Loading this candidate’s profile from the FEC filings and campaign records.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Loading this candidate’s profile from the FEC filings and campaign records.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Candidates › AZ-01 race › 2025–2026
RepublicanU.S. House, AZ-01Arizona
Has not served in Congress
12 priorities from josephchaplik.com, in the order they are listed there. Every heading and the text under it is copied exactly, as one passage for each page it is from, and links to that place on the page; hover a source to see which passage it opens.
Pro 2nd amendment.
Election integrity.
Ensuring our state budget is always balanced.
Protect free speech, due process, and our freedom of religion.
Pro-life.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · josephchaplik.com/issues
Heading as listed on josephchaplik.com/issues ↗ (opens josephchaplik.com/issues at this heading)
Common sense policies that protect small businesses.
Low state income tax for all to prosper.
Low tax climate to help small businesses thrive.
Limit government regulations to ensure healthy growth for employees and their families.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · josephchaplik.com/issues
Heading as listed on josephchaplik.com/issues ↗ (opens josephchaplik.com/issues at this heading)
A strong and secure border preventing illegal entrance.
Properly funded and staffed police force.
Protecting our most vulnerable by fighting human trafficking.
Promoting a safe environment for our children & elderly.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · josephchaplik.com/issues
Heading as listed on josephchaplik.com/issues ↗ (opens josephchaplik.com/issues at this heading)
Full Accountability and Full Transparency that eliminates waste.
Results-based funding that reward schools that are getting it right!
School choice for all children.
Freedom of speech protections on University campuses.
Opposes comprehensive sex education in elementary school.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · josephchaplik.com/issues
Heading as listed on josephchaplik.com/issues ↗ (opens josephchaplik.com/issues at this heading)
Supports fighting unconstitutionality of Obamacare.
Supports protecting those with preexisting conditions.
Supports laws allowing individuals to deduct the costs of health care from their state income tax.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · josephchaplik.com/issues
Heading as listed on josephchaplik.com/issues ↗ (opens josephchaplik.com/issues at this heading)
Hold states accountable for fraudulent use of federal dollars
Increased transparency and oversight of federal dollars
Zero-based budgeting mindset
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · josephchaplik.com/us-congress-2
A strong and secure border preventing illegal crossings
Deporting those who came here illegally, especially during the Biden Border Invasion
Proper funding and staffing for ICE and Border Patrol
Protecting our most vulnerable by fighting human trafficking
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · josephchaplik.com/us-congress-2
Priority on safe communities where families and businesses can thrive
Tough on crime federal policies
Federal dollars withheld from states and cities that enact soft-on-crime policies
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · josephchaplik.com/us-congress-2
Define and call out radical, anti-American ideology
Crack down on illegal immigrants and visa-holders with ties to terrorism and anti-American extremism
Emphasize teaching American principles and civics in K-12 schools and postsecondary institutions
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · josephchaplik.com/us-congress-2
Oppose increases to the federal income tax
Reduce and eliminate burdensome regulations that drive up the cost of goods
Champion fiscally conservative, free market solutions to improve housing affordability
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · josephchaplik.com/us-congress-2
Pro-2nd Amendment
Clean up our election process and root out corruption
Protect free speech, due process, and our freedom of religion
Pro-Life
Defend health freedom and oppose mandates
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · josephchaplik.com/us-congress-2
Champion education freedom
Stand up for parents’ right to direct the upbringing, education and health care decisions of their child
Oppose woke indoctrination of K-12 students in the classroom
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · josephchaplik.com/us-congress-2
FEC filings, Dec 15, 2025 to Sep 30, 2026 · Official FEC bulk data · committee C00930719
100¢ of every dollar raised has been spent across 4 reports ($711.3K of $714K). Cash on hand went from $240.2K on Dec 31, 2025 to $2.7K on Sep 30, 2026.
| Report | Raised in the period | Spent in the period | Cash on hand at its close |
|---|---|---|---|
| YEAR-END 2025 through Dec 31, 2025 | $249,250 | $9,084 | $240,166 |
| APRIL QUARTERLY 2026 through Mar 31, 2026 | $168,221 | $142,698 | $265,689 |
| PRE-PRIMARY 2026 through Jul 1, 2026 | $187,500 | $323,669 | $129,520 |
| OCTOBER QUARTERLY 2026 through Sep 30, 2026 | $109,025 | $235,841 | $2,704 |
Each report’s own period, as filed with the FEC; a report filed again counts once, as its latest copy.
Each loan as the campaign’s report through Sep 30, 2026 lists it, with what is still owed. A loan from an earlier cycle can appear here, and one repaid in full drops off the report, so the list need not add up to the row.
113 endorsers listed on Joseph Chaplik’s own campaign site: 63 officials, 6 organizations, 44 people.
