Loading this committee’s profile from its FEC filings.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Loading this committee’s profile from its FEC filings.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
PACs › PAC (qualified) › 2025–2026
FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026 · FEC bulk filing data · committee C00432260 · files monthly
“The Club’s Political Action Committee (PAC) endorses and raises money for candidates who stay true to the fundamental principles of limited government and economic freedom. One of the benefits of joining Club for Growth is that you receive detailed information on candidates endorsed by the Club for Growth PAC and are able to contribute to their campaigns directly through the PAC.”
Club for Growth, the organization this committee is the political fund of, clubforgrowth.org
Quoted from the committee's site, or its sponsor's or funder's where its own says nothing. The statement is filed under topics from a fixed list, chosen by AI models when two of three agree; which side it takes is in its own words.
10 priorities from the site of Club for Growth, the organization this committee is the political fund of, in the order they are listed there. Every heading and the text under it is copied exactly, as one passage for each page it is from, and links to that place on the page; hover a source to see which passage it opens.
Working to deliver historic wins for families who’ve waited too long for real school freedom options in every state.
Our message is resonating: put parents in charge or face the wrath of voters.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · clubforgrowth.org
Heading as listed on clubforgrowth.org ↗ (opens clubforgrowth.org at this heading)
Helping elect candidates for Congress who will fight for Bitcoin freedom and against any government overreach of Bitcoin.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · clubforgrowth.org
Bitcoin Freedom PAC is leading the charge in the key races that matter this November.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · clubforgrowth.org/about/what-we-do
Heading as listed on clubforgrowth.org ↗ (opens clubforgrowth.org at this heading)
Heading as listed on clubforgrowth.org ↗ (opens clubforgrowth.org at this heading)
Reducing income tax rates and repealing the death tax
Replacing the current tax code with a fair/flat tax
The full repeal of ObamaCare and the end of abusive lawsuits through medical malpractice/tort reform
Reducing the size and scope of the federal government
Cutting government spending and passing a Balanced Budget Amendment to the United States Constitution
The Club for Growth is focused on conservative economic policy and does not take positions on social issues or on the immigration/borders debate.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · clubforgrowth.org/about/what-we-do
What does Club for Growth believe are the key policies necessary to balance our budget and grow our economy?
Lower marginal income tax rates
Cutting and limiting government spending
Death Tax repeal
Expanding free trade
Legal reform to end abusive lawsuits
Replacing the current tax code
School choice
Regulatory reform and deregulation
Reform entitlements to increase economic freedom and ensure that long-term federal spending is financially sustainable
Social Security reform with personal retirement accounts
What is the Club for Growth’s Congressional Scorecard?
The Club for Growth’s Congressional Scorecard is published annually so that Club members and the public can monitor the voting behavior of Members of Congress on issues of economic growth.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · clubforgrowth.org/about/what-we-do
The government has grown so large that the activities of hundreds of the federal government’s agencies are beyond the knowledge and understanding of its citizens.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · clubforgrowth.org/issues
In fact, the federal government has grown to such an enormous, overreaching extent that our representatives in Congress cannot adequately oversee and control its activities.
It is imperative for lawmakers to get the nation’s finances in order immediately by applying a fiscally conservative approach to federal spending and restructuring unsustainable entitlement programs.
Policy Recommendations: ↗ (opens clubforgrowth.org/issue/budget-spending at this heading)
Dramatically reduce discretionary spending.
Rein in runaway entitlement spending through market-based reforms.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · clubforgrowth.org/issue/budget-spending
Heading as listed on clubforgrowth.org/issues ↗ (opens clubforgrowth.org/issues at this heading)
Parents of all income levels should have the opportunity to choose for their children the best education choice available to them, whether in public, private, religious, or home schools.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · clubforgrowth.org/issues
Too many public schools are failing at their job of educating students.
Providing choice, from primary to high school, will empower parents to choose high performing schools for their children, giving them a better education and better future.
Policy Recommendations: ↗ (opens clubforgrowth.org/issue/education at this heading)
Take further steps to empower parents through choice of schools.
Continue and improve the charter school system.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · clubforgrowth.org/issue/education
Heading as listed on clubforgrowth.org/issues ↗ (opens clubforgrowth.org/issues at this heading)
Entitlement programs are the single largest drivers of our nation’s mounting debt and must be reformed immediately before it’s too late.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · clubforgrowth.org/issues
Not only is our current entitlement system bankrupting our nation, it is simply unsustainable in its current form.
Policy Recommendations: ↗ (opens clubforgrowth.org/issue/entitlements at this heading)
Repeal Obamacare.
Enact Medicare reform that utilizes a premium-support function to replace the current system.
Block-grant Medicaid to the states.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · clubforgrowth.org/issue/entitlements
Heading as listed on clubforgrowth.org/issues ↗ (opens clubforgrowth.org/issues at this heading)
Free trade is about economic freedom and limited government.
People should have the right to buy and sell from whomever they please, without the interference of government.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · clubforgrowth.org/issues
When government hinders the otherwise free flow of goods and services it ends up picking winners and losers in the marketplace.
