Loading this committee’s profile from its FEC filings.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Loading this committee’s profile from its FEC filings.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
PACs › Hybrid PAC (nonqualified) › 2025–2026
Hybrid PAC (nonqualified)Mountain Brook, AlabamaActive
Connected organization: Lummis Victory Committee
FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026 · FEC bulk filing data · committee C00894428 · files monthly
“First Principles Digital is a Republican-led, Republican-trusted, Republican-focused Super PAC working to elect pro-crypto leaders to Congress.”
First Principles Digital, on its own site, firstprinciplesdigital.com
Quoted from the committee's site, or its sponsor's or funder's where its own says nothing. The statement is filed under topics from a fixed list, chosen by AI models when two of three agree; which side it takes is in its own words.
1 priority from the committee’s own site, in the order they are listed there. Every heading and the text under it is copied exactly, as one passage for each page it is from, and links to that place on the page; hover a source to see which passage it opens.
First Principles Digital is a Republican-led, Republican-focused organization working to elect pro-crypto leaders to Congress and turn supporters into champions.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · firstprinciplesdigital.com
Heading as listed on firstprinciplesdigital.com ↗ (opens firstprinciplesdigital.com at this heading)
Each part reads different filings, so counts and totals can differ.
Direct PAC contributions and independent expenditures explicitly reported as support, by the party of the candidate they went to.
Contributions are reported money, not endorsements; a PAC giving to both parties is common.
Every contribution on line 23 of the committee’s own Schedule B, which is the filing its summary totals are built from. That line covers federal candidates, party committees and other political committees alike, so a super PAC funding other super PACs appears here rather than under candidate giving.
| Recipient | Count | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| Republican candidates | 4 | $9.5K · 54% |
| Other or unresolved candidates | 3 | $7K · 40% |
| Other PACs and committees | 1 | $1K · 5.7% |
| All recipients | 8 | $17.5K |
| State | Candidates | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| Montana | 1 | $5K |
| Alabama | 2 | $4.5K |
| Iowa | 1 | $3.5K |
| Ohio | 1 | $1.5K |
| Kansas | 1 | $1K |
| Tennessee | 1 | $1K |
The 6 largest sources are listed. Each as the committee named it on this line, $2.2M from 3 sources in all, with its largest individual donors, whose gifts it files here too. Individuals' gifts on this line are not itemized in the data the site holds, so the list need not add up to the row.
The largest of the committees is listed. Counted from the givers' own filings, which can run above the total this committee reports.
Total reported receipts $3,268,456
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. Open a source marked + to see who gave. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 4 contributions · 99% | $992,511 |
| 1 contribution · 0.5% | $4,993 |
By the state each contributor wrote on the filing. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line together, so one committee or organization transfer can account for a whole state. Contributors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized and cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
| Employer as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| 4 contributions · 99% of ranked | $992,511 |
| 1 contribution · 0.5% of ranked | $4,993 |
Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
Total reported disbursements $2,184,948
Every dollar this committee reported spending this cycle, split by the lines it reports against. Open a line to see who was actually paid on it. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
These are the payments the committee itemized to vendors, staff and other committees. Its $902,547 in independent expenditures is filed separately, against the candidate each was about, so it is counted in the split above and listed by candidate below, not here.
$2.2M spent from Jan 2025 to Oct 2026. Most in one report: $904.7K, Oct 1 – Oct 14, 2026.
The running total of what the committee’s FEC reports say it spent, independent expenditures included, with a point at the end of each report. The line is straight between reports because a report gives one total for its whole period. Numbered lines mark the elections that drew the most independent spending. Each expenditure counts toward the next election on its seat after the day it was made, and a seat is named when it drew at least a tenth of that spending.
No lobbying disclosures matched
First Principles Digital is registered with the Federal Election Commission as a Hybrid PAC (nonqualified). Its FEC record names Lummis Victory Committee as an affiliate. Official FEC summary: Federal Election Commission committee record.
Statements are quoted from these pages exactly. Headings, order and wording are the committee’s or its sponsor’s; the record marking is ours.
First Principles Digital is matched to organization records using the FEC committee identity, structured identifiers, and corroborated organization data.
Bars drawn to $5K, the largest gift total here. 2025–2026 filings.
Candidate contribution rows come from candidate committee Schedule A filings, the same rows the party chart above counts.
Money moving between this committee and other committees, matched on FEC committee ID rather than the name each filing was typed under. Both sides exclude memo entries. The figures here count each committee once, from the itemized transfers read for this section, so they will not match the payment counts under Who this PAC gave to.
Committees that reported giving to this one on their own Schedule A filings, grouped by the giver’s committee ID.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| PAC (qualified) · 1 payment | $5K |
| PAC (nonqualified) · 1 payment | $4.6K |
$9.6K from 2 committees, counting every itemized receipt this cycle.
Disbursements this committee itemized to another committee: candidate contributions, party transfers and payments alike, not contributions only.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| Senate campaign committee · Connected to SHEEHY VICTORY COMMITTEE · 2 payments | $5K |
| Senate campaign committee · Connected to ONE TEAM SENATE MAJORITY · 1 payment | $3.5K |
| Senate campaign committee · Connected to ASHLEY HINSON VICTORY COMMITTEE · 1 payment | $3.5K |
| Senate campaign committee · Connected to FRIENDS OF KENNEDY · 2 payments | $1.5K |
| PAC (nonqualified) · 1 payment | $1K |
| Senate campaign committee · Connected to ONE TEAM SENATE MAJORITY · 1 payment | $1K |
| Senate campaign committee · 1 payment | $1K |
| Senate campaign committee · Connected to 2024 THUNE REPUBLICAN SENATE VICTORY · 1 payment | $1K |
$17.5K across 8 recipient committees, or 0.8% of everything this committee reports spending.
Built from FEC Schedule A and Schedule B filings for the selected cycle. A committee only appears here if the money was itemized under its FEC committee ID.
| Occupation as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| 4 contributions · 99% of ranked | $992,511 |
| 1 contribution · 0.5% of ranked | $4,993 |
Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
Total itemized disbursements $19,061
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
All 36 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 2 payments · 0.2% of all spending | $5,000 |
| 1 payment · 0.2% of all spending | $3,500 |
| 1 payment · 0.2% of all spending | $3,500 |
| 2 payments · <0.1% of all spending | $1,500 |
| 1 payment · <0.1% of all spending | $1,000 |
| 1 payment · <0.1% of all spending | $1,000 |
| 1 payment · <0.1% of all spending | $1,000 |
| 1 payment · <0.1% of all spending | $1,000 |
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.