Loading this candidate’s profile from the FEC filings and campaign records.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Loading this candidate’s profile from the FEC filings and campaign records.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Candidates › WA-04 race › 2025–2026
R Republican nominee for U.S. House, WA-04
Has not served in Congress
12 priorities from mckinneyforwashington.com, in the order they are listed there. Every heading and the text under it is copied exactly, as one passage for each page it is from, and links to that place on the page; hover a source to see which passage it opens.
Amanda McKinney proudly supports President Donald Trump and the America First agenda.
She believes in secure borders, strong national defense, energy independence, free markets, and ending the weaponization of government. Her mission is simple, put American families, workers, farmers, and communities first.
In Congress, Amanda McKinney will be a fighter for Central Washington and a consistent America First voice in Washington, D.C.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · mckinneyforwashington.com
Heading as listed on mckinneyforwashington.com ↗ (opens mckinneyforwashington.com at this heading)
Amanda McKinney believes a nation without borders is not a nation. She supports President Trump’s commitment to border security and enforcing immigration law.
Failed federal policies have fueled fentanyl trafficking, human smuggling, and violent crime that reaches deep into American communities. Amanda will fight for strong border enforcement, accountability, and an immigration system that puts American safety and sovereignty first.
In Congress, she will support policies that secure the border, strengthen national defense, and uphold the rule of law.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · mckinneyforwashington.com
Heading as listed on mckinneyforwashington.com ↗ (opens mckinneyforwashington.com at this heading)
Amanda McKinney believes women and girls deserve fairness, safety, and equal opportunity.
She supports protecting Title IX and ensuring that women’s sports remain for biological females. Amanda will oppose policies that undermine women’s athletics or erase biological reality in the name of ideology.
This is about protecting opportunities for girls, not politics.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · mckinneyforwashington.com
Heading as listed on mckinneyforwashington.com ↗ (opens mckinneyforwashington.com at this heading)
Agriculture is the backbone of Central Washington and a pillar of American strength. Amanda McKinney knows that family farms and ranches feed this nation and should never be sacrificed to radical environmental agendas or foreign competition.
As a county commissioner, Amanda pushed back against federal overreach that threatened farmers, dairies, and ranchers with one-size-fits-all regulations written by people who have never worked the land. In Congress, she will fight to roll back burdensome regulations, protect working lands, and ensure farmers have a voice at the table.
A strong agricultural sector is essential to food security, economic independence, and national security. Amanda believes America should feed itself first.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · mckinneyforwashington.com
Heading as listed on mckinneyforwashington.com ↗ (opens mckinneyforwashington.com at this heading)
Public safety is not optional. As the daughter of a retired law enforcement officer, Amanda McKinney has always backed the men and women who keep our communities safe.
She has supported sheriff resources, K-9 units, emergency communications upgrades, and investments in public safety infrastructure. Amanda rejects anti-police rhetoric and policies that embolden criminals and endanger families.
In Congress, she will fight to restore law and order, dismantle fentanyl trafficking networks, and ensure law enforcement has the tools they need to do their jobs safely and effectively.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · mckinneyforwashington.com
Heading as listed on mckinneyforwashington.com ↗ (opens mckinneyforwashington.com at this heading)
Water is life in Washington’s 4th District. Amanda McKinney has led on water policy by defending senior water rights, expanding storage, and advancing locally driven solutions that support agriculture, growth, and community protection.
She supported the Yakima Basin Integrated Plan, helped establish a county water bank through senior water rights acquisition, and backed flood control and infrastructure investments to protect homes, farms, and businesses. Amanda believes water policy must respect property rights and local needs, not be dictated by federal agencies.
In Congress, she will fight for commonsense water policy that protects farmers, communities, and Central Washington’s future.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · mckinneyforwashington.com
Heading as listed on mckinneyforwashington.com ↗ (opens mckinneyforwashington.com at this heading)
Amanda McKinney is a staunch defender of the Second Amendment and the constitutional rights of law-abiding Americans. Raised in a family deeply rooted in responsible firearm ownership, her father has been a federally licensed firearms dealer for more than 40 years. That experience instilled in Amanda a deep respect for safety, responsibility, and a faithful understanding of our constitutionally protected right to keep and bear arms.
As a county commissioner, Amanda has testified against gun control laws that punish responsible citizens, impose financial barriers on working families, and fail to stop criminals. She believes the answer to violent crime is enforcing the law, not disarming lawful Americans.
