Loading this committee’s profile from its FEC filings.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Loading this committee’s profile from its FEC filings.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
PACs › Senate campaign committee › 2025–2026
Senate campaign committeePrincipal campaign committeeSalem, MassachusettsActive
Connected organization: Moulton Leadership Fund
FEC filings through Sep 30, 2026 · FEC bulk filing data · committee C00547240 · files quarterly
No published list of positions
Each part reads different filings, so counts and totals can differ.
Direct PAC contributions and independent expenditures explicitly reported as support, by the party of the candidate they went to.
Contributions are reported money, not endorsements; a PAC giving to both parties is common.
Every contribution on line 23 of the committee’s own Schedule B, which is the filing its summary totals are built from. That line covers federal candidates, party committees and other political committees alike, so a super PAC funding other super PACs appears here rather than under candidate giving.
| Recipient | Count | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| Democratic candidates | 1 | $169 · 100% |
| All recipients | 1 | $169 |
| State | Candidates | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| Maryland | 1 | $169 |
Bars drawn to $169, the largest gift total here. 2025–2026 filings.
Candidate contribution rows come from candidate committee Schedule A filings, the same rows the party chart above counts.
Money moving between this committee and other committees, matched on FEC committee ID rather than the name each filing was typed under. Both sides exclude memo entries. The figures here count each committee once, from the itemized transfers read for this section, so they will not match the payment counts under Who this PAC gave to.
Committees that reported giving to this one on their own Schedule A filings, grouped by the giver’s committee ID.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| PAC (qualified) · Connected to INT'L ASSOCIATION OF BRIDGE, STRUCTURAL, ORNAMENTAL AND REINFORCING IRON WORKERS · 3 payments | $7.5K |
| PAC (qualified) · Connected to HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC. · 2 payments | $7K |
| Hybrid PAC (qualified) · 8 payments | $5K |
| PAC (qualified) · Connected to INT'L UNION OF ELEVATOR CONSTRUCTORS · 2 payments | $5K |
| PAC (qualified) · Connected to RYAN · 1 payment | $5K |
| PAC (qualified) · Connected to GENERAL ATOMICS · 4 payments | $5K |
| PAC (qualified) · 2 payments | $5K |
| PAC (qualified) · Connected to IBEW LOCAL 103 · 2 payments | $5K |
| PAC (qualified) · Connected to PLUMBERS & STEAMFITTERS LOCAL 22 PAC INC · 1 payment | $5K |
| PAC (qualified) · Connected to COMMUNICATIONS WORKERS OF AMERICA · 1 payment | $5K |
| PAC (qualified) · Connected to GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY · 2 payments | $5K |
| PAC (qualified) · Connected to INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS · 1 payment | $5K |
$221.3K from 83 committees, counting every itemized receipt this cycle. The largest 12 are shown.
Disbursements this committee itemized to another committee: candidate contributions, party transfers and payments alike, not contributions only.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| PAC (qualified) · 1 payment | $5K |
| PAC (qualified) · Connected to COUNCIL OF INSURANCE AGENTS & BROKERS · 1 payment | $5K |
| PAC (qualified) · Connected to PALANTIR TECHNOLOGIES INC. · 1 payment | $2.5K |
| PAC (qualified) · 1 payment | $2K |
| PAC (nonqualified) · Connected to HAWKEYE 360 · 1 payment | $1K |
| PAC (qualified) · Connected to ELBIT SYSTEMS OF AMERICA LLC · 1 payment | $500 |
Built from FEC Schedule A and Schedule B filings for the selected cycle. A committee only appears here if the money was itemized under its FEC committee ID.
A donor who gave several times appears once. The 12 largest donors by total given are listed. In all, 4,929 itemized contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $5.4M. FEC contributor lists are public records and cannot be used for commercial solicitation.
Total reported receipts $6,669,668
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. Open a source marked + to see who gave. FEC filings through Sep 30, 2026.
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 2,850 contributions · 49% | $2,658,678 |
| 513 contributions · 15% | $830,409 |
| 447 contributions · 12% |
Total reported disbursements $8,414,654
Every dollar this committee reported spending this cycle, split by the lines it reports against. Open a line to see who was actually paid on it. FEC filings through Sep 30, 2026.
$8.4M spent from Jan 2025 to Sep 2026. Most in one report: $2.2M, Aug 13 – Sep 30, 2026.
The running total of what the committee’s FEC reports say it spent, independent expenditures included, with a point at the end of each report. The line is straight between reports because a report gives one total for its whole period.
No lobbying disclosures matched
Seth for Massachusetts, Inc is registered with the Federal Election Commission as a Senate campaign committee. It is a principal campaign committee. Its FEC record names Moulton Leadership Fund as an affiliate. Official FEC summary: Federal Election Commission committee record.
No pages quoted
No approved organization identity yet
| $169 |
$16.2K across 7 recipient committees, or 0.2% of everything this committee reports spending.
The 12 largest committees by total given are listed. Counted from the givers' own filings, which can run above the total this committee reports.
| $639,032 |
| 165 contributions · 5.8% | $314,681 |
| 76 contributions · 2.4% | $128,158 |
| 88 contributions · 2.2% | $116,527 |
| 66 contributions · 1.8% | $97,550 |
| 117 contributions · 1.7% | $91,434 |
By the state each contributor wrote on the filing. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line together, so one committee or organization transfer can account for a whole state. Contributors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized and cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
| Employer as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an employer · 1,844 contributions · 42% of ranked | $1,410,869 |
| Written instead of an employer · 358 contributions · 10% of ranked | $333,715 |
| Written instead of an employer · 59 contributions · 1.9% of ranked | $62,998 |
| 29 contributions · 0.9% of ranked | $30,950 |
| 10 contributions · 0.8% of ranked | $26,431 |
| 38 contributions · 0.7% of ranked | $22,600 |
| 36 contributions · 0.7% of ranked | $21,750 |
| 7 contributions · 0.6% of ranked | $20,600 |
A further $364,243 came from donors whose answer names no employer (N/A, None, blank), so it is not ranked. Ranked from the largest 200 of 201 employer spellings filed; each share is of the money in those. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($614,612) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
| Occupation as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an occupation · 2,102 contributions · 32% of ranked | $1,554,432 |
| 251 contributions · 5.9% of ranked | $284,624 |
| 118 contributions · 4.9% of ranked | $236,431 |
| 98 contributions · 4.7% of ranked | $229,139 |
| 70 contributions · 3.5% of ranked | $168,525 |
| 74 contributions · 2.9% of ranked | $140,653 |
| Written instead of an occupation · 127 contributions · 2.6% of ranked | $125,300 |
| 111 contributions · 2% of ranked | $97,225 |
A further $139,128 came from donors whose answer names no occupation (blank), so it is not ranked. Ranked from the largest 200 of 201 occupation spellings filed; each share is of the money in those. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($614,612) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
Total itemized disbursements $6,093,913
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Sep 30, 2026.
All 2,515 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
115 payments were reported as a lump sum, such as a card or payroll bill, with the detail filed underneath as memo entries. Those entries, $1,396,965 in all, are counted under the payee and purpose they name rather than under the processor that was paid. The total is the same either way.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 5 payments · 16% of all spending | $1,347,461 |
| 30 payments · 7.7% of all spending | $650,798 |
| 118 payments · 7.4% of all spending | $619,118 |
| 6 payments · 5.8% of all spending | $486,478 |
| 16 payments · 3.7% of all spending | $313,418 |
| 40 payments · 3.1% of all spending | $257,436 |
| 17 payments · 2.6% of all spending | $221,081 |
| 116 payments · 2.4% of all spending | $199,859 |
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.