Loading this committee’s profile from its FEC filings.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Loading this committee’s profile from its FEC filings.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
PACs › Hybrid PAC (nonqualified) › 2025–2026
FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026 · FEC bulk filing data · committee C99002396 · files quarterly
Notices dated after Oct 14, 2026 are added; earlier ones are already in the regular reports.
“Since 1980, AmeriPAC has helped fund and elect a large number of conservative freedom oriented candidates to public office. In addition to direct financial support of candidates, AmeriPAC also makes independent expenditures, funding proven campaign techniques such as media appearances, email alerts, radio/TV ads, and social media presence.”
American PAC, on its own site, ameripac.org
Quoted from the committee's site, or its sponsor's or funder's where its own says nothing. The statement is filed under topics from a fixed list, chosen by AI models when two of three agree; which side it takes is in its own words.
No published list of positions
Each part reads different filings, so counts and totals can differ.
Direct PAC contributions and independent expenditures explicitly reported as support, by the party of the candidate they went to.
Spending against candidates is drawn on its own bar and left out of the support totals.
Contributions are reported money, not endorsements; a PAC giving to both parties is common.
Every contribution on line 23 of the committee’s own Schedule B, which is the filing its summary totals are built from. That line covers federal candidates, party committees and other political committees alike, so a super PAC funding other super PACs appears here rather than under candidate giving.
| Recipient | Count | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| Republican candidates | 4 | $20K · 100% |
| All recipients | 4 | $20K |
| State | Candidates | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| Ohio | 1 | $5K |
| Texas | 1 | $5K |
| Georgia | 1 | $5K |
| North Carolina | 1 | $5K |
Bars drawn to $5K, the largest gift total here. 2025–2026 filings.
Candidate contribution rows come from candidate committee Schedule A filings, the same rows the party chart above counts.
Money moving between this committee and other committees, matched on FEC committee ID rather than the name each filing was typed under. Both sides exclude memo entries. The figures here count each committee once, from the itemized transfers read for this section, so they will not match the payment counts under Who this PAC gave to.
Committees that reported giving to this one on their own Schedule A filings, grouped by the giver’s committee ID.
No committee-to-committee receipts were itemized this cycle.
A donor who gave several times appears once. The 12 largest donors by total given are listed. In all, 50,563 itemized contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $1.5M. FEC contributor lists are public records and cannot be used for commercial solicitation.
Total reported receipts $4,638,004
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. Open a source marked + to see who gave. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 5,820 contributions · 14% | $208,410 |
| 7,525 contributions · 14% |
Total reported disbursements $4,226,044
Every dollar this committee reported spending this cycle, split by the lines it reports against. Open a line to see who was actually paid on it. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
These are the payments the committee itemized to vendors, staff and other committees. Its $1,216,458 in independent expenditures is filed separately, against the candidate each was about, so it is counted in the split above and listed by candidate below, not here.
$4.2M spent from Jan 2025 to Oct 2026. Most in one report: $1.4M, Jul 1 – Sep 30, 2026.
The running total of what the committee’s FEC reports say it spent, independent expenditures included, with a point at the end of each report. The line is straight between reports because a report gives one total for its whole period. Numbered lines mark the elections that drew the most independent spending. Each expenditure counts toward the next election on its seat after the day it was made, and a seat is named when it drew at least a tenth of that spending. The line stops at the latest report, through Oct 14, 2026, at the dashed rule; elections after it are marked where they fall.
Published by the Commission against this committee’s own FEC ID. An audit is a periodic examination that reports findings; an administrative fine is a penalty for filing a specific report late or not at all. They are separate instruments and are not combined into a score here.
Late 30G report, 2014$550 assessed
Case 2926 at the FEC ↗Late 30G report, 2004$1.8K assessed
Case 1306 at the FEC ↗Source: the Commission’s audit-case and administrative-fine records, joined on this committee’s FEC ID, imported Oct 26, 2026. Enforcement matters (MURs) are published only against respondent names, with no committee identifier, so they are not shown here rather than being matched by name.
