Loading this candidate’s profile from the FEC filings and campaign records.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Loading this candidate’s profile from the FEC filings and campaign records.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Candidates › Colorado U.S. Senate race › 2025–2026
R Republican nominee for U.S. Senate, Colorado
Has not served in Congress
4 priorities from baisleyforsenate.com, in the order they are listed there. Every heading and the text under it is copied exactly, as one passage for each page it is from, and links to that place on the page; hover a source to see which passage it opens.
Mark Baisley’s vision is a Colorado — and an America — where businesses thrive and every worker — whether blue-collar, energy, agriculture, or high-tech — has a real shot at a strong paycheck and a secure future.
As a businessman and state senator, Mark has proven he can innovate and win. He understands that prosperity doesn’t come from Washington mandates — it comes from unleashing the private sector. In the United States Senate, he will fight to cut federal taxes, roll back job-killing regulations, restore American energy dominance, and make the US a magnet for employers — not a playground for unelected bureaucrats.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · baisleyforsenate.com/issues
Heading as listed on baisleyforsenate.com ↗ (opens baisleyforsenate.com at this heading)
Mark Baisley is committed to making Colorado safe for everyone—no matter where they live. Mark will work with law enforcement to give them the support and funding they need to keep us safe. Similarly, Mark will work to end the dangerous programs that put violent criminals back into our neighborhoods before they’ve rehabilitated.
You can count on Mark to put your family first and to make Colorado safe. Recent policies may have put our families in danger, but Mark knows we can make our communities safe and prosperous again.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · baisleyforsenate.com/issues
People from around the globe see the exceptional character of American liberty and naturally believe that they also deserve to live in an environment of Natural Law — and they do. More than any other nation, America is enriched by immigrants “yearning to breathe free.” And each year, 1.2 million people are legally invited to live in the United States. These welcomed souls are vetted to ensure that they:
- Are not violent or dishonorable
- Will be self-reliant contributors
- Will proudly assimilate into American culture
Those applicants who are not fortunate enough to share in the American inheritance should establish Natural Law in their native countries by pledging to each other their lives, their fortunes and their sacred honor.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · baisleyforsenate.com/issues
Heading as listed on baisleyforsenate.com ↗ (opens baisleyforsenate.com at this heading)
America’s farmers and ranchers remain the backbone of our domestic economy and national food security. They feed our families and fuel significant portions of rural economic activity. At the same time, they face structural cost pressures that punish hard work and make sustained profitability harder to achieve.
Senator Mark Baisley has a consistent record of fighting government overreach, cutting red tape, and backing private sector solutions in the Colorado State Senate. He understands that durable prosperity comes from freer markets rather than expanded bureaucracy or dependency programs.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · baisleyforsenate.com/issues
Heading as listed on baisleyforsenate.com ↗ (opens baisleyforsenate.com at this heading)
FEC filings, Jan 1, 2025 to Oct 14, 2026 · Official FEC bulk data · committee C00932848
76¢ of every dollar raised has been spent across 5 reports ($83.7K of $110K). Cash on hand went from $5.7K on Mar 31, 2026 to $26.3K on Oct 14, 2026.
| Report | Raised in the period | Spent in the period | Cash on hand at its close |
|---|---|---|---|
| APRIL QUARTERLY 2026 through Mar 31, 2026 | $31,416 | $25,746 | $5,670 |
| PRE-PRIMARY 2026 through Jun 10, 2026 | $45,282 | $39,957 | $11,445 |
| JULY QUARTERLY 2026 through Jun 30, 2026 | $33,304 | $18,019 | $26,730 |
| OCTOBER QUARTERLY 2026 through Sep 30, 2026 | $0 | $0 | $26,280 |
| PRE-GENERAL 2026 through Oct 14, 2026 | $0 | $0 | $26,280 |
Each report’s own period, as filed with the FEC; a report filed again counts once, as its latest copy.
36 endorsers listed on Mark Baisley’s own campaign site: 30 officials, 6 people.
This is the campaign's claim, checked by an editor against its page; the endorsers have not confirmed it to us. Each name opens the campaign’s page with that name highlighted.
Former US Senator
Former Colorado Governor
US Representative
US Representative
US Representative
US Representative
Former US Representative
Former Secretary of State
Retired
Patriot Capital
Lost · 716,675 votes (39%) · 2 of 9 · Full results ↗
Every contest for this seat that named this candidate, most recent last; a result is shown once the race is called. Election dates and results from civicAPI (civicapi.org). civicAPI aggregates results from Secretaries of State and equivalent election bodies, and makes its own race calls. civicapi.org ↗
Official FEC filing record for the current cycle. The priorities they publish are quoted from their own site, in their order.
Statements are quoted from these pages exactly. Headings, order and wording are the campaign’s; the record marking is ours.
A donor who gave several times appears once. The 12 largest donors by total given are listed. In all, 81 itemized contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $100.5K.
Total reported receipts $138,210
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. Open a source marked + to see who gave. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
92% of the money placed by state came from inside Colorado: $91.5K of $99.9K.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 73 contributions · 92% | $91,480 |
| 2 contributions · 7% | $7,000 |
| 2 contributions · 0.8% | $762 |
| 1 contribution · 0.5% | $450 |
| 1 contribution · 0.2% | $208 |
By the state each donor wrote on the filing, across 5 states and territories. Donors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized, so they cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
| Employer as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an employer · 33 contributions · 39% of ranked | $37,667 |
| 1 contribution · 15% of ranked | $14,000 |
| Written instead of an employer · 8 contributions · 7.7% of ranked | $7,462 |
| 2 contributions · 7.3% of ranked | $7,000 |
| 2 contributions · 5.7% of ranked | $5,464 |
| 1 contribution · 3.6% of ranked | $3,500 |
| 1 contribution · 3.6% of ranked | $3,500 |
| 2 contributions · 2.8% of ranked | $2,705 |
A further $4,070 came from donors whose answer names no employer (blank), so it is not ranked. Itemized gifts over $200, grouped by the words donors filed: not an industry classification, and a gift from an employee is not a gift from the employer. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($28,434) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
Money groups spent on their own, not through a campaign. Each ad is filed against the candidate it names, so money attacking an opponent shows on the opponent’s row. Open a candidate to see who spent it.
The campaign also refunded $3,500 in contributions, which the categories below do not include.
Total itemized disbursements $71,865
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
All 95 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 11 payments · 23% of all spending | $25,491 |
| 8 payments · 11% of all spending | $11,930 |
| 2 payments · 4.1% of all spending | $4,500 |
| 3 payments · 3.7% of all spending | $4,106 |
| 2 payments · 2.4% of all spending | $2,625 |
| 1 payment · 2.2% of all spending | $2,450 |
| 2 payments · 2% of all spending | $2,245 |
| 5 payments · 1.8% of all spending | $1,948 |
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.
| Occupation as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an occupation · 33 contributions · 39% of ranked | $37,667 |
| 2 contributions · 16% of ranked | $15,000 |
| 2 contributions · 7.3% of ranked | $7,000 |
| 2 contributions · 5.7% of ranked | $5,464 |
| 1 contribution · 3.6% of ranked | $3,500 |
| 1 contribution · 3.6% of ranked | $3,500 |
| Written instead of an occupation · 1 contribution · 3.6% of ranked | $3,500 |
| 2 contributions · 2.8% of ranked | $2,705 |
A further $4,070 came from donors whose answer names no occupation (blank), so it is not ranked. Itemized gifts over $200, grouped by the words donors filed: not an industry classification, and a gift from an employee is not a gift from the employer. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($28,434) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.