For instance, if China is allegedly “dumping” cheap steel into the country, and the U.S. government responds by enacting some form of a trade barrier (often a tariff), then negative consequences occur.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · clubforgrowth.org/issue/free-trade
Heading as listed on clubforgrowth.org/issues ↗ (opens clubforgrowth.org/issues at this heading)
Federal regulatory agencies exert a hidden tax on American consumers and the U.S. economy.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · clubforgrowth.org/issues
These costs come in various forms: the cost of paperwork filled out by businesses, higher prices at stores, hampered innovation, and sometimes even reduced health and safety.
While some regulation is necessary, such as rules to protect against fraud, much of it is neither needed nor productive.
Policy Recommendations: ↗ (opens clubforgrowth.org/issue/regulation at this heading)
Make regulatory reform a major priority.
Further strengthen the regulatory review processes.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · clubforgrowth.org/issue/regulation
Heading as listed on clubforgrowth.org/issues ↗ (opens clubforgrowth.org/issues at this heading)
The goal of tax policy should be to raise only the amount of money needed to fund legitimate functions of government while doing the least amount of damage to the economy and respecting the principle of treating taxpayers equally.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · clubforgrowth.org/issues
Policy Recommendations: ↗ (opens clubforgrowth.org/issue/taxes at this heading)
Tax cuts are just one step toward the ideal of replacing our outdated and complex Federal Tax Code with a modern and simple tax.
Through comprehensive tax reform, either a flat tax or a single-rate national sales tax (like the Fair Tax) would spur economic growth, be fairer, and would lower compliance costs.
This is why a flat tax would boost growth.
A national sales tax has similar benefits.
Absent comprehensive tax reform, key tax cuts that would improve the economy include: ↗ (opens clubforgrowth.org/issue/taxes at this heading)
Lower or eliminate marginal income tax rates for individuals.
Lower or eliminate the dividend tax rate.
Lower or eliminate the individual capital gains tax rate.
Lower or eliminate the corporate income tax rate.
Lower or eliminate the estate tax (“Death tax”).
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · clubforgrowth.org/issue/taxes
Heading as listed on clubforgrowth.org/issues ↗ (opens clubforgrowth.org/issues at this heading)
Term limits of 3 House and 2 Senate terms keep members near to the residents of their districts rather than focusing on building special interests constituencies from which they can draw money and attention.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · clubforgrowth.org/issues
Club for Growth strongly supports term limits for Members of Congress.
Currently, the culture in Washington encourages members to develop long-term relationships with lobbyists and bureaucrats.
This collusion ultimately swells the size and power of government.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · clubforgrowth.org/issue/term-limits
Heading as listed on clubforgrowth.org/issues ↗ (opens clubforgrowth.org/issues at this heading)
Lawmakers must work, within Constitutional bounds, to achieve a legal system that is not unnecessarily punitive and is fair, predictable, and just to all parties.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · clubforgrowth.org/issues
The U.S. tort system costs our economy billions of dollars each year.
This is particularly important during an economic downturn when abusive litigation and attempts to regulate through litigation result in such high costs and liability that harms economic growth.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · clubforgrowth.org/issue/tort-reform
Heading as listed on clubforgrowth.org/issues ↗ (opens clubforgrowth.org/issues at this heading)
Each part reads different filings, so counts and totals can differ.
Direct PAC contributions and independent expenditures explicitly reported as support, by the party of the candidate they went to.
Contributions are reported money, not endorsements; a PAC giving to both parties is common.
Every contribution on line 23 of the committee’s own Schedule B, which is the filing its summary totals are built from. That line covers federal candidates, party committees and other political committees alike, so a super PAC funding other super PACs appears here rather than under candidate giving.
| Recipient | Count | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| Republican candidates | 18 | $118.3K · 100% |
| All recipients | 18 | $118.3K |
| State | Candidates | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| Texas | 4 | $44.1K |
| Pennsylvania | 1 | $15.8K |
| Wisconsin | 1 | $12K |
| Arizona | 2 | $10.6K |
| Alaska | 1 | $6.2K |
| Alabama | 1 | $5.8K |
| Florida | 1 | $4.5K |
| Georgia | 1 | $4.3K |
The largest 8 of 14 states.
A donor who gave several times appears once. The 12 largest donors by total given are listed. In all, 989 itemized contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $838.1K. FEC contributor lists are public records and cannot be used for commercial solicitation.
Total reported receipts $1,343,258
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. Open a source marked + to see who gave. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 133 contributions · 27% | $227,545 |
| 110 contributions · 19% | $155,152 |
| 55 contributions · 10% |
Total reported disbursements $1,341,508
Every dollar this committee reported spending this cycle, split by the lines it reports against. Open a line to see who was actually paid on it. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
These are the payments the committee itemized to vendors, staff and other committees. Its $375,072 in independent expenditures is filed separately, against the candidate each was about, so it is counted in the split above and listed by candidate below, not here.
$1.3M spent from Jan 2025 to Oct 2026. Most in one report: $203.9K, July 2026.
