Loading this candidate’s profile from the FEC filings and campaign records.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Loading this candidate’s profile from the FEC filings and campaign records.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Candidates › AL-05 race › 2025–2026
D Democratic nominee for U.S. House, AL-05
Has not served in Congress
30 priorities from sneedforcongress.com, in the order they are listed there. Every heading and the text under it is copied exactly, as one passage for each page it is from, and links to that place on the page; hover a source to see which passage it opens.
Growth means nothing if you can't pay the bills.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · sneedforcongress.com/ourwayforward
I support a responsible moratorium on new data center construction in North Alabama. Communities have a right to know how these large facilities will impact their families, their neighborhoods, and their utility bills. Local residents deserve to have a voice in what is being built in their communities before they are approved and built.
Congress should form a dedicated, permanent New Emerging Technologies Task Force to advise the public and lawmakers on the advantages and disadvantages of new tech to better understand its effect on communities and to inform sensible regulatory oversight and guidelines.
Due to the enormous power and water consumption of data centers, the costs must be borne by the company, not the consumer. In addition, utility usage by data centers should not impact the communities’ ability to access utilities or raise their costs.
Provided that prior to breaking ground, data centers undergo adequate planning and oversight,their construction should be undertaken by union workers to ensure the highest standards of safety and quality. This will result in new, good-paying union jobs with benefits and help keep Alabama on the forefront of new, cutting-edge technologies.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · sneedforcongress.com/data-centers
A top-tier economy needs more than just college degrees.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · sneedforcongress.com/ourwayforward
Oppose the "CHOOSE Act" and all voucher schemes.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · sneedforcongress.com/ed-op
Heading as listed on sneedforcongress.com/ed-op ↗ (opens sneedforcongress.com/ed-op at this heading)
We cannot build a #1 economy on a #43 education system.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · sneedforcongress.com/ed-op
Heading as listed on sneedforcongress.com/ed-op ↗ (opens sneedforcongress.com/ed-op at this heading)
Create a public-private partnership to close the teacher pay gap.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · sneedforcongress.com/ed-op
Heading as listed on sneedforcongress.com/ed-op ↗ (opens sneedforcongress.com/ed-op at this heading)
Our grid isn't just a utility; it’s a national security asset.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · sneedforcongress.com/ourwayforward
"Grid-UP," will create a federal grant program prioritizing "National Security Priority Zones".
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · sneedforcongress.com/energy
Federal "Grid Impact Fee" dedicated solely to funding the new transmission and generation capacity they require.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · sneedforcongress.com/energy
Restore federal funding for clean, innovative, and sustainable technologies.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · sneedforcongress.com/energy
We cannot let sprawl destroy what makes this region special.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · sneedforcongress.com/ourwayforward
Rapid, sprawling growth is paving over the natural landmarks that define our region.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · sneedforcongress.com/environment
FEC filings, Apr 1, 2025 to Oct 14, 2026 · Official FEC bulk data · committee C00902809
73¢ of every dollar raised has been spent across 9 reports ($669.5K of $917.3K). Cash on hand went from $106.2K on Jun 30, 2025 to $247.8K on Oct 14, 2026.
| Report | Raised in the period | Spent in the period | Cash on hand at its close |
|---|---|---|---|
| JULY QUARTERLY 2025 through Jun 30, 2025 | $120,915 | $14,724 | $106,191 |
| OCTOBER QUARTERLY 2025 through Sep 30, 2025 | $116,038 | $46,986 | $175,243 |
| YEAR-END 2025 through Dec 31, 2025 | $113,965 | $84,655 | $204,554 |
| APRIL QUARTERLY 2026 through Mar 31, 2026 | $102,268 | $72,583 | $234,239 |
| PRE-PRIMARY 2026 through Apr 29, 2026 | $15,536 | $36,921 | $212,853 |
| PRE-RUN-OFF 2026 through May 27, 2026 | $15,779 | $85,294 | $143,338 |
| JULY QUARTERLY 2026 through Jun 30, 2026 | $162,011 | $135,629 | $169,720 |
| OCTOBER QUARTERLY 2026 through Sep 30, 2026 | $214,356 | $163,140 | $220,936 |
| PRE-GENERAL 2026 through Oct 14, 2026 | $56,421 | $29,551 | $247,807 |
Each report’s own period, as filed with the FEC; a report filed again counts once, as its latest copy.
