not confirmed it to us. Each name opens the campaign’s page with that name highlighted.
“Sen. Marshall has proven time and time again that he is a friend of labor,” said Teamsters General President Sean O’Brien. “As a member of the U.S. Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions, Sen. Marshall has been eager to partner with us on legislation that protects workers, even when it requires breaking rank with his own party. We look forward to continuing to work together with Sen. Marshall to fight for the rights of hardworking Americans.” “We are proud to endorse the candidate in this race who continues to be a voice for the middle-class workers of our great state, and that candidate is Sen. Marshall,” Teamsters Local 696 President Mike Scribner said. “Kansas Teamsters need someone in Washington who is willing to fight on their behalf. Throughout his tenure, Sen. Marshall has shown that he is the person for the job.”
“As a fifth-generation Kansas farm kid, I am proud to be endorsed by the Kansas Farm Bureau. An endorsement from KFB is not just an endorsement from an organization, it’s a vote of confidence from the members — the men and women who work hard every day to feed America — and I do not take that lightly,” said Senator Marshall. “Our farmers and ranchers are some of the best people I know. It is the honor of a lifetime to represent them in the U.S. Senate, and I promise to always fight for them whether in Kansas or in Washington, D.C.”
Advanced · 267,887 votes (80%) · 1 of 2 · Full results ↗
Election not held yet · Full results ↗
Every contest for this seat that named this candidate, most recent last; a result is shown once the race is called. Election dates and results from civicAPI (civicapi.org). civicAPI aggregates results from Secretaries of State and equivalent election bodies, and makes its own race calls. civicapi.org ↗
Latest poll · Tavern Research, Jan 28, 2026 · too few nonpartisan polls for a lead
A poll is a snapshot, not a forecast.
Official FEC filing record for the current cycle. The priorities they publish are quoted from their own site, in their order.
No campaign pages quoted
A donor who gave several times appears once. The 12 largest donors by total given are listed. In all, 2,740 itemized contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $1.6M.
The 12 largest committees by total given are listed. In all, 759 committee contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $2M. Counted from the givers' own filings, which can run above the total the campaign itself reports.
Money moved in from the candidate’s other authorized committees, such as a joint fundraising committee. It was raised once and is reported again here on arrival. The 5 largest sources by total given are listed. In all, 41 transfers were filed this cycle, totaling $638.8K.
Total reported receipts $5,350,064
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. Open a source marked + to see who gave. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
15% of the money placed by state came from inside Kansas: $230.4K of $1.6M.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 413 contributions · 15% | $230,436 |
| 49 contributions · 9% | $141,035 |
| 304 contributions · 8.3% | $130,043 |
| 149 contributions · 7.4% | $115,762 |
| 132 contributions · 7.3% | $114,178 |
| 97 contributions · 6.3% | $99,094 |
| 90 contributions · 5.4% | $85,538 |
| 159 contributions · 4.3% | $67,578 |
By the state each donor wrote on the filing, across 50 states and territories. Donors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized, so they cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
| Employer as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an employer · 275 contributions · 15% of ranked | $188,765 |
| Written instead of an employer · 1,619 contributions · 13% of ranked | $163,222 |
| 3 contributions · 1.6% of ranked | $21,000 |
| 4 contributions · 1.5% of ranked | $19,000 |
| 8 contributions · 1.4% of ranked | $18,500 |
| Written instead of an employer · 6 contributions · 1.4% of ranked | $18,000 |
| 3 contributions · 1.2% of ranked | $15,000 |
| 8 contributions · 1.2% of ranked | $15,000 |
A further $87,450 came from donors whose answer names no employer (N/A, None, blank), so it is not ranked. Ranked from the largest 200 of 201 employer spellings filed; each share is of the money in those. Itemized gifts over $200, grouped by the words donors filed: not an industry classification, and a gift from an employee is not a gift from the employer. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($219,536) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
Money groups spent on their own, not through a campaign. Each ad is filed against the candidate it names, so money attacking an opponent shows on the opponent’s row. Open a candidate to see who spent it.
The campaign also refunded $180,642 in contributions, which the categories below do not include.
Total itemized disbursements $902,283
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
All 401 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
33 payments were reported as a lump sum, such as a card or payroll bill, with the detail filed underneath as memo entries. Those entries, $30,659 in all, are counted under the payee and purpose they name rather than under the processor that was paid. The total is the same either way.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 2 payments · 6.1% of all spending | $382,786 |
| 2 payments · 2.4% of all spending | $150,000 |
| 20 payments · 0.7% of all spending | $43,335 |
| 1 payment · 0.6% of all spending | $39,958 |
| 43 payments · 0.5% of all spending | $33,423 |
| 1 payment · 0.5% of all spending | $30,000 |
| 20 payments · 0.4% of all spending | $27,617 |
| 39 payments · 0.3% of all spending | $18,287 |
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.
| Occupation as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| 107 contributions · 13% of ranked | $195,450 |
| Written instead of an occupation · 1,630 contributions · 12% of ranked | $179,522 |
| 57 contributions · 5.9% of ranked | $89,428 |
| 26 contributions · 3.7% of ranked | $55,400 |
| 18 contributions · 3.7% of ranked | $55,025 |
| 25 contributions · 3.5% of ranked | $52,584 |
| 32 contributions · 3.5% of ranked | $52,550 |
| 21 contributions · 2.8% of ranked | $42,000 |
A further $61,670 came from donors whose answer names no occupation (None, blank), so it is not ranked. Ranked from the largest 200 of 201 occupation spellings filed; each share is of the money in those. Itemized gifts over $200, grouped by the words donors filed: not an industry classification, and a gift from an employee is not a gift from the employer. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($219,536) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.