Loading this committee’s profile from its FEC filings.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Loading this committee’s profile from its FEC filings.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
PACs › Hybrid PAC (nonqualified) › 2025–2026
FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026 · FEC bulk filing data · committee C00821439 · files monthly
Notices dated after Oct 14, 2026 are added; earlier ones are already in the regular reports.
“MAHA PAC exists for one reason: to elect Republicans to the House and Senate in 2026 who will fight for the Make America Healthy Again agenda.”
Maha PAC, on its own site, themahapac.com
Quoted from the committee's site, or its sponsor's or funder's where its own says nothing. The statement is filed under topics from a fixed list, chosen by AI models when two of three agree; which side it takes is in its own words.
3 priorities from the committee’s own site, in the order they are listed there. Every heading and the text under it is copied exactly, as one passage for each page it is from, and links to that place on the page; hover a source to see which passage it opens.
The MAHA movement is the most important public health movement in modern history.
MAHA PAC exists to ensure it becomes permanent by electing Republicans to the House and Senate in 2026 who will champion the Make America Healthy Again agenda — real food for our kids, transparency in healthcare, and an end to the overmedicalization of American children.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · themahapac.com
Heading as listed on themahapac.com ↗ (opens themahapac.com at this heading)
MAHA PAC backs candidates who will fight for the issues that matter most.
FLA Group polling shows each one commands massive bipartisan support, strong MAHA base enthusiasm, and real traction with swing voters.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · themahapac.com
Force hospitals and insurers to publish real prices so families can shop for care like they shop for everything else.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · themahapac.com
Mandate hospital and insurer price transparency so Americans can make informed healthcare decisions.
Americans deserve to know what healthcare costs before they receive it.
FLA Polling Score ↗ (opens themahapac.com/priorities at this heading)
Voter support on a 0-10 scale across key demographics
Administration Achievement ↗ (opens themahapac.com/priorities at this heading)
Launching NIH studies on autism root causes
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · themahapac.com/priorities
Heading as listed on themahapac.com ↗ (opens themahapac.com at this heading)
End the revolving door between pharma lobbyists and the agencies that regulate them.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · themahapac.com
Heading as listed on themahapac.com ↗ (opens themahapac.com at this heading)
Remove harmful additives and ultra-processed foods from school cafeterias across America.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · themahapac.com
Heading as listed on themahapac.com ↗ (opens themahapac.com at this heading)
Protect children from unnecessary pharmaceutical interventions and support natural development.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · themahapac.com
Heading as listed on themahapac.com ↗ (opens themahapac.com at this heading)
Heading as listed on themahapac.com ↗ (opens themahapac.com at this heading)
Reduce ultra-processed food in school lunches and institutional settings, and get real food to our kids.
Ultra-processed food is making Americans sick.
We back candidates who will fight to reform school lunch programs, support local agriculture, and ensure every child has access to real, nutritious food.
FLA Polling Score ↗ (opens themahapac.com/priorities at this heading)
Voter support on a 0-10 scale across key demographics
Administration Achievement: Operation Stork Speed for infant formula
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · themahapac.com/priorities
Heading as listed on themahapac.com/priorities ↗ (opens themahapac.com/priorities at this heading)
Crack down on conflicts of interest between health agencies and Big Pharma.
The revolving door between federal health agencies and pharmaceutical companies has eroded public trust.
We support candidates who will demand transparency, end conflicts of interest, and hold the industry accountable.
FLA Polling Score ↗ (opens themahapac.com/priorities at this heading)
Voter support on a 0-10 scale across key demographics
Administration Achievement: Most favored nation pricing negotiations
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · themahapac.com/priorities
Heading as listed on themahapac.com/priorities ↗ (opens themahapac.com/priorities at this heading)
Remove petroleum-based food dyes from the food supply, starting with products marketed to children.
Petroleum-based food dyes have been linked to behavioral issues in children and are already banned in many countries.
We support legislation to eliminate these unnecessary chemicals from the American food supply.
FLA Polling Score ↗ (opens themahapac.com/priorities at this heading)
Voter support on a 0-10 scale across key demographics
Administration Achievement ↗ (opens themahapac.com/priorities at this heading)
Eliminating petroleum-based dyes from food supply
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · themahapac.com/priorities
Heading as listed on themahapac.com/priorities ↗ (opens themahapac.com/priorities at this heading)
Address the overmedicalization of American children and launch real research into the root causes of childhood health crises.
Too many children are being medicated before root causes are investigated.
We support candidates who will fund real research into why childhood chronic illness is surging and pursue solutions that address causes, not just symptoms.
