Loading this committee’s profile from its FEC filings.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Loading this committee’s profile from its FEC filings.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
PACs › PAC (qualified) › 2025–2026
PAC (qualified)Clifton, VirginiaActive
Connected organization: Helmer
male given name (Linked public record: Wikidata organization record)
FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026 · FEC bulk filing data · committee C00890939 · files quarterly
“Secure Progress is Virginia Delegate Dan Helmer's leadership fund backing candidates in targeted legislative districts. Dan knows how to win — he's run two competitive campaigns, helped flip the House in 2023, and now serves as Campaigns Chair for the House Democratic Caucus. With a research-backed, results-driven model, we recruit top-tier candidates and deploy cutting-edge tactics to grow and defend Virginia's Democratic majority — building the infrastructure today to win even bigger tomorrow.”
Secure Progress, on its own site, secureprogress.org
Quoted from the committee's site, or its sponsor's or funder's where its own says nothing. The statement is filed under topics from a fixed list, chosen by AI models when two of three agree; which side it takes is in its own words.
No published list of positions
Each part reads different filings, so counts and totals can differ.
Direct PAC contributions and independent expenditures explicitly reported as support, by the party of the candidate they went to.
Contributions are reported money, not endorsements; a PAC giving to both parties is common.
Every contribution on line 23 of the committee’s own Schedule B, which is the filing its summary totals are built from. That line covers federal candidates, party committees and other political committees alike, so a super PAC funding other super PACs appears here rather than under candidate giving.
| Recipient | Count | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| Democratic candidates | 6 | $13.8K · 19% |
| Other or unresolved candidates | 1 | $1K · 1.4% |
| Other PACs and committees | 3 | $56.4K · 79% |
| All recipients | 10 | $71.2K |
| State | Candidates | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| Virginia | 5 | $7.8K |
| New Hampshire | 1 | $5K |
| Massachusetts | 1 | $2K |
The 13 largest sources are listed. Each as the committee named it on this line, $491.9K from 13 sources in all.
A donor who gave several times appears once. The 11 largest donors by total given are listed. In all, 1,096 itemized contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $580K. These gifts, as the FEC's contributor file lists them, come to more than the $64.3K the committee's own summary reports for this line; the two filings disagree. FEC contributor lists are public records and cannot be used for commercial solicitation.
Total reported receipts $1,695,285
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. Open a source marked + to see who gave. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 415 contributions · 30% | $171,618 |
| 134 contributions · 13% | $77,179 |
| 75 contributions · 11% | $64,710 |
| 16 contributions · 6.6% | $38,004 |
| 67 contributions · 6.2% |
Total reported disbursements $1,713,411
Every dollar this committee reported spending this cycle, split by the lines it reports against. Open a line to see who was actually paid on it. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
$1.7M spent from Jan 2025 to Oct 2026. Most in one report: $1.2M, Jul 1 – Dec 31, 2025.
The running total of what the committee’s FEC reports say it spent, independent expenditures included, with a point at the end of each report. The line is straight between reports because a report gives one total for its whole period.
No lobbying disclosures matched
male given name Linked public record: Wikidata organization record.
Statements are quoted from these pages exactly. Headings, order and wording are the committee’s or its sponsor’s; the record marking is ours.
Secure Progress is matched to organization records using the FEC committee identity, structured identifiers, and corroborated organization data.
Bars drawn to $50K, the largest gift total here. 2025–2026 filings.
Candidate contribution rows come from candidate committee Schedule A filings, the same rows the party chart above counts.
Money moving between this committee and other committees, matched on FEC committee ID rather than the name each filing was typed under. Both sides exclude memo entries. The figures here count each committee once, from the itemized transfers read for this section, so they will not match the payment counts under Who this PAC gave to.
Committees that reported giving to this one on their own Schedule A filings, grouped by the giver’s committee ID.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| PAC (qualified) · 1 payment | $5K |
| Hybrid PAC (qualified) · 1 payment | $50 |
$5.1K from 2 committees, counting every itemized receipt this cycle.
Disbursements this committee itemized to another committee: candidate contributions, party transfers and payments alike, not contributions only.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| PAC (qualified) · Connected to WOMEN VOTE · 1 payment | $50K |
| Hybrid PAC (qualified) · Connected to CRUSH MAGA PAC · 1 payment | $5K |
| House campaign committee · Connected to NEW POLITICS NEXT MISSION FUND · 1 payment | $5K |
| House campaign committee · Connected to DEM RISING 2026 · 1 payment | $5K |
| Senate campaign committee · Connected to MOULTON LEADERSHIP FUND · 1 payment | $2K |
| 1 payment | $1.4K |
| House campaign committee · 1 payment | $1K |
| House campaign committee · 1 payment | $1K |
| House campaign committee · Connected to SCHIFF VINDMAN VICTORY FUND · 1 payment | $450 |
| House campaign committee · Connected to WALKINSHAW VICTORY FUND · 1 payment | $350 |
$71.2K across 10 recipient committees, or 4.2% of everything this committee reports spending.
Built from FEC Schedule A and Schedule B filings for the selected cycle. A committee only appears here if the money was itemized under its FEC committee ID.
| $36,150 |
| 46 contributions · 5.8% | $33,429 |
| 43 contributions · 4.9% | $28,321 |
| 73 contributions · 4.8% | $27,859 |
By the state each contributor wrote on the filing. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line together, so one committee or organization transfer can account for a whole state. Contributors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized and cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
| Employer as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an employer · 738 contributions · 40% of ranked | $229,323 |
| Written instead of an employer · 118 contributions · 22% of ranked | $126,373 |
| Written instead of an employer · 22 contributions · 8.7% of ranked | $49,925 |
| 1 contribution · 4.3% of ranked | $25,000 |
| 17 contributions · 1.3% of ranked | $7,725 |
| 3 contributions · 1% of ranked | $6,000 |
| 1 contribution · 0.9% of ranked | $5,018 |
| 1 contribution · 0.9% of ranked | $5,000 |
A further $4,100 came from donors whose answer names no employer (Information requested, blank), so it is not ranked. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($99,515) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
| Occupation as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an occupation · 738 contributions · 40% of ranked | $229,323 |
| 74 contributions · 11% of ranked | $62,930 |
| Written instead of an occupation · 22 contributions · 8.7% of ranked | $49,925 |
| 7 contributions · 5.4% of ranked | $31,150 |
| 1 contribution · 4.3% of ranked | $25,000 |
| 1 contribution · 4.3% of ranked | $25,000 |
| 1 contribution · 4.3% of ranked | $25,000 |
| 1 contribution · 4.3% of ranked | $25,000 |
A further $4,100 came from donors whose answer names no occupation (Information requested, blank), so it is not ranked. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($99,515) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
Total itemized disbursements $95,325
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
All 98 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 1 payment · 2.9% of all spending | $50,000 |
| 1 payment · 0.3% of all spending | $5,000 |
| 1 payment · 0.3% of all spending | $5,000 |
| 1 payment · 0.3% of all spending | $5,000 |
| 5 payments · 0.3% of all spending | $4,984 |
| 1 payment · 0.3% of all spending | $4,900 |
| 67 payments · 0.3% of all spending | $4,726 |
| 4 payments · 0.2% of all spending | $3,750 |
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.