FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026 · FEC bulk filing data · committee C00823302 · files quarterly
SummaryAt a glance
Why it exists
No statement of purpose found on its site.
Money
$31.2K raised, $14.5K spent, $23.4K cash on hand (through Oct 14, 2026). Where it comes from
Who funds it
58% from donors giving over $200 · 42% from donors giving $200 or less · largest donor Michael R. Downing, $3.5K. See who funds it
Where it goes
$6K given to candidates and committees, the largest to Donald S. Beyer Jr. ($2K) · 70% of its support to Democrats, 30% to Republicans. See where it goes
Lobbying
Institute of Internal Auditors lobbied on 6 issues. See lobbying
Its wordsWhat does this committee say it is for?
No published list of positions
This committee’s site publishes no list of positions we could read, and we found no statement of why it exists. We do not write one for it.
Who it gives toWhich candidates and committees get its money?
Each part reads different filings, so counts and totals can differ.
Party support distribution$5K to 4 candidates
Direct PAC contributions and independent expenditures explicitly reported as support, by the party of the candidate they went to.
For candidates $5,000
Democratic 70%
Republican 30%
Support by the party of the candidate
Party of the candidate
Candidates
Direct
Independent
Amount
Share
Democratic
2
$3,500
$0
$3,500
70%
Republican
2
$1,500
$0
$1,500
30%
Shown support
4
$5,000
$0
$5,000
100%
Contributions are reported money, not endorsements; a PAC giving to both parties is common.
Who this PAC gave to$6,000 in 12 payments
Every contribution on line 23 of the committee’s own Schedule B, which is the filing its summary totals are built from. That line covers federal candidates, party committees and other political committees alike, so a super PAC funding other super PACs appears here rather than under candidate giving.
By recipient
Line 23 contributions by kind and party of recipient
Recipient
Count
Amount
Democratic candidates
2
$3.5K · 58%
Republican candidates
2
$1.5K · 25%
Other PACs and committees
1
$1K · 17%
All recipients
5
$6K
By the candidate’s state
Contributions to candidates by the candidate’s state
DSDarren SotoDemocratic · U.S. House · FL-09 · via Darren Soto For Congress4 payments, latest May 7, 2026 · CONTRIBUTION · FEC filing, May 7, 2026$1.5K
Mackenzie for CongressPAC or other committee1 payment, latest May 14, 2026 · CONTRIBUTION · FEC filing, May 14, 2026$1K
Darren Soto4 receipts, latest May 7, 2026Darren Soto for Congress · H6FL09179$1.5K
Gus M. Bilirakis4 receipts, latest May 14, 2026Bilirakis for Congress · H6FL09070$1K
Frank D. Lucas1 receipt, latest May 14, 2026Lucas for Congress · H4OK06056$500
Candidate contribution rows come from candidate committee Schedule A filings, the same rows the party chart above counts.
Committee money network
Money moving between this committee and other committees, matched on FEC committee ID rather than the name each filing was typed under. Both sides exclude memo entries. The figures here count each committee once, from the itemized transfers read for this section, so they will not match the payment counts under Who this PAC gave to.
Committees funding this one
Committees that reported giving to this one on their own Schedule A filings, grouped by the giver’s committee ID.
No committee-to-committee receipts were itemized this cycle.
Committees this one funds
Disbursements this committee itemized to another committee: candidate contributions, party transfers and payments alike, not contributions only.
$6K across 5 recipient committees, or 41% of everything this committee reports spending.
Built from FEC Schedule A and Schedule B filings for the selected cycle. A committee only appears here if the money was itemized under its FEC committee ID.
Money inWho funds the PAC?