In Congress, Amanda will oppose unconstitutional gun control and stand firm in defense of the right of Americans to protect themselves, their families, and their communities.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · mckinneyforwashington.com
Heading as listed on mckinneyforwashington.com ↗ (opens mckinneyforwashington.com at this heading)
Energy independence is national security. Amanda McKinney supports American energy dominance through hydropower, nuclear energy, natural gas, and responsible domestic production.
She opposes radical energy mandates that raise costs, destabilize the grid, and hurt farmers, families, and small businesses. Amanda believes America should never depend on foreign adversaries for energy.
In Congress, she will fight for affordable, reliable energy, protect jobs, and put American workers first.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · mckinneyforwashington.com
Heading as listed on mckinneyforwashington.com ↗ (opens mckinneyforwashington.com at this heading)
Amanda McKinney has a proven record of holding government accountable. She exposed flawed COVID data that kept Central Washington locked down and helped uncover millions of dollars in fraudulent aid claims, protecting taxpayers.
She believes federal agencies must follow the law and answer to the people. In Congress, Amanda will work to rein in unelected bureaucrats, restore transparency, and end the weaponization of government against citizens.
Government should serve the people, not rule them.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · mckinneyforwashington.com
Heading as listed on mckinneyforwashington.com ↗ (opens mckinneyforwashington.com at this heading)
Amanda McKinney supports innovation that strengthens American competitiveness, protects jobs, and safeguards national security.
She believes the United States must lead in artificial intelligence and advanced technologies, not surrender leadership to China or other adversaries. Amanda opposes heavy-handed regulation that stifles innovation or drives jobs overseas.
Technology policy should protect freedom, security, and American workers.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · mckinneyforwashington.com
Heading as listed on mckinneyforwashington.com ↗ (opens mckinneyforwashington.com at this heading)
With her background in banking, Amanda McKinney understands the importance of financial freedom and innovation.
She supports cryptocurrency and blockchain innovation as tools for economic growth, privacy, and American leadership. Amanda opposes using regulation to monitor or control lawful financial activity.
In Congress, she will fight to keep financial innovation in the United States and protect Americans from government overreach.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · mckinneyforwashington.com
Heading as listed on mckinneyforwashington.com ↗ (opens mckinneyforwashington.com at this heading)
Amanda McKinney believes Washington spends too much and delivers too little.
She has uncovered fraud, opposed wasteful spending, and demanded accountability at the local level. In Congress, she will fight for fiscal discipline, transparency, and policies that respect working families and small businesses.
Every dollar wasted in Washington is a dollar taken from American families.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · mckinneyforwashington.com
Heading as listed on mckinneyforwashington.com ↗ (opens mckinneyforwashington.com at this heading)
FEC filings, Jan 1, 2026 to Oct 14, 2026 · Official FEC bulk data · committee C00932582
85¢ of every dollar raised has been spent across 5 reports ($1.2M of $1.4M). Cash on hand went from $451.1K on Mar 31, 2026 to $217.4K on Oct 14, 2026.
| Report | Raised in the period | Spent in the period | Cash on hand at its close |
|---|---|---|---|
| APRIL QUARTERLY 2026 through Mar 31, 2026 | $523,892 | $72,794 | $451,098 |
| JULY QUARTERLY 2026 through Jun 30, 2026 | $404,703 | $412,187 | $443,613 |
| PRE-PRIMARY 2026 through Jul 15, 2026 | $53,225 | $281,391 | $215,447 |
| OCTOBER QUARTERLY 2026 through Sep 30, 2026 | $328,001 | $376,785 | $166,664 |
| PRE-GENERAL 2026 through Oct 14, 2026 | $138,653 | $87,940 | $217,376 |
Each report’s own period, as filed with the FEC; a report filed again counts once, as its latest copy.
156 endorsers listed on Amanda McKinney’s own campaign site: 50 officials, 2 organizations, 104 people.
This is the campaign's claim, checked by an editor against its page; the endorsers have not confirmed it to us. Each name opens the campaign’s page with that name highlighted.
