Loading this candidate’s profile from the FEC filings and campaign records.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Loading this candidate’s profile from the FEC filings and campaign records.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Candidates › TX-30 race › 2025–2026
D Democratic nominee for U.S. House, TX-30
Has not served in Congress
18 priorities from haynesforcongress.com, in the order they are listed there. Every heading and the text under it is copied exactly, as one passage for each page it is from, and links to that place on the page; hover a source to see which passage it opens.
Economic security is not merely about having just enough to survive—it is about
whether families can cover their daily expenses, save for retirement and their children’s
futures, and manage setbacks without being pushed into crisis. The True Cost of
Economic Security, developed by the Urban Institute, reminds us that real-life costs and
resources for housing, food, health care, childcare, transportation, and savings and debt
repayment must be included in measuring economic security. In District 30, as in too
many districts across the country, families are one emergency away from financial
collapse. That reality is compounded by predatory industries that profit from
desperation.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · haynesforcongress.com/issues/issue-1
My activism against the payday and car title loan industry reflects a clear value:
no one should be trapped in cycles of debt simply because they are poor. These
industries extract wealth from communities that are already underbanked and stripped
of opportunity, disproportionately targeting Black, Brown, and neglected neighborhoods.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · haynesforcongress.com/issues/issue-2
In Congress, I will fight for policies that:
- Cap interest rates nationally and close loopholes that allow predatory lenders to exploit vulnerable borrowers.
- Strengthen consumer protections and enforce fair lending laws.
- Expand Access to affordable housing, childcare, healthcare, and paid family leave.
- Support wage growth tied to the real cost of living, not outdated benchmarks.
- Invest in wealth-building opportunities, including home ownership, small business development, and student debt relief.
- Economic security must be treated as a public good — not a privilege reserved for those with generational wealth.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · haynesforcongress.com/issues/congressional-priorities-for-economic-security
The gerrymandered redistricting of District 30 removed key economic engines,
weakening access to jobs, investment, and infrastructure. This was not
accidental—it was political, and it has had real consequences for working families
and small businesses.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · haynesforcongress.com/issues/development-without-displacement-rebuilding-what-gerrymandering-stripped-away
Development should not displace communities — it should strengthen them. As a representative, I will advocate for:
- Federal investment in historically under-resourced neighborhoods.
- Support for minority-owned and locally rooted small businesses.
- Infrastructure funding that prioritizes public transit, broadband access, and climate-resilient construction.
- Community-centered economic planning that ensures residents benefit from growth.
- Development must be measured by who thrives--not by who is pushed
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · haynesforcongress.com/issues/a-new-vision-for-equitable-development
Environmental injustice is not accidental — it is the result of policy choices.
Archaic and racist zoning laws have placed landfills, industrial plants, and polluting
facilities next to Black, Brown, and neglected communities, leading to higher rates of
asthma, cancer, and chronic illness.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · haynesforcongress.com/issues/environmental-justice-confronting-racism-in-policy-and-practice
My work challenging environmental racism has always been rooted in a simple truth: zip code should not determine life expectancy.
In Congress, I will:
- Strengthen environmental justice provisions in federal law.
- Ensure communities most impacted by pollution are first in line for remediation and clean energy investments.
- Hold corporations accountable for environmental harm.
- Support a just transition to green jobs that provide living wages and local hiring.
- Environmental justice is public health, civil rights, and economic justice--combined.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · haynesforcongress.com/issues/from-the-outside-to-the-inside
Education remains one of the clearest indicators of inequality in the United
States. Underfunded schools in District 30 are not failing--they are being failed.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · haynesforcongress.com/issues/educational-justice-funding-potential-not-just-systems
I will champion:
- Equitable federal funding formulas that prioritize high-need districts.
- Increased investment in early childhood education.
- Resources for mental health services, counselors, and social workers in schools.
- Fair pay and support for educators.
- Pathways to higher education, vocational training, and workforce development without crushing debt.
Education policy must reflect the belief that every child, regardless of race, income, or zip code, deserves excellence.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · haynesforcongress.com/issues/policies-for-educational-justice
My faith informs my values--but it does not dictate anyone else's beliefs. In a pluralistic democracy, faith should never be used as a weapon, a wedge, or a tool for proselytizing. Instead, faith at its best offers a moral framework that calls us toward justice, dignity, care for one another, and the valuing of all.
As a person of faith, I am guided by values rooted in fairness, compassion, and accountability — values that translate naturally into public policy without requiring religious conformity. These are not sectarian ideals; they are democratic ones. Across faith traditions--and even among those who claim no religious affiliation--there is broad agreement that:
- People should not be exploited because they are poor.
- Children deserve safe schools and real opportunities.
- Communities should not be poisoned for profit.
- Workers deserve dignity, fair wages, and security.
- Government should protect the vulnerable, not empower predatory systems.
- No one should be othered or discriminated against because of who they are and how they were created.
My faith values will fight to ensure that justice shapes politics. My sense of justice involves crafting policies that heal the harmed and close the gap between a vision of a nation characterized by liberty, possibility, and harmony, and the reality of brokenness, violence, vulnerability, a hierarchy of value, fear, and the lack of opportunity.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · haynesforcongress.com/issues/faith-freedom-and-justice-values-without-imposition
My activism—whether confronting predatory lending, challenging environmental racism, confronting an unjust criminal justice system, or fighting for educational justice- has always been rooted in a moral conviction that systems should serve people, not prey on them. That conviction comes from faith, but its expression is public, inclusive, and grounded in universal principles of justice and human dignity.