Where the money came from $31,170 reported receipts
Itemized (over $200)Donors who have given more than $200 this cycle, so the FEC itemizes (names) them.$18,18258%
Largest donors
Michael R. Downing7 contributions, latest Jun 22, 2026 · VP, NORTH AMERICAN ADVOCACY · THE INSTITUTE OF INTERNAL AUDITORS, IN · LAKE MARY, FL$3,500
Javier Javier Faleato2 contributions, latest Apr 10, 2026 · EVP, GLOB. INST. RELATIONS & PROF. PAT · THE INSTITUTE OF INTERNAL AUDITORS, IN · LAKE MARY, FL$1,000
Terry Grafenstine2 contributions, latest Apr 2, 2026 · CHIEF AUDIT EXECUTIVE · PENFED CREDIT UNION · MANASSAS, VA$1,000
Michael J. LynnOne contribution on Dec 15, 2025 · PRINCIPAL/CEO · ST. JOHN;S UNIVERSITY · WALDWICK, NJ$1,000
Jordan Reed3 contributions, latest Jun 30, 2026 · MANAGING DIRECTOR · PROTIVITI · HOUSTON, TX$800
Warren W. Stippich Jr.2 contributions, latest Apr 2, 2026 · PARTNER · GRANT THORNTON ADVISORS · SAINT CHARLES, IL$750
Anthony J. Pugliese18 contributions, latest Dec 19, 2025 · PRESIDENT AND CEO · THE INSTITUTE OF INTERNAL AUDITORS, IN · LAKE MARY, FL$684
Michael Levy8 contributions, latest Oct 16, 2025 · VP OF INTERNAL AUDIT · CHERRY HILL ADVISORY · VOORHEES, NJ$664
Ann Cohen2 contributions, latest Apr 10, 2026 · EVP, CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER · THE INSTITUTE OF INTERNAL AUDITORS, IN · LAKE MARY, FL$500
Michael Todd FreemanOne contribution on Apr 12, 2025 · VP INTERNAL AUDIT · VULCAN MATERIALS COMPANY · BIRMINGHAM, AL$500
Janet Elizabeth GhoshOne contribution on Jan 2, 2025 · EVP, CHIEF PEOPLE OFFICER · THE INSTITUTE OF INTERNAL AUDITORS, IN · LAKE MARY, FL$500
A donor who gave several times appears once. The 12 largest donors by total given are listed. In all, 144 itemized contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $15.7K. FEC contributor lists are public records and cannot be used for commercial solicitation.
Unitemized ($200 or less)Donors who have given $200 or less this cycle, so the FEC does not itemize (name) them.$12,98842%
Total reported receipts $31,170
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. Open a source marked + to see who gave. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
Who donated: where they live, their employers and jobs
Where the donors live $15,688 placed by state
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
under $333
$333+
$1.3K+
$3K+
$5.3K+
none
Top states
Top donor states
Name
Amount
Florida116 contributions · 53%
$8,332
New Jersey9 contributions · 11%
$1,664
Alabama3 contributions · 8%
$1,250
Virginia2 contributions · 6.4%
$1,000
California4 contributions · 5.4%
$852
Texas3 contributions · 5.1%
$800
Illinois2 contributions · 4.8%
$750
Ohio1 contribution · 3.2%
SpendingWhere does the money go?
How the spending splits $14,500 reported
Contributions to candidates and other committeesMoney given to federal candidates, party committees and other PACs.$14,500100%
Every dollar this committee reported spending this cycle, split by the lines it reports against. Open a line to see who was actually paid on it. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
What the payments were for $6,000 itemized
Given to othersContributions to other candidates, party committees, and PACs.$6,000100%
Filed as
CONTRIBUTION$6,000
Paid to
Friends of Don Beyer$2,000
Darren Soto for Congress$1,500
Mackenzie for Congress$1,000
Bilirakis for Congress$1,000
Lucas for Congress$500
Total itemized disbursements $6,000
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
All 12 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.
Spending over time
$14.5K spent from Jan 2025 to Oct 2026. Most in one report: $8.5K, Jul 1 – Sep 30, 2026.
$14.5K
Jan 2025Oct 2026
The running total of what the committee’s FEC reports say it spent, independent expenditures included, with a point at the end of each report. The line is straight between reports because a report gives one total for its whole period.
What Institute of Internal Auditors lobbies on 2026 reports
Besides giving through its PAC, Institute of Internal Auditors pays lobbyists to press Congress and federal agencies. Each quarter it, or a firm it hires, files a public report under the Lobbying Disclosure Act saying which topics it worked on, what it spent, and whom it contacted. This is what those reports say.
Spent on lobbying in 2026
$170K
Quarterly reports read
6
Bills it named
2
Topics it lobbied on
Each report files its work under official topics. The bar shows how often each topic came up across the reports; open one to read what was filed under it. Naming a bill says the organization lobbied on it, not which side it took.