FLA Polling Score ↗ (opens themahapac.com/priorities at this heading)
Voter support on a 0-10 scale across key demographics
Administration Achievement ↗ (opens themahapac.com/priorities at this heading)
Completely overhauled the childhood vaccine schedule
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · themahapac.com/priorities
Heading as listed on themahapac.com/priorities ↗ (opens themahapac.com/priorities at this heading)
Heading as listed on themahapac.com/priorities ↗ (opens themahapac.com/priorities at this heading)
Each part reads different filings, so counts and totals can differ.
Direct PAC contributions and independent expenditures explicitly reported as support, by the party of the candidate they went to.
Spending against candidates is drawn on its own bar and left out of the support totals.
Contributions are reported money, not endorsements; a PAC giving to both parties is common.
Every contribution on line 23 of the committee’s own Schedule B, which is the filing its summary totals are built from. That line covers federal candidates, party committees and other political committees alike, so a super PAC funding other super PACs appears here rather than under candidate giving.
No contributions itemized
Nothing loaded
Candidate contribution rows come from candidate committee Schedule A filings, the same rows the party chart above counts.
Money moving between this committee and other committees, matched on FEC committee ID rather than the name each filing was typed under. Both sides exclude memo entries. The figures here count each committee once, from the itemized transfers read for this section, so they will not match the payment counts under Who this PAC gave to.
Committees that reported giving to this one on their own Schedule A filings, grouped by the giver’s committee ID.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| PAC (nonqualified) · 1 payment | $5.9K |
$5.9K from 1 committee, counting every itemized receipt this cycle.
Disbursements this committee itemized to another committee: candidate contributions, party transfers and payments alike, not contributions only.
No disbursements to other committees were itemized this cycle.
Built from FEC Schedule A and Schedule B filings for the selected cycle. A committee only appears here if the money was itemized under its FEC committee ID.
The 15 largest sources are listed. Each as the committee named it on this line, $2.6M from 23 sources in all, with its largest individual donors, whose gifts it files here too. Individuals' gifts on this line are not itemized in the data the site holds, so the list need not add up to the row.
Total reported receipts $3,200,978
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. Open a source marked + to see who gave. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 2 contributions · 54% | $300,000 |
| 32 contributions · 18% | $102,651 |
| 1 contribution · 11% | $60,000 |
| 2 contributions · 4.5% | $25,000 |
| 2 contributions · 3.1% | $17,500 |
| 11 contributions · 2% | $11,242 |
| 7 contributions · 1.9% |
Total reported disbursements $10,844,540
Every dollar this committee reported spending this cycle, split by the lines it reports against. Open a line to see who was actually paid on it. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
These are the payments the committee itemized to vendors, staff and other committees. Its $738,251 in independent expenditures is filed separately, against the candidate each was about, so it is counted in the split above and listed by candidate below, not here.
Total itemized disbursements
$10.5M spent from Jan 2025 to Oct 2026. Most in one report: $3.8M, Jan 1 – Jun 30, 2025.
The running total of what the committee’s FEC reports say it spent, independent expenditures included, with a point at the end of each report. The line is straight between reports because a report gives one total for its whole period.
No lobbying disclosures matched
Maha PAC is registered with the Federal Election Commission as a Hybrid PAC (nonqualified). Official FEC summary: Federal Election Commission committee record.
Statements are quoted from these pages exactly. Headings, order and wording are the committee’s or its sponsor’s; the record marking is ours.
Maha PAC is matched to organization records using the FEC committee identity, structured identifiers, and corroborated organization data.
| $10,319 |
| 1 contribution · 1.8% | $10,000 |
By the state each contributor wrote on the filing. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line together, so one committee or organization transfer can account for a whole state. Contributors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized and cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
| Employer as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| 1 contribution · 45% of ranked | $250,000 |
| Written instead of an employer · 7 contributions · 19% of ranked | $106,688 |
| Written instead of an employer · 125 contributions · 12% of ranked | $66,690 |
| 2 contributions · 9.9% of ranked | $55,000 |
| 1 contribution · 4.5% of ranked | $25,000 |
| 1 contribution · 1.8% of ranked | $10,000 |
| 1 contribution · 1.8% of ranked | $10,000 |
| 1 contribution · 1.8% of ranked | $10,000 |
Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
| Occupation as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| 1 contribution · 45% of ranked | $250,000 |
| Written instead of an occupation · 124 contributions · 12% of ranked | $64,690 |
| 2 contributions · 9.9% of ranked | $55,000 |
| 1 contribution · 9% of ranked | $50,000 |
| 1 contribution · 4.5% of ranked | $25,000 |
| 2 contributions · 4.5% of ranked | $25,000 |
| 1 contribution · 1.8% of ranked | $10,000 |
| 1 contribution · 1.8% of ranked | $10,000 |
Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
All 12 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 1 payment · 0.5% of all spending | $50,000 |
| 1 payment · <0.1% of all spending | $3,560 |
| 2 payments · <0.1% of all spending | $50 |
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.