FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026 · FEC bulk filing data · committee C00892653 · files quarterly
SummaryAt a glance
Why it exists
In its own words, filed under Candidates from a group. Read the statement
Money
$1.7M raised, $1.7M spent, $175.5K cash on hand (through Oct 14, 2026). Where it comes from
Who funds it
76% filed as other receipts · 13% from PACs and other committees · largest donor Contours, Inc, $450K. See who funds it
Where it goes
$224.6K spent for candidates, most on CA-23 ($224.6K) · $12.5K given to candidates and committees, the largest to Michael Thurow ($5K) · 100% of its support to independents. See where it goes
Where it spendsWhich races and candidates is its money for or against?
“The Working Class Heroes Fund is the only organization in the country dedicated to uniting and mobilizing working people across party lines to give the working class a seat at the table.
We know you shouldn’t have to be a self-funding crypto billionaire to get elected to public office.”
Quoted from the committee's site, or its sponsor's or funder's where its own says nothing. The statement is filed under topics from a fixed list, chosen by AI models when two of three agree; which side it takes is in its own words.
No published list of positions
Its site sums up what it stands for in the statement above, and publishes no list of positions beyond it.
Who it gives toWhich candidates and committees get its money?
Each part reads different filings, so counts and totals can differ.
Party support distribution$237.1K to 5 candidates
Direct PAC contributions and independent expenditures explicitly reported as support, by the party of the candidate they went to.
For candidates $237,137
Independent 100%
Contributions are reported money, not endorsements; a PAC giving to both parties is common.
Who this PAC gave to$12,500 in 5 payments
Every contribution on line 23 of the committee’s own Schedule B, which is the filing its summary totals are built from. That line covers federal candidates, party committees and other political committees alike, so a super PAC funding other super PACs appears here rather than under candidate giving.
By recipient
Line 23 contributions by kind and party of recipient
Recipient
Count
Amount
Other or unresolved candidates
4
$12.5K · 100%
All recipients
4
$12.5K
By the candidate’s state
Contributions to candidates by the candidate’s state
State
Candidates
Amount
Wisconsin
1
$5K
Nebraska
1
$2.5K
Washington
1
$2.5K
Alaska
1
$2.5K
Recipients 4
MTMichael ThurowIndependent · U.S. House · WI-06 · via Mike Thurow For Congress2 payments, latest Feb 18, 2026 · IN-KIND CONTRIBUTION · FEC filing, Feb 18, 2026$5K
DODan OsbornIndependent · U.S. Senate · NE · via Osborn For Senate1 payment, latest Feb 10, 2026 · CONTRIBUTION · FEC filing, Feb 10, 2026$2.5K
NPNate PowellIndependent · U.S. House · WA-05 · via Powell For Congress1 payment, latest Feb 10, 2026 · CONTRIBUTION · FEC filing, Feb 10, 2026$2.5K
BHBill HillIndependent · U.S. House · AK-00 · via Bill Hill For Alaskans1 payment, latest Feb 10, 2026 · CONTRIBUTION · FEC filing, Feb 10, 2026$2.5K
Bars drawn to $5K, the largest gift total here. 2025–2026 filings.
Show candidate activity and the money network
Candidate and election activity as the recipients filed it
Michael Thurow2 receipts, latest Feb 18, 2026Mike Thurow for Congress · H6WI06233$5K
Bill Hill1 receipt, latest Feb 10, 2026Bill Hill for Alaskans · H6AK01092$2.5K
Nate Powell1 receipt, latest Feb 10, 2026Powell for Congress · H6WA05239$2.5K
Dan Osborn1 receipt, latest Feb 10, 2026Osborn for Senate · S4NE00207$2.5K
Candidate contribution rows come from candidate committee Schedule A filings, the same rows the party chart above counts.
Committee money network
Money moving between this committee and other committees, matched on FEC committee ID rather than the name each filing was typed under. Both sides exclude memo entries. The figures here count each committee once, from the itemized transfers read for this section, so they will not match the payment counts under Who this PAC gave to.
Committees funding this one
Committees that reported giving to this one on their own Schedule A filings, grouped by the giver’s committee ID.
Committees funding this one
Money inWho funds the PAC?