This is the campaign's claim, checked by an editor against its page; the endorsers have not confirmed it to us. Each name opens the campaign’s page with that name highlighted.
Maricopa County
Maricopa County Recorder · LD-10 State Representative
LD1 State Senator
LD3 State Senator
LD30 State Representative · LD-30 State Representative
LD7 State Representative · Former LD-06 State Representative
LD4 State Representative
LD27 State Representative
Former Congressional Candidate CD1
Former Congressional Candidate CD1
Former Congressional Candidate CD1
Former Congressional Candidate CD1
Former Congressional Candidate CD1
Former Candidate State Representative LD2
Conservative Grassroots Leader
Former MCRC Chair
Not yet called · 85% reporting · Full results ↗
Every contest for this seat that named this candidate, most recent last; a result is shown once the race is called. Election dates and results from civicAPI (civicapi.org). civicAPI aggregates results from Secretaries of State and equivalent election bodies, and makes its own race calls. civicapi.org ↗
Primary July 21, 2026 · 2 polls
Each dot is a poll. A line is drawn from the third nonpartisan poll; there are 2 so far. How polls are read
Poll data from The New York Times, licensed CC BY 4.0 · Updated October 28, 2026 · 1 poll paid for by a party or campaign is left out
Official FEC filing record for the current cycle. The priorities they publish are quoted from their own site, in their order.
Statements are quoted from these pages exactly. Headings, order and wording are the campaign’s; the record marking is ours.
A donor who gave several times appears once. The 12 largest donors by total given are listed. In all, 286 itemized contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $287.5K.
The largest of the committees is listed. In all, 1 committee contribution was filed this cycle, totaling $500. Counted from the givers' own filings, which can run above the total the campaign itself reports.
Total reported receipts $713,996
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. Open a source marked + to see who gave. FEC filings through Sep 30, 2026.
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
93% of the money placed by state came from inside Arizona: $267.2K of $287.5K.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 269 contributions · 93% | $267,215 |
| 2 contributions · 2.4% | $7,000 |
| 3 contributions · 1.6% | $4,500 |
| 2 contributions · 1% | $3,000 |
| 3 contributions · 1% | $2,750 |
| 3 contributions · 0.3% | $1,000 |
| 1 contribution · 0.3% | $1,000 |
| 1 contribution · 0.2% | $500 |
By the state each donor wrote on the filing, across 9 states and territories. Donors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized, so they cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
| Employer as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an employer · 158 contributions · 50% of ranked | $141,568 |
| Written instead of an employer · 29 contributions · 13% of ranked | $36,360 |
| Written instead of an employer · 3 contributions · 3% of ranked | $8,500 |
| 2 contributions · 2.4% of ranked | $7,000 |
| 2 contributions · 2.4% of ranked | $7,000 |
| 3 contributions · 2.4% of ranked | $7,000 |
| 2 contributions · 1.7% of ranked | $5,000 |
| 2 contributions · 1.7% of ranked | $5,000 |
A further $1,500 came from donors whose answer names no employer (blank), so it is not ranked. Itemized gifts over $200, grouped by the words donors filed: not an industry classification, and a gift from an employee is not a gift from the employer. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($18,863) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
Money groups spent on their own, not through a campaign. Each ad is filed against the candidate it names, so money attacking an opponent shows on the opponent’s row. Open a candidate to see who spent it.
The campaign also refunded $24,500 in contributions, which the categories below do not include.
Total itemized disbursements $472,602
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Sep 30, 2026.
All 270 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 6 payments · 12% of all spending | $84,792 |
| 6 payments · 10% of all spending | $74,175 |
| 6 payments · 5.9% of all spending | $42,000 |
| 2 payments · 4.9% of all spending | $35,000 |
| 5 payments · 4.6% of all spending | $32,641 |
| 1 payment · 4.5% of all spending | $31,899 |
| 3 payments · 2.6% of all spending | $18,183 |
| 8 payments · 2.3% of all spending | $16,350 |
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.
| Occupation as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an occupation · 158 contributions · 50% of ranked | $141,568 |
| Written instead of an occupation · 9 contributions · 5.1% of ranked | $14,500 |
| Written instead of an occupation · 3 contributions · 3% of ranked | $8,500 |
| 6 contributions · 2.8% of ranked | $8,000 |
| 2 contributions · 2.4% of ranked | $7,000 |
| 2 contributions · 2.4% of ranked | $7,000 |
| 3 contributions · 2.4% of ranked | $7,000 |
| 2 contributions · 2.4% of ranked | $7,000 |
A further $1,500 came from donors whose answer names no occupation (blank), so it is not ranked. Itemized gifts over $200, grouped by the words donors filed: not an industry classification, and a gift from an employee is not a gift from the employer. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($18,863) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.