I reject the use of religion to:
- Control personal choices
- Exclude or marginalize communities
- Undermine democracy
- Justify inequality or harm
Instead, faith should push us to ask more complex questions of power, profit, and policy.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · haynesforcongress.com/issues/faith-as-a-moral-lens-not-a-political-tool
In Congress, my faith values will shape how I govern--not who I govern.
They will guide me to:
- Center the voices of those most impacted by injustice
- Hold powerful interests accountable
- Craft policies that repair harm rather than deepen it.
- Build coalitions across lines of belief, race, class, and party.
Justice is not about belief enforcement—it is about public responsibility.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · haynesforcongress.com/issues/justice-oriented-governance
FEC filings, Dec 8, 2025 to Oct 14, 2026 · Official FEC bulk data · committee C00931667
77¢ of every dollar raised has been spent across 6 reports ($535.8K of $694.9K). Cash on hand went from $0 on Dec 31, 2025 to $159K on Oct 14, 2026.
| Report | Raised in the period | Spent in the period | Cash on hand at its close |
|---|---|---|---|
| YEAR-END 2025 through Dec 31, 2025 | $3,247 | $3,247 | $0 |
| PRE-PRIMARY 2026 through Feb 11, 2026 | $155,316 | $19,769 | $135,547 |
| APRIL QUARTERLY 2026 through Mar 31, 2026 | $188,878 | $199,576 | $124,849 |
| JULY QUARTERLY 2026 through Jun 30, 2026 | $72,712 | $77,785 | $119,776 |
| OCTOBER QUARTERLY 2026 through Sep 30, 2026 | $236,880 | $156,573 | $200,083 |
| PRE-GENERAL 2026 through Oct 14, 2026 | $37,832 | $78,879 | $159,036 |
Each report’s own period, as filed with the FEC; a report filed again counts once, as its latest copy.
No endorsements page
Advanced · 76,701 votes (73%) · 1 of 3 · Full results ↗
Won · 160,961 votes (59%) · 1 of 2 · Full results ↗
Every contest for this seat that named this candidate, most recent last; a result is shown once the race is called. Election dates and results from civicAPI (civicapi.org). civicAPI aggregates results from Secretaries of State and equivalent election bodies, and makes its own race calls. civicapi.org ↗
Official FEC filing record for the current cycle. The priorities they publish are quoted from their own site, in their order.
Statements are quoted from these pages exactly. Headings, order and wording are the campaign’s; the record marking is ours.
A donor who gave several times appears once. The 12 largest donors by total given are listed. In all, 310 itemized contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $329.3K.
The 12 largest committees by total given are listed. In all, 42 committee contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $114.9K. Counted from the givers' own filings, which can run above the total the campaign itself reports.
Total reported receipts $694,865
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. Open a source marked + to see who gave. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
59% of the money placed by state came from inside Texas: $193.8K of $329.3K.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 191 contributions · 59% | $193,833 |
| 37 contributions · 12% | $39,410 |
| 14 contributions · 8.1% | $26,555 |
| 7 contributions · 4% | $13,250 |
| 12 contributions · 3.2% | $10,545 |
| 8 contributions · 2.1% | $7,050 |
| 2 contributions · 2.1% | $7,000 |
| 7 contributions · 1.4% | $4,750 |
By the state each donor wrote on the filing, across 22 states and territories. Donors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized, so they cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
| Employer as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an employer · 93 contributions · 27% of ranked | $90,115 |
| Written instead of an employer · 27 contributions · 11% of ranked | $34,810 |
| 3 contributions · 3.2% of ranked | $10,500 |
| 3 contributions · 3.2% of ranked | $10,500 |
| 2 contributions · 2.1% of ranked | $7,000 |
| 2 contributions · 2.1% of ranked | $7,000 |
| 2 contributions · 1.5% of ranked | $5,000 |
| 1 contribution · 1.5% of ranked | $5,000 |
Itemized gifts over $200, grouped by the words donors filed: not an industry classification, and a gift from an employee is not a gift from the employer. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($93,460) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
Money groups spent on their own, not through a campaign. Each ad is filed against the candidate it names, so money attacking an opponent shows on the opponent’s row. Open a candidate to see who spent it.
The campaign also refunded $9,776 in contributions, which the categories below do not include.
Total itemized disbursements $373,749
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
All 208 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
9 payments were reported as a lump sum, such as a card or payroll bill, with the detail filed underneath as memo entries. Those entries, $25,468 in all, are counted under the payee and purpose they name rather than under the processor that was paid. The total is the same either way.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 3 payments · 17% of all spending | $90,861 |
| 5 payments · 5% of all spending | $26,835 |
| 15 payments · 4.9% of all spending | $26,029 |
| 2 payments · 4.3% of all spending | $23,045 |
| 1 payment · 4.1% of all spending | $21,880 |
| 6 payments · 3.9% of all spending | $21,000 |
| 2 payments · 2.9% of all spending | $15,411 |
| 36 payments · 2.7% of all spending | $14,229 |
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.
| Occupation as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an occupation · 90 contributions · 26% of ranked | $86,865 |
| 26 contributions · 14% of ranked | $45,500 |
| 13 contributions · 6.6% of ranked | $21,705 |
| 16 contributions · 4.5% of ranked | $14,850 |
| 12 contributions · 4.2% of ranked | $13,800 |
| 3 contributions · 2.4% of ranked | $8,000 |
| 2 contributions · 2.1% of ranked | $7,000 |
| 2 contributions · 2.1% of ranked | $7,000 |
Itemized gifts over $200, grouped by the words donors filed: not an industry classification, and a gift from an employee is not a gift from the employer. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($93,460) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.