The running total of what the committee’s FEC reports say it spent, independent expenditures included, with a point at the end of each report. The line is straight between reports because a report gives one total for its whole period. Numbered lines mark the elections that drew the most independent spending. Each expenditure counts toward the next election on its seat after the day it was made, and a seat is named when it drew at least a tenth of that spending.
No lobbying disclosures matched
Club for Growth PAC is registered with the Federal Election Commission as a PAC (qualified). Its FEC record names Club for Growth as an affiliate. Official FEC summary: Federal Election Commission committee record.
Statements are quoted from these pages exactly. Headings, order and wording are the committee’s or its sponsor’s; the record marking is ours.
Club for Growth PAC is matched to organization records using the FEC committee identity, structured identifiers, and corroborated organization data.
LittleSis data is shared under CC BY-SA 4.0.
Bars drawn to $17.3K, the largest gift total here. 2025–2026 filings.
Candidate contribution rows come from candidate committee Schedule A filings, the same rows the party chart above counts.
Money moving between this committee and other committees, matched on FEC committee ID rather than the name each filing was typed under. Both sides exclude memo entries. The figures here count each committee once, from the itemized transfers read for this section, so they will not match the payment counts under Who this PAC gave to.
Committees that reported giving to this one on their own Schedule A filings, grouped by the giver’s committee ID.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| Super PAC (independent expenditure-only) · 1 payment | $4.3M |
$4.3M from 1 committee, counting every itemized receipt this cycle.
Disbursements this committee itemized to another committee: candidate contributions, party transfers and payments alike, not contributions only.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| House campaign committee · Connected to JON BONCK VICTORY FUND · 26 payments | $17.3K |
| House campaign committee · Connected to GOBER BOLD FRONTIERS FUND · 24 payments | $17.1K |
| House campaign committee · Connected to PROTECT THE HOUSE 2024 · 57 payments | $15.8K |
| House campaign committee · 76 payments | $12K |
| House campaign committee · 11 payments | $6.5K |
| House campaign committee · Connected to BEGICH FOR AK-AL REPUBLICAN NOMINEE FUND 2024 · 21 payments | $6.2K |
| House campaign committee · Connected to WINNING EDGE FUND · 8 payments | $6K |
| Senate campaign committee · Connected to ONE TEAM SENATE MAJORITY · 4 payments | $5.8K |
| House campaign committee · Connected to APL VICTORY FUND · 27 payments | $4.5K |
| House campaign committee · Connected to CLAY FULLER VICTORY FUND · 5 payments | $4.3K |
| House campaign committee · Connected to GROW THE MAJORITY · 23 payments | $4.1K |
| House campaign committee · Connected to TEIXEIRA VICTORY FUND · 3 payments | $3.8K |
$118.3K across 21 recipient committees, or 8.8% of everything this committee reports spending. The largest 12 are shown. A further $68.2K was filed as memo entries, which FEC reports separately to avoid counting it twice.
Built from FEC Schedule A and Schedule B filings for the selected cycle. A committee only appears here if the money was itemized under its FEC committee ID.
| $87,220 |
| 96 contributions · 10% | $84,344 |
| 19 contributions · 3.9% | $32,330 |
| 31 contributions · 3.3% | $27,700 |
| 19 contributions · 2.5% | $21,000 |
| 10 contributions · 2.1% | $17,315 |
By the state each contributor wrote on the filing. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line together, so one committee or organization transfer can account for a whole state. Contributors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized and cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
| Employer as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| 15 contributions · 17% of ranked | $95,500 |
| Written instead of an employer · 307 contributions · 12% of ranked | $70,633 |
| 10 contributions · 12% of ranked | $70,000 |
| Written instead of an employer · 85 contributions · 12% of ranked | $66,145 |
| 15 contributions · 10% of ranked | $57,500 |
| 2 contributions · 4.4% of ranked | $25,000 |
| 20 contributions · 3.6% of ranked | $20,500 |
| 19 contributions · 3% of ranked | $17,300 |
A further $268,325 came from donors whose answer names no employer (N/A, None, blank), so it is not ranked. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($95,818) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
| Occupation as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an occupation · 554 contributions · 39% of ranked | $305,748 |
| 10 contributions · 8.9% of ranked | $70,000 |
| 28 contributions · 8.6% of ranked | $67,250 |
| 15 contributions · 7.9% of ranked | $62,000 |
| 10 contributions · 7.9% of ranked | $62,000 |
| 11 contributions · 4.1% of ranked | $32,250 |
| 2 contributions · 3.2% of ranked | $25,000 |
| 20 contributions · 2.3% of ranked | $18,300 |
A further $55,750 came from donors whose answer names no occupation (N/A, blank), so it is not ranked. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($95,818) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
Total itemized disbursements $209,045
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
All 686 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 74 payments · 2.4% of all spending | $31,998 |
| 26 payments · 1.3% of all spending | $17,261 |
| 24 payments · 1.3% of all spending | $17,071 |
| 57 payments · 1.2% of all spending | $15,833 |
| 98 payments · 1.2% of all spending | $15,490 |
| 76 payments · 0.9% of all spending | $11,958 |
| 2 payments · 0.8% of all spending | $11,195 |
| 11 payments · 0.5% of all spending | $6,500 |
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.