President
House Speaker (LA-04)
House Majority Leader (LA-01) · House Majority Leader
House Majority Whip (MN-06) · House Majority Whip
House Chief Deputy Whip (PA-14)
House Judiciary Chairman (OH-04) · House Judiciary Chairman
House Agriculture Committee Chairman (PA-15)
Representative (WA-05)
Advanced · 49,625 votes (35%) · 1 of 11 · Full results ↗
Won · 149,911 votes (56%) · 1 of 2 · Full results ↗
Every contest for this seat that named this candidate, most recent last; a result is shown once the race is called. Election dates and results from civicAPI (civicapi.org). civicAPI aggregates results from Secretaries of State and equivalent election bodies, and makes its own race calls. civicapi.org ↗
Official FEC filing record for the current cycle. The priorities they publish are quoted from their own site, in their order.
Statements are quoted from these pages exactly. Headings, order and wording are the campaign’s; the record marking is ours.
A donor who gave several times appears once. The 12 largest donors by total given are listed. In all, 1,986 itemized contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $554.4K.
The 12 largest committees by total given are listed. In all, 83 committee contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $224.5K. Counted from the givers' own filings, which can run above the total the campaign itself reports.
Money moved in from the candidate’s other authorized committees, such as a joint fundraising committee. It was raised once and is reported again here on arrival. The 2 largest sources by total given are listed. In all, 5 transfers were filed this cycle, totaling $78K.
Total reported receipts $1,448,474
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. Open a source marked + to see who gave. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
78% of the money placed by state came from inside Washington: $432.3K of $554.4K.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 486 contributions · 78% | $432,307 |
| 284 contributions · 5.7% | $31,817 |
| 20 contributions · 4.3% | $23,817 |
| 255 contributions · 2.7% | $14,743 |
| 4 contributions · 1.7% | $9,237 |
| 69 contributions · 1.3% | $7,210 |
| 164 contributions · 1.1% | $6,257 |
| 5 contributions · 0.9% | $5,159 |
By the state each donor wrote on the filing, across 33 states and territories. Donors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized, so they cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
| Employer as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an employer · 1,676 contributions · 47% of ranked | $230,390 |
| Written instead of an employer · 40 contributions · 9.5% of ranked | $47,230 |
| 3 contributions · 2.9% of ranked | $14,191 |
| 3 contributions · 2.8% of ranked | $14,000 |
| 1 contribution · 2% of ranked | $10,000 |
| Written instead of an employer · 3 contributions · 1.7% of ranked | $8,425 |
| 3 contributions · 1.5% of ranked | $7,520 |
| 2 contributions · 1.5% of ranked | $7,520 |
A further $59,510 came from donors whose answer names no employer (blank), so it is not ranked. Itemized gifts over $200, grouped by the words donors filed: not an industry classification, and a gift from an employee is not a gift from the employer. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($284,524) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
Money groups spent on their own, not through a campaign. Each ad is filed against the candidate it names, so money attacking an opponent shows on the opponent’s row. Open a candidate to see who spent it.
The campaign also refunded $16,150 in contributions, which the categories below do not include.
Total itemized disbursements $844,213
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
All 468 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
15 payments were reported as a lump sum, such as a card or payroll bill, with the detail filed underneath as memo entries. Those entries, $60,915 in all, are counted under the payee and purpose they name rather than under the processor that was paid. The total is the same either way.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 6 payments · 14% of all spending | $174,966 |
| 1 payment · 9% of all spending | $110,801 |
| 2 payments · 7.8% of all spending | $95,466 |
| 25 payments · 4.1% of all spending | $50,185 |
| 2 payments · 3.7% of all spending | $45,700 |
| 7 payments · 3.7% of all spending | $45,609 |
| 7 payments · 3.4% of all spending | $41,739 |
| 1 payment · 3% of all spending | $37,000 |
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.
| Occupation as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an occupation · 1,675 contributions · 46% of ranked | $229,590 |
| 14 contributions · 3.9% of ranked | $19,207 |
| 4 contributions · 2.9% of ranked | $14,591 |
| 5 contributions · 2.8% of ranked | $13,705 |
| 11 contributions · 2.5% of ranked | $12,352 |
| 8 contributions · 2.5% of ranked | $12,181 |
| 3 contributions · 2.1% of ranked | $10,237 |
| 3 contributions · 2% of ranked | $10,020 |
A further $59,010 came from donors whose answer names no occupation (blank), so it is not ranked. Itemized gifts over $200, grouped by the words donors filed: not an industry classification, and a gift from an employee is not a gift from the employer. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($284,524) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.