No lobbying disclosures matched
American PAC is registered with the Federal Election Commission as a Hybrid PAC (nonqualified). Official FEC summary: Federal Election Commission committee record.
Statements are quoted from these pages exactly. Headings, order and wording are the committee’s or its sponsor’s; the record marking is ours.
American PAC is matched to organization records using the FEC committee identity, structured identifiers, and corroborated organization data.
Disbursements this committee itemized to another committee: candidate contributions, party transfers and payments alike, not contributions only.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| Senate campaign committee · Connected to FRIENDS OF KENNEDY · 1 payment | $5K |
| Senate campaign committee · Connected to TEAM PAXTON · 1 payment | $5K |
| Senate campaign committee · Connected to TRANSPORTATION TRUST FUND · 1 payment | $5K |
| Senate campaign committee · Connected to WHATLEY VICTORY COMMITTEE · 1 payment | $5K |
$20K across 4 recipient committees, or 0.5% of everything this committee reports spending.
Built from FEC Schedule A and Schedule B filings for the selected cycle. A committee only appears here if the money was itemized under its FEC committee ID.
| $206,118 |
| 5,335 contributions · 11% | $163,572 |
| 1,852 contributions · 4.6% | $68,590 |
| 1,294 contributions · 4.2% | $63,178 |
| 1,988 contributions · 3.3% | $49,817 |
| 1,507 contributions · 3.2% | $48,090 |
| 1,238 contributions · 2.5% | $38,133 |
By the state each contributor wrote on the filing. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line together, so one committee or organization transfer can account for a whole state. Contributors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized and cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
| Employer as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an employer · 40,273 contributions · 81% of ranked | $1,114,919 |
| Written instead of an employer · 905 contributions · 2.8% of ranked | $38,275 |
| 206 contributions · 1.1% of ranked | $14,986 |
| 97 contributions · 0.9% of ranked | $13,125 |
| 83 contributions · 0.6% of ranked | $8,060 |
| 148 contributions · 0.5% of ranked | $7,429 |
| 20 contributions · 0.4% of ranked | $5,120 |
| 6 contributions · 0.4% of ranked | $5,073 |
A further $84,049 came from donors whose answer names no employer (N/A, None, blank), so it is not ranked. Ranked from the largest 200 of 201 employer spellings filed; each share is of the money in those. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($3,098,838) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
| Occupation as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an occupation · 40,619 contributions · 81% of ranked | $1,124,536 |
| Written instead of an occupation · 966 contributions · 2.6% of ranked | $35,786 |
| 100 contributions · 0.9% of ranked | $13,202 |
| 148 contributions · 0.5% of ranked | $7,429 |
| 20 contributions · 0.4% of ranked | $5,120 |
| 129 contributions · 0.4% of ranked | $5,010 |
| 100 contributions · 0.4% of ranked | $4,995 |
| 1 contribution · 0.3% of ranked | $4,750 |
A further $78,826 came from donors whose answer names no occupation (N/A, None, blank), so it is not ranked. Ranked from the largest 200 of 201 occupation spellings filed; each share is of the money in those. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($3,098,838) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
Total itemized disbursements $2,938,320
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
All 400 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
14 payments were reported as a lump sum, such as a card or payroll bill, with the detail filed underneath as memo entries. Those entries, $40,621 in all, are counted under the payee and purpose they name rather than under the processor that was paid. The total is the same either way.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 22 payments · 26% of all spending | $1,104,125 |
| 15 payments · 9.4% of all spending | $395,521 |
| 16 payments · 5.6% of all spending | $236,052 |
| 34 payments · 4.8% of all spending | $202,500 |
| 16 payments · 4.7% of all spending | $199,432 |
| 6 payments · 3.4% of all spending | $145,091 |
| 3 payments · 3.4% of all spending | $144,000 |
| 16 payments · 1.4% of all spending | $61,269 |
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.