Loading this candidate’s profile from the FEC filings and campaign records.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Loading this candidate’s profile from the FEC filings and campaign records.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Candidates › WA-04 race › 2025–2026
D Democratic nominee for U.S. House, WA-04
Has not served in Congress
6 priorities from johnduresky4congress.com, in the order they are listed there. Every heading and the text under it is copied exactly, as one passage for each page it is from, and links to that place on the page; hover a source to see which passage it opens.
Protect our farmers from reckless tariffs, defend water rights, and ensure federal farm policy works for Central Washington.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · johnduresky4congress.com
Central Washington's economy runs on agriculture. Our farmers feed the nation and the world, but reckless trade policy, water insecurity, and rising costs threaten the foundation of our communities.
John will fight to: ↗ (opens johnduresky4congress.com/issues at this heading)
- Remove harmful tariffs that hurt our farmers and raise prices for consumers
- Protect irrigation and water rights for agricultural producers
- Ensure the Farm Bill works for small and mid-size operations, not just corporate agriculture
- Support programs that help the next generation of farmers get started
- Defend agricultural labor access, our farms need workers, and immigration policy must reflect that
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · johnduresky4congress.com/issues
Heading as listed on johnduresky4congress.com ↗ (opens johnduresky4congress.com at this heading)
Improve the VA based on what veterans actually experience, not what politicians imagine.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · johnduresky4congress.com
John doesn't just talk about supporting veterans, he is one. As a retired Air Force Major with three combat deployments, he knows the VA system from the inside.
John will fight to: ↗ (opens johnduresky4congress.com/issues at this heading)
- Improve VA healthcare based on what veterans actually experience, not what politicians imagine
- Reduce wait times and improve mental health services
- Ensure veterans transition to civilian life have real support, jobs, housing, and education
- Hold the VA accountable and protect the dedicated employees who serve veterans every day
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · johnduresky4congress.com/issues
Heading as listed on johnduresky4congress.com ↗ (opens johnduresky4congress.com at this heading)
Lower costs for working families, protect good-paying Hanford jobs, and invest in infrastructure.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · johnduresky4congress.com
- Working families in the 4th District are being squeezed by rising costs, stagnant wages, and an economy that rewards the wealthy while leaving everyone else behind.
- John will fight to:
- Protect good-paying Hanford cleanup jobs and federal employment in the region
- Lower the cost of housing, groceries, and healthcare
- Invest in infrastructure - roads, bridges, broadband - that creates jobs and connects communities
- Raise the federal minimum wage so work actually pays
- Rebuild trust in labor unions and protect workers' right to organize
- Reform the tax code to close loopholes like stepped-up basis and carried interest
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · johnduresky4congress.com/issues
Heading as listed on johnduresky4congress.com ↗ (opens johnduresky4congress.com at this heading)
Term limits, ban stock trading, and overturn Citizens United.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · johnduresky4congress.com
Americans are tired of politicians who serve themselves instead of their constituents. John signed the Take BAC Congress pledge because he believes elected officials should be held to a higher standard.
John supports: ↗ (opens johnduresky4congress.com/issues at this heading)
- Congressional term limits
- A lobbying moratorium after leaving office
- Banning Congressional stock trading
- Overturning Citizens United to get dark money out of politics
- Supreme Court ethics reform
- Protecting Social Security from politicians who want to cut or privatize it
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · johnduresky4congress.com/issues
Heading as listed on johnduresky4congress.com ↗ (opens johnduresky4congress.com at this heading)
Keep rural hospitals open, restore ACA subsidies, and protect Medicare and Medicaid.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · johnduresky4congress.com
No one in Central Washington should have to drive 100 miles to see a doctor or go bankrupt because of a medical emergency. But that's the reality for too many families in our district.
John will fight to: ↗ (opens johnduresky4congress.com/issues at this heading)
- Keep rural hospitals open and funded
- Restore and expand ACA subsidies to make insurance affordable
- Protect Medicare and Medicaid from cuts
- Lower prescription drug costs
- Move toward universal healthcare access so coverage doesn't depend on your employer or your ZIP code
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · johnduresky4congress.com/issues
Heading as listed on johnduresky4congress.com ↗ (opens johnduresky4congress.com at this heading)
What happened under DOGE should never happen again. John will fight to protect the people who keep our government running.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · johnduresky4congress.com
John spent his career in federal service. He's seen firsthand the dedication of civil servants, and the damage done when politicians treat them as disposable. What happened under DOGE should never happen again.
John will fight to:
- Protect federal employees from politically motivated mass firings
- Ensure Hanford workers and federal employees across the district have job security
- Oppose any effort to gut the civil service for political purposes
- Strengthen whistleblower protections for federal workers who speak up
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · johnduresky4congress.com/issues
FEC filings, Apr 1, 2025 to Oct 14, 2026 · Official FEC bulk data · committee C00916585
82¢ of every dollar raised has been spent across 8 reports ($375.3K of $459K). Cash on hand went from $3.7K on Jun 30, 2025 to $83.7K on Oct 14, 2026.
| Report | Raised in the period | Spent in the period | Cash on hand at its close |
|---|---|---|---|
| JULY QUARTERLY 2025 through Jun 30, 2025 | $3,887 | $227 | $3,660 |
| OCTOBER QUARTERLY 2025 through Sep 30, 2025 | $1,402 | $1,640 | $3,422 |
| YEAR-END 2025 through Dec 31, 2025 | $8,951 | $742 | $11,630 |
| APRIL QUARTERLY 2026 through Mar 31, 2026 | $55,671 | $21,912 | $45,389 |
| JULY QUARTERLY 2026 through Jun 30, 2026 | $98,198 | $92,511 | $51,014 |
| PRE-PRIMARY 2026 through Jul 15, 2026 | $10,911 | $27,678 | $34,309 |
| OCTOBER QUARTERLY 2026 through Sep 30, 2026 | $209,269 | $114,851 | $128,727 |
| PRE-GENERAL 2026 through Oct 14, 2026 | $70,731 | $115,767 | $83,691 |
Each report’s own period, as filed with the FEC; a report filed again counts once, as its latest copy.