Computer Industryin 4 report entries · 1 bill named
In its own words
The IIA conducted meetings with members and staff of the U.S. House Energy and Commerce Committee to discuss recommendations for strengthening the Frontier Risk Oversight, National Transparency, Independent Evaluation, and Reporting Act (FRONTIER ACT;
H.R. 9925).
These engagements highlighted the important role internal audit can play in providing ongoing assurance over internal controls and risk management pursuant to Section 4 of the proposal.
In addition, The IIA held introductory meetings with the staff of members serving on the U.S. Senate Subcommittee on Consumer Protection, Technology, and Data Privacy.
These engagements were an opportunity to provide an overview of the internal audit profession and discuss how internal auditors can be a technical resource on issues related to AI safety and security.
Consumer Issues/Safety/Productsin 3 report entries · 1 bill named
In its own words
The IIA conducted introductory meetings with members of the U.S. House Energy and Commerce Committee to discuss the role of internal audit in providing independent assurance over artificial intelligence risk management and controls.
Furthermore, The IIA submitted a letter to members of the U.S. House Energy and Commerce Committee and U.S. Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation regarding the White House National AI Policy Framework.
The letter emphasized the need to include independent assurance over AI systems and controls in any potential legislation emanating from the White House policy framework.
In addition, The IIA sent a letter to members of the U.S. House Subcommittee on Commerce, Manufacturing, and Trade concerning the SECURE Data Act (H.R. 8413).
The letter recommended the inclusion of independent assurance mechanisms in the legislation to ensure the processes envisioned by the legislation are operating appropriately.
The IIA conducted meetings with members and staff on the U.S. House Energy and Commerce Committee as a follow-up to a June 2026 letter regarding the SECURE Data Act (H.R. 8413).
In the letter, The IIA highlighted the importance of including independent assurance mechanisms in the proposed data privacy legislation to ensure the processes envisioned by the bill are operating appropriately.
The IIA submitted letters to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission in response to the following requests for information: 1) On July 2, The IIA provided perspective on the SEC's Draft Strategic Plan for Fiscal Years 2026-2030 (File No. DSP-3) 2) On August 26, The IIA sent a letter to the SEC requesting a 90-day extension on the public comment period on a New York Stock Exchange proposal to amend Sections 303A.00 and 303A.07 of the Listed Company Manual (SEC Release No. 34-106128;
File No. SR-NYSE-2026-37). 3) On September 8, The IIA submitted a letter to the SEC - and signed a joint letter with multiple coalition groups - in opposition to the New York Stock Exchange proposal to amend Sections 303A.00 and 303A.07 of the Listed Company Manual (SEC Release No. 34-106128;
File No. SR-NYSE-2026-37).
The IIA also sent two letters to the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board in Q3: 1) IIA Comments in Response to the Request for Public Comment on the PCAOB Standard Setting (August 7;
PCAOB Release No. 2026-005) 2)IIA Comments in Response to the Request for Public Comment on the Draft 2026-2030 Strategic Plan Goals and Objectives (September 3;
PCAOB Release No. 2026-006).
The IIA conducted meetings with members and staff on the U.S. House Committee on Financial Services to discuss key recommendations from a recent IIA report regarding modernization of the U.S. Sarbanes-Oxley Act.
Commodities (big ticket)in 2 report entries
In its own words
The IIA submitted a letter to the leaders of the U.S. Senate and U.S. House of Representatives to offer perspective on emerging prediction market policies.
The letter recommended that Congress take the following three actions concerning this novel policy topic: 1) Require prediction market platforms to establish formal internal control frameworks 2) Ensure the operation of independent, properly structured internal audit functions at registered exchanges 3) Commission a GAO study focused on controls and audit infrastructure In addition, The IIA submitted a letter to the Commodity Futures Exchange Commission in response to a request for comment on 91 FR 12516, RIN 3038-AF65 (Document No. 2026-05105).
The letter recommended that the CFTC require prediction market registrants to possess an internal audit function in any forthcoming regulatory proposals.
The IIA conducted meetings with members and staff of U.S. House Committee on Financial Services to offer perspective on emerging prediction market policies.
These meetings were a follow-up to a letter sent to Congress by The IIA in April 2026 recommending the following three actions concerning prediction markets: 1) Require prediction market platforms to establish formal internal control frameworks 2) Ensure the operation of independent, properly structured internal audit functions at registered exchanges 3) Commission a GAO study focused on controls and audit infrastructure
Who did the lobbying
The organization’s own reports give its total lobbying costs, including any firms it hired; each firm reports what this client paid it.
The Institute of Internal AuditorsIts own staff · 3 reports$170K
NVG, LLCLobbying firm · 3 reports$120K
Contributions on the LD-203 report
Reported twice a year by the lobbying filer. $111K is political giving that also appears in FEC filings.
Connie Chan$5.6K
Elect Democratic Women$4.7K
Judy Won$4K
Brad Lander$3.5K
Rep. Katherine Clark$3.5K
Derek Tran$3K
Dave Min$2.8K
Rep. Julie Johnson$2.8K
Graham Platner$2.6K
Eric Chung$2.5K
Matched by name: these reports are filed for “INSTITUTE OF INTERNAL AUDITORS”, found by searching “INSTITUTE OF INTERNAL AUDITORS”. Lobbying and FEC records share no ID, so an organization that lobbies under another name is missed. Source: LDA.gov, accessed Oct 27, 2026. Senate Office of Public Records cannot vouch for the data or analyses derived from these data after the data have been retrieved from LDA.gov.
THE INSTITUTE OF INTERNAL AUDITORS POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE
Filings covered
Through Oct 14, 2026
Data source
FEC bulk filing data
The Institute of Internal Auditors PAC is registered with the Federal Election Commission as a PAC (nonqualified). Official FEC summary: Federal Election Commission committee record.
Pages quoted 0 pages
No pages quoted
Nothing from this committee’s or its sponsor’s site is quoted yet.
Linked public records
No approved organization identity yet
The official FEC committee record remains available under Filings.
$500
By the state each contributor wrote on the filing. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line together, so one committee or organization transfer can account for a whole state. Contributors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized and cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
Donors’ employers as filed
Donors’ employers
Employer as filed
Amount
The Institute Of Internal Auditors In97 contributions · 51% of ranked
$7,971
Vulcan Materials Company3 contributions · 8% of ranked
$1,250
Penfed Credit Union2 contributions · 6.4% of ranked
$1,000
ST John;s University1 contribution · 6.4% of ranked
$1,000
Protiviti3 contributions · 5.1% of ranked
$800
Grant Thornton Advisors2 contributions · 4.8% of ranked
$750
Meta2 contributions · 4.8% of ranked
$750
Cherry Hill Advisory8 contributions · 4.2% of ranked
$664
Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($12,988) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
Donors’ occupations as filed
Donors’ occupations
Occupation as filed
Amount
SR Director North American Advocacy6 contributions · 19% of ranked
$3,000
Partner5 contributions · 8.2% of ranked
$1,290
VP Internal Audit3 contributions · 8% of ranked
$1,250
Chief Audit Executive2 contributions · 6.4% of ranked
$1,000
Principal/ceo1 contribution · 6.4% of ranked
$1,000
Managing Director3 contributions · 5.1% of ranked
$800
Director/ Head Of Internal Audit (corp2 contributions · 4.8% of ranked
$750
President And CEO18 contributions · 4.4% of ranked
$684
Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($12,988) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
The IIA conducted meetings with members of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, as well as members and staff from the U.S. House Committee on Financial Services and U.S. Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
These meetings discussed key recommendations of an IIA report, published in March 2026, on modernizing the U.S. Sarbanes-Oxley Act.
In addition, The IIA submitted letters to both the Federal Deposit Insurance Company (Fed.
Reg. 18534 (Apr. 10, 2026)) and Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (Docket ID OCC-2025-0372;
RIN 1557-AF41) regarding proposed regulations for implementing the GENIUS Act.
In both cases, The IIA offered technical clarifications for strengthening the existing internal audit requirements in the proposed regulations.
It highlighted the certifications, standards, and independence considerations that are fundamental to a properly structured internal audit function.
The IIA conducted meetings with staff of members serving on the U.S. House Subcommittee on Capital Markets and U.S. Senate Subcommittee on Securities, Insurance, and Investments.
These meetings were intended to discuss key recommendations of an IIA report, published in March 2026, on modernizing the U.S. Sarbanes-Oxley Act.