1 endorser listed on Andrew Sneed’s own campaign site.
This is the campaign's claim, checked by an editor against its page; the endorsers have not confirmed it to us. Each name opens the campaign’s page with that name highlighted.
Not yet called · 99% reporting · Full results ↗
Not yet called · 99% reporting · Full results ↗
Election not held yet · Full results ↗
Every contest for this seat that named this candidate, most recent last; a result is shown once the race is called. Election dates and results from civicAPI (civicapi.org). civicAPI aggregates results from Secretaries of State and equivalent election bodies, and makes its own race calls. civicapi.org ↗
Official FEC filing record for the current cycle. The priorities they publish are quoted from their own site, in their order.
Statements are quoted from these pages exactly. Headings, order and wording are the campaign’s; the record marking is ours.
A donor who gave several times appears once. The 12 largest donors by total given are listed. In all, 749 itemized contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $569.6K.
The 8 largest committees by total given are listed. In all, 9 committee contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $20.1K. Counted from the givers' own filings, which can run above the total the campaign itself reports.
Total reported receipts $917,290
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. Open a source marked + to see who gave. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
92% of the money placed by state came from inside Alabama: $520.8K of $567.6K.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 683 contributions · 92% | $520,832 |
| 10 contributions · 4.3% | $24,350 |
| 3 contributions · 1.1% | $6,325 |
| 6 contributions · 0.8% | $4,350 |
| 2 contributions · 0.5% | $3,000 |
| 7 contributions · 0.5% | $2,750 |
| 2 contributions · 0.3% | $1,500 |
| 2 contributions · 0.2% | $1,029 |
By the state each donor wrote on the filing, across 14 states and territories. Donors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized, so they cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
| Employer as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an employer · 264 contributions · 31% of ranked | $155,842 |
| Written instead of an employer · 60 contributions · 13% of ranked | $66,625 |
| Written instead of an employer · 48 contributions · 5.1% of ranked | $26,085 |
| 1 contribution · 3.9% of ranked | $20,000 |
| 15 contributions · 3.4% of ranked | $17,250 |
| 3 contributions · 2% of ranked | $10,000 |
| 3 contributions · 2% of ranked | $10,000 |
| 4 contributions · 1.8% of ranked | $9,000 |
A further $61,900 came from donors whose answer names no employer (N/A, blank), so it is not ranked. Itemized gifts over $200, grouped by the words donors filed: not an industry classification, and a gift from an employee is not a gift from the employer. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($125,572) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
No outside spending filed
The campaign also refunded $11,000 in contributions, which the categories below do not include.
Total itemized disbursements $475,397
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
All 486 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 9 payments · 14% of all spending | $94,152 |
| 3 payments · 6.9% of all spending | $46,404 |
| 13 payments · 5.1% of all spending | $34,096 |
| 4 payments · 4.5% of all spending | $30,396 |
| 25 payments · 4.4% of all spending | $29,461 |
| 7 payments · 4.2% of all spending | $28,105 |
| 50 payments · 3.7% of all spending | $24,655 |
| 15 payments · 2.3% of all spending | $15,500 |
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.
| Occupation as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an occupation · 257 contributions · 28% of ranked | $143,942 |
| Written instead of an occupation · 67 contributions · 16% of ranked | $78,875 |
| 53 contributions · 9.5% of ranked | $48,500 |
| 1 contribution · 3.9% of ranked | $20,000 |
| 25 contributions · 3.5% of ranked | $17,600 |
| 13 contributions · 3% of ranked | $15,150 |
| 7 contributions · 2.3% of ranked | $11,500 |
| 7 contributions · 2.2% of ranked | $11,000 |
A further $61,550 came from donors whose answer names no occupation (N/A, blank), so it is not ranked. Itemized gifts over $200, grouped by the words donors filed: not an industry classification, and a gift from an employee is not a gift from the employer. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($125,572) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.