Where the money came from $1,714,937 reported receipts
Other receiptsWhere a super PAC files what corporations, unions and other organizations give it, since they have no line of their own. Hybrid PACs, and some super PACs, file individuals' unlimited gifts here too, along with any interest or dividends.$1,301,99976%
Thomas Preston-WernerOne contribution on Mar 28, 2025 · INVESTOR · SELF · ROSS, CA$50,000
Osborn for Senate 20241 receipt, latest May 21, 2025 · OMAHA, Nebraska$25,000
Propel Capital Networks LLC1 receipt, latest May 14, 2026 · Brooklyn, New York$25,000
W. Pete Welch7 contributions, latest Nov 4, 2025 · ECONOMIST · U.S. DHHS · WASHINGTON, DC$22,000
Christine Elliot-Negri2 contributions, latest Feb 5, 2025 · TEACHER · CUNY · PORT WASHINGTON, NY$20,000
Luke Elliot-Negri2 contributions, latest Feb 5, 2025 · EDUCATOR · CUNY · PORT WASHINGTON, NY$20,000
Common Defense Civic Engagement1 receipt, latest Nov 24, 2025 · New York, New York$10,000
Eric CramerOne contribution on Apr 9, 2026 · ATTORNEY · BERGER MONTAGUE PC · PHILADELPHIA, PA$10,000
William HarrisOne contribution on Mar 3, 2026 · NOT EMPLOYED · RETIRED · LEXINGTON, ME$9,999
Omaha Firefighters Local #3851 receipt, latest Feb 18, 2025 · Omaha, Nebraska$5,000
The 15 largest sources are listed. Each as the committee named it on this line, $1.1M from 9 sources in all, with its largest individual donors, whose gifts it files here too. Individuals' gifts on this line are not itemized in the data the site holds, so the list need not add up to the row.
PACs and other committeesPolitical action committees and other candidates' committees.$230,00013%
The largest of the committees is listed. Counted from the givers' own filings, which can run above the total this committee reports.
Itemized (over $200)Donors who have given more than $200 this cycle, so the FEC itemizes (names) them.$166,1869.7%
Unitemized ($200 or less)Donors who have given $200 or less this cycle, so the FEC does not itemize (name) them.$11,7230.7%
Refunds and rebatesMoney coming back to the committee: rebates and refunds of what it spent, contributions it made that were returned, and loans it made that were repaid.$5,0000.3%
Not itemized by sourceReported receipts that none of the summary's lines accounts for.$30<0.1%
Total reported receipts $1,714,937
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. Open a source marked + to see who gave. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
Who donated: where they live, their employers and jobs
Where the donors live $322,405 placed by state
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
under $8.3K
$8.3K+
$33.2K+
$74.8K+
$132.9K+
none
Top states
Top donor states
Name
Amount
California17 contributions · 64%
$207,650
New York10 contributions · 16%
$50,100
District of Columbia11 contributions · 6.9%
$22,100
Pennsylvania5 contributions · 3.2%
$10,400
Maine1 contribution · 3.1%
$9,999
Washington3 contributions · 1.8%
$5,750
Illinois1 contribution · 1.6%
SpendingWhere does the money go?
How the spending splits $1,746,347 reported
Other disbursementsEverything the committee reports outside the lines above.$832,85248%
Independent expendituresSpending to support or oppose a candidate, made without coordinating with them.$478,89127%
Spent for or against
Karen MatthewsSupport · 3 records · latest May 13, 2026$224,637
Operating expendituresThe committee's own running costs.$292,50417%
Contribution refundsMoney returned to the people and committees that gave it.$100<0.1%
Total reported disbursements $1,746,347
Every dollar this committee reported spending this cycle, split by the lines it reports against. Open a line to see who was actually paid on it. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
What the payments were for $293,476 itemized
These are the payments the committee itemized to vendors, staff and other committees. Its $478,891 in independent expenditures is filed separately, against the candidate each was about, so it is counted in the split above and listed by candidate below, not here.
Given to othersContributions to other candidates, party committees, and PACs.$264,73290%
$1.7M spent from Jan 2025 to Oct 2026. Most in one report: $344.7K, Apr 1 – May 13, 2026.
$1.7M1
Jan 2025Oct 2026
1Jun 2, 2026 primary, CA-23$224.6K of its independent spending was aimed at it
The running total of what the committee’s FEC reports say it spent, independent expenditures included, with a point at the end of each report. The line is straight between reports because a report gives one total for its whole period. Numbered lines mark the elections that drew the most independent spending. Each expenditure counts toward the next election on its seat after the day it was made, and a seat is named when it drew at least a tenth of that spending.
A name search for “WORKING CLASS HEROES FUND” in Lobbying Disclosure Act filings found no issues reported. FEC and the Senate share no organization identifier, so lobbying is matched by name; a sponsor that lobbies under another name is not found.
Working Class Heroes Fund is matched to organization records using the FEC committee identity, structured identifiers, and corroborated organization data.
Bill Hill for AlaskansHouse campaign committee · Connected to IMPOSSIBLE TO INEVITABLE · 1 payment
$2.5K
$12.5K across 4 recipient committees, or 0.7% of everything this committee reports spending.
Built from FEC Schedule A and Schedule B filings for the selected cycle. A committee only appears here if the money was itemized under its FEC committee ID.
$5,000
Massachusetts6 contributions · 1.5%
$4,700
By the state each contributor wrote on the filing. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line together, so one committee or organization transfer can account for a whole state. Contributors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized and cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
Donors’ employers as filed
Donors’ employers
Employer as filed
Amount
Icsi4 contributions · 47% of ranked
$150,000
Self-employedWritten instead of an employer · 17 contributions · 19% of ranked
$60,250
Cuny4 contributions · 12% of ranked
$40,000
U S DHHS7 contributions · 6.8% of ranked
$22,000
Not employedWritten instead of an employer · 29 contributions · 6.7% of ranked
$21,636
Berger Montague PC1 contribution · 3.1% of ranked
$10,000
RetiredWritten instead of an employer · 1 contribution · 3.1% of ranked
$9,999
Documentary Filmmaker1 contribution · 1.6% of ranked
$5,000
Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($11,723) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
Donors’ occupations as filed
Donors’ occupations
Occupation as filed
Amount
Scientist4 contributions · 47% of ranked
$150,000
Investor1 contribution · 16% of ranked
$50,000
Economist7 contributions · 6.8% of ranked
$22,000
Not employedWritten instead of an occupation · 28 contributions · 6.7% of ranked
$21,635
Educator2 contributions · 6.2% of ranked
$20,000
Teacher2 contributions · 6.2% of ranked
$20,000
Attorney1 contribution · 3.1% of ranked
$10,000
RetiredWritten instead of an occupation · 2 contributions · 3.1% of ranked
$10,000
Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($11,723) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
TravelAirfare, lodging, mileage, and ground transport.$11,2203.8%
Filed as
AIR TRAVEL$6,839
LODGING$2,134
TRAVEL REIMBURSEMENT$1,538
TRAVEL$544
RAIL TRAVEL$165
Paid to
Southwest Airlines$2,725
Delta Airlines$2,581
Airbnb$1,573
Moraff, Daniel$1,538
United Airlines$1,501
Lyft$544
Consulting and strategyStrategic, political, legal, and compliance consulting, and campaign management.$6,5002.2%
Filed as
STRATEGY CONSULTING$6,000
POLITICAL STRATEGY CONSULTANT$500
Paid to
Independent Campaigns LLC$6,000
Scdpolitical LLC$500
Polling and researchSurveys, opposition research, voter file work, and analytics.$5,0001.7%
Filed as
RESEARCH$5,000
Paid to
Tavern Research$5,000
Printing, mail, and shippingPrinted literature, direct mail, postage, design, and delivery.$2,6780.9%
Filed as
POSTAGE$1,752
MAILING$550
MAILING SUPPLIES$209
MAILING AND TRAVEL REIMBURSEMENT$167
Paid to
United States Post Office$1,752
Mail Depot$350
Office Max$209
Sweeney, Kevin$200
Osborn, Megan$167
OtherPayments whose filed description does not match any category above. Every one is listed so it can be read directly.$1,6520.6%
Filed as
CAR RENTAL$1,060
No description filed$550
RENTAL CAR$43
Paid to
Thrifty$750
UPS Store$390
Hertz$310
Lyft$159
Enterprise$43
Taxes, fees, and bank chargesPayroll and income taxes, filing fees, bank and merchant processing charges.$8520.3%
Filed as
MERCHANT FEES$435
MERCHANT PROCESSING FEE$235
BANK FEES$182
Paid to
ActBlue Technical Services$670
Amalgamated Bank$182
Card paymentsPaid to a card processor with no itemisation filed beneath it, so the purchases behind it are not on the record.$6340.2%
Filed as
MERCHANT AND CREDIT CARD FEES$634
Paid to
ActBlue Technical Services$634
Fundraising and eventsThe cost of raising money: finance consultants, donor list rental and acquisition, event venues, catering, and donor processing.$208<0.1%
Filed as
EVENT REGISTRATION$208
Paid to
Greater Omaha CBMC$208
Total itemized disbursements $293,476
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
All 234 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
6 payments were reported as a lump sum, such as a card or payroll bill, with the detail filed underneath as memo entries. Those entries, $14,002 in all, are counted under the payee and purpose they name rather than under the processor that was paid. The total is the same either way.
Largest vendors
Largest vendors
Name
Amount
Independent Campaigns LLC11 payments · 5.7% of all spending
$98,714
Osborn for Senate 20241 payment · 1.4% of all spending
$25,000
Elias Law Group2 payments · 1.3% of all spending
$22,158
Kieloch Consulting2 payments · 1.1% of all spending
$20,000
Survey USA1 payment · 0.8% of all spending
$14,750
Modern Campaign Solutions4 payments · 0.8% of all spending
$13,573
Moraff, Daniel2 payments · 0.8% of all spending
$13,278
Pate, Will2 payments · 0.6% of all spending
$11,250
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.
