Loading this candidate’s profile from the FEC filings and campaign records.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Loading this candidate’s profile from the FEC filings and campaign records.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Candidates › CA-27 race › 2025–2026
R Republican nominee for U.S. House, CA-27
Has not served in Congress
5 priorities from jasongibbsforcongress.com, in the order they are listed there. Every heading and the text under it is copied exactly, as one passage for each page it is from, and links to that place on the page; hover a source to see which passage it opens.
California families are being squeezed from every direction—housing, groceries, gas, and energy. Jason will fight to lower the cost of living by opposing new taxes, supporting energy affordability, and holding government accountable for wasteful spending. Families shouldn't be punished for trying to get ahead. Jason knows what it’s like to balance a budget, and he’ll bring that discipline to Washington.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · jasongibbsforcongress.com
Heading as listed on jasongibbsforcongress.com ↗ (opens jasongibbsforcongress.com at this heading)
We all deserve to feel safe in our homes, schools, and neighborhoods. Jason will support law enforcement and stand up to the “soft-on-crime” policies that are letting repeat offenders walk free. He’ll push to end catch-and-release justice and restore consequences for criminal behavior. Public safety isn’t partisan—it’s common sense. Most importantly, he’ll aways have the back of our first responders.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · jasongibbsforcongress.com
Heading as listed on jasongibbsforcongress.com ↗ (opens jasongibbsforcongress.com at this heading)
The border is broken, and it’s putting families, law enforcement, and legal immigrants at risk. Jason supports securing the border, cracking down on fentanyl trafficking, and ending policies that reward illegal entry. He believes in legal immigration and upholding the law—not chaos and loopholes. We need a system that works for America again, and Jason will work hard to make that happen.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · jasongibbsforcongress.com
Heading as listed on jasongibbsforcongress.com ↗ (opens jasongibbsforcongress.com at this heading)
Too often, decisions about our neighborhoods are being made by bureaucrats in Sacramento and Washington. Jason believes local communities—not state or federal politicians—know best how to manage housing, schools, and public safety. He’ll stand up against one-size-fits-all mandates and protect local decision-making. Government should listen to the people—not dictate to them.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · jasongibbsforcongress.com
Heading as listed on jasongibbsforcongress.com ↗ (opens jasongibbsforcongress.com at this heading)
Every child deserves access to a great education—and every parent deserves a say in what their kids are being taught. Jason will fight for opportunity, transparency, and high standards in our classrooms. He’ll work to expand career pathways, technical training, and opportunity for every student—not just those heading to a four-year college. Education should empower families—not political agendas.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · jasongibbsforcongress.com
Heading as listed on jasongibbsforcongress.com ↗ (opens jasongibbsforcongress.com at this heading)
FEC filings, Jan 1, 2025 to Oct 14, 2026 · Official FEC bulk data · committee C00909887
85¢ of every dollar raised has been spent across 7 reports ($353.3K of $413.8K). Cash on hand went from $184.7K on Sep 30, 2025 to $60.5K on Oct 14, 2026.
| Report | Raised in the period | Spent in the period | Cash on hand at its close |
|---|---|---|---|
| OCTOBER QUARTERLY 2025 through Sep 30, 2025 | $208,270 | $23,553 | $184,718 |
| YEAR-END 2025 through Dec 31, 2025 | $14,485 | $58,796 | $140,407 |
| APRIL QUARTERLY 2026 through Mar 31, 2026 | $121,144 | $30,569 | $230,983 |
| PRE-PRIMARY 2026 through May 13, 2026 | $3,001 | $42,003 | $191,980 |
| JULY QUARTERLY 2026 through Jun 30, 2026 | $32,539 | $22,643 | $201,877 |
| OCTOBER QUARTERLY 2026 through Sep 30, 2026 | $22,359 | $56,386 | $167,850 |
| PRE-GENERAL 2026 through Oct 14, 2026 | $12,039 | $119,391 | $60,499 |
Each report’s own period, as filed with the FEC; a report filed again counts once, as its latest copy.