26 endorsers listed on John Duresky’s own campaign site: 11 parties, 10 unions, 4 organizations, 1 newspaper.
This is the campaign's claim, checked by an editor against its page; the endorsers have not confirmed it to us. Each name opens the campaign’s page with that name highlighted.
Washington State Labor Council
“The working class has always been the backbone of our state and our nation. Our working families are feeling the sting of bad policy in the wallet and on the dinner table. If we don’t protect our workers, we can’t succeed as a society.”
International Association of Machinists & Aerospace Workers District Lodge 751
Washington Education Association
“The candidates we endorse share our vision for strengthening public education, the middle class, and our country.” -WEA”
Advanced · 42,637 votes (30%) · 2 of 11 · Full results ↗
Election not held yet · Full results ↗
Every contest for this seat that named this candidate, most recent last; a result is shown once the race is called. Election dates and results from civicAPI (civicapi.org). civicAPI aggregates results from Secretaries of State and equivalent election bodies, and makes its own race calls. civicapi.org ↗
Official FEC filing record for the current cycle. The priorities they publish are quoted from their own site, in their order.
Statements are quoted from these pages exactly. Headings, order and wording are the campaign’s; the record marking is ours.
A donor who gave several times appears once. The 12 largest donors by total given are listed. In all, 261 itemized contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $101.4K.
The 2 largest committees by total given are listed. In all, 2 committee contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $2K. Counted from the givers' own filings, which can run above the total the campaign itself reports.
Each loan as the campaign’s report through Oct 14, 2026 lists it, with what is still owed. A loan from an earlier cycle can appear here, and one repaid in full drops off the report, so the list need not add up to the row.
Total reported receipts $459,020
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. Open a source marked + to see who gave. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
94% of the money placed by state came from inside Washington: $95.3K of $101.4K.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 249 contributions · 94% | $95,250 |
| 1 contribution · 2.5% | $2,500 |
| 1 contribution · 1% | $1,000 |
| 1 contribution · 1% | $1,000 |
| 2 contributions · 0.7% | $750 |
| 4 contributions · 0.6% | $600 |
| 2 contributions · 0.2% | $200 |
| 1 contribution · <0.1% | $100 |
By the state each donor wrote on the filing, across 8 states and territories. Donors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized, so they cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
| Employer as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an employer · 158 contributions · 61% of ranked | $52,550 |
| 4 contributions · 16% of ranked | $14,000 |
| Written instead of an employer · 14 contributions · 5.5% of ranked | $4,695 |
| 5 contributions · 3.8% of ranked | $3,250 |
| Written instead of an employer · 4 contributions · 2.2% of ranked | $1,850 |
| 2 contributions · 1.2% of ranked | $1,050 |
| 1 contribution · 1.2% of ranked | $1,000 |
| 1 contribution · 1.2% of ranked | $1,000 |
A further $15,824 came from donors whose answer names no employer (None, blank), so it is not ranked. Itemized gifts over $200, grouped by the words donors filed: not an industry classification, and a gift from an employee is not a gift from the employer. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($136,665) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
Money groups spent on their own, not through a campaign. Each ad is filed against the candidate it names, so money attacking an opponent shows on the opponent’s row. Open a candidate to see who spent it.
The campaign also refunded $5,037 in contributions, which the categories below do not include.
Total itemized disbursements $253,276
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
All 281 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
6 payments were reported as a lump sum, such as a card or payroll bill, with the detail filed underneath as memo entries. Those entries, $14,213 in all, are counted under the payee and purpose they name rather than under the processor that was paid. The total is the same either way.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 26 payments · 38% of all spending | $142,057 |
| 7 payments · 11% of all spending | $40,875 |
| 11 payments · 5.6% of all spending | $21,146 |
| 6 payments · 2.1% of all spending | $7,833 |
| 1 payment · 1.6% of all spending | $6,000 |
| 1 payment · 1.1% of all spending | $4,253 |
| 1 payment · 1.1% of all spending | $4,000 |
| 34 payments · 0.8% of all spending | $2,850 |
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.
| Occupation as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an occupation · 159 contributions · 59% of ranked | $53,550 |
| 4 contributions · 15% of ranked | $14,000 |
| Written instead of an occupation · 20 contributions · 9.4% of ranked | $8,482 |
| 5 contributions · 3.6% of ranked | $3,250 |
| 2 contributions · 1.2% of ranked | $1,050 |
| 1 contribution · 1.1% of ranked | $1,000 |
| 1 contribution · 1.1% of ranked | $1,000 |
| 1 contribution · 1.1% of ranked | $1,000 |
A further $11,037 came from donors whose answer names no occupation (blank), so it is not ranked. Itemized gifts over $200, grouped by the words donors filed: not an industry classification, and a gift from an employee is not a gift from the employer. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($136,665) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.