Loading this candidate’s profile from the FEC filings and campaign records.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Loading this candidate’s profile from the FEC filings and campaign records.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Candidates › CA-40 race › 2025–2026
IndependentU.S. House, CA-40California
Has not served in Congress
3 priorities from ninalinhforcongress26.com, in the order they are listed there. Every heading and the text under it is copied exactly, as one passage for each page it is from, and links to that place on the page; hover a source to see which passage it opens.
Families in our district are feeling the squeeze of rising costs while wages stay flat. From groceries to gas, rent to childcare – the basics are becoming luxuries.
Reform tax brackets to ensure working and middle-class families keep more of what they earn
Expand deductions for childcare, healthcare, and education expenses
Restore the SALT deduction to provide relief for California families
Support small businesses with fair tax policies and access to capital
Invest in infrastructure that creates jobs and strengthens our local economy
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · ninalinhforcongress26.com/issues
Healthcare is personal to me. No one should have to choose between getting care and paying rent. No parent should lie awake worrying about affording their child's medication.
Strengthen and expand Medicare and Medicaid to cover more families
Lower prescription drug costs by allowing Medicare to negotiate prices
Ensure quality care is accessible regardless of zip code or income
Protect families from medical bankruptcy and surprise billing
Expand mental health services and integrate them into primary care
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · ninalinhforcongress26.com/issues
Public education saved my life and opened doors I never knew existed. I've seen how funding formulas and policy decisions impact real classrooms and real kids.
Reform federal funding models to ensure resources reach underserved communities
Provide targeted investments for schools serving high-need populations
Expand access to after-school programs, mental health support, and enrichment activities
Ensure every student has access to technology and high-speed internet
Support teachers with competitive pay, professional development, and classroom resources
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · ninalinhforcongress26.com/issues
FEC filings, Jan 1, 2025 to Jun 30, 2026 · Official FEC bulk data · committee C00902460
$1.00 has been spent for every dollar raised across 6 reports ($442.1K of $442.1K). Cash on hand went from $104.3K on Jun 30, 2025 to $0 on Jun 30, 2026.
| Report | Raised in the period | Spent in the period | Cash on hand at its close |
|---|---|---|---|
| JULY QUARTERLY 2025 through Jun 30, 2025 | $146,394 | $42,094 | $104,300 |
| OCTOBER QUARTERLY 2025 through Sep 30, 2025 | $70,413 | $36,532 | $138,181 |
| YEAR-END 2025 through Dec 31, 2025 | $9,515 | $32,790 | $114,906 |
| APRIL QUARTERLY 2026 through Mar 31, 2026 | $40,910 | $46,628 | $109,187 |
| PRE-PRIMARY 2026 through May 13, 2026 | $10,400 | $88,310 | $31,278 |
| TERMINATION REPORT 2026 through Jun 30, 2026 | $164,485 | $195,763 | $0 |
Each report’s own period, as filed with the FEC; a report filed again counts once, as its latest copy.
No endorsements page
Not yet called · 100% reporting · Full results ↗
Every contest for this seat that named this candidate, most recent last; a result is shown once the race is called. Election dates and results from civicAPI (civicapi.org). civicAPI aggregates results from Secretaries of State and equivalent election bodies, and makes its own race calls. civicapi.org ↗
Official FEC filing record for the current cycle. The priorities they publish are quoted from their own site, in their order.
Statements are quoted from these pages exactly. Headings, order and wording are the campaign’s; the record marking is ours.
A donor who gave several times appears once. The 12 largest donors by total given are listed. In all, 164 itemized contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $323.4K.
Each loan as the campaign’s report through Jun 30, 2026 lists it, with what is still owed. A loan from an earlier cycle can appear here, and one repaid in full drops off the report, so the list need not add up to the row.
Total reported receipts $442,117
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. Open a source marked + to see who gave. FEC filings through Jun 30, 2026.
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
87% of the money placed by state came from inside California: $280K of $323.4K.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 120 contributions · 87% | $279,994 |
| 11 contributions · 5.7% | $18,500 |
| 12 contributions · 2.5% | $8,000 |
| 6 contributions · 1.4% | $4,650 |
| 4 contributions · 1.3% | $4,250 |
| 1 contribution · 0.6% | $2,000 |
| 2 contributions · 0.5% | $1,750 |
| 2 contributions · 0.4% | $1,250 |
By the state each donor wrote on the filing, across 14 states and territories. Donors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized, so they cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
| Employer as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| 7 contributions · 51% of ranked | $128,022 |
| Written instead of an employer · 22 contributions · 13% of ranked | $31,650 |
| 2 contributions · 2.8% of ranked | $7,000 |
| 2 contributions · 2.8% of ranked | $7,000 |
| 2 contributions · 2.8% of ranked | $7,000 |
| 1 contribution · 1.4% of ranked | $3,500 |
| 1 contribution · 1.4% of ranked | $3,500 |
| 1 contribution · 1.4% of ranked | $3,500 |
A further $71,350 came from donors whose answer names no employer (None, blank), so it is not ranked. Itemized gifts over $200, grouped by the words donors filed: not an industry classification, and a gift from an employee is not a gift from the employer. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($4,334) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
Money groups spent on their own, not through a campaign. Each ad is filed against the candidate it names, so money attacking an opponent shows on the opponent’s row. Open a candidate to see who spent it.
The campaign also refunded $27,950 in contributions, which the categories below do not include.
Total itemized disbursements $283,689
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Jun 30, 2026.
All 254 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
13 payments were reported as a lump sum, such as a card or payroll bill, with the detail filed underneath as memo entries. Those entries, $7,261 in all, are counted under the payee and purpose they name rather than under the processor that was paid. The total is the same either way.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 5 payments · 12% of all spending | $54,752 |
| 6 payments · 9.3% of all spending | $41,000 |
| 26 payments · 8.2% of all spending | $36,138 |
| 2 payments · 6.7% of all spending | $29,672 |
| 6 payments · 5.8% of all spending | $25,539 |
| 9 payments · 3.4% of all spending | $14,882 |
| 3 payments · 3.3% of all spending | $14,610 |
| 3 payments · 2.7% of all spending | $12,000 |
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.
| Occupation as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| 7 contributions · 43% of ranked | $128,022 |
| Written instead of an occupation · 24 contributions · 10% of ranked | $29,700 |
| 4 contributions · 4.7% of ranked | $14,000 |
| Written instead of an occupation · 15 contributions · 4.7% of ranked | $13,850 |
| 10 contributions · 2.9% of ranked | $8,500 |
| 3 contributions · 2.7% of ranked | $8,000 |
| 2 contributions · 2.4% of ranked | $7,000 |
| 2 contributions · 2.4% of ranked | $7,000 |
A further $27,050 came from donors whose answer names no occupation (blank), so it is not ranked. Itemized gifts over $200, grouped by the words donors filed: not an industry classification, and a gift from an employee is not a gift from the employer. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($4,334) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.