No endorsements page
Advanced · 62,758 votes (41%) · 1 of 4 · Full results ↗
Election not held yet · Full results ↗
Every contest for this seat that named this candidate, most recent last; a result is shown once the race is called. Election dates and results from civicAPI (civicapi.org). civicAPI aggregates results from Secretaries of State and equivalent election bodies, and makes its own race calls. civicapi.org ↗
Official FEC filing record for the current cycle. The priorities they publish are quoted from their own site, in their order.
Statements are quoted from these pages exactly. Headings, order and wording are the campaign’s; the record marking is ours.
A donor who gave several times appears once. The 12 largest donors by total given are listed. In all, 212 itemized contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $355.4K.
The 2 largest committees by total given are listed. In all, 3 committee contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $7K. Counted from the givers' own filings, which can run above the total the campaign itself reports.
Money moved in from the candidate’s other authorized committees, such as a joint fundraising committee. It was raised once and is reported again here on arrival. The largest of the sources is listed. In all, 1 transfer was filed this cycle, totaling $2.7K.
Total reported receipts $413,838
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. Open a source marked + to see who gave. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
97% of the money placed by state came from inside California: $344.9K of $355.4K.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 209 contributions · 97% | $344,925 |
| 2 contributions · 2% | $7,000 |
| 1 contribution · 1% | $3,500 |
By the state each donor wrote on the filing, across 3 states and territories. Donors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized, so they cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
| Employer as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an employer · 61 contributions · 21% of ranked | $66,860 |
| 4 contributions · 4.4% of ranked | $14,000 |
| 4 contributions · 4.4% of ranked | $14,000 |
| 2 contributions · 2.2% of ranked | $7,000 |
| 2 contributions · 2.2% of ranked | $7,000 |
| 2 contributions · 2.2% of ranked | $7,000 |
| 2 contributions · 2.2% of ranked | $7,000 |
| 2 contributions · 2.2% of ranked | $7,000 |
A further $39,691 came from donors whose answer names no employer (None, blank), so it is not ranked. Itemized gifts over $200, grouped by the words donors filed: not an industry classification, and a gift from an employee is not a gift from the employer. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($7,098) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
| Occupation as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an occupation · 61 contributions · 19% of ranked | $66,860 |
| Written instead of an occupation · 13 contributions · 11% of ranked | $38,191 |
| 13 contributions · 9.6% of ranked | $33,900 |
| 11 contributions · 6.5% of ranked | $23,000 |
| 11 contributions · 5.6% of ranked | $19,750 |
| 14 contributions · 5.3% of ranked | $18,834 |
| 6 contributions · 4.5% of ranked | $15,750 |
| 4 contributions · 4% of ranked | $14,000 |
A further $1,500 came from donors whose answer names no occupation (blank), so it is not ranked. Itemized gifts over $200, grouped by the words donors filed: not an industry classification, and a gift from an employee is not a gift from the employer. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($7,098) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
Money groups spent on their own, not through a campaign. Each ad is filed against the candidate it names, so money attacking an opponent shows on the opponent’s row. Open a candidate to see who spent it.
The campaign also refunded $1,500 in contributions, which the categories below do not include.
Total itemized disbursements $291,954
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
All 95 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
10 payments were reported as a lump sum, such as a card or payroll bill, with the detail filed underneath as memo entries. Those entries, $82,822 in all, are counted under the payee and purpose they name rather than under the processor that was paid. The total is the same either way.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 21 payments · 29% of all spending | $103,011 |
| 3 payments · 20% of all spending | $71,184 |
| 6 payments · 11% of all spending | $37,689 |
| 13 payments · 7.6% of all spending | $26,775 |
| 18 payments · 3.5% of all spending | $12,422 |
| 3 payments · 3.1% of all spending | $11,000 |
| 1 payment · 2.8% of all spending | $10,000 |
| 1 payment · 1.1% of all spending | $